| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
   |
Posted - 2008.04.15 18:47:00 -
[1]
"Instead of hosing people in game for hard earned money every time a large transaction is made... "
Bought ISK is not 'hard earned'...
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 19:12:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Anaalys Fluuterby
I think someone has been pew-pewing too much and hasn't looked at the market or how things are made...
So, next time you wish to buy your T2 minnie ship and can't find any because the price of POS fuel went through the roof, don't whine on the forums. You DO realize that most of the T2 stuff you buy is built in HighSec using player-ran POSs, right? No Icefields == No Fuel, or very expensive fuel. Raise prices on things and it just makes it more likely that people will buy ISK to replace their losses.
I also think you need to train "Comprehension Of Actions" to at least level 3, so that you understand that along with taking the ill-gotten ISK they also hit the farming operations that GOT that ISK and that trail leads to other buyers.
Unless you already have "ISK Purchasing Power" to level 2 and have bought it yourself and don't want CCP to take yours, so you are instead recommending nerfing others in a plan which won't do anything...
Actally, if POS fuel became a lot more expensive and cut down on the POS spam, many 0.0 pilots would weep tears of joy.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 22:12:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Anaalys Fluuterby
Originally by: Malcanis
Actally, if POS fuel became a lot more expensive and cut down on the POS spam, many 0.0 pilots would weep tears of joy.
If POS fuel got more expensive those 0.0 pilots would be told to hit the ice belts and start Pew-Pewing ice.
Those tears would be of dismay 
Yeah, me and my 40k SP in Industry, great ice miner.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 22:34:00 -
[4]
Originally by: General Spaz
Actually I have spoken at length to people who have used macro's. You'd be surprised how simple it is to use and how complex the program is.
For the sake of science we tried every way imaginable to make his macro fail, but it was futile, the program is just too good.
The only thing that seems to work is Goon-style jihad, but then you have the chance of killing real people.
So far we have agreed on 3 things.
1. Stop macro's
2. Fix logoffski
3. Allow non-covops to be probed somehow that is fair for all parties.
In addition to that, hauler missions could be tweaked to become non-farmable, then only mission farmers would remain. And as far as I am concerned missions are enough work that even ISK sellers don't want to do it.
Doing the first three things would probably drive these people out of business by default.
I've done jobs that were worse than farming missions.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 23:30:00 -
[5]
Originally by: General Spaz
Edited by: General Spaz on 15/04/2008 23:17:50
Tell me about it. But i'll bet we both got alot more money then they are getting.
In absolute terms? Sure. In relative terms? Maybe not.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
| |
|