|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Goumindong
|
Posted - 2008.03.30 22:07:00 -
[1]
Originally by: NightmareX Why not just remove all of the Titans instead then?, the Doomsday weapon is all the Titans have.
This very not true. If you cannot figure out how to use titans without their DD, then you should not be planning any strategic ops. http://eve-files.com/dl/154147
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. Vote Goumindong for CSM[/url] |

Goumindong
|
Posted - 2008.03.30 23:52:00 -
[2]
Originally by: NightmareX
Originally by: Goumindong
Originally by: NightmareX Why not just remove all of the Titans instead then?, the Doomsday weapon is all the Titans have.
This very not true. If you cannot figure out how to use titans without their DD, then you should not be planning any strategic ops.
Well without a doomsday device a Titan is just a big ship with less DPS than a Battleship.
I'm talking about the weapons you can use on the Titan.
No, its not, do i have to spell it out for you?
[Also, guns on a titan lol] http://eve-files.com/dl/154147
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. Vote Goumindong for CSM[/url] |

Goumindong
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.03.31 00:52:00 -
[3]
Originally by: NightmareX
I know it's lol to have guns on the Titan, but that was not the point, the point is that if the doomsday device is removed from game, then why do we need a Titan then when we have Motherships then?
And i also know the Titan have some few more things that you can't do with a Mothership.
But paying like 85-90 more bill isk for ONLY some few more things that you can do with a Titan over a Mothership is a total waste of isk.
Actually a titan has less combat ability than a mothership. That is not what you would be using your titan for.
Vote Goumindong for CSM |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.04.25 19:55:00 -
[4]
Originally by: HydroSan Edited by: HydroSan on 25/04/2008 02:40:14 I've reverted to using ad hominem against you because I've already written no less than three giant blocks of text and all you and the other one-man-alt-corp posters have done is:
1. Bring up politics including my alliance. 2. Shout ANTI-ZERG as loud and as many times as you can. 3. Bring up "suggestions" that would do absolutely nothing to prevent Titan stacking because it doesn't take into account anything I or other people have brought up in said giant walls of text.
Now either post with your main, address the things I've talked about or get out of this thread. Thanks in advance.
Now you know how it feels.
Vote Goumindong for CSM |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.04.25 23:36:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Gamesguy
You, of all people, dont get to make this claim.
That is rich, coming from you. |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.06 02:10:00 -
[6]
"you have to be even better at it" is pretty much the same as breaking the rule. Its like saying "new players need to be able to accomplish things" and then saying its O.K. because 10000 new players can accomplish something.
The matter of scale cannot be avoided and making it harder to achieve the goal in those manners is very much the same thing as removing those options.
Vote Goumindong for CSM |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.06 15:06:00 -
[7]
Originally by: TypoNinja
'They spend more money they should win crap' as you put it is only half right, 'they spent more money so they have an advantage' would be the correct form
And the question that is being answered is not "should they have an advantage?" the question that is being answered is "how much of an advantage should they have?".
The answer is "less than they do now" |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.11 23:24:00 -
[8]
Don't attack him. Attack his arguments.
Of which they are many flaws.
To start with your argument ignores tactical considerations, ignores scale, ignores ranges, ignores warping, ignores dictors, ignores cov-ops, and simply ignores the fact that CCP has said that this is not a game where skillpoints or money trump all and has enshrined that in their design manifesto for the game
Not titans online, not motherships online, not capitals online, not dreadnoughts online. But Eve online, where the lowliest ship can be a threat to the highest.
Vote Goumindong for CSM |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.11 23:26:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Irn Bruce I posted this in the other thread, but I suppose it belongs here. And sorry if it's been brought up before, but I can't be bothered reading 23 pages.
How about simply making titans very vulnerable to doomsday blasts? They wouldn't be hit by their own blast, but if multiple titans were present, they would hurt each other really badly.
titans have like 4-8m EHP. at 70k damage per DD it would take 50 -> 100 DD's to take one down.
Vote Goumindong for CSM |

Goumindong
Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.15 04:43:00 -
[10]
Originally by: TypoNinja
Threat, yes. the question is how much of a threat?
Im 5'11 and weight about 125 lbs, in a fist fight I'm a threat to a 250 professional boxer. Not much of a threat, but a threat.
Threat does not equate to 'reasonable chance I can take you'
Do you realize that you committed the same fallacy that you accused me of committing in this post?[and one i was pointing out either in the quoted post or before hand]
No one is saying they should not have an advantage they are saying the advantage they have is too great.
Vote Goumindong for CSM |
|
|
|
|