| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Frontman 242
I Robot Me Tarzan
0
   |
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
9/10 for your corpie |
Elzon1
Shadow Boys Corp
Bloodbound.
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:25:00 -
[62] - Quote
Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection
Perhaps after insurance there is another option to purchase a faster response time from concord?
Maybe even make that have a counter bribe option so a group/individual can prevent the faster response time.
Perhaps, maybe even make it a slower than normal response time. 
And this is no one time fee. You will have to repay the fee/bribe everytime it has been used.
Makes the carebears feel safe, but is easily counterable if one has the will to do so. |
THE L0CK
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:30:00 -
[63] - Quote
Elzon1 wrote:Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection Perhaps after insurance there is another option to purchase a faster response time from concord? Maybe even make that have a counter bribe option so a group/individual can prevent the faster response time. Perhaps, maybe even make it a slower than normal response time. And this is no one time fee. You will have to repay the fee/bribe everytime it has been used. Makes the carebears feel safe, but is easily counterable if one has the will to do so.
So instead of sitting outside of stations we'll all be sitting inside a station playing 'let's see who can throw the most money away'. Spreadsheet bid wars doesn't really sound appealing.
Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
Lexmana
Imperial Stout
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:33:00 -
[64] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Lexmana wrote:Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection This! payment options: ISK Doughnuts Shrubberies
How about 11% of your income for basic protection(0.5). Gate guns and station guns is extra. And if you want special treatment (1.0) it is even more. And if someone outbids you .... |
Velicitia
Open Designs
680
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:35:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:Velicitia wrote:Lexmana wrote:Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection This! payment options: ISK Doughnuts Shrubberies How about 11% of your income for basic protection(0.5). Gate guns and station guns is extra. And if you want special treatment (1.0) it is even more.
Gate/Station work anywhere in empire (because, well, that's how it works already) ... so let's not mess with that.
"Concord Tax" could work ... but why pay? |
Glarealot
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:43:00 -
[66] - Quote
I love this change. =D Might see a revival in high sec corps again, and less folks hanging out in NPC corps. |
Elzon1
Shadow Boys Corp
Bloodbound.
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:44:00 -
[67] - Quote
THE L0CK wrote:Elzon1 wrote:Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection Perhaps after insurance there is another option to purchase a faster response time from concord? Maybe even make that have a counter bribe option so a group/individual can prevent the faster response time. Perhaps, maybe even make it a slower than normal response time. And this is no one time fee. You will have to repay the fee/bribe everytime it has been used. Makes the carebears feel safe, but is easily counterable if one has the will to do so. So instead of sitting outside of stations we'll all be sitting inside a station playing 'let's see who can throw the most money away'. Spreadsheet bid wars doesn't really sound appealing.
What is war without calculating risk vs. war?
Answer: TOTALHELLDEATH!!!
The reason TOTALHELLDEATH never really occurs is because stupid only lasts so far as it's resources can take it.
"Spreadsheet bid wars"- Thats pretty much EVE right there. |
Grumpy Owly
281
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:47:00 -
[68] - Quote
Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection
We do, it's called taxation and presumably escrow charges seeing as it's the SCC who regulate trade.
Technically its not really protection, more disincentivization, due to it being a delayed policing responce to criminal activity as opposed to prevention of criminal activity in the first place.
This since the definition of the word protection applies to keeping something safe, but this isn't the case even with the Concord presence. Nor am I advocating it should be.
But then I'm assuming your criminal mind is simply warping what would be the correct interpretation of the lore in the game for persuasive benefit to the criminal cause as opposed to seeing it for what it is. 
Glad to hear war decs are not consensual however.
Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2902
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
Xolve wrote:This thread needs more butt mad npc corp pubbies crying "griefers! griefers!"
FYI you're a pubbie too, as you're not a member of Goonswarm - being their little pet doesn't really count, I'm afraid.
----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |
Lexmana
Imperial Stout
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:58:00 -
[70] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Lexmana wrote:Velicitia wrote:Lexmana wrote:Andski wrote:make concord mercenaries
you buy their protection This! payment options: ISK Doughnuts Shrubberies How about 11% of your income for basic protection(0.5). Gate guns and station guns is extra. And if you want special treatment (1.0) it is even more. Gate/Station work anywhere in empire (because, well, that's how it works already) ... so let's not mess with that. "Concord Tax" could work ... but why pay?
You pay to get your CONCORD sticker you put on your bumper. It is worth a lot for some people. If you don't pay, gate/station guns will look the other way. I expect this to transfer to lowsec aswell.
Also, you can't .01 ISK CONCORD for them to abandon their customer. It is more like double or tripple the original offer.
|
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1072
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:01:00 -
[71] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:CATPAIN KIRK wrote:i think the real jim kirk is dead. just for you're information. You might want to tell that to the "priceline negotiator". (hint, it's the same guy)
He's dead there too, as of the last commercial.
Or to put it another way...
You're dead Jim... again.
When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |
Xolve
The Suicide Kings
Test Alliance Please Ignore
944
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:05:00 -
[72] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:FYI you're a pubbie too, as you're not a member of Goonswarm - being their little pet doesn't really count, I'm afraid.
Confirming the Goon community only exists in EvE: Online, and nowhere else. We are absolutely not a externally based community on pay-to-play forums. Way to look informative though, :GoonHate:.
:HappySun:
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Red Teufel
Blackened Skies
THE UNTHINKABLES
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:17:00 -
[73] - Quote
hrmm ever since my sec status went down the drain, I've felt like all of eve has been at war with me and i like it. |
Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
111
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:22:00 -
[74] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Velicitia wrote:CATPAIN KIRK wrote:i think the real jim kirk is dead. just for you're information. You might want to tell that to the "priceline negotiator". (hint, it's the same guy) He's dead there too, as of the last commercial. Or to put it another way... You're dead Jim... again.
Priceline negotiator is yes, Shatner is doing fine. |
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:42:00 -
[75] - Quote
CCP Tuxford, you are my hero! :swoon: |
CATPAIN KIRK
State War Academy
Caldari State
58
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
TheBreadMuncher wrote:
Seriously though - "Cat pain" Kirk?
AWW - FECK! I just notcied! |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
278
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:50:00 -
[77] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken.
I so wish this.
this is a signature |
Evei Shard
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:02:00 -
[78] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken.
This would be great if it was based on tax rates.
20% tax rate, enjoy your eve.
10% tax rate, lowsec and down you are red to everyone
5% tax rate, don't venture past 0.7
0% tax rate, red to everyone outside of 1.0 systems
(red as in wardec red).
Profit favors the prepared |
Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
111
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
This thread went from shock to super funny, to making me sad now. |
Velicitia
Open Designs
680
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:07:00 -
[80] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Priceline negotiator is yes, Shatner is doing fine.
born 1931 o_O
hard to believe the guy is 80, and still doing things... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:18:00 -
[81] - Quote
Chiggy W wrote:Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good. All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it. This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke. Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? 
Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?) |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:20:00 -
[82] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right.
lol ban OP for spreading riotous troll threads that next week get impletmented because they are a good idea |
Lexmana
Imperial Stout
232
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:20:00 -
[83] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Chiggy W wrote:Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good. All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it. This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke. Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)
Consensual wardecs is basically what we have today ... I expect it to change to the better.
|
Frontman 242
I Robot Me Tarzan
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:25:00 -
[84] - Quote
Xolve wrote:We are absolutely not a externally based community on pay-to-play forums.
U R funny. U dont get pay to play joke. Go home. UR master is calling you. |
THE L0CK
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:31:00 -
[85] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Chiggy W wrote:Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good. All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it. This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke. Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)
So lets say a smacktalking nub enters your mission or mining area, steals all your stuff and suicides your ship. Now lets say you have a good alliance and a lot of good pilots, how are you supposed to get your revenge if he doesn't accept the wardec.
Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration
Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
376
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 21:35:00 -
[86] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken.
...I want to believe
Want to go to war with everyone 
|
Aggressive Nutmeg
121
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 22:44:00 -
[87] - Quote
CATPAIN KIRK wrote:TheBreadMuncher wrote:
Seriously though - "Cat pain" Kirk?
AWW - FECK! I just notcied!
notcied?
Never make eye contact with someone while eating a banana. |
Xolve
The Suicide Kings
Test Alliance Please Ignore
945
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 22:54:00 -
[88] - Quote
Frontman 242 wrote:Xolve wrote:We are absolutely not a externally based community on pay-to-play forums. U R funny. U dont get pay to play joke. Go home. UR master is calling you.
You remind me of the Russian Tears some pubbie gave me Saturday after I smartbombed his Bestower/Pod and said:
"Me love animals ******* **** mother condom over"
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Sprite Can
77
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 22:59:00 -
[89] - Quote
Person A: I heard they're redoing the warden system
Person B: would be awesome of wardens had to be mutual
Person C: omg someone was talking about wardens requiring mutual agreement?
Person D: WAT!? *posts on forum*
Refreshing Lemon-Lime~ |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
278
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 23:14:00 -
[90] - Quote
Sprite Can wrote:Person A: I heard they're redoing the wardec system
Person B: would be awesome if wardecs had to be mutual
Person C: omg someone was talking about wardecs requiring mutual agreement?
Person D: WAT!? *posts on forum*
Ohnoes not the wardens systems, what will I do with my minmatar slavefarms now!!11!2
edit: Awww. That's rude, I had your post quoted before it was edited to correct spelling, and still it altered the quote to your edit.. not nice CCP not nice!
this is a signature |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |