| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
56
   |
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
schurem wrote:Want the modular space station thingers instead of the horrible bubble staffs we have now. please CCP? implement this stuff?
And while you are at it make them like dockable and allow us to get out and walk around in them one day. Don't make them as good Starbases in terms of storage and whatnot of course. |
Vedje
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 16:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
+1
Agreed current POS stations are ugly, and very difficult to manage.
As a WH pilot that also lives in a WH i need to point out as well that
the logistics needed to keep a pos alive are horrible.
Unless you are lucky to live in some c4 which has all the resources
you need to feed the pos, you are in for a lot of hauling.
The suggestions made by players look amazing, inviting and
i am sure they would make the life easier for small corps that are setting
off to live outside the highsec. This would propel younger corps to
open their own operations outside the highsec, join an alliance, and therewith
the community would be expanded.
As i recall my 1st impression of a pos, it looked like a huge balloon
with some minmatar rust caught in it. |
Dirty Decky
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 23:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
Cypermethren wrote:
Sexy pos pics
+1
Make all that happen^^
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
66
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 13:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
This would also be a great chance to not only balance POS's but fix the issue with thier size. They need to be WAY bigger than they are now. The size currently just looks silly. You can store a capital ship in that? WTF?! Of course this also goes for actual stations as well. I know a while back CCP made them bigger...but not big enough. BIGGER! ******* BIGGER! |
Cheekything
Black Lance
Executive Outcomes
58
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 20:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
I just want a pretty place to attend to. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
87
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 13:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
This thread isn't on the first page...this is a farce!
Any chance a Dev or GM could sticky this thread? It is deserving of it. Perhaps the CSM could throw some weight around to get it stickied?
Draculina Alucardi...3rd account canceled, no reason to hold an account for a SC pilot, if you can only use it in PVP ... thanks CCP :)-á
Support the cause! Linky |
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Iure Divino
62
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 02:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:This thread isn't on the first page...this is a farce!
Any chance a Dev or GM could sticky this thread? It is deserving of it. Perhaps the CSM could throw some weight around to get it stickied?
Current CSM is comprised of the wrong people. We should field a candidate to push this issue as a primary concern.
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 13:08:00 -
[38] - Quote
Thing is...we know CCP is working on something for POS's. Seems we don't know exactly what since they are keeping the nice fluffy warm details to themselves for now.
Draculina Alucardi...3rd account canceled, no reason to hold an account for a SC pilot, if you can only use it in PVP ... thanks CCP :)-á
Support the cause! Linky |
Arbiter Reborn
Saiph Industries
SRS.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 19:28:00 -
[39] - Quote
priority 1 !!!
priority 2 THE REST OF THE UI / GUI |
Arbiter Reborn
Saiph Industries
SRS.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 19:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
DOUBLE POST FAIL |
|
|
Cheekything
Black Lance
Executive Outcomes
64
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 00:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
We need better POSes. |
Simon Victor
Axiom Holdings
Axiom Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 19:32:00 -
[42] - Quote
Looking at CCP's winter expansion list, it just says Starbase Logistcis Management. It sounds like a change to hangars and stuff instead of the whole POS system.
I don't know about you guys, but I need to see this whole plan contained within this thread go into the winter expansion to be happy. It's been far too long, and I'm not going to wait through another expansion for something as epic as this! Here's to hoping CCP has this up their sleeve and are underplaying it on the expansion list...
The friend zone is the equivalent of a job interview where they think you're great, but they still hire the moron that does a terrible job. |
Zylawy
Ignorance Is Bliss.
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 21:11:00 -
[43] - Quote
I agree. The POS needs revision! |
Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 02:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
+1
WH POS dwellers would especially like this one. |
rwg93
Ad Futurum
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 03:35:00 -
[45] - Quote
Perhaps expand this idea to include sov mechanics and outposts.
They could have the current small, med, lrg Towers, but then add outpost and station class towers.
The outpost class towers could be anchored to moons or planets and would function as the current TCU and ihubs do while integrating some stuff from normal POSs
The station class could function like current outposts do and only be anchored to planets but have the benefits of being able to add defenses and balance it with limited storage space (still way more than current POSs have ofc) and perhaps a limit to the number of people who can be docked at once
These would follow the modular setup and would work well with the current ihub and outpost upgrading mechanics while allowing even more flexibility.
This could be great for small alliances that could use the defensive abilities around TCUs/Ihubs that are cost balanced with the other functions the modular system offers and it would allow all POS like objects to be in one organized category instead of the huge gaps between the current structures (ihub, outposts, moon POS) |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
112
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 20:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
Mark my words...someday...someday...CCP will let us put stations in WH space. I will then leave WH space.
Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Cheekything
Black Lance
Executive Outcomes
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 19:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
They are proposing changed to the PI stuff and it looks great.
Can POS borrow it plox.
I.e. use different standings / relationships (owner, corp, Alliance) to access different mods but easier would be nice :P |
Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 20:02:00 -
[48] - Quote
This is a good idea POS now look more like scrap piles trapped inside a force field. This is an upgrade that changes no functionality (unless you give us a CQ in the corp hangar) which would greatly improve playability imo. Ship maintenance arrays should display ships like the current in station hangar with different levels of completion and swarms of workers/ drones on scaffolding around the ships. Simple animations like those used in station hangars should not over tax servers. I support implementation asap. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
162
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bumping for awesomeness...hopefully the POS changes this winter make this thread obsolete...only time will tell.
Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Mercedes Bens
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 03:24:00 -
[50] - Quote
supported |
|
|
True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 14:30:00 -
[51] - Quote
Since no one brought it up. In the most recent dev blog video they said they will be adding "POS Fuel Pellets", so that you combine the current POS fuels pre-POS and build fuel pellets, which are then a generic fuel you take the pos and drop in.
This will make management and planning so much easier for everyone that runs POS, especially for those that run multiple. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
165
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 15:17:00 -
[52] - Quote
That will be nice.
Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Lucid Phoenix
Infidel Armaments
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:46:00 -
[53] - Quote
I think modifying the faction towers to use the same fuel as normal towers is ridicilous. The whole point of investing in one of the faction towers is reduced fuel costs, so it will pay for itself.
Now I understand that in trying to simplify the game, and making the fuel costs more simplistic, I get that. However a bigger fuel bay, isn't going to do it in so far as a fair trade off.
What I propose is this, and incremental increase in the powergrid/cpu output for the tier 1/tier 2 towers, thereby retaining some of the 'fuel savings', and allowing the simplization of the fuel situation at the same time.
Please give this idea serious thought, as it would only be fair to reap some ACTUAL benefit to faction towers people paid their hard earned isk for.
Thank you
Lucid Phoenix
|
True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
Lucid Phoenix wrote:I think modifying the faction towers to use the same fuel as normal towers is ridicilous. The whole point of investing in one of the faction towers is reduced fuel costs, so it will pay for itself.
Now I understand that in trying to simplify the game, and making the fuel costs more simplistic, I get that. However a bigger fuel bay, isn't going to do it in so far as a fair trade off.
What I propose is this, and incremental increase in the powergrid/cpu output for the tier 1/tier 2 towers, thereby retaining some of the 'fuel savings', and allowing the simplization of the fuel situation at the same time.
Please give this idea serious thought, as it would only be fair to reap some ACTUAL benefit to faction towers people paid their hard earned isk for.
Thank you
Lucid Phoenix
I think its a bit early to jump the gun on this unless you have access to more information already? maybe there will be different sized pellets, or the pellet consumption rates will change depending on standard/faction towers.
Please don't start crying "over simplification" everytime they change something to remove tedium/overly complicated mechanics
complicated != Complex
Things can be complex, without being complicated, if you've ever been involved in helping maintain 20+ towers, balancing all the fuel loads to travel around 50 systems to stock up towers is a horrible boring task that will be made better. |
Simon Victor
Axiom Holdings
Axiom Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 22:33:00 -
[55] - Quote
CCP! Just do it! Don't even think about it... Just do it!
I approve of this message... |
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 05:24:00 -
[56] - Quote
they will
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=320990
read the first page ;) |
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic
Tragedy.
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 14:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Doesn't exactly mean anything but a dev blowing smoke out of his ass until there is an official dev blog on the matter. Any dev that wants to step up to the plate and let us know what the current plans are in regard to this thread...you are more than welcome to.
Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Zarak1 Kenpach1
Aperture Harmonics
K162
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 19:57:00 -
[58] - Quote
+1 FTDH is awesome |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 15:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
+1. I supported the original back in 07, I support it still.
Feel free to come on over to the recently reopened ship crew thread and give me some support too.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=34523 |
anvyl sky
10
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:39:00 -
[60] - Quote
bumpedybump. this topic is close to my heart |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |