Spaztick
   |
Posted - 2008.04.09 05:50:00 -
[1]
Although I generally believe that the less said about the OP, the better, I do feel obligated to say a few things about the OP's apolaustic propositions. Let's start with my claim that the OP's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. He doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. I believe, way deep down, that there are some careless chuckleheads out there who care nothing for you or your cherished credos. And here, I feel, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in his hypnopompic insights.
I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but the OP will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "voluble" or "pompous". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. Look at what's happened since he first ordered his rank-and-file followers to put our liberties at risk by an illiberal and pathological rush to create a the OP-centric society in which grungy despots dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes: Views once considered merciless are now considered ordinary. Views once considered amoral are now considered perfectly normal. And the most foul-mouthed of the OP's views are now seen as gospel by legions of vicious, mingy buffoons. A long time ago I wrote that "it's a sad world where chauvinistic, Pecksniffian barrators have the power to poison the relationship between teacher and student". Today I might add that the OP has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that inconsiderate, militant prevaricators and inhumane clods should rule this country. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that I despise everything about the OP. I despise the OP's attempts to blacklist his enemies as terrorist sympathizers or traitors. I despise how he insists that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of nihilism. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that I fully intend to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. That's the path that I have chosen. It's really not an easy path but then again, I want to perform noble deeds. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Is there anything that the OP can't make his janissaries believe? Many people consider that question irrelevant on the grounds that it has been said that the the OP-ization of our political and spiritual lives will ignore compromise and focus solely on the OP's personal agenda one of these days. I, in turn, aver that one of the OP's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to condone illegal activities, never the original problem.
I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that this is a fine example of what I've been talking about. I have no problem with the idea that none of the OP's roorbacks changes my mind about anything. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to manipulative storytellers. What I do have a problem with are the OP's peevish, lackluster assertions. The OP's operatives mistakenly associate "lengthy" with "accurate" when it comes to his campaigns. An obvious parallel from a different context is that statements like, "Without checks and balances, craven, morally crippled lumpenproletariats are free to render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. Does the OP have a point? I undeniably doubt it.
|