Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
   |
Posted - 2008.04.29 13:01:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Cadde
Yes but i find it hard to believe they can find and proof on whether the user clicked yes or no on the question box in hand. The server only see what the client tells it and it most likely told the server that the repair drones where to repair the NPC.
So the problem lies in the client where it executed the drone command before the question. Like "Shoot first and ask questions later"
That's entirely possible actually, but I'd try anyway. The worst thing that could happen is that they say no.
Quote:
Just feels really stupid and I've read plenty of old and new threads on the subject and the smartest comment I've heard so far is... "If we are not supposed to escape Concord, then make it impossible to do so! I.e, turn off our ability to warp until we actually defeat them."
And if we aren't supposed to defeat concord then make them invulnerable.
As far as I know, there's no real way to "escape" CONCORD. They follow you through warp, and they won't let you dock once you've incurred their wrath. They also have anti-cloaking technology.
[quote[But then again, if that where to be the case...
If you commit a crime, why not simply destroy the offenders ship on the spot and leave the whole concord deal out of it.
As someone else has said, CONCORD provides consequences, not safety. If someone attacks you (assuming no war-dec, can flagging, etc), CONCORD will Arrive in 5-30 seconds and destroy their ship. This does not guarantee that your ship will survive in that time period, however. You are responsible for ensuring your survival until CONCORD arrives.
Quote:
"If you can escape Concord, then good for you but keep in mind that Concord will hunt you down for 20 minutes. And if you use this to GRIEF other players (As in the rules about GRIEFING) you WILL be banned!"
I don't think that the current system is broken, to be honest. Why go through the trouble of making it possible to escape CONCORD and then spend more GM time to monitor activity and enforce bans? It seems like an artificial solution to a non-existant problem.
----------------
Tarminic - 35 Million SP in Forum Warfare
Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.81 (Updated 4/8) |