| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
63
   |
Posted - 2012.02.22 16:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
I like how quickly you get angry\offensive with people.
Firstly,
Your logic fails.
You're not allowed to build caps in high sec + you're not allowed to jump caps into high sec doesn't = you're not allowed caps in high sec.
Secondly,
They're not doing anything, you can't fit them for aggression and you can't sell them so they're effecively just a bragging right. So where's the hard.
Lets here your rational well constructed argument for wht T2 BPOs must be removed from the game.
Taking into account that they're not respionsible for there "being no profit in T2 invention" as things like Damage Control II's used to run around 20-30mil before invention and the low profit margins have been proven time and again to be a mix of inventards not working things out, the "I R MINE IT SO R IS FREE" crew and the "right click sell, whatever" brigade.
There is always a way for you to get this though, get the isk, buy the bpos, destroy them yourself. |
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 16:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:
Why are you talking about T2 BPOs? This is off topic no?
well.... this....
Schmacos tryne wrote:Chribba wrote:Remove all T2 BPO's now! No compensation. Remove all moon goo now. GIve everyone 100B.
/c I agree! edit: minus the 100B
But you're logic for removing carriers from Hi is faulty.
It's a
If some herps are derps and some derps are gerps then some herps are definatly gerps.
Given that CCP have said that high sec carriers are ok and that as long as they follow rules they can stay there, they're fair game.
so, why do you want them removed from high?
If one was repping something you were shooting at that counts as a hostile act and it'd get moved.
If one was missioning, the same applys.
Pretty much all you you can do in one is mine veld. |
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
I give up and agree with your view point
I too hate history and think that everything in the past should be ignored and have current rules applied to it |
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
I'm now contacting my government to force them to demolish any and all buildings that have been erecticed since the last building standards change.
This will include all listed and historical buildings that weren't built following the current ruleing and regulations. |
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
66
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 09:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:TheBlueMonkey wrote:I give up and agree with your view point
I too hate history and think that everything in the past should be ignored and have current rules applied to it Your attempt on irony is lost. You're saying you paid 15% tax in 1986 so you will always pay 15% tax?
and you're saying I paid 15% tax in 1986 so should be able to redeem the difference in tax change today. |
| |
|