Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
As you all know, miners currently dont belong in nullsec. they dont mine enough to support all the capital builds and they pritty much waste their time since you can easily run incursion and buy the minerals and then haul. i think mining (in this case Nullsec/Lowsec mining) needs a little upgrade. so i was thinking about what it was missing, not how to boost it. and then it hit me:
at the moment you got capital ships in all shapes and sizes: PvE, PvP, Hauling, Crushing and Hauling. but for some reason you dont have one for mining. which is (tbh) really strange. so i took the time to sit down a think about what it needs and how to not make it overpowered but still good for a nullsec corperation/alliance to have a few of them mining.
so imagine a capital ship with the following specs:
4 Highslots -> 3 turret hardpoints and 1 for something else like a drone range extender (i will explain why in a second) 5 Midslots -> for shieldtanking and maybe a survey scanner 3 Lowslots -> for cargospace extenders and maybe a damage control if you want 3 Rigslots -> just like any other capital ship
75000 HP Shield (with a recharge of 20000 seconds) 50000 HP Armor 125000 HP Structure
15000 m3 Cargohold 75 m3 Dronehold 50 Mbit/s Bandwidth
Capital Mining Ship Skill Bonus: 5% Increased yield from Capital Mining Laser per level (which i will give the specs of shortly) 5% Increased Shield Resistance per level
Ship Role Bonus: 500% Increased yield from Mining Drones (since these are used way too little) 500% Increased scan range of the Survey Scanner
And now the Capital Mining Laser specs:
Highslot (obvious) 2500m3 Yield 5 minute Cycle Time enough powergrid usage so that other ships cant fit it (or have the ship get a bonus like -99,9% powergrid usage) decent CPU usage
This way it isnt overpowered or anything, but can easily help out nullsec and get more miners in nullsec as well so that not only the combat community gets into nullsec. _______________________________________________________________________ Before replying to this post, a few sidenotes to make some things clear:
-This ship is not allowed to mine in Highsec, its a capital ship so lowsec and nullsec only -This ship can use gates, but just like a capital ship, its slow and vunerable -READ THE POSTS, dont post something thats already said -if you are against this, have a good solid argument to explain why you dont like it -and last but not least, RESPECT OTHERS OPINION!
Enjoy! |

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad before you add the good eh? The pie is a tautology |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad befotre you add the good eh?
well i really want the mining drones to be used more then they do atm, therefor i made it a 500% bonus yield so they bring up alot more minerals |

Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
14
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
This is what I've imagined should be used in Moon Mining, Something that has to be docked when you log out at the end of the day, Kinda like the ship from the new Star Trek Movie. I make the sharp pointy things that you use to make things go BOOM! -áWithout me, you wouldn't have those sharp pointy things, and without you, I wouldn't have a reason to make those sharp pointy things. |

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad befotre you add the good eh? well i really want the mining drones to be used more then they do atm, therefor i made it a 500% bonus yield so they bring up alot more minerals
Cool.
I agree, but increasing the amount of minerals you mine is ultimately no different than having a lower limit The pie is a tautology |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Toshiroma McDiesel wrote:This is what I've imagined should be used in Moon Mining, Something that has to be docked when you log out at the end of the day, Kinda like the ship from the new Star Trek Movie.
moonmining is really something that should be dont by a structure, not a capital ship. and btw, this isnt starwars. we dont blow up worlds with a giant laser |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad before you add the good eh?
Might want to read this recent thread afore you assume it's "all rosey" with drone alloy removal.
The mining 'buff' fallacy Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad befotre you add the good eh? well i really want the mining drones to be used more then they do atm, therefor i made it a 500% bonus yield so they bring up alot more minerals Cool. I agree, but increasing the amount of minerals you mine is ultimately no different than having a lower limit
true but at the moment they yield 25m3 per minute, so 500% is 125m3 per minute which is still not overpowered when mining with 5 drones |

Ajita al Tchar
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad befotre you add the good eh? well i really want the mining drones to be used more then they do atm, therefor i made it a 500% bonus yield so they bring up alot more minerals
Not those kinds of drones. Paragon is talking about rogue drone regions in null where "mining" can already been done with a variety of caps by shooting rogue drones and looting the alloys that drop.
But seriously, the problem with mining isn't the lack of ships, it's the material distribution and the fact that what miners do is somewhat obsoleted by those ratting in rogue drone space (and to a lesser degree mission loot drops). Plus, there's the whole snoozefest mining mechanics thing that's automated incredibly easily which means bots. AND ratting bots in drone regs. So, a ship isn't the solution for the problem mining is facing. |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ajita al Tchar wrote:Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Good ideas, but the best possible thing that could be done would be getting rid of Drone alloy; cut away the bad befotre you add the good eh? well i really want the mining drones to be used more then they do atm, therefor i made it a 500% bonus yield so they bring up alot more minerals Not those kinds of drones. Paragon is talking about rogue drone regions in null where "mining" can already been done with a variety of caps by shooting rogue drones and looting the alloys that drop. But seriously, the problem with mining isn't the lack of ships, it's the material distribution and the fact that what miners do is somewhat obsoleted by those ratting in rogue drone space (and to a lesser degree mission loot drops). Plus, there's the whole snoozefest mining mechanics thing that's automated incredibly easily which means bots. AND ratting bots in drone regs. So, a ship isn't the solution for the problem mining is facing.
well thats only drone region. but tbh the alloy drops should be used for other stuff like drones instead of minerals. but thats a whole other subject tbh. and botter will easily be ganked since its a capital ship, so it will not get away that easily. |

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Interesting.
Unfortunately it's also totally wrong
The pie is a tautology |

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Battle On wrote: well thats only drone region.
I cannot stress enough how bad the drone regions are for the mining profession The pie is a tautology |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Interesting. Unfortunately it's also totally wrong
So you took about 5 mins to read the thread and simply dismiss those points with no reason or evidence to suggest otherwise, how very interesting.  Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Battle On wrote: well thats only drone region.
I cannot stress enough how bad the drone regions are for the mining profession
yeah but the discussion about drone region and drone alloys isnt this discussion. |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Battle On wrote: well thats only drone region.
I cannot stress enough how bad the drone regions are for the mining profession yeah but the discussion about drone region and drone alloys isnt this discussion.
The topic is very relevant to your proposal OP as it discusses the ideas behind improving mining yields or redistribution of minerals. Which since your idea suggests improvement to yields with a capital mining ship should be of interest to you. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:12:00 -
[16] - Quote
Grumpy Owly So you took about 5 mins to read the thread and simply dismiss those points with no reason or evidence to suggest otherwise, how very interesting. [:roll: wrote:
The increase of price following the buff will attract more miners-to-be and the price will eventually lower as the demand is sated, then miners will leave as it becomes less lucrative, then they will be drawn back as it gets more expensive......... The pie is a tautology |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:14:00 -
[17] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Battle On wrote: well thats only drone region.
I cannot stress enough how bad the drone regions are for the mining profession yeah but the discussion about drone region and drone alloys isnt this discussion. The topic is very relevant to your proposal OP as it discusses the ideas behind improving mining yields or redistribution of minerals. Which since your idea suggests improvement to yields with a capital mining ship should be of interest to you.
yes, drone region can farm minerals with normal capital ships in large number, but the rest of new eden doesnt. so if you want to discuss this, make a new topic or join the old topic. this topic is for this ship and how it can be very usefull |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Grumpy Owly So you took about 5 mins to read the thread and simply dismiss those points with no reason or evidence to suggest otherwise, how very interesting. [:roll: wrote: The increase of price following the buff will attract more miners-to-be and the price will eventually lower as the demand is sated, then miners will leave as it becomes less lucrative, then they will be drawn back as it gets more expensive.........
Though we have yet to see this supposed shift in behaviour which ideally was the reson for the change in the first place, granted I will let time run it's course, but the interesting shift in mineral prices is of note.
Doesn't address the added inflation due to increased bounties or the idea of removing resource possibilites form other areas of space regardless of how slight they are though.
However, I cannot deny the theoretical improvement that drone poo removal can shift to improve mining possibilities.
However, at the moment I'm simply capatalising on this with the combined efforts of the Hulkageddon influence, since as a result of something going on in the market, certain mineral prices and mining/hauler prices are increasing. It is certainly one to watch however, especially if it significantly starts to effect goods prices generally in the market as a result. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:Paragon Renegade wrote:Battle On wrote: well thats only drone region.
I cannot stress enough how bad the drone regions are for the mining profession yeah but the discussion about drone region and drone alloys isnt this discussion. The topic is very relevant to your proposal OP as it discusses the ideas behind improving mining yields or redistribution of minerals. Which since your idea suggests improvement to yields with a capital mining ship should be of interest to you. yes, drone region can farm minerals with normal capital ships in large number, but the rest of new eden doesnt. so if you want to discuss this, make a new topic or join the old topic. this topic is for this ship and how it can be very usefull
Erm, I think your missing the point, improving mining yields does nothing to help the miner. Especially if it isnt balanced in the economy. As any improvements can simply act to oversaturate the market and therefore drive mineral values down. It's a basic mechanism of the economy.
And I'm sorry you do not own the forum, as such I'm entitled to express my opinions as I like. (I'm sorry if you think the cross posting isnt helpful, but I really don't want to have to type all the relevant discussion out when its allready available) Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
oke, can you 2 please go to a chatroom and talk this out somewhere else? cause its totally not related with this ship anymore. what happens in drone region is non of my concern. if it gets nerfed or not, is also not of my concern so please go somewhere else and discuss it there. if you wanna say something, at least let it have any relation with the ship |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
it wont inflict the market that much since it will require alot of hauling to get it to highsec. the only market that will be effected is the local markets in nullsec. but tbh every nullsec corp/alliance will prob use this ship to get people farm minerals for them so that they dont have to haul them from highsec with a high chance of getting popped. it also gives miners a chance to get into nullsec without having to spend ages training combat skills while they dont want to |

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:32:00 -
[22] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote: Though we have yet to see this supposed shift in behaviour which ideally was the reson for the change in the first place, granted I will let time run it's course, but the interesting shift in mineral prices is of note.
Doesn't address the added inflation due to increased bounties or the idea of removing resource possibilites form other areas of space regardless of how slight they are though.
However, I cannot deny the theoretical improvement that drone poo removal can shift to improve mining possibilities.
However, at the moment I'm simply capatalising on this with the combined efforts of the Hulkageddon influence, since as a result of something going on in the market, certain mineral prices and mining/hauler prices are increasing. It is certainly one to watch however, especially if it significantly starts to effect goods prices generally in the market as a result.
I haven't seen a post this well-worded or thoughtful for quite some time, it's good to see that good posters still persist "in our field".
Yes, I consider the inflation with the theoretical drone bounty to be a problem, in much the same way I consider incursions and Level 4 missions to be problems with regards to inflation. However, I feel it would be better not to suddenly just change the alloys to bounties- it would be much more preferable if another ISK sink was introduced to counteract the effects.
And "hulkageddon" or wtf it is this year, being arranged by the goons and all, doesn't really matter in the long run; an anti-miner campaign can only be sustained so long as the player populace doing the ganking has both the will and resources to do so; suddenly cutting off drone loot and making miners the 95% suppliers of minerals will make such campaigns untenable The pie is a tautology |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Battle On wrote:it wont inflict the market that much since it will require alot of hauling to get it to highsec. the only market that will be effected is the local markets in nullsec. but tbh every nullsec corp/alliance will prob use this ship to get people farm minerals for them so that they dont have to haul them from highsec with a high chance of getting popped. it also gives miners a chance to get into nullsec without having to spend ages training combat skills while they dont want to
In which case I'd see it as a significant imbalance in the game and the risk/reward model. As you are then not only heavily skewing yields but moreso in certain areas and making it easier or less risky to do so theoretically as I imagine is your intended design. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:34:00 -
[24] - Quote
allright, since you 2 are still continueing i will just stfu and post this again tomorrow |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:36:00 -
[25] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:it wont inflict the market that much since it will require alot of hauling to get it to highsec. the only market that will be effected is the local markets in nullsec. but tbh every nullsec corp/alliance will prob use this ship to get people farm minerals for them so that they dont have to haul them from highsec with a high chance of getting popped. it also gives miners a chance to get into nullsec without having to spend ages training combat skills while they dont want to In which case I'd see it as a significant imbalance in the game and the risk/reward model. As you are then not only heavily skewing yields but moreso in certain areas and making it easier or less risky to do so theoretically as I imagine is your intended design.
its a capital mining. its easily gankable and if all nullsec corps have one, will will balance itself. but good luck discussing the ow so worthy subject about drone region because you seem to like that more. i will stfu now and repost it tomorrow |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
1028

|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Paragon Renegade
Wyvern Operations
318
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
Don't we already have a Rorqual? :D The pie is a tautology |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:40:00 -
[28] - Quote
rorqual is a support ship, not a miner |

Grumpy Owly
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:it wont inflict the market that much since it will require alot of hauling to get it to highsec. the only market that will be effected is the local markets in nullsec. but tbh every nullsec corp/alliance will prob use this ship to get people farm minerals for them so that they dont have to haul them from highsec with a high chance of getting popped. it also gives miners a chance to get into nullsec without having to spend ages training combat skills while they dont want to In which case I'd see it as a significant imbalance in the game and the risk/reward model. As you are then not only heavily skewing yields but moreso in certain areas and making it easier or less risky to do so theoretically as I imagine is your intended design. its a capital mining. its easily gankable and if all nullsec corps have one, will will balance itself. but good luck discussing the ow so worthy subject about drone region because you seem to like that more. i will stfu now and repost it tomorrow
No it wont balance itself out if all null corps have one, as what about those who arent in null sec idiot? (Completley missing the point again)
But please push for your mining "death star" of inequality and bankruptcy if that is what you really want either today or tomorrow. I know it wont be implemented as is as a proposal due to the meta issues associated with it. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
first of all, if you read my post good, i said it can only be used in lowsec and nullsec secondly, i used to be in nullsec mining almost all day long. we didnt hauled 1 trit of it to highsec cause we used it to build station and capitals. just like 99% of the miners in nullsec atm, they all use their minerals in that way.
so in conclusion, the only thing different will be that there will be more capitals and maybe more stations and less hauling. but it wont really affect the highsec markets since it cant be used in highsec and lowsec will prob be a bit risky since its still a capital.
and uhm, better not take this personal, that last statement you made is really not the point. |

Grumpy Owly
240
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:13:00 -
[31] - Quote
Battle On wrote:first of all, if you read my post good, i said it can only be used in lowsec and nullsec secondly, i used to be in nullsec mining almost all day long. we didnt hauled 1 trit of it to highsec cause we used it to build station and capitals. just like 99% of the miners in nullsec atm, they all use their minerals in that way.
so in conclusion, the only thing different will be that there will be more capitals and maybe more stations and less hauling. but it wont really affect the highsec markets since it cant be used in highsec and lowsec will prob be a bit risky since its still a capital.
and uhm, better not take this personal, that last statement you made is really not the point.
Trit is not the only mineral.
Of course it will effect the high sec market by "knock on effect". Either by flooding it with ABC minerals at a profit to the null seccers who have access to the new capital ship to mine it in larger quantities or any other mineral of relevance should they choose to do so. Also by virtue that there is less dependancy on the other areas markets as a result it also has an effect to it.
By virtue of making it less "gankable" by "regular" sub capital means and that it is a capital ship affords better possibilities for its use. And by removing the need to do this less hauling that you considered risky you are removing that consideration also.
Of course should these ships be "defensable" is certain alliances defended space then suddenly it becomes a seriously viable mining platform that significantly outstrips all others. By virtue of its creation you have assigned the possibility of assigning defensive measures for it. Especially as you are aware of it's value and potential risks. Thus affording a significant advantage to its deployment.
I suggest cleaning that crystal ball you have it seems to be covered in BS. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Velicitia
Open Designs
662
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:18:00 -
[32] - Quote
Battle On wrote:first of all, if you read my post good, i said it can only be used in lowsec and nullsec So it's only in nullsec then (because, honestly, low isn't worth it).
Battle On wrote:secondly, i used to be in nullsec mining almost all day long. we didnt hauled 1 trit of it to highsec cause we used it to build station and capitals. just like 99% of the miners in nullsec atm, they all use their minerals in that way.
Anecdotal evidence, at best. But you're on the right track to some degree. I'd wager that whilst you (or your directors, whoever) didn't sell trit, you/your corp/your alliance sold highends, and used the isk to buy trit/lowends (or 425mm guns, or whatever else makes for good mineral compression).
Battle On wrote:so in conclusion, the only thing different will be that there will be more capitals and maybe more stations and less hauling. but it wont really affect the highsec markets since it cant be used in highsec and lowsec will prob be a bit risky since its still a capital.
and uhm, better not take this personal, that last statement you made is really not the point.
More capitals are probably a "bad thing" (especially "more supers"). More stations are probably also a bad thing (hell, they seem pretty prevalent as it is already. Used to be lucky if you could get one to a region).
This can adversely affect the mineral markets in hisec (think about it ... rather than you buying 400m trit in Jita for your next toy, you mine it instead). Though, I wouldn't mind seeing trit prices come back down  |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
at the moment, most of the minerals is comming from the drone region, not form the other regions. simply because they use the minerals by there own to build ships, capitals and station. so this will not effect the market since (you said this yourself) drone region wont get these miners since they kill drones and get their minerals from the loot.
and a capital mining in lowsec is an easy pray since especially this one cant defend itself propperly. as you can see, it can only have 5 vespa's out. so there will only be a hand full mining in lowsec and selling it in highsec. and even if they do that, they will need a orca by there side so hau l for them since their own cargohold will have too few space to let it cycle 3 times.
therefor it will mostly be used in nullsec for own use (like i already said a few times now) and WONT EFFECT HIGHSEC THAT MUCH AS YOU THINK <- this time a little bigger since you appearently dont see this line.
so please, come with a valid argument.
|

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Battle On wrote:first of all, if you read my post good, i said it can only be used in lowsec and nullsec So it's only in nullsec then (because, honestly, low isn't worth it). Battle On wrote:secondly, i used to be in nullsec mining almost all day long. we didnt hauled 1 trit of it to highsec cause we used it to build station and capitals. just like 99% of the miners in nullsec atm, they all use their minerals in that way. Anecdotal evidence, at best. But you're on the right track to some degree. I'd wager that whilst you (or your directors, whoever) didn't sell trit, you/your corp/your alliance sold highends, and used the isk to buy trit/lowends (or 425mm guns, or whatever else makes for good mineral compression). Battle On wrote:so in conclusion, the only thing different will be that there will be more capitals and maybe more stations and less hauling. but it wont really affect the highsec markets since it cant be used in highsec and lowsec will prob be a bit risky since its still a capital.
and uhm, better not take this personal, that last statement you made is really not the point. More capitals are probably a "bad thing" (especially "more supers"). More stations are probably also a bad thing (hell, they seem pretty prevalent as it is already. Used to be lucky if you could get one to a region). This can adversely affect the mineral markets in hisec (think about it ... rather than you buying 400m trit in Jita for your next toy, you mine it instead). Though, I wouldn't mind seeing trit prices come back down 
all the minerals i mined was used in capital build and 1 station (1N-FJ8). and more capitals doesnt matter, since they are needed for battles in nullsec so they will eventually pop. and station, whats a bad thing about that?
|

Grumpy Owly
240
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:31:00 -
[35] - Quote
Battle On wrote:at the moment, most of the minerals is comming from the drone region, not form the other regions. simply because they use the minerals by there own to build ships, capitals and station. so this will not effect the market since (you said this yourself) drone region wont get these miners since they kill drones and get their minerals from the loot.
roflysst ....... Erm, if you actually spent two seconds to actually read the topic you'd see that the drone regions or gun mining has been seriously nerfed due to crucible. That's really what part of the discussion was about and its knock on effects. As a result, now is probably a very good time for mining as a result of those changes. Way to go with knowing what your talking about.
And apart form that you are saying that to compensate for an imbalance in null sec is to make it worse?
Quote:so please, come with a valid argument.
Have done with many, you seem to simply be in denial about them. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:44:00 -
[36] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:at the moment, most of the minerals is comming from the drone region, not form the other regions. simply because they use the minerals by there own to build ships, capitals and station. so this will not effect the market since (you said this yourself) drone region wont get these miners since they kill drones and get their minerals from the loot. roflysst ....... Erm, if you actually spent two seconds to actually read the topic you'd see that the drone regions or gun mining has been seriously nerfed due to crucible. That's really what part of the discussion was about and its knock on effects. As a result, now is probably a very good time for mining as a result of those changes. Way to go with knowing what your talking about. And apart form that you are saying that to compensate for an imbalance in null sec is to make it worse? Quote:so please, come with a valid argument. Have done with many, you seem to simply be in denial about them.
no, so seem to be only focused on the fact that it will screw up the highsec economy, but i already said a few times that it wont. but you simply refuse to accept this and come up with more rediculous statements about how i "can" screw it up, which it wont.
atm mining in nullsec isnt done that much and even is it is, the minerals are used for own use in 99% of the cases. unless you come with good proof to say its otherwise, then please show me.
this ship is simply designed to give the miners a chance to get into eve alot easier and also help nullsec to fuel themselfs, just like W-space can be (although you might want to haul out of w-space once or twice a week to sell your loot). |

Grumpy Owly
240
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:58:00 -
[37] - Quote
Battle On wrote:atm mining in nullsec isnt done that much and even is it is, the minerals are used for own use in 99% of the cases. unless you come with good proof to say its otherwise, then please show me.
So you are saying that virtually all the ABC minerals on the main hubs in high sec is supplied from non null sources. All the tech 2 and the moon goo items required to build them is supplied from outside of null sec. 
I would find that very hard to believe. However, seeing as you are using a figure to site a claim firstly please provide evidence that 99% is retained.
Quote:this ship is simply designed to give the miners a chance to get into eve alot easier and also help nullsec to fuel themselfs, just like W-space can be (although you might want to haul out of w-space once or twice a week to sell your loot).
And I don't deny the designs to make things easier, this is why it supports by argument of making it an imbalancing proposal.
Unaware of any fueling capabilities in W-Space as far as I'm aware they are dependant on ICE from elsewhere. Also with the reduced mass capabilites afforded to worm holes it would likley mean that the required ships needed to successfully gank this capital might be limited as a result to sub capital class ships in WH space needed to effect them. (At least with the current designs, not if certain current CSM plans get underway of course).
Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:So you are saying that virtually all the ABC minerals on the main hubs in high sec is supplied from non null sources. All the tech 2 and the moon goo items required to build them is supplied from outside of null sec. 
^ read up, i think you didnt read my comments that well
Grumpy Owly wrote:Unaware of any fueling capabilities in W-Space as far as I'm aware they are dependant on ICE from elsewhere. Also with the reduced mass capabilites afforded to worm holes it would likley mean that the required ships needed to successfully gank this capital might be limited as a result to sub capital class ships in WH space needed to effect them. (At least with the current designs, not if certain current CSM plans get underway of course).
indeed, they depend on ice (my mistake) but nevertheless it was only an example. and i dont think many will build this capital in a wh, since no1 bothers about mining in a wormhole either. they dont even build that much rorquals in w-space.
the point is, that you claim that it will effect highsec mineral market and therefor alot other stuff. but tbh it wont, simply because there will only be a hand full that will bring those minerals over.
so either come up with some new arguments or just close your mouth and move on, because we are atm running in circles here....
|

Grumpy Owly
241
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:55:00 -
[39] - Quote
Battle On wrote: so either come up with some new arguments or just close your mouth and move on, because we are atm running in circles here....
For which you are responsible for since you arent proving anything to support your claims and hold nothing but a biased argument whilst in denial and showing a distinct lack of knowledge or awareness about the game.
Not fooling anyone bud about simply being passionate about "forcing" your idea through however. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote: so either come up with some new arguments or just close your mouth and move on, because we are atm running in circles here....
For which you are responsible for since you arent proving anything to support your claims and hold nothing but a biased argument whilst in denial and showing a distinct lack of knowledge or awareness about the game. Not fooling anyone bud about simply being passionate about "forcing" your idea through however.
im pritty sure i got more experience then you do. i at least played longer then 3 months ;-) and btw, no1 can proof that this ship will or will not affect the market, since thats the future (and last i checked there is no way of going into the future). but it seems that you are just out of arguments atm so you are trying to take it personal (aka "lack of knowledge or awareness about the game"), which is not that impressive and is not going to bring you any fame or what so ever.
so this discussion is over since you failed and went over to personal insults. good day. |

Grumpy Owly
241
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote: so either come up with some new arguments or just close your mouth and move on, because we are atm running in circles here....
For which you are responsible for since you arent proving anything to support your claims and hold nothing but a biased argument whilst in denial and showing a distinct lack of knowledge or awareness about the game. Not fooling anyone bud about simply being passionate about "forcing" your idea through however. im pritty sure i got more experience then you do. i at least played longer then 3 months ;-) and btw, no1 can proof that this ship will or will not affect the market, since thats the future (and last i checked there is no way of going into the future). but it seems that you are just out of arguments atm so you are trying to take it personal (aka "lack of knowledge or awareness about the game"), which is not that impressive and is not going to bring you any fame or what so ever. so this discussion is over since you failed and went over to personal insults. good day.
Sorry if I hurt your ego, or the fact that an alt for an NPC corp knows a little bit more about the game than you.
Nothing personal about it however. You have demonstrated invalid points, incorrect assumptions and have not supported your claims designed to give credability to your design other than selfish meta capabilities. It is purely an objective assesment of your argument or should I say lack thereof. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Velicitia
Open Designs
663
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:12:00 -
[42] - Quote
Battle On wrote:
all the minerals i mined was used in capital build and 1 station (1N-FJ8). and more capitals doesnt matter, since they are needed for battles in nullsec so they will eventually pop. and station, whats a bad thing about that?
When I lived down in null (a few years back), all the mins I mined were used in NOL-M9, J-LPX7, and (obviously) the super production POSes that were in the area, and I know that the alliance brought down **** TONNES of lowends from hisec (oh, the horrors of doing that before the days of JFs).
Capitals are already highly prevalent, they don't need to be made easier for nullsec people to obtain (they're already pretty "easy" as it is). Seriously, there's already enough of a wall for empire entities to get into nullsec without it being even easier for nullsec alliances to crank out (super)caps.
Stations being spammed all over the place simply make space smaller, and that's just not fun (I liked running with the "deepspace" mining crews based out of a POS/rorqual for 3-4 days before hauling our loot back to a refinery)
Now, what you're failing to take into account (which the rest of us are) is that while this won't change the drone regions, it WILL change what the other regions are importing. You *HAVE* to take that into account -- Jita moves something like a trillion units of trit per day, at 4+ ISK/unit. Taking say 25% of that out of the equation means that the (inflated) trit prices will start falling back to ~3 ISK/unit. And then that's just trit we're talking about ... the same thing will happen for all the other minerals (even the highends -- just because you aren't exporting to empire, doesn't mean other alliances aren't). |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:25:00 -
[43] - Quote
Velicitia wrote: When I lived down in null (a few years back), all the mins I mined were used in NOL-M9, J-LPX7, and (obviously) the super production POSes that were in the area, and I know that the alliance brought down **** TONNES of lowends from hisec (oh, the horrors of doing that before the days of JFs).
indeed, its a terrible job to do, even with the JF's. its one of the reasons why i came up with this ship. the other fact is, is that alot of miners are looking for a way in to nullsec and simply arent allowed because of their poor skill. now they get a chance to do so.
Quote:Capitals are already highly prevalent, they don't need to be made easier for nullsec people to obtain (they're already pretty "easy" as it is). Seriously, there's already enough of a wall for empire entities to get into nullsec without it being even easier for nullsec alliances to crank out (super)caps.
it wont be easier to get capitals made. its just that instead of hauling it, you mine it and with mining you also increase the industrial lvl of that system which is at this moment lvl 0 in most of the nullsec systems.
[quote[Stations being spammed all over the place simply make space smaller, and that's just not fun (I liked running with the "deepspace" mining crews based out of a POS/rorqual for 3-4 days before hauling our loot back to a refinery)[/quote]
thats tbh your own personal opinion. back in nullsec i used to mine every day and at the end of the day i hauled to the refinary or someone else did it for me.
Quote:Now, what you're failing to take into account (which the rest of us are) is that while this won't change the drone regions, it WILL change what the other regions are importing. You *HAVE* to take that into account -- Jita moves something like a trillion units of trit per day, at 4+ ISK/unit. Taking say 25% of that out of the equation means that the (inflated) trit prices will start falling back to ~3 ISK/unit. And then that's just trit we're talking about ... the same thing will happen for all the other minerals (even the highends -- just because you aren't exporting to empire, doesn't mean other alliances aren't).
^ i didnt left this out. if you read back i fully said that drone region prob wont have these miners since they get minerals out of loot from drones. it will only change for the regions that are hauling. also, like you said it yourself, in the other regions the minerals are used for own build, not for sales. so the market prices wont really chance. besides that, since incursion yield so much money, everything will go up in price.
|

Velicitia
Open Designs
663
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:46:00 -
[44] - Quote
Battle On wrote:it wont be easier to get capitals made. its just that instead of hauling it, you mine it So, getting everything locally, rather than ensuring you have a good supply chain between "home" and Jita is somehow not easier?
Battle On wrote:Quote:Now, what you're failing to take into account (which the rest of us are) is that while this won't change the drone regions, it WILL change what the other regions are importing. You *HAVE* to take that into account -- Jita moves something like a trillion units of trit per day, at 4+ ISK/unit. Taking say 25% of that out of the equation means that the (inflated) trit prices will start falling back to ~3 ISK/unit. And then that's just trit we're talking about ... the same thing will happen for all the other minerals (even the highends -- just because you aren't exporting to empire, doesn't mean other alliances aren't). ^ i didnt left this out. if you read back i fully said that drone region prob wont have these miners since they get minerals out of loot from drones. it will only change for the regions that are hauling. also, like you said it yourself, in the other regions the minerals are used for own build, not for sales. so the market prices wont really chance. besides that, since incursion yield so much money, everything will go up in price.
ugh, no... you have it backwards. I'm just making up BS numbers here to keep things simple.
Alliance A lives in Branch. They're building (super)capitals by importing lowends, and exporting excess hi-ends (because they have a huge abundance). They're importing 1 billion trit, 500m pyer, 250m mex, 125m iso from Jita (i.e. buy in Jita, use in Branch).
Jita moves 10b trit, 5b Pyer, 2,5b mex, and 1.25b Iso in the same timeframe. Prices are stable at 4/5/50/63 (i.e. supply and demand are close enough that the prices move +/- a negligible amount every 2-week cycle).
Your new ship gets put in game. Alliance A gets their miners into one (however many miners it happens to be). Since Trit/Pyer/Mex/Iso are all easier to mine, rather than import ... they stop going to Jita.
Jita still moves the same number of mins in a 2 week period, but since the demand drops by 10%, the prices start coming down. No biggie, right?
Well, now, alliance B (who was supplying Jita lowends) has gotten their hands on one of these ... and INCREASES their bi-weekly production by 15%. Now the supply in jita is at least 15 percent ABOVE demand ... and prices start coming down some more.
After a while (and the nullsec alliances start spamming these like crazy), Jita starts ONLY supplying hisec buyers... the demand falls to say 25% of what it used to be ... but the supply is now 50% higher than what it used to be...
sure, cheap minerals are great in making cheap ships and the pvp guys are happy ... but now think about the rookie miner pulling in 100m3 of veldspar every minute in his probe, and having to sell it at 2 ISK (or lower) per unit because the demand just isn't there...
|

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 22:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
Velicitia wrote: ugh, no... you have it backwards. I'm just making up BS numbers here to keep things simple.
Alliance A lives in Branch. They're building (super)capitals by importing lowends, and exporting excess hi-ends (because they have a huge abundance). They're importing 1 billion trit, 500m pyer, 250m mex, 125m iso from Jita (i.e. buy in Jita, use in Branch).
Jita moves 10b trit, 5b Pyer, 2,5b mex, and 1.25b Iso in the same timeframe. Prices are stable at 4/5/50/63 (i.e. supply and demand are close enough that the prices move +/- a negligible amount every 2-week cycle).
Your new ship gets put in game. Alliance A gets their miners into one (however many miners it happens to be). Since Trit/Pyer/Mex/Iso are all easier to mine, rather than import ... they stop going to Jita.
Jita still moves the same number of mins in a 2 week period, but since the demand drops by 10%, the prices start coming down. No biggie, right?
Well, now, alliance B (who was supplying Jita lowends) has gotten their hands on one of these ... and INCREASES their bi-weekly production by 15%. Now the supply in jita is at least 15 percent ABOVE demand ... and prices start coming down some more.
After a while (and the nullsec alliances start spamming these like crazy), Jita starts ONLY supplying hisec buyers... the demand falls to say 25% of what it used to be ... but the supply is now 50% higher than what it used to be...
sure, cheap minerals are great in making cheap ships and the pvp guys are happy ... but now think about the rookie miner pulling in 100m3 of veldspar every minute in his probe, and having to sell it at 2 ISK (or lower) per unit because the demand just isn't there...
i honestly dont think thats what going to happen. this is my view:
At the moment, Alliance A is getting everything out of highsec since they have only 50-75 hulks in their alliance and use those minerals themselfs. so they go to jita and buy all they need.
meanwhile in Drone Region, Alliance B is moving out 50% of their daily load of minerals out because they have way to much. this support for lets say 75% Jita's mineral amount.
also at the same time, alliances C-Z are doing the same as alliance A.
now the Capital Miner comes on the market. Alliance B will still put out the same amount since they have no need of more minerals. all the other alliances get more minerals from their miners, not only the high ends, but also the low ends. they use it all for themselfs to get almost every pilot in capitals. However, my miner (since its not overpowered) is still not enough to give enough minerals so the alliances still have to haul some of the minerals.
in the end the prices will go down a little but, but also rise due the isk made in incursions. also rookie miners will still have enough money to buy ships and do what they want, while the alliances have less hauling.
|

Grumpy Owly
241
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 22:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
Battle On wrote:However, my miner (since its not overpowered)
Lets examine this claim.
Quote:so imagine a capital ship with the following specs:
4 Highslots -> 3 turret hardpoints and 1 for something else like a drone range extender (i will explain why in a second) 5 Midslots -> for shieldtanking and maybe a survey scanner 3 Lowslots -> for cargospace extenders and maybe a damage control if you want 3 Rigslots -> just like any other capital ship
75000 HP Shield (with a recharge of 20000 seconds) 50000 HP Armor 125000 HP Structure
15000 m3 Cargohold 75 m3 Dronehold 50 Mbit/s Bandwidth
Capital Mining Ship Skill Bonus: 5% Increased yield from Capital Mining Laser per level (which i will give the specs of shortly) 5% Increased Shield Resistance per level
Ship Role Bonus: 500% Increased yield from Mining Drones (since these are used way too little) 500% Increased scan range of the Survey Scanner
And now the Capital Mining Laser specs:
Highslot (obvious) 2500m3 Yield 5 minute Cycle Time enough powergrid usage so that other ships cant fit it (or have the ship get a bonus like -99,9% powergrid usage) decent CPU usage
Using a modulated strip miner II and a crystal is 16.7% better than a regular strip miner which equates to 630m3 every 180 seconds.
Using the above proposed capital mining laser we have 2500m3 every 300 seconds.
So base yields from the mining lasers we get:
MSM = 630 / 180 = 3.5 m3/s CAP = 2500 / 300 = 8.3 m3/s
Capital miner base ratio is 2.37 more times as effective
But apply the ship bonuses:
Hulk = 3% mining barge + 3% exhumers, so at level 5 for both would be 6% * 5 = 30% increase.
Hulk using MSM = 3.5 + (0.3 * 3.5) = 4.55
Capital ship at level 5 = 5% * 5 = 25% increase
CAP using cap miner = 8.3 + (0.25 * 8.3) = 10.375
Ship modified = 2.28 more times as effective.
I wont use general skills to boost these values as it will be effectively the same effective change at level 5. But the drone yields of for the capital of +500% will certainly add to the process.
So in effect the use of this ship will make it over double if not approaching triple the effectiveness of a hulk by yields alone. So in theory making it potentially possible for miners in null sec to generate 2 to 3 more times the mining material than before.
As to the other blinkered views you have from your crystal ball, simply a strawman from your own perspective. Especiailly with the contrary perspective already being demonstrated by someone else. Or the fact that you continue to deny the changes to the drone regions "et all". Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Agustice Arterius
Couch Athletics
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 23:02:00 -
[47] - Quote
Battle On wrote: moonmining is really something that should be dont by a structure, not a capital ship. and btw, this isnt starwars. we dont blow up worlds with a giant laser
I wanna do this though 
http://onlyhdwallpapers.com/wallpaper/concept_planet_crack_download_high_resolution_desktop_1000x1660_wallpaper-213962.jpeg |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 07:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote: I wont use general skills to boost these values as it will be effectively the same effective change at level 5. But the drone yields of for the capital of +500% will certainly add to the process.
So in effect the use of this ship will make it over double if not approaching triple the effectiveness of a hulk by yields alone. So in theory making it potentially possible for miners in null sec to generate 2 to 3 more times the mining material than before. .
indeed it will be 3x efficient but dont forget, its a capita ship. it will take a long time to train for it and it will take a good amount of money to get one. take for example the Carrier. the upgrade from a Battleship to Carrier is also a great upgrade (similar to the upgrade from the Hulk to this Capital Miner). but its allowed and not overpowered since you have a long skill and need alot of money for it.
also what some forget is that there will still be some hauling. nullsec miners mine ABC before everything else. therefor nullsec alliances dont have enough lowend minerals to compare with the high ends. so either they sell some of the highends, or just buy a good amount of lowends and haul them and increase they capital build. |

Grumpy Owly
245
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 08:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote: I wont use general skills to boost these values as it will be effectively the same effective change at level 5. But the drone yields of for the capital of +500% will certainly add to the process.
So in effect the use of this ship will make it over double if not approaching triple the effectiveness of a hulk by yields alone. So in theory making it potentially possible for miners in null sec to generate 2 to 3 more times the mining material than before. .
indeed it will be 3x efficient but dont forget, its a capita ship. it will take a long time to train for it and it will take a good amount of money to get one. take for example the Carrier. the upgrade from a Battleship to Carrier is also a great upgrade (similar to the upgrade from the Hulk to this Capital Miner). but its allowed and not overpowered since you have a long skill and need alot of money for it. also what some forget is that there will still be some hauling. nullsec miners mine ABC before everything else. therefor nullsec alliances dont have enough lowend minerals to compare with the high ends. so either they sell some of the highends, or just buy a good amount of lowends and haul them and increase they capital build.
And what does that have to do with anything.
Once its effectively paid for itself, its still generating minerals at the extent of 2 to 3 times more than the best ship useable in other zones.
And rather than me get the calculator out to prove a point I'll keep it simple by using a comparison; when you buy a coveter say as your first really effective mining ship you use it in the hope to one day buy the more expensive Hulk to get a better long term return for your investment (both in skills and isk) into it. Its exactly the same comparison between a Hulk and your proposed capital ship. Except for the obvious restrictions of where it can be used.
So no the investment argument is not a credible answer to the potential of the vessel, that's a naive understanding of the problem this could ultimatley generate.
Your ABC comment then changes nothing currently other than improve the potential and speed up mineral aquistion to afford more time in the process of the hauling you think is neccessary. Of course with such a new capital ship they could simply mine the low end minerals they wanted and totally remove the need to haul at their discretion due to the improvement to yields. Even though profits wise it is better to mine ABC sell some excess to buy compressed low end minerals in tech and haul it back to null.
As usual your arguments hold no water. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 08:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:^last post
a good hulk miner mines for around 25mill on Arkonor ore at current prices per hour at current prices. however since there isnt enough he also has to mine bistot and crokite etc so this drops to a steady 17,5mill per hour.
a good BS pilot can make around 20mill/hour doing anomaly's in nullsec. its low but its what they should at least make per hour.
if you upgrade the hulk to the capital miner, you get 3x the yield so 52,5mill/hour avarage.
if you put the BS pilot in a carrier and let him do anomaly's, you can EASILY get 60-80mill/hour <- saw it myself back in nullsec
besides that, you can also run Incursion with a faction BS and get 120mill/hour in highsec. <- and this i know for sure since im doing that myself at the moment.
so really, if you look at it its nothing more then getting mining up to a career in eve that profitable and not only be done by botters. |

Grumpy Owly
245
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 09:12:00 -
[51] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:^last post a good hulk miner mines for around 25mill on Arkonor ore at current prices per hour at current prices. however since there isnt enough he also has to mine bistot and crokite etc so this drops to a steady 17,5mill per hour. a good BS pilot can make around 20mill/hour doing anomaly's in nullsec. its low but its what they should at least make per hour. if you upgrade the hulk to the capital miner, you get 3x the yield so 52,5mill/hour avarage. if you put the BS pilot in a carrier and let him do anomaly's, you can EASILY get 60-80mill/hour <- saw it myself back in nullsec besides that, you can also run Incursion with a faction BS and get 120mill/hour in highsec. <- and this i know for sure since im doing that myself at the moment. so really, if you look at it its nothing more then getting mining up to a career in eve that profitable and not only be done by botters.
No it wont. Mineral abundance will effectively reduce the value of the minerals effectively causing the prices to reduce. I tried to cover this as the original basic premise of why improving yields does nothing of benefit for the miner in terms of profitability.
And it still does nothing to address the regional inequalties as a result of its application.
*knocks head on wall* I don't know what to say? Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 09:17:00 -
[52] - Quote
here's the thing, you keep going into what the effects will be. but thats just a yes-no game since we both have our own idea's of what will happen. also no1 will know because it hasnt happened yet. i already tried to find info about when the hulk came into the game, but found not much.... else i couldve used that to compare the effects. so simply lets stop this, and focus on how to improve this ship shall we? |

Grumpy Owly
245
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 09:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
Battle On wrote:here's the thing, you keep going into what the effects will be. but thats just a yes-no game since we both have our own idea's of what will happen. also no1 will know because it hasnt happened yet. i already tried to find info about when the hulk came into the game, but found not much.... else i couldve used that to compare the effects. so simply lets stop this, and focus on how to improve this ship shall we?
Supply and Demand
The market mechanism
Welcome to basic economics, which suprisingly enough in a player driven model like EvE is in effect.
Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 09:28:00 -
[54] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:here's the thing, you keep going into what the effects will be. but thats just a yes-no game since we both have our own idea's of what will happen. also no1 will know because it hasnt happened yet. i already tried to find info about when the hulk came into the game, but found not much.... else i couldve used that to compare the effects. so simply lets stop this, and focus on how to improve this ship shall we? Supply and DemandThe market mechanismWelcome to basic economics, which suprisingly enough in a player driven model like EvE is in effect.
urgh -.- you cant let it rest cant you? we already went over this topic, and even the most wise economist cant predict what will happen simply because there is not enough info of where the minerals in jita are comming from (i believe most comes from drone region, which wont be effected by this miner, and the highsec botter, which also wont be effected) and where the minerals are going to. if you give me data on those things, then we can really work it out, if not, then we simply CANT. so you can keep whining about the economy without having a clue how it all sticks together or just focus if this ship (THE SHIP not the whole economic system of eve) is not overpowered or has something underpowered maybe. |

Grumpy Owly
245
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 11:04:00 -
[55] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Battle On wrote:here's the thing, you keep going into what the effects will be. but thats just a yes-no game since we both have our own idea's of what will happen. also no1 will know because it hasnt happened yet. i already tried to find info about when the hulk came into the game, but found not much.... else i couldve used that to compare the effects. so simply lets stop this, and focus on how to improve this ship shall we? Supply and DemandThe market mechanismWelcome to basic economics, which suprisingly enough in a player driven model like EvE is in effect. urgh -.- you cant let it rest cant you? we already went over this topic, and even the most wise economist cant predict what will happen simply because there is not enough info of where the minerals in jita are comming from (i believe most comes from drone region, which wont be effected by this miner, and the highsec botter, which also wont be effected) and where the minerals are going to. if you give me data on those things, then we can really work it out, if not, then we simply CANT. so you can keep whining about the economy without having a clue how it all sticks together or just focus if this ship ( THE SHIP not the whole economic system of eve) is not overpowered or has something underpowered maybe.
Believe it or not, Battle On, I've been trying to empower you with information to help you with your development and as an industrialist.
Regardless I see the old addage of "you can lead a horse to water" seems to hold true here.
So I'll leave you to explore your development as you wish, pointless trying to persue balance issues with you on this as you clearly have defined goals for it, so I'll leave you to your "fun" which at this stage seems to be the best approach to take. No hard feelings I hope and all the best in EvE. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 11:18:00 -
[56] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote: Believe it or not, Battle On, I've been trying to empower you with information to help you with your development and as an industrialist.
yes you have, but the information you give is simply your own opinion/idea of what will happen, not hard facts. therefor you cannot assume it will actually happen
^ uhm no, simply because you didnt gave me info, only your own idea of what will happen. so you clearly dont understand what the song is about
Quote:So I'll leave you to explore your development as you wish, pointless trying to persue balance issues with you on this as you clearly have defined goals for it, so I'll leave you to your "fun" which at this stage seems to be the best approach to take. No hard feelings I hope and all the best in EvE.
good, because im getting tired of this myself as well. the best in eve to you to, whoever you might be
|

Alx Warlord
SUPERNOVA SOCIETY Tribal Conclave
67
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 18:42:00 -
[57] - Quote
Capital ship minning?
1 step: Get close to a small asteroid 2 step: Scoop to cargo bay 3 step:???? 4 step: profit!
Just kidding... new ships are always a good adition to the game... the only flaw IMO is that this ship should not use stargates and should use sentry or fighter like minning drones... maybe exumer drones, they should mine and then lauch the ore in a can.
But the adition of this ship will not change much the game... if you realy want to fix economy, what nullsec and low-sec need is a way to kill afk cloackers so there would be more possibility for the minners (add the promissed in the last csm meeting: cloak hunter ship)... and also gives the minning barges more tank.... And remove the minerals droped from the drone land and add bounty to them ( promissed in the last csm meeting). This would fix things allot! |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 18:58:00 -
[58] - Quote
Alx Warlord wrote:Capital ship minning?
1 step: Get close to a small asteroid 2 step: Scoop to cargo bay 3 step:???? 4 step: profit!
Just kidding... new ships are always a good adition to the game... the only flaw IMO is that this ship should not use stargates and should use sentry or fighter like minning drones... maybe exumer drones, they should mine and then lauch the ore in a can.
But the adition of this ship will not change much the game... if you realy want to fix economy, what nullsec and low-sec need is a way to kill afk cloackers so there would be more possibility for the minners (add the promissed in the last csm meeting: cloak hunter ship)... and also gives the minning barges more tank.... And remove the minerals droped from the drone land and add bounty to them ( promissed in the last csm meeting). This would fix things allot!
well if there are exhumer drones they wouldmine more. that + the 500% bonus would be just insane. that stargate is a good point. it should have the jump ability ofcourse. and sentry/fighter will be a bit overpowered since its still a miner, it allow to be able to defend against nullsec rats, but not against gankers. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
668
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 19:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Battle On wrote:^ uhm no, simply because you didnt gave me info, only your own idea of what will happen. so you clearly dont understand what the song is about
But he is giving you the info. You keep trying to refute it with "but you can't tell the future".
Barges were released in '04 with POS/SOV/Alliances/etc (Exodus). Exhumers were released in '05 (RMR).
Though it wasn't til '06 (when T2 lottery ended and invention was released) that they became affordable for the masses.
And yeah, you can't know the future 100 percent ... but at the same time, we can postulate what will happen to the mineral market pretty effectively if it things took 1/3 the time to obtain.
edit --> CCP -- fix your damn forums to accept the percent sign |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 19:46:00 -
[60] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:
But he is giving you the info. You keep trying to refute it with "but you can't tell the future".
Barges were released in '04 with POS/SOV/Alliances/etc (Exodus). Exhumers were released in '05 (RMR).
Though it wasn't til '06 (when T2 lottery ended and invention was released) that they became affordable for the masses.
And yeah, you can't know the future 100 percent ... but at the same time, we can postulate what will happen to the mineral market pretty effectively if it things took 1/3 the time to obtain.
edit --> CCP -- fix your damn forums to accept the percent sign
true and i use that info as well and come up with my own idea what will happen based on facts know. but more then that isnt possible atm without hard facts where all minerals are comming from.
i would love to do all the mats on how the market will react. i would really love to, but atm no1 know how much minerals are hauled from drone region atm. or how many will be hauled to Branch.
its just a simple fact that its useless to discuss this, thats why i say, focus on the ship, not on the impact to the economy.
|

Buzzy Warstl
Huron Syndicate
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 19:51:00 -
[61] - Quote
Actually, academic papers on market theory only explain why he holds the view he does, they say nothing about EvE market dynamics.
I do understand economics, and game design.
Having the hulk as top miner made sense at the time, as did keeping it at the top for a long time after, but since then there have been ships added to the combat side that take more minerals to make and draw more isk from the available fountains.
Thus, without hard numbers and historical data beyond what is released in the CCP economic review it is really impossible to call what the net effect of a miner that can out-produce a hulk would be at this stage of the game.
Anyone claiming otherwise is just too impressed with their own cleverness for reasonable discussion. |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 20:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
Buzzy Warstl wrote:Actually, academic papers on market theory only explain why he holds the view he does, they say nothing about EvE market dynamics.
I do understand economics, and game design.
Having the hulk as top miner made sense at the time, as did keeping it at the top for a long time after, but since then there have been ships added to the combat side that take more minerals to make and draw more isk from the available fountains.
Thus, without hard numbers and historical data beyond what is released in the CCP economic review it is really impossible to call what the net effect of a miner that can out-produce a hulk would be at this stage of the game.
Anyone claiming otherwise is just too impressed with their own cleverness for reasonable discussion.
finally someone that understands why its of no use discussing something without hard facts. High 5 m8! |

Velicitia
Open Designs
670
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 21:15:00 -
[63] - Quote
Buzzy Warstl wrote: Having the hulk as top miner made sense at the time, as did keeping it at the top for a long time after, but since then there have been ships added to the combat side that take more minerals to make and draw more isk from the available fountains.
Hulk was released in '06 as part of RMR (as already stated). Carriers, Motherships, and Titans were all released at this time as well.
The only T1 ships that have been released since then (that I can recall): - Rorqual --> Rev II (summer '07) - Orca --> Quantum Rise (winter '08) - Noctis --> Incursion (Winter '10) - Naga/Oracle/Talos/Tornado --> Crucible (winter '11)
Crucible is (as far as I can tell) the only expansion that has pretty well screwed with the mineral basket. However, I'm not going to attribute that to the four new ships -- their combined mineral need is still significantly less than that of a capship.
Buzzy Warstl wrote:Thus, without hard numbers and historical data beyond what is released in the CCP economic review it is really impossible to call what the net effect of a miner that can out-produce a hulk would be at this stage of the game.
So, rather than looking at what we know, and drawing conclusions from that ... you're just going to write it off and jump on board with "well, more minerals are a good thing".
Of the 3194 nullsec systems we can visit (IIRC, there are 230 or so in the Jove regions), there are 689 in the drone lands (21%). How can anyone argue that adding a ship with a 3:1 advantage in the remaining 79% of nullsec, CCP would not completely break the supply side of mining? |

Jenshae Chiroptera
459
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 23:43:00 -
[64] - Quote
I would say it is a tough choice between this and the idea about the mining structure, which remote reps. I think the repper would have more planning, conflict and be more interesting than just having a huge ship, which could probably be hot dropped and ganked anyway.  Ideas & stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. -á Status: Taking a break |

Buzzy Warstl
Huron Syndicate
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 23:49:00 -
[65] - Quote
Yeah, I'm kinda leery of this ship myself on playability grounds, but I thought arguing against it on the basis of what it would do to the EvE economy was blasted silly.
I could see using a block of these in a nullsec mining-improved system to clear the grav belts, but I'm not sure they'd be adequately defendable outside that situation, and that's a pretty narrow market, |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 11:42:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I would say it is a tough choice between this and the idea about the mining structure, which remote reps. I think the repper would have more planning, conflict and be more interesting than just having a huge ship, which could probably be hot dropped and ganked anyway. 
well ganking a capital ship is hard, and this one especially since you gotta find it first since it will most likely mine at grav sites. and could you tell me the idea of the so called "Mining structure"? or link the topic? would love to read it. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
462
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 14:34:00 -
[67] - Quote
Battle On wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I would say it is a tough choice between this and the idea about the mining structure, which remote reps. I think the repper would have more planning, conflict and be more interesting than just having a huge ship, which could probably be hot dropped and ganked anyway.  well ganking a capital ship is hard, and this one especially since you gotta find it first since it will most likely mine at grav sites. and could you tell me the idea of the so called "Mining structure"? or link the topic? would love to read it.
They aren't very clear but the basic idea looks simple enough, I like the abbreviation, a good deal of angst in it.  Ideas & stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. -á Status: Taking a break |

Battle On
Jita Exiles Cowpunching Overlords With Sovereignty
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 14:48:00 -
[68] - Quote
to be honest, its not worked out that well like how much to not make it overpowered but still usefull etc. besides that, it doesnt chance anything to the amount of isk miners make these days (which is very low compared to the risk involved these days) |

Velicitia
Open Designs
672
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 23:37:00 -
[69] - Quote
Risk? what ******* risk is there in mining?
just keep tabs on "known gankers" and don't mine within a few jumps from trade hubs... I mean, seriously, it's not exactly difficult to not get ganked... |

Jenshae Chiroptera
462
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 16:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Risk? what ******* risk is there in mining?
just keep tabs on "known gankers" and don't mine within a few jumps from trade hubs... I mean, seriously, it's not exactly difficult to not get ganked...
"LOL mining n00b no read OP."  Ideas & stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. -á Status: Taking a break |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |