EVE Search - MISSILE LAUNCHERS

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

MISSILE LAUNCHERS - SiSi client data

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Drew Solaert University of Caille Gallente Federation 70	Posted - 2012.03.03 23:09:00 - [31] - Quote God damn! well played CCP if this is for reals.
YuuKnow 147	Posted - 2012.03.04 03:11:00 - [32] - Quote I just hope the firing effects of all ammo (projectices, hybrid charges, and missiles) get an upgrade. Its the weakest part of the graphics IMHO. Kindof ironic to have such great ship/environment graphics coupled with crappy firing effects.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 3366	Posted - 2012.03.04 05:35:00 - [33] - Quote Next up damaged states and hits! Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops 5212	Posted - 2012.03.04 05:41:00 - [34] - Quote Nova Fox wrote: Next up damaged states and hits! GÇªsince v3 apparently supports decals and on-the-fly retexturing, it shouldn't be that far off (unless you want them to always match the damage with the actual hits). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants.
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp 1084	Posted - 2012.03.04 06:46:00 - [35] - Quote Opertone wrote: oh no! Missile ejection bays! Very cool! Missile launcher look like turrrets? Omg, facepalm. WHy dont' they look like mining laser instead? What did you expect they'd look like, port holes? When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point. Also, I can kill you with my brain.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 3366	Posted - 2012.03.04 08:14:00 - [36] - Quote Tippia wrote: Nova Fox wrote: Next up damaged states and hits! GÇªsince v3 apparently supports decals and on-the-fly retexturing, it shouldn't be that far off (unless you want them to always match the damage with the actual hits). Well animated particle junk flying off when strikes are made against the hull and acutal more holes and the sort but yeah just reskins in a damaged state. What you're talking about I think thats another 10 years down the road when they can get dots working right or other technolgies not yet available. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Valentyn3 Deep Core Mining Inc. 75	Posted - 2012.03.04 08:32:00 - [37] - Quote Ranger 1 wrote: ACESsiggy wrote: They look like turrets. WHy not just create bay like doors opening and closing for all ships that utilize missiles. It has been brought up before, but I would hazard a guess that it would involve more work to modify the model of the ship to accommodate a "bay" that opens as opposed to a turret that is simply added to existing hard points. It also is complicated by how to handle different numbers of missile launchers added, although they could simply make it a matter of "anything more than one missile launcher added gets the same bay graphic"... which would be a little under whelming. This is true. A lot of the missile boats would have bays deeper than their hardpoints would allow, leading to weird Tardis effects. EVE why u no obey Newtonian Physics? Sure wish I could fit med artillery on my frigate to. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops 5215	Posted - 2012.03.04 08:43:00 - [38] - Quote Nova Fox wrote: [Well animated particle junk flying off when strikes are made against the hull and acutal more holes and the sort but yeah just reskins in a damaged state. Come to think of it, the strike effects should probably be just that: effects from the strike, much like how we now have missile explosions and those weird shimmering effects from lasers and hybrids GÇö not something that's really tied to the ship model. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants.
Sirius Cassiopeiae Perkone Caldari State 85	Posted - 2012.03.04 16:19:00 - [39] - Quote Can't wait for more launcher models... :)
PotatoOverdose Royal Black Watch Highlanders Flatline. 42	Posted - 2012.03.04 16:58:00 - [40] - Quote Full of win.
Seleia O'Sinnor Drop of Honey 179	Posted - 2012.03.04 18:42:00 - [41] - Quote Crossing fingers to get new torpedo explosions! Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing.
TheBreadMuncher Boxxed Up Industries 28	Posted - 2012.03.04 18:43:00 - [42] - Quote Seleia O'Sinnor wrote: Crossing fingers to get new torpedo explosions! First of all we need the hybrid rebalance.
Sirius Cassiopeiae Perkone Caldari State 85	Posted - 2012.03.04 19:11:00 - [43] - Quote TheBreadMuncher wrote: Seleia O'Sinnor wrote: Crossing fingers to get new torpedo explosions! First of all we need the hybrid rebalance. Yea... put graphic designers on rebalancing hybrids. But please, first, sign here that you will not complain any more: _______________________________
Sirius Cassiopeiae Perkone Caldari State 85	Posted - 2012.03.04 19:13:00 - [44] - Quote Seleia O'Sinnor wrote: Crossing fingers to get new torpedo explosions! I am hoping that all explosions get new effects.
Mire Stoude Capital Industries Research And Development Fidelas Constans 2	Posted - 2012.03.04 20:50:00 - [45] - Quote Thomas Abernathy wrote: People really turn up their graphics and effects while fighting and zoom in on their ship? In what game does this happen? When not in huge fleets, you should be able to play Eve with full graphics and effects unless your computer is ... not good. Also, what is the purpose of spinning ships without full graphics on? I can't imagine an Eve without ship spinning. EDIT: Also, I look forward to the day of seeing dynamic missile launchers on my Drake/Gu.
Seleia O'Sinnor Drop of Honey 180	Posted - 2012.03.04 21:35:00 - [46] - Quote Or at least cramp up the transparency like with the SEBOs for the torp explosions. They look like super novae right now... Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing.
ChromeStriker The Riot Formation 68	Posted - 2012.03.05 11:08:00 - [47] - Quote Looking forward to new Stealth bombers :D - Nulla Curas
J3ssica Alba Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 121	Posted - 2012.03.05 11:23:00 - [48] - Quote ACESsiggy wrote: They look like turrets. WHy not just create bay like doors opening and closing for all ships that utilize missiles. http://steelnavy.com/images/Abbott/Burke%20Sept%2092%2001.jpg
JC Anderson Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group 197	Posted - 2012.03.05 12:28:00 - [49] - Quote Loaded up the one called Test Launcher, and Siege. Those two already have mesh animation data tied to them for active/inactive, deploy/pack, fire/reload.
Solstice Project I'm So Meta Even This Acronym 1399	Posted - 2012.03.05 12:38:00 - [50] - Quote J3ssica Alba wrote: ACESsiggy wrote: They look like turrets. WHy not just create bay like doors opening and closing for all ships that utilize missiles. http://steelnavy.com/images/Abbott/Burke%20Sept%2092%2001.jpg Maybe/probably because there's not enough room on a slot to make that work, or look good. Or: It's always possible to look at a ship and tell what weapons it has, which wouldn't quite work if there was just "a hole". I'm not into missiles, but i see that they are making different launchers, for different missile/rocket classes ... so they probably try to stay consistent. Besides ... it's cooler this way. :) Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire
JC Anderson Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group 197	Posted - 2012.03.05 12:41:00 - [51] - Quote I've always just assumed the missile launchers used some sort of advanced cloaking technology.
Lina Miaoke The Ostrogoths Curatores Veritatis Alliance 84	Posted - 2012.03.05 13:27:00 - [52] - Quote If missile come out from each missile launcher... I promise to attack multiple targets. This is gonna make HAM Tengu stupidly awesome!
Opertone Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 114	Posted - 2012.03.05 14:01:00 - [53] - Quote Ranger 1 wrote: Opertone wrote: oh no! Missile ejection bays! Very cool! Missile launcher look like turrrets? Omg, facepalm. WHy dont' they look like mining laser instead? What did you expect they'd look like, port holes? Port holes, fixed, solid ejection bays, no moving parts, just openning and closing. Manticore has beautiful launchers. This turret thing is rubish.
Ciar Meara Virtus Vindice 542	Posted - 2012.03.05 14:21:00 - [54] - Quote perhaps the bomb launcher will be a hatch of some kind. There was a statement/rumour going around that they where redoing stealth bombers. Something like the malleus would do nicely. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp 1086	Posted - 2012.03.05 14:30:00 - [55] - Quote Opertone wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: Opertone wrote: oh no! Missile ejection bays! Very cool! Missile launcher look like turrrets? Omg, facepalm. WHy dont' they look like mining laser instead? What did you expect they'd look like, port holes? Port holes, fixed, solid ejection bays, no moving parts, just openning and closing. Manticore has beautiful launchers. http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/graphics/ids/1024/1881.jpg This turret thing is rubish. A raised area on the hull might be fine for the Drake and Manticore (although the Manti only has two launchers showing), but doesn't work at all for the vast majority of ships that can optionally use launchers. Most of the more visually interesting SciFi shows show missile batteries/arrays, I have no problem with EVE becoming even better in this aspect. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point. Also, I can kill you with my brain.
Gordon Fell Acura Tech 5	Posted - 2012.03.05 14:55:00 - [56] - Quote Most hulls should be modified to aesthetically allow launcher hardpoints. E.g. a Drake warping has a smooth surface, but when it's ready to do it's business, the launchers will sort-of peek out (which also means an empty Drake probably has a few gaping holes in it). Manticore should have it's tacked on launchers removed, instead showing hardpoints. I do really feel sorry for whoever has the task of redoing missiles visually, and I'm guessing it could take quite a while for everything to be ready for missiles. Launcher models are just a tiny step in this process.
Elanor Vega Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic 126	Posted - 2012.03.06 16:25:00 - [57] - Quote So CCP... why are you guys so silent about this? :p
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp 1089	Posted - 2012.03.06 16:32:00 - [58] - Quote Elanor Vega wrote: So CCP... why are you guys so silent about this? :p I would imagine this will be one of those things officially revealed at Fanfest. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point. Also, I can kill you with my brain.
Anshio Tamark Avitus Lugus 113	Posted - 2012.03.06 17:37:00 - [59] - Quote Dirk Magnum wrote: HAVE MY GAY ABORTION. Finally we get missile launchers. And it was good. How will torp launchers scale with stealth bombers though, I wonder? They won't. That's how... I guess. Who cares, really?
Sirinda Offworld Miners and Fabricators Guild 34	Posted - 2012.03.06 17:53:00 - [60] - Quote Either they get another weapon with comparable stats to existing launchers, or the launchers get two distinct models, one of which would be designed to fit on bombers. Pick your poison. Also, just throwing this out here, current VLS as used on the Arleigh Burke class destroyers cannot be reloaded at sea. If they've been fired dry, the ship is pretty much toothless.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.