| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Valentyn3
Deep Core Mining Inc.
67
   |
Posted - 2012.02.29 00:29:00 -
[151] - Quote
Anshio Tamark wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken. "Declare peace functionality may be broken"? You're not sure if you can declare peace or not? Good thing you're only testing it on SiSi at the moment. I sure would hate to see this game mechanic suddenly being activated on TQ.
Swing and a miss.
EVE why u no obey Newtonian Physics?
Sure wish I could fit med artillery on my frigate to. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg
I used to have an avatar background like you but then I took a 404 filenotfound in the knee. |
AureoBroker
Natural Inventions
Solyaris Chtonium
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 03:02:00 -
[152] - Quote
Really, for anyone who thinks war is consensual - study history.
If someone wants your loot, you don't politely decline a war. |
Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity
Exhale.
130
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 05:25:00 -
[153] - Quote
Posting in the best troll thread ive seen in a long time :) |
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
403
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 06:33:00 -
[154] - Quote
good tbh if true.
atm war decs are not workings as intended, they are just used to grief.
granted this measure is a little extreme, i think they should just multiply the wardec price by 10.
they could also do some elaborate system where the average security level of the corp being decced accounts for the war dec price.
I hope this isn't a lie, because if it isn't at least ccp is seeing that war decs atm need a change. |
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
403
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 06:35:00 -
[155] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken.
server will shutdown in 20 seconds. |
Bent Barrel
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 10:26:00 -
[156] - Quote
OP found out there is a "make mutual" option on the right click menu ? By the sound of it, he found the right click menu for the first time ... |
Plaude Pollard
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 10:43:00 -
[157] - Quote
Let's looks at real-life examples of how wars work. Did the Japanese ask the US if it was okay to attack one of the biggest naval bases in the US? Not as far as I know. Did the US ask the Japanese if it was okay to test a new Weapon of Mass Destruction over a Japanese town? Not as far as I know. Did the US ask if it was okay to invade Iraq? Not as far as I know. So do Capsuleers really need to ask "Can we kill your POS?" before doing it? The attacked ones can just take down their tower and store it in the station while the war is going on. And if they're miners, they probably won't notice it because chances are they're bots (though I know a few people who mine manually). |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
777
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 11:21:00 -
[158] - Quote
Moar woar
|
Keno Skir
91
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 11:32:00 -
[159] - Quote
0oO0oOoOo0o wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken. ??? This is crazy. Do you like to kill EVE ??? If the players liked a system like that, where they can be attacked by others without CONCORD interference, they'd live in lowsec or 0.0. Yet the vast majority of players lives in highsec, as proven by various QEN-Reports or a simple look on the map at any time. Means you are going to FORCE people into something that already exists but is not wanted. What do you think will happen with the amount of players online and the subscriptions ? It doesn't take a crystal ball to see that.
You tit, honestly you need several pinches of salt with that mate...
Anyway, wouldnt it solve the problem almost completely just to raise the cost of wardecs? 2mil is chicken change to any corp more than a month old. 10mil a week which doubles for each additional war (10-20-40-80-160mil a week for 5 concurrent wars) sounds more on target off the top of my head.
While most corps could still afford this if necessary, i think it would cut down on highsec griefers targeting newbie corps for next to no gain.
^ oppinion ;) ^
The Apostle : I want a kangeroo
Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians
Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US?
Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
Lane Shift
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:29:00 -
[160] - Quote
Chiggy W wrote:Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good. All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it. This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke. Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? 
Ohhh, noooo. That means you can't seek out easy indy and noob corps and wardec them. If you didn't "SUCK" so bad at pvp you could go to lowsec, nullsec, wormholes, or militia and find plenty.
But hi sec wars are only used by people that are to pathetic to find targets that can shoot back.
They want indy targets, that have little or no skill points in gunnery, and war ships.
You are the most pathetic individuals in this game. |
|
|
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
686
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:34:00 -
[161] - Quote
This thread delivers.
Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |
masternerdguy
Inner Shadow
NightSong Directorate
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:36:00 -
[162] - Quote
This is an outrage. ccp finally caved to peer pressure. |
Lane Shift
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:39:00 -
[163] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:This is an outrage. ccp finally caved to peer pressure.
awww, poor baby. Maybe you shouldn't suck so bad and go find someone that can shoot back.
But you do and I guess if you suck you suck. |
Serge Bastana
GWA Corp
270
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:54:00 -
[164] - Quote
Anshio Tamark wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken. "Declare peace functionality may be broken"? You're not sure if you can declare peace or not? Good thing you're only testing it on SiSi at the moment. I sure would hate to see this game mechanic suddenly being activated on TQ.
They just haven't bothered trying yet
WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |
Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
138
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:21:00 -
[165] - Quote
Lane Shift wrote:Chiggy W wrote:Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good. All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it. This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke. Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ohhh, noooo. That means you can't seek out easy indy and noob corps and wardec them. If you didn't "SUCK" so bad at pvp you could go to lowsec, nullsec, wormholes, or militia and find plenty. But hi sec wars are only used by people that are to pathetic to find targets that can shoot back. They want indy targets, that have little or no skill points in gunnery, and war ships. You are the most pathetic individuals in this game.
Not only did you necro a month old thread, you blatantly fell for the troll even though it was ousted very early on in the thread. -2 points for you sir. |
Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din
Fatal Ascension
179
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:22:00 -
[166] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Lane Shift wrote:Chiggy W wrote:Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good. All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it. This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke. Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ohhh, noooo. That means you can't seek out easy indy and noob corps and wardec them. If you didn't "SUCK" so bad at pvp you could go to lowsec, nullsec, wormholes, or militia and find plenty. But hi sec wars are only used by people that are to pathetic to find targets that can shoot back. They want indy targets, that have little or no skill points in gunnery, and war ships. You are the most pathetic individuals in this game. Not only did you necro a month old thread, you blatantly fell for the troll even though it was ousted very early on in the thread. -2 points for you sir.
Don't forget the deductions for style.
He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller.
-Darth Gustav's Axiom |
Khanh'rhh
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
894
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:35:00 -
[167] - Quote
Lane Shift wrote:But hi sec wars are only used by people that are to pathetic to find targets that can shoot back.
They want indy targets, that have little or no skill points in gunnery, and war ships
Yeah, you're not that bright are you.
Firstly, most highsec residents are mission runners / Incursion runners and have loads of SP in all the same skills you need to PVP. Train propulsion jamming and you're set :) Specifically Industrial specced characters are largely alts.
Also, your base assumption is wrong. Anyone wardeccing in highsec is looking for "warships" to shoot; because the pilots are usually terrible and its hilarious. Industrial characters usually never undock. Those that do are largely in the "my minerals are free if I mine them!" camp and deserve to be exploded.
It doesn't matter whether you think they are bad people are not, part of eve being a sandbox allows them the ability to do it. Adapt or die.
-
"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Khanh'rhh
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
894
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:38:00 -
[168] - Quote
Finally, are you SURE you want your argument to be "we're bad at the game, so please please be nice to us" ?
-
"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Avid Bumhumper
Furian Necromongers
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:41:00 -
[169] - Quote
CATPAIN KIRK wrote:baltec1 wrote:Good sir, you are no jim kirk and that sarcasm was bad  Huh? Does that mean you teling me I'm not jim kirk was bad sacrasm? igdi but no - i'm not realy jim kirk. i'm just a guy playing eve and named myself after him. i think the real jim kirk is dead. just for you're information.
No he's only dead in a few universes. You unfortunately, are alive and breeding in ours.... |
Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
178
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 19:05:00 -
[170] - Quote
Arguing with Tippia is the definition of futility. |
|
|
Tobiaz
Spacerats
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 19:30:00 -
[171] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:errm what?
What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right. YOU TELL'EM! In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace. also declare peace functionality may be broken.
We do not joke about something this important, mister! Internet spaceships are serious business!
Still I'd imagine it'd be awesome...
http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif
How about fixing image-linking on the forums, CCP? I want to see signatures! |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:21:00 -
[172] - Quote
Brotha Umad wrote:Yay ! Now I can recruit again for my empire corp, without bothering to teach newbs how to play pvp.
Thanks CCP !
Seriously, if it comes to this, just remove wardecs, they'll be useless. Alternatively, raise the price for a non-consensual war (the current prices date back to an era when isk were flowing less). And make consensual wars free...
By the current rules war decks in hi sec are already useless |
Patient 2428190
DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School
122
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 21:10:00 -
[173] - Quote
Closer to being real than most people think.
Defender favored wardec mechanics inbound! |
Spy 21
Lonetrek Exploration and Salvage
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 22:00:00 -
[174] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:
You pay to get your CONCORD sticker you put on your bumper. It is worth a lot for some people. If you don't pay, gate/station guns will look the other way. I expect this to transfer to lowsec aswell.
Also, you can't .01 ISK CONCORD for them to abandon their customer. It is more like double or tripple the original offer.
Sort of like buyhing tickets to the Concord Annual Ball.
|
Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 23:27:00 -
[175] - Quote
Make carebears invulnerable
Swap playerbase for cashjuicy kiddies
Introduce NeX store advantages
Swap payment model to Pay To Win.
Make youtube video that slaps us all in the face for thinking we could beat Hilmar's Dream.
Profit. |
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P
C C P Alliance
1606
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:11:00 -
[176] - Quote
Those at Fanfest should attend the War Dec presentation and roundtable!
CCP Punkturis | EVE UI Developer | @katrinat |
|
Joyelle
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:25:00 -
[177] - Quote
can someone actually give us the details of the new mechanism instead of trolling the living day light out of our souls? |
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P
C C P Alliance
1606
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:27:00 -
[178] - Quote
it will be presented in the presentation at fanfest! I promise!
CCP Punkturis | EVE UI Developer | @katrinat |
|
Joyelle
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:45:00 -
[179] - Quote
so, I no get details until I either come to or watch the fanfest? Well, if that's the case, fanfest is just a few days away... also, help me get my 10bil from this fraud of a guy that took my isk and has refused to send me the character I paid for while you are at it.  |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
466
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:47:00 -
[180] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:it will be presented in the presentation at fanfest! I promise!
CCP should be banned from delivering news at Fanfest, Twitter, external media like TenTon etc. You should just stick to your loyal customerbase at EVE-O, and keep the rest for social interaction and interviews. It's quite damn offensive to hear about gamebreaking changes in external media before we can find them on these forums.
shiptoastin' liek a baws |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |