Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.08 06:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
I've been an avid fan of this thread the many revivals and I think the new forums needs a copy of it.
Been 5 years we just got "walking in stations" well sort of but can we get a decent POS now plox.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=391410 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1208972
Evelgrivion wrote:[edit]Edited by: Evelgrivion on 29/05/2011 04:48:41[/edit] Images have been replaced. Unfortunately, I lost the originals with the forum debacle, but the ones that were linked are an acceptable substitute. To put it simply, the current POS system is Butt-ugly, lagtacular, overpowered, underpowered, and completely, totally whacky, and fails to live up to the expectations of those who wish to see them for the first time. This proposal at the very least aims to solve the first and last two issues, whilst providing a way for those who do not have 30 billion to blow on a station to get a suitable level of infrastructure for new 0.0 operations. In a nutshell, its a modular POS with most of the functionality of a station, depending on the modules attached. How would this all go together? Today's idea comes with pictures! The heart of the system is a simple interconnecting module. From this modular structure, all modules are referenced, attached, and based within a simple grid system. Exhibit AThe four corridors allow for easy expansion of the station, and scalable infrastructure can grow with the needs of the corporation. or alliance in possession of it. Exhibit BMuch like the current POS system, the heart and soul of the station would remain the control tower. For this example, let me introduce Exhibit C, for a small Caldari styled control tower. Exhibit CFrom this control tower, everything else on the POS is referenced. Instead of giving us exact XYZ coordinates of every module in space, they can be instead referenced to the tower and the layout grid on which it is based. After deployment of the control tower, you can begin adding additional structures to the POS to give it the functionality you want it to have. Allow me to present Exhibits D and E. Exhibits D & E (Large File)Exhibit D is a storage container module; these provide the storage capabilities for the POS. Exhibit E is a refinery module, which would obviously provide refinery capabilities for the station. Up a certain point, additional refinery modules would provide additional refinery efficiency, though logarithmically decreasing with each one while consuming the same amount of poewr. This could allow larger, more powerful, and more expensive designs to have a place in the universe. Up to this point, the accessibility remains the same as it is for the current POS, with one user hovering outside the module at a time. To alleviate the issues inherent in that, I present exhibit F; the hangar module. This system is not limited to 1x1 modules, and "supermodules" are a distinct possibility with this system. Exhibit FProviding a certain quantity of hangar space (Meters-¦) depending on size (and expense), the hangar module provides an interface to POS management just like standard stations, allowing simple refining, manufacturing, and possibly even clone bays, depending on the modules that you have installed. Put it altogether, and you get a simple POS that is easy to manage, expandable, and ranging in capabilities and expense. In its most basic form, I present Exhibit G. Exhibit GHere is an optional, more contraversial change that this system would make. If CCP wishes, they could integrate much of a POSs defense into this module system; rather than having free floating, invincible guns, large weapons battery modules could be introduced to the station. Presenting Exhibit H. Exhibit HFully realized, Exhibit I. Exhibit I (Fully Realised Modular POS)While this is just a simple example, the potential is there for leagues more complex and powerful bases than those demonstrated here. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.08 19:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Confirming that CCP needs to update POS's as one of the priority items. Would be cool to get out and walk around in one as well... |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
This thread needs more zest. |
Kylar Tzu
Wildland Privateers
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 01:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
I strongly agree with this, it is time for a change |
Mr Adama
Und3r Th3 Influ3nc3
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 01:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
As always, supported... again |
Amun Khonsu
Royal Order of Security Specialists
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 07:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
+1 I like the idea Fight them until turmoil is no more and strike terror into their hearts. |
Cyprus Black
Perkone Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cheeky your avatar creeps me out. I don't know why.
+1 to flogging that dead horse on the new forums. Now, where's that support button... |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
This thread should be stickied on the new forums. |
Usurpine
GDC Holding Shadow of xXDEATHXx
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
supported. We need content, not barbie dresses. |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
436
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
The entire CSM is behind the Dead Horse proposal, just like every other right-thinking individual who plays EVE. |
|
Tethys Atreides
The Audacity of Huge
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
Do it. Do it now. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 01:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
If the CSM accomplishes to get CCP to do any one single thing this year...it should be this. |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
34
|
Posted - 2011.09.18 14:23:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bump because it's needed. |
Frau JeanYus
PsiTit Corp
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.18 21:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
Agree & Bump
Let's go - do it - hello?
|
Jag Kara
Gh0st Hunters Sspectre
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.19 17:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
I'm still surprised they do so much to change the game and still brush over this. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
44
|
Posted - 2011.09.19 17:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
As cool as this looks, imagine them being blown up by the next fleet to come along, simply because they look cool. I like it, I think... but they can go boom... Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
41
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 13:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
But I like it when things go BOOOMMM!!
Keeping it under CCP's nose till they update POS. |
Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.25 15:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Yep, POS's need to A: Not look like a flaoting junkyard and B: Have a fuel that is one cell built from the current pos fuels so you onlu need to carry that one item, not 7.
Have a racial fuel cell for each race, made from the ice and pi products, each fuel cell, or rod lasts 3 hours on a smal pos, 2 on a medium and 1 on a large, simple, make life easier. Looking after pos's is not fun or enjoyable but is necessary, can we try and make it as painless as possible please... |
Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
724
|
Posted - 2011.09.25 19:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:The entire CSM is behind the Dead Horse proposal, just like every other right-thinking individual who plays EVE.
When Mittens and I agree on something, it's usually a good idea. We agree on this. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |
ehon
Edani Innovations
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 18:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:The Mittani wrote:The entire CSM is behind the Dead Horse proposal, just like every other right-thinking individual who plays EVE. When Mittens and I agree on something, it's usually a good idea. We agree on this.
then i expect to see some sort of results..... |
|
Cypermethren
Celtic Cartage And Hauling
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 06:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jesus man...
I remember seeing these pictures and getting so excited, and then forgetting about it again as nothing happend :(
Here for all of you whom did not have the pleasure of seeing these when they origionaly got posted.
Origional Thread: http://eve-search.com/thread/391410/page/8 http://cyerus.eve-it.org/?p=94
Sexy Modular Pos's:
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/Exhibit_a.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_b.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_c.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_de.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_f.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_g.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_h.jpg
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/DDHorse/exhibit_i.jpg
http://cyerus.eve-it.org/img/modular_example_full.jpg
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
52
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 13:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
4th link for exhibit_de is broken. |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
49
|
Posted - 2011.10.01 16:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:4th link for exhibit_de is broken.
Would have to speak to chribba about that :/ |
anvyl sky
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.03 20:49:00 -
[24] - Quote
shameless bump. lets keep this at page one permanently, guys. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
53
|
Posted - 2011.10.03 21:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Yes...this thread deserves way more attention than it is getting. Yes...HINT HINT CCP! |
Omega Flames
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 09:54:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Yes...this thread deserves way more attention than it is getting. Yes...HINT HINT CCP! I hate to be the guy to burst the proverbial bubble but.... there is a reason it's called the dead horse thread, and that's cause CCP let the horse die years ago and via their inaction to fix pos's told us they don't give a hoot about our hints. If you want pos's to be fixed I suggest you crash Jita, that's about the only thing large enough to get their attention and make them respond. I'd wager there have been more ideas fielded about how to fix pos's than any other topic, and you see where we are at still. Personally I'm going to curse CCP and then continue playing knowing one day I'll move on from this game just like i eventually moved on from Runescape and WoW. When companies stop thinking they know what a player wants better than the player knows what he wants is the day pigs fly. In short, you aren't getting pos fixes sry man I really am. |
StormHammer 666
Arch Arsonists of EvE Another Really Stupid Enterprise
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 10:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
But it is still a nice idea! Stormhammer 666 CEO ARSE Another Really Stupid Enterprise
Where pew pew time is fun time! |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 22:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
Omega Flames wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Yes...this thread deserves way more attention than it is getting. Yes...HINT HINT CCP! I hate to be the guy to burst the proverbial bubble but.... there is a reason it's called the dead horse thread, and that's cause CCP let the horse die years ago and via their inaction to fix pos's told us they don't give a hoot about our hints. If you want pos's to be fixed I suggest you crash Jita, that's about the only thing large enough to get their attention and make them respond. I'd wager there have been more ideas fielded about how to fix pos's than any other topic, and you see where we are at still. Personally I'm going to curse CCP and then continue playing knowing one day I'll move on from this game just like i eventually moved on from Runescape and WoW. When companies stop thinking they know what a player wants better than the player knows what he wants is the day pigs fly. In short, you aren't getting pos fixes sry man I really am.
I hate to be that guy who feels the need to point out the very obvious flaw that everyone know about.
Fact is POS are old and needed changing.
CCP needs to put some time into changing them.
The flogging the old horse thread was a great place where people discussed why it was so important that they change and is still very important today.
It doesn't matter if CCP is slow, they are getting slowly back on the ball after a bunch of terribly implemented ideas.
Since we have new forums this needed to be one of the first threads before all the stupid people whine about afk cloakers and nerf XYZ it's too powereful and more importantly it needs to stay relevant. |
schurem
Silver Snake Enterprise
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 17:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
Want the modular space station thingers instead of the horrible bubble staffs we have now. please CCP? implement this stuff? |
Candente
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 17:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
Exhibit I is pretty bad ass and the POS should look like that in the beginning.
Although I think a force field should be added to the picture jsut because it's what we've been used to.
Death of this horse is a lie! |
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
schurem wrote:Want the modular space station thingers instead of the horrible bubble staffs we have now. please CCP? implement this stuff?
And while you are at it make them like dockable and allow us to get out and walk around in them one day. Don't make them as good Starbases in terms of storage and whatnot of course. |
Vedje
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 16:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
+1 Agreed current POS stations are ugly, and very difficult to manage.
As a WH pilot that also lives in a WH i need to point out as well that the logistics needed to keep a pos alive are horrible. Unless you are lucky to live in some c4 which has all the resources you need to feed the pos, you are in for a lot of hauling.
The suggestions made by players look amazing, inviting and i am sure they would make the life easier for small corps that are setting off to live outside the highsec. This would propel younger corps to open their own operations outside the highsec, join an alliance, and therewith the community would be expanded. As i recall my 1st impression of a pos, it looked like a huge balloon with some minmatar rust caught in it. |
Dirty Decky
Red Frog Freight Red-Frog
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 23:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
Cypermethren wrote: Sexy pos pics
+1
Make all that happen^^
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
66
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 13:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
This would also be a great chance to not only balance POS's but fix the issue with thier size. They need to be WAY bigger than they are now. The size currently just looks silly. You can store a capital ship in that? WTF?! Of course this also goes for actual stations as well. I know a while back CCP made them bigger...but not big enough. BIGGER! ******* BIGGER! |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
58
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 20:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
I just want a pretty place to attend to. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
87
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 13:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
This thread isn't on the first page...this is a farce!
Any chance a Dev or GM could sticky this thread? It is deserving of it. Perhaps the CSM could throw some weight around to get it stickied? Draculina Alucardi...3rd account canceled, no reason to hold an account for a SC pilot, if you can only use it in PVP ... thanks CCP :)-á Support the cause! Linky |
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Iure Divino
62
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 02:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:This thread isn't on the first page...this is a farce!
Any chance a Dev or GM could sticky this thread? It is deserving of it. Perhaps the CSM could throw some weight around to get it stickied?
Current CSM is comprised of the wrong people. We should field a candidate to push this issue as a primary concern.
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 13:08:00 -
[38] - Quote
Thing is...we know CCP is working on something for POS's. Seems we don't know exactly what since they are keeping the nice fluffy warm details to themselves for now. Draculina Alucardi...3rd account canceled, no reason to hold an account for a SC pilot, if you can only use it in PVP ... thanks CCP :)-á Support the cause! Linky |
Arbiter Reborn
Saiph Industries SRS.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 19:28:00 -
[39] - Quote
priority 1 !!!
priority 2 THE REST OF THE UI / GUI |
Arbiter Reborn
Saiph Industries SRS.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 19:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
DOUBLE POST FAIL |
|
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
64
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 00:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
We need better POSes. |
Simon Victor
Axiom Holdings Axiom Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 19:32:00 -
[42] - Quote
Looking at CCP's winter expansion list, it just says Starbase Logistcis Management. It sounds like a change to hangars and stuff instead of the whole POS system.
I don't know about you guys, but I need to see this whole plan contained within this thread go into the winter expansion to be happy. It's been far too long, and I'm not going to wait through another expansion for something as epic as this! Here's to hoping CCP has this up their sleeve and are underplaying it on the expansion list... The friend zone is the equivalent of a job interview where they think you're great, but they still hire the moron that does a terrible job. |
Zylawy
Ignorance Is Bliss. SpaceMonkey's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 21:11:00 -
[43] - Quote
I agree. The POS needs revision! |
Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 02:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
+1
WH POS dwellers would especially like this one. |
rwg93
Ad Futurum
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 03:35:00 -
[45] - Quote
Perhaps expand this idea to include sov mechanics and outposts.
They could have the current small, med, lrg Towers, but then add outpost and station class towers.
The outpost class towers could be anchored to moons or planets and would function as the current TCU and ihubs do while integrating some stuff from normal POSs
The station class could function like current outposts do and only be anchored to planets but have the benefits of being able to add defenses and balance it with limited storage space (still way more than current POSs have ofc) and perhaps a limit to the number of people who can be docked at once
These would follow the modular setup and would work well with the current ihub and outpost upgrading mechanics while allowing even more flexibility.
This could be great for small alliances that could use the defensive abilities around TCUs/Ihubs that are cost balanced with the other functions the modular system offers and it would allow all POS like objects to be in one organized category instead of the huge gaps between the current structures (ihub, outposts, moon POS) |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
112
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 20:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
Mark my words...someday...someday...CCP will let us put stations in WH space. I will then leave WH space. Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Cheekything
Black Lance Executive Outcomes
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 19:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
They are proposing changed to the PI stuff and it looks great.
Can POS borrow it plox.
I.e. use different standings / relationships (owner, corp, Alliance) to access different mods but easier would be nice :P |
Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 20:02:00 -
[48] - Quote
This is a good idea POS now look more like scrap piles trapped inside a force field. This is an upgrade that changes no functionality (unless you give us a CQ in the corp hangar) which would greatly improve playability imo. Ship maintenance arrays should display ships like the current in station hangar with different levels of completion and swarms of workers/ drones on scaffolding around the ships. Simple animations like those used in station hangars should not over tax servers. I support implementation asap. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
162
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bumping for awesomeness...hopefully the POS changes this winter make this thread obsolete...only time will tell. Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Mercedes Bens
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 03:24:00 -
[50] - Quote
supported |
|
True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 14:30:00 -
[51] - Quote
Since no one brought it up. In the most recent dev blog video they said they will be adding "POS Fuel Pellets", so that you combine the current POS fuels pre-POS and build fuel pellets, which are then a generic fuel you take the pos and drop in.
This will make management and planning so much easier for everyone that runs POS, especially for those that run multiple. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
165
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 15:17:00 -
[52] - Quote
That will be nice. Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Lucid Phoenix
Infidel Armaments
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:46:00 -
[53] - Quote
I think modifying the faction towers to use the same fuel as normal towers is ridicilous. The whole point of investing in one of the faction towers is reduced fuel costs, so it will pay for itself. Now I understand that in trying to simplify the game, and making the fuel costs more simplistic, I get that. However a bigger fuel bay, isn't going to do it in so far as a fair trade off. What I propose is this, and incremental increase in the powergrid/cpu output for the tier 1/tier 2 towers, thereby retaining some of the 'fuel savings', and allowing the simplization of the fuel situation at the same time. Please give this idea serious thought, as it would only be fair to reap some ACTUAL benefit to faction towers people paid their hard earned isk for.
Thank you
Lucid Phoenix
|
True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
Lucid Phoenix wrote:I think modifying the faction towers to use the same fuel as normal towers is ridicilous. The whole point of investing in one of the faction towers is reduced fuel costs, so it will pay for itself. Now I understand that in trying to simplify the game, and making the fuel costs more simplistic, I get that. However a bigger fuel bay, isn't going to do it in so far as a fair trade off. What I propose is this, and incremental increase in the powergrid/cpu output for the tier 1/tier 2 towers, thereby retaining some of the 'fuel savings', and allowing the simplization of the fuel situation at the same time. Please give this idea serious thought, as it would only be fair to reap some ACTUAL benefit to faction towers people paid their hard earned isk for.
Thank you
Lucid Phoenix
I think its a bit early to jump the gun on this unless you have access to more information already? maybe there will be different sized pellets, or the pellet consumption rates will change depending on standard/faction towers.
Please don't start crying "over simplification" everytime they change something to remove tedium/overly complicated mechanics
complicated != Complex
Things can be complex, without being complicated, if you've ever been involved in helping maintain 20+ towers, balancing all the fuel loads to travel around 50 systems to stock up towers is a horrible boring task that will be made better. |
Simon Victor
Axiom Holdings Axiom Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 22:33:00 -
[55] - Quote
CCP! Just do it! Don't even think about it... Just do it! I approve of this message... |
Gilbaron
The Scope Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 05:24:00 -
[56] - Quote
they will
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=320990
read the first page ;) |
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 14:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Doesn't exactly mean anything but a dev blowing smoke out of his ass until there is an official dev blog on the matter. Any dev that wants to step up to the plate and let us know what the current plans are in regard to this thread...you are more than welcome to. Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |
Zarak1 Kenpach1
Aperture Harmonics K162
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 19:57:00 -
[58] - Quote
+1 FTDH is awesome |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 15:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
+1. I supported the original back in 07, I support it still.
Feel free to come on over to the recently reopened ship crew thread and give me some support too.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=34523 |
anvyl sky
10
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:39:00 -
[60] - Quote
bumpedybump. this topic is close to my heart |
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
268
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:41:00 -
[61] - Quote
Priority 2 should be boobies...as noted in my sig... EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX!
Support our boobies!-á[url]https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=24221&find=unread[/url]
|
Zammo Bahrut
Banana On A Plate
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 20:24:00 -
[62] - Quote
+1
especially for SMA access roles ...
POS's in general need much lovin.. the fuel block is a great start... lets see more! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |