EVE Search - Goons lose the war, can we get a battle report please?

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Goons lose the war, can we get a battle report please?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ballistic CEO The Ballistic Corporation	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:02:00 - [1] After completely failing to kill BoB and now taking part in small skirmishes "for the lols" in Tri space and several other regions I was wondering if there is any offical word about the campaign from the Goon side? After watching the usual low quality smacktalk/attempted intellectual diatribe in several other active threads I figure someone at Goons must have a few words to say about their defeat? Hi sec research POS + Corp Auction
Mike Huckabee GoonFleet	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:06:00 - [2] You cannot win an offensive war.
Death Mate Death Mates	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:12:00 - [3] Edited by: Death Mate on 05/05/2008 15:12:42 Originally by: Mike Huckabee You cannot win an offensive war. A lot of significant medication in this response. »\(¦_o)/»
mynnna Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:13:00 - [4] We sure hold a lot of space for a defeated alliance.
Scatim Helicon GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:19:00 - [5] After much head scratching over the best way to achieve our goals of completely ruining EVE for everyone, we decided the best way would be to let one alliance (BoB) take over the whole of 0.0 so that Tranquility becomes a stagnant wasteland just like the Chinese server. -----------
Mike Huckabee GoonFleet	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:25:00 - [6] Originally by: Death Mate Edited by: Death Mate on 05/05/2008 15:12:42 Originally by: Mike Huckabee You cannot win an offensive war. A lot of significant medication in this response. >>> My post >>> > Your head <
Anton Marx Caldari Warhamsters Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:28:00 - [7] Originally by: Scatim Helicon After much head scratching over the best way to achieve our goals of completely ruining EVE for everyone, we decided the best way would be to let one alliance (BoB) take over the whole of 0.0 so that Tranquility becomes a stagnant wasteland just like the Chinese server. That's actually pretty neat :) [WAR.H] Anton Marx
Gontard Minmatar E-Truth	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:33:00 - [8] Originally by: mynnna We sure hold a lot of space for a defeated alliance. KOS had a lot of space too.
Mike Huckabee GoonFleet	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:34:00 - [9] Originally by: Gontard Originally by: mynnna We sure hold a lot of space for a defeated alliance. KOS had a lot of space too. BoB had a lot of space too until we took it from them.
Sentinel Eeex Caldari DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:36:00 - [10] Originally by: Ballistic CEO After completely failing to kill BoB and now taking part in small skirmishes "for the lols" in Tri space and several other regions I was wondering if there is any offical word about the campaign from the Goon side? After watching the usual low quality smacktalk/attempted intellectual diatribe in several other active threads I figure someone at Goons must have a few words to say about their defeat? You got it wrong. We won.
Chap Man Caldari Einherjar Rising Cry Havoc.	Posted - 2008.05.05 15:58:00 - [11] Edited by: Chap Man on 05/05/2008 15:59:08 I could be wrong but I believe Goon and Co. said they would defeat BoB and take Delve(remember the whole Dine in NOL thing?). Not judge the war on how much space they were able to take. What is the official stance on this?
Polinus Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:03:00 - [12] I coudl be wrong (but i am not) But molle said Bob would save Lotka Volterra and Destroy RA and Goons when THEY started the war. On current circunstances, if anyone lost the war, is bob.
Mr McDee Ancient Crew	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:08:00 - [13] 1. BoB is stronger than ever before steadily retaking their space. 2. Cryolition has crumbled, broke up, turned on each other and simply jerked off. So who has won the War?
Amuko Amarr Disturbance Inc.	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:09:00 - [14] Originally by: Chap Man Edited by: Chap Man on 05/05/2008 15:59:08 I could be wrong but I believe Goon and Co. said they would defeat BoB and take Delve(remember the whole Dine in NOL thing?). Not judge the war on how much space they were able to take. What is the official stance on this? I'm on neither side in the conflict and inactive atm so I couldn't care less, but BoB did say Goons would never be allowed to live in 0.0 space again, go figure. As far as I'm concerned it's a draw.
DREDD Caldari Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:09:00 - [15] Originally by: Chap Man Edited by: Chap Man on 05/05/2008 15:59:08 I could be wrong but I believe Goon and Co. said they would defeat BoB and take Delve(remember the whole Dine in NOL thing?). Not judge the war on how much space they were able to take. What is the official stance on this? BoB's a footnote now? Should I say more?
becherel	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:12:00 - [16] goons haven¦t lost yet... they had to go and scam a few people to finance the war before they continued..
Howling Jinn Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch.	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:15:00 - [17] Originally by: DREDD Originally by: Chap Man Edited by: Chap Man on 05/05/2008 15:59:08 I could be wrong but I believe Goon and Co. said they would defeat BoB and take Delve(remember the whole Dine in NOL thing?). Not judge the war on how much space they were able to take. What is the official stance on this? BoB's a footnote now? Should I say more? How long will it take BOB to clean out Fountain and then return focus on you, the pubbieswarm?
ChoppinBrocolli GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:20:00 - [18] Goonswarm Most of GoonswarmÆs initial focus came from where I wanted my own corp to go. The fundamental, founding philosophy of GF was to function from empire as a group of mercs for hire. With that goal as our aim, our early months/years were one resounding success after another. We found other pilots of similar desire and began to build something truly special. Then EVE evolved and, with the advent of cap ships (and talk of Tech 3 requiring 0.0 research) we gambled and placed a foothold in 0.0, as an opportunity had presented itself to do so without openly declaring hostilities with the intention of taking real estate from someone (which would make us look quite un-mercenary-like). That gamble turned out to have two major consequences (among other minor ones) û we, in no uncertain terms, dominated the arena of capital fleet combat for nearly a year, easily outstripping any other alliance sans the major powerhouses such as BoB / RA, etc... This sent us far ahead of the curve in 0.0 potency and in being able to control 0.0 real estate (whether that control was for ourselves or for a client). The other consequence was that it created a home that required regular maintenance and defense. The former is an advantage that is now long gone. The latter turns out to be relatively difficult to manage for a PvP alliance that prided itself on being small and almost exclusively invitation only. Either way, for quite some time, many of us were already struggling to see how we could continue to play the mercenary card in our current (now former) space. Alliances today with less than 1200-1500 members can't realistically hold their own space unless they team up with others, which was counter to GSs stance/style/decision etc to remain neutral/independent as possible. By way of GSÆs 'elite' mentality and our just plain small size, GS alone always lacked the manpower to do much on our own. This was our choice and it proved to be both a boon and a bane on many occasions. GSÆs specialty was always being the ætip of the spearÆ, such as we were last year in the war against D2. We were always a comparatively tiny alliance. The largest GS-only gang I have ever seen in over three years topped out at 108 pilots. Considering the impact weÆve had, I still find that rather amazing. The Coalition The Coalition was conceived with the best intentions for the alliance as a whole based upon the reading of the situation at the time. It was not the way I would have steered the alliance, but my path was considered to be growing stale by far too many. So we took a chance to go completely and violently æindependentÆ and everything that could go wrong did go wrong, including massive holes in both leadership and participation for a variety of reasons. I was not prepared, nor did I want, to spend several weeks / months leading yet another æcrusadeÆ of alliances. By a trick of fate and a case of bad timing, thatÆs exactly where I ended up again. I kept the alliance alive for the past few months mainly because I had hoped Dri Kulsane would be able to return and find a way to take it in the direction he originally intended. When that didnÆt happen, IÆm sure many saw the writing on the wall.
Fry Fortune Ultrapolite Socialites GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:20:00 - [19] Originally by: Howling Jinn Originally by: DREDD Originally by: Chap Man Edited by: Chap Man on 05/05/2008 15:59:08 I could be wrong but I believe Goon and Co. said they would defeat BoB and take Delve(remember the whole Dine in NOL thing?). Not judge the war on how much space they were able to take. What is the official stance on this? BoB's a footnote now? Should I say more? How long will it take BOB to clean out Fountain and then return focus on you, the pubbieswarm? yes let's just disband because we couldn't beat 12 titans and npc space. What do you suggest we do then=?
Mike Huckabee GoonFleet	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:25:00 - [20] Originally by: ChoppinBrocolli Goonswarm Most of GoonswarmÆs initial focus came from where I wanted my own corp to go. The fundamental, founding philosophy of GF was to function from empire as a group of mercs for hire. With that goal as our aim, our early months/years were one resounding success after another. We found other pilots of similar desire and began to build something truly special. Then EVE evolved and, with the advent of cap ships (and talk of Tech 3 requiring 0.0 research) we gambled and placed a foothold in 0.0, as an opportunity had presented itself to do so without openly declaring hostilities with the intention of taking real estate from someone (which would make us look quite un-mercenary-like). That gamble turned out to have two major consequences (among other minor ones) û we, in no uncertain terms, dominated the arena of capital fleet combat for nearly a year, easily outstripping any other alliance sans the major powerhouses such as BoB / RA, etc... This sent us far ahead of the curve in 0.0 potency and in being able to control 0.0 real estate (whether that control was for ourselves or for a client). The other consequence was that it created a home that required regular maintenance and defense. The former is an advantage that is now long gone. The latter turns out to be relatively difficult to manage for a PvP alliance that prided itself on being small and almost exclusively invitation only. Either way, for quite some time, many of us were already struggling to see how we could continue to play the mercenary card in our current (now former) space. Alliances today with less than 1200-1500 members can't realistically hold their own space unless they team up with others, which was counter to GSs stance/style/decision etc to remain neutral/independent as possible. By way of GSÆs 'elite' mentality and our just plain small size, GS alone always lacked the manpower to do much on our own. This was our choice and it proved to be both a boon and a bane on many occasions. GSÆs specialty was always being the ætip of the spearÆ, such as we were last year in the war against D2. We were always a comparatively tiny alliance. The largest GS-only gang I have ever seen in over three years topped out at 108 pilots. Considering the impact weÆve had, I still find that rather amazing. The Coalition The Coalition was conceived with the best intentions for the alliance as a whole based upon the reading of the situation at the time. It was not the way I would have steered the alliance, but my path was considered to be growing stale by far too many. So we took a chance to go completely and violently æindependentÆ and everything that could go wrong did go wrong, including massive holes in both leadership and participation for a variety of reasons. I was not prepared, nor did I want, to spend several weeks / months leading yet another æcrusadeÆ of alliances. By a trick of fate and a case of bad timing, thatÆs exactly where I ended up again. I kept the alliance alive for the past few months mainly because I had hoped Dri Kulsane would be able to return and find a way to take it in the direction he originally intended. When that didnÆt happen, IÆm sure many saw the writing on the wall. Let me perform oral sex on you by posting mad props.
Victor Vision Central Intelligence Service	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:25:00 - [21] The coalition always consisted of largely independent entities. These different entities in the coalition had different goals in the war. Some failed to reach their goals, some reached some goals and others reached all goals or even surpassed them. Besides, the war has not completely ended. It has turned from a hot war to a cold war. If neccessary, new coalitions can be formed and the hot war can be resumed. EVE War I-The Beginning - EVE History Wiki
RevrendStyx Dirty Deeds Corp. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:38:00 - [22] Originally by: ChoppinBrocolli Goonswarm Most of GoonswarmÆs initial focus came from where I wanted my own corp to go. The fundamental, founding philosophy of GF was to function from empire as a group of mercs for hire. With that goal as our aim, our early months/years were one resounding success after another. We found other pilots of similar desire and began to build something truly special. Then EVE evolved and, with the advent of cap ships (and talk of Tech 3 requiring 0.0 research) we gambled and placed a foothold in 0.0, as an opportunity had presented itself to do so without openly declaring hostilities with the intention of taking real estate from someone (which would make us look quite un-mercenary-like). That gamble turned out to have two major consequences (among other minor ones) û we, in no uncertain terms, dominated the arena of capital fleet combat for nearly a year, easily outstripping any other alliance sans the major powerhouses such as BoB / RA, etc... This sent us far ahead of the curve in 0.0 potency and in being able to control 0.0 real estate (whether that control was for ourselves or for a client). The other consequence was that it created a home that required regular maintenance and defense. The former is an advantage that is now long gone. The latter turns out to be relatively difficult to manage for a PvP alliance that prided itself on being small and almost exclusively invitation only. Either way, for quite some time, many of us were already struggling to see how we could continue to play the mercenary card in our current (now former) space. Alliances today with less than 1200-1500 members can't realistically hold their own space unless they team up with others, which was counter to GSs stance/style/decision etc to remain neutral/independent as possible. By way of GSÆs 'elite' mentality and our just plain small size, GS alone always lacked the manpower to do much on our own. This was our choice and it proved to be both a boon and a bane on many occasions. GSÆs specialty was always being the ætip of the spearÆ, such as we were last year in the war against D2. We were always a comparatively tiny alliance. The largest GS-only gang I have ever seen in over three years topped out at 108 pilots. Considering the impact weÆve had, I still find that rather amazing. The Coalition The Coalition was conceived with the best intentions for the alliance as a whole based upon the reading of the situation at the time. It was not the way I would have steered the alliance, but my path was considered to be growing stale by far too many. So we took a chance to go completely and violently æindependentÆ and everything that could go wrong did go wrong, including massive holes in both leadership and participation for a variety of reasons. I was not prepared, nor did I want, to spend several weeks / months leading yet another æcrusadeÆ of alliances. By a trick of fate and a case of bad timing, thatÆs exactly where I ended up again. I kept the alliance alive for the past few months mainly because I had hoped Dri Kulsane would be able to return and find a way to take it in the direction he originally intended. When that didnÆt happen, IÆm sure many saw the writing on the wall. Sounds just like MC's closing statment, Scamming threads too
Slickdrac Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:38:00 - [23] Well, if we are going win/lose based off of goals, neither BoB nor Goons won yet, since Goons goal was to wipe out BoB, and BoB's goal was to wipe out Goons. However, checks space held Goons seem to be winning. I suck at forums
Shinori GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:46:00 - [24] Many things were said by both groups, there are no goons, and nol dining, neither accomplished it. One thing is for sure, both of us have come out of this fight stronger. This is an official intermission. When bob invaded our space, we had reason to want to fight them, and when bob come back to that place, we will be ready once more with fresh new hate for them.
Itzena GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:53:00 - [25] Originally by: RevrendStyx Sounds just like MC's closing statment, Scamming threads too That's certainly a post right there that you made.
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.05.05 16:56:00 - [26] Originally by: Chap Man Edited by: Chap Man on 05/05/2008 15:59:08 I could be wrong but I believe Goon and Co. said they would defeat BoB and take Delve(remember the whole Dine in NOL thing?). Not judge the war on how much space they were able to take. What is the official stance on this? right, they went to go dine in N... lets go ride bicycles!
Doctor Oda Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.05.05 17:02:00 - [27] Originally by: Mike Huckabee You cannot win an offensive war. Please tell that to ASCN.
Niraco79 Gallente Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.05.05 17:02:00 - [28] Alts = cowards ...c/d??
Malachon Draco eXceed Inc. eXceed.	Posted - 2008.05.05 17:04:00 - [29] Originally by: Doctor Oda Originally by: Mike Huckabee You cannot win an offensive war. Please tell that to ASCN. You have an awful big mouth for someone who has been in BoB for all of 2 weeks.
Hrin Minmatar Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.05 17:07:00 - [30] How can there be a battle report when there are no goons?

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.