EVE Search - Ferox pvp?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Ferox pvp?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Aeryx	Posted - 2008.04.17 17:58:00 - [1] Hi: 2 light neutron blaster II(null), 5heavy missiles med: cap booster, x-large sheild booster, invuln field,em harnder, target painter/warp scram lows: co-processor, 2bcuII,dcII rig: anti thermal screen drones: 5 warrior II's pvp ferox not meant for solo. Just made it to supplement a gang in pvp. The blasters were a last minute thing just to pop drones that come after me and can be changed out for anything along with the target painter. Suggestions? For some reason I really like the ferox. Don't ask me why I just do.
Annowyn Boennerup Banden Boner Bandits	Posted - 2008.04.17 18:22:00 - [2] I have a mate that runs the 5 heavies in the highs. Rolls passive shield tank, though. Does rather well.
Lux Exterior Gallente Critical Analysis R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.04.17 18:25:00 - [3] You'll be fitting guns to a Drake next. That which does not kill us makes us stronger. Friedrich Nietzsche
Omarvelous Destry's Lounge XIII Legio	Posted - 2008.04.17 18:38:00 - [4] No offense but that is a terrible Ferox pvp fit. If you use heavies - stick with a Drake. If you use an x-large shield booster you will cap out. This is far better: 3x Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control Unit II 10MN MWD Scram Web Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II 6x Heavy Ion Blaster II (faction anti-matter/Null) Heavy/Heavy Assault Missile Launcher 5x ECM light drones, or warrior IIs 3x Core Defence Field Extender Rigs or Anti-EM, Anti-Thermal, Anti-Kinetic rigs. More than 2x the dps of your setup. Buffer tank is fairly decent, considering you have to fill for full tackle. __________________________________________________ Sup brosef! Destry's Lounge is looking for a few good drunks - contact me in game.
Garmon Minmatar Genos Occidere	Posted - 2008.04.17 18:57:00 - [5] Listen to Omav, and why the hell would you fit launchers to a ferox anyway? If you want to fit launchers ,get a drake
Trevor Warps	Posted - 2008.04.17 19:05:00 - [6] Rails.
Huggs Caldari Eternity INC. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2008.04.17 20:05:00 - [7] [Ferox, Huggs Close Support] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II x 3 Tracking Enhancer II Invulnerability Field II Sensor Booster II, Targeting Speed Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Tracking Computer II Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive 200mm Railgun II x 5 Heavy Missile Launcher II x 2 Warrior II x5 This is decent setup for gang support. Mix/match your lows and mids to suit your needs. ________________________________________________ If you're buyin'.. I'm flyin' and they're dyin' [email protected]
Raymond Sterns Utopian Research I.E.L. The ENTITY.	Posted - 2008.04.17 22:13:00 - [8] Originally by: Omarvelous No offense but that is a terrible Ferox pvp fit. If you use heavies - stick with a Drake. If you use an x-large shield booster you will cap out. This is far better: 3x Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control Unit II 10MN MWD Scram Web Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II 6x Heavy Ion Blaster II (faction anti-matter/Null) Heavy/Heavy Assault Missile Launcher 5x ECM light drones, or warrior IIs 3x Core Defence Field Extender Rigs or Anti-EM, Anti-Thermal, Anti-Kinetic rigs. More than 2x the dps of your setup. Buffer tank is fairly decent, considering you have to fill for full tackle. If you're able, maybe add a Smartbomb for pesky drones. I like Omar's setups.
Opertone Caldari Simtech Productions	Posted - 2008.04.17 22:16:00 - [9] depends on the role of the ship i would prefer smaller Medium size rail guns, smart bomb passive tank with a buffer some MAG stabs and some PDS and a set of ECM drones or other nasty EW drones i haven't flown a ferox seriously, but smart bomb ensures that you kill the drones better than with blasters i would not rather trust blasters because caldari are slow in general and have bonus to optimal range and not to damage
James Lyrus Lyrus Associates	Posted - 2008.04.17 22:57:00 - [10] Edited by: James Lyrus on 17/04/2008 22:58:28 Don't pvp fit a ferox with missiles. The Drake does that better. (Arguably it's just plain better anyway). 6x Ion Blasters 1x HAM 10mn MWD, web, point, 2x LSE 3x Magnetic field stabilisers, PDS II 3x Core defense field extenders. 48k effective hitpoints, and a 100dps of regen. 474dps with faction ammo. You're about cap stable too. Of course, the Brutix is _probably_ better at it - you can certainly gank a lot harder with the brutix. Edit: Quick runthrough of setups says that whilst you can do a better brutix gank fit, or tank fit, the ferox does come out slightly ahead when you want to do a bit of both - and the brutix needs cap injectors. -- Crane needs more grid 249km locking?
Bad Borris Dragons Of Redemption Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.04.17 23:01:00 - [11] Originally by: James Lyrus Edited by: James Lyrus on 17/04/2008 22:58:28 Don't pvp fit a ferox with missiles. The Drake does that better. (Arguably it's just plain better anyway). 6x Ion Blasters 1x HAM 10mn MWD, web, point, 2x LSE 3x Magnetic field stabilisers, PDS II 3x Core defense field extenders. 48k effective hitpoints, and a 100dps of regen. 474dps with faction ammo. You're about cap stable too. Of course, the Brutix is _probably_ better at it - you can certainly gank a lot harder with the brutix. Edit: Quick runthrough of setups says that whilst you can do a better brutix gank fit, or tank fit, the ferox does come out slightly ahead when you want to do a bit of both - and the brutix needs cap injectors. This is very nice imo, alot of bang for you're buck.
The Tzar	Posted - 2008.04.18 01:06:00 - [12] Edited by: The Tzar on 18/04/2008 01:08:38 Originally by: Bad Borris Originally by: James Lyrus Edited by: James Lyrus on 17/04/2008 22:58:28 Don't pvp fit a ferox with missiles. The Drake does that better. (Arguably it's just plain better anyway). 6x Ion Blasters 1x HAM 10mn MWD, web, point, 2x LSE 3x Magnetic field stabilisers, PDS II 3x Core defense field extenders. 48k effective hitpoints, and a 100dps of regen. 474dps with faction ammo. You're about cap stable too. Of course, the Brutix is _probably_ better at it - you can certainly gank a lot harder with the brutix. Edit: Quick runthrough of setups says that whilst you can do a better brutix gank fit, or tank fit, the ferox does come out slightly ahead when you want to do a bit of both - and the brutix needs cap injectors. This is very nice imo, alot of bang for you're buck. It's a nice fit for sure but best part of 100M on a ferox? Must be a cult thing... edit : The trouble is it needs those extender rigs to make it last long enought to get some damage down. As above, brutix can do it better with 'built in' damage mods and full tank if needed. __________________________________________ 'Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear intelligent until they speak' __________________________________________
James Lyrus Lyrus Associates	Posted - 2008.04.18 20:09:00 - [13] Originally by: The Tzar Edited by: The Tzar on 18/04/2008 01:08:38 Originally by: Bad Borris Originally by: James Lyrus Edited by: James Lyrus on 17/04/2008 22:58:28 Don't pvp fit a ferox with missiles. The Drake does that better. (Arguably it's just plain better anyway). 6x Ion Blasters 1x HAM 10mn MWD, web, point, 2x LSE 3x Magnetic field stabilisers, PDS II 3x Core defense field extenders. 48k effective hitpoints, and a 100dps of regen. 474dps with faction ammo. You're about cap stable too. Of course, the Brutix is _probably_ better at it - you can certainly gank a lot harder with the brutix. Edit: Quick runthrough of setups says that whilst you can do a better brutix gank fit, or tank fit, the ferox does come out slightly ahead when you want to do a bit of both - and the brutix needs cap injectors. This is very nice imo, alot of bang for you're buck. It's a nice fit for sure but best part of 100M on a ferox? Must be a cult thing... edit : The trouble is it needs those extender rigs to make it last long enought to get some damage down. As above, brutix can do it better with 'built in' damage mods and full tank if needed. You can use resistance rigs instead if you want. They're not quite as good, but they do the job. Or just not rig, or use t1 or whatever. I baseline on T2 + rigs, because that way I know anything less than T2 will fit, with good skills, and that ship'll perform marginally less well if the rigs are too expensive. There's only a _few_ situations where I consider the rigs to be 'mandatory' (and that's where the rigs make the difference between cap stable, and not, or 'can fit all this stuff' and not) -- Crane needs more grid 249km locking?
LordThyGod	Posted - 2008.04.19 06:53:00 - [14] [Ferox, New Setup 1 import 1] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Internal Force Field Array I Large Shield Booster II Shield Boost Amplifier II Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Medium Capacitor Booster II, Cap Booster 800 Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Small Nosferatu II Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Ancillary Current Router I Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I Warrior II x5 530 dps,380 dps tank, cap stable adds a good bit of punch to a gang

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.