EVE Search - CSM candidates - QUICK REFERENCE CARDS

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

CSM candidates - QUICK REFERENCE CARDS

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Vio Geraci Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.07 09:10:00 - [31] [0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers [0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains
Blazing Fire Interstellar Operations Incorporated	Posted - 2008.05.07 09:43:00 - [32] Originally by: Vio Geraci [0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers [0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains I red most of them. What I expect from Akita is to put summarize that info in more easy to compare format. Blazing Fire CEO Interstellar Operations Incorporated Corp web site Recruitment Looking for PvPeers in 0.0 space Looking for Hulk and Mackinaw pilots. We pay for the Ore Services [Service] Killboard hosting [Service] Forum hosting [Service] Web site hosting [Service] Obelisk for rent [Service] Alliance Creation
Siigari Kitawa Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.05.07 09:45:00 - [33] I'm not a candidate but I think it'd be cool to let the forums know how I feel on certain issues as I would really like to run for this eventually, and now is the best time to generate a buzz. Things in red mean I am very adamant about it in one way or another, and will explain below. Name: David Pietz Country of Origin: United States, Oregon [9] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [0] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? [9] Rate your own forum reading presence [9] Rate your own forum posting presence [9] Rate your own ingame presence [9] Rate your own PvP activity level [7] Rate your own PvE activity level [8] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [3] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [0] Lowsec mining needs a boost [0] Highsec mining needs a boost [0] We need larger mining ships [0] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [0] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [0] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever) [8] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [3] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf [9] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [0] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [9] No insurance for CONCORD kills [9] No insurance for 0.0 kills [0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [0] No insurance for Battleships and above [3] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die [4] Moon mining needs a total revamp [0] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [0] Allow moon mining in highsec [1] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [0] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [9] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [0] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [1] Local should be replaced with constellation chat [0] Local should be replaced with region chat [0] Local must go away completely [0] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc) [6] Stealth bombers need a boost [9] Black ops need a boost [0] Marauders need a boost [0] HICtors need a nerf [0] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [0] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [0] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [9] Web drones need a boost [9] Painter drones need a boost [0] ECM drones need a nerf [0] ECMs need a nerf [0] RSDs need a nerf [0] Carriers need a nerf [0] Motherships need a nerf [0] Titans need a nerf [0] Focus fire needs a nerf [5] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [0] T1 rigs are too expensive [0] T2 rigs are too expensive [3] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression [0] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [0] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [9] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [9] More PVE content for small groups [9] More PVP content for small groups [9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [0] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [0] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [0] Remove all T2 BPOs [1] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs [9] RSDs need a BOOST
Siigari Kitawa Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.05.07 09:54:00 - [34] Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 07/05/2008 09:58:56 Okay now allow me to explain myself, again I have no campaign but I'd like to ring in on these issues. Capital ships should never ever be allowed to cyno INTO highsec. Capital ships by nature (every capital ship there is an ever will be) are restricted by ingame rules that CONCORD has placed into effect stating NO CYNOS IN HIGHSEC. EVER. Capitals are powerhouses that need to be left where there is risk. Lowsec mission running needs a boost because as it is right now the rewards are equal to rewards found in highsec. Lowsec = more risk, so it should include greater rewards. Note however then I put that highsec missions do not need to be located in lowsec only. This is because if you move them all to lowsec, people will start grinding the next best thing or finding a new way to make money. MOVING missions around is not the answer. Adding significant rewards to more dangerous ones is. BPCs are copies. You cannot research a copy because the person that sold it to you sold it "as-is" and you have to deal with it. If you could research copies then the price of a researched copy would have no value. I believe that we should have a way to allow the public to use our labs, however the location of the lab should be masked somehow. You must have scientific networking trained to 5 in order to see public labs (as a reward for training it to level 5, you are now allowed to see regional public AND regional corporation labs for rent.) Covert ops ships and normal ships alike have perfectly reasonable bonuses/penalties to their cloaks right now. I believe it should remain this way because changing how cloaks work will cause huge drawbacks to normal play where having cloaks can create a lot of entertaining situations such as ambushes, getting away from someone, etc. ECM drones are fine the way they are. If you don't like ECM drones jamming you, have your friend blow them up. EVE is a team game. If you are by yourself you do not have my pity. ECM modules do not need a nerf, as they work as they should on their specialized ships. RSDs most assuredly do not need a nerf. They are nerfed beyond good use right now, and their specialized ships have barely the bonuses to overcome their paltry abilities. RSDs however do need a BOOST. The fact that any module isn't all that great on non-specialized ships is fairly commonplace, however on specialized ships all RSDs receive is a simple bonus to strength. 5% per level. No cap reduction bonus, no additional strength bonus, just an extra 25% on a module that STACKS. Remote Sensor Dampeners are the only targeting-based electronic warfare module that has a stacking penalty (note I said targeting-based EW, target painters and tracking disruptors do not disrupt your ability to lock a target.) When I see people refusing nerfs, I often must point out that the opposite may be necessary. RSDs have that need.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.05.07 12:26:00 - [35] Originally by: Blazing Fire Originally by: Vio Geraci [0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers [0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains I red most of them. What I expect from Akita is to put summarize that info in more easy to compare format. I'd be happy if 1000 people that would have otherwise not bothered to even try to find out anything about the candidates would actually take a look at this. Worst case scenario, they still vote "abstain". What harm CAN it do ? As for the "amount of useful info"... yeah, sure, it might NOT be the "most useful thing one could possibly have". I don't see YOU TRYING to do anything better. So, again, at worst, this is a waste of 10-15 minutes of a candidate's time (as opposed to wasting hours on end trying to respond to the question of INDIVIDUAL people one at a time in various other threads), and getting some minor exposure to the public. If you decide to "not fill the quick reference card", good for you... I don't care. I OFFERED help. Wether you think it's worth taking or not is your problem. Waste of time ? Don't participate, YOUR loss. Or no loss, if you think nobody would read it. As for the "info summary"... so far we have 20 out of 64 (actually, a lot less since several have dropped out officially, and others didn't even bother posting much, if at all in here)... soon enough, there will be (hopefully) enough to warrant some form of summarisation that's easy to look at, "at a glance". I'll see what I can do then
steejans nix Amarr Crusader Enterprises Interstellar	Posted - 2008.05.07 12:51:00 - [36] Edited by: steejans nix on 07/05/2008 12:51:56 Found it most helped a lot personally and i'm not even good with numbers !! Shame Akita not run herself though as would be a good "all round" canditate, seems to be aware of all aspects of game. *edit speeling
Veryez	Posted - 2008.05.07 13:29:00 - [37] Originally by: Vio Geraci [0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers [0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains Rather foolish on your part, actually thank you Akita T for this poll. While I don't have to read every entry, I do read every entry for people whom I am thinking of voting for. I don't expect a candidate to agree with all my ideas, but I'd rather vote for one who isn't strongly opposed to them. Some have even surprised me with their opinions - which makes my decision even harder.
Eima Nalt	Posted - 2008.05.07 17:29:00 - [38] In game, I hear a lot about nano-f----try from vairous pilots in various alliances but I notice that almost all of the responding candidates disagree with either of the statements about nerfing speed tanking. Is this a serious disconnect between candidate views and subscriber concerns? Is democracy broken? Discuss.
Nickaelhoop Minmatar Coalition of Industrialists	Posted - 2008.05.07 21:19:00 - [39] Edited by: Nickaelhoop on 07/05/2008 21:22:03 Edited by: Nickaelhoop on 07/05/2008 21:21:42 CANDIDATE NAME : Nicholas White COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : Scotland - United Kingdom [6] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [5] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? [7] Rate your own forum reading presence [5] Rate your own forum posting presence [8] Rate your own ingame presence [6] Rate your own PvP activity level [8] Rate your own PvE activity level [9] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [0] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [8] Lowsec mining needs a boost [4] Highsec mining needs a boost [7] We need larger mining ships [7] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [7] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [5] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever) [8] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [4] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf [6] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [9] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [4] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [8] No insurance for CONCORD kills [5] No insurance for 0.0 kills [2] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [2] No insurance for Battleships and above [5] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die [7] Moon mining needs a total revamp [9] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [9] Allow moon mining in highsec [5] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [8] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [7] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [6] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [7] Local should be replaced with constellation chat [2] Local should be replaced with region chat [0] Local must go away completely [6] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc) [] Stealth bombers need a boost [5] Black ops need a boost [5] Marauders need a boost [3] HICtors need a nerf [8] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [7] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [1] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [2] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [2] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [2] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [2] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [4] Web drones need a boost [5] Painter drones need a boost [6] ECM drones need a nerf [2] ECMs need a nerf [5] RSDs need a nerf [2] Carriers need a nerf [2] Motherships need a nerf [1] Titans need a nerf [4] Focus fire needs a nerf [7] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [3] T1 rigs are too expensive [6] T2 rigs are too expensive [7] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [2] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [3] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [4] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [6] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [1] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [1] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [8] More PVE content for small groups [8] More PVP content for small groups [9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [8] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [9] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [3] Remove all T2 BPOs [7] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs My own thread has been updated to reflect this, please comment here: My Thread My Campaign Thread
Dierdra Vaal Caldari Eve University Ivy League	Posted - 2008.05.07 21:43:00 - [40] [7] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [0] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meeting ? - NOTE: it is only 1 meeting [8] Rate your own forum reading presence [3] Rate your own forum posting presence [7] Rate your own ingame presence [6] Rate your own PvP activity level [6] Rate your own PvE activity level [2] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [1] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [7] Lowsec mining needs a boost [0] Highsec mining needs a boost [4] We need larger mining ships [0] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [2] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [5] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever) [8] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [2] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf [7] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [4] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [9] No insurance for CONCORD kills [0] No insurance for 0.0 kills [0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [0] No insurance for Battleships and above [4] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die [5] Moon mining needs a total revamp [5] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [4] Allow moon mining in highsec [7] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [7] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [6] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [2] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [2] Local should be replaced with constellation chat [2] Local should be replaced with region chat [4] Local must go away completely [0] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc) [7] Stealth bombers need a boost [6] Black ops need a boost [6] Marauders need a boost [4] HICtors need a nerf [7] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [6] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [3] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [3] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [2] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [3] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [5] Web drones need a boost [5] Painter drones need a boost [4] ECM drones need a nerf [4] ECMs need a nerf [4] RSDs need a nerf [4] Carriers need a nerf [4] Motherships need a nerf [4] Titans need a nerf [4] Focus fire needs a nerf [3] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [3] T1 rigs are too expensive [7] T2 rigs are too expensive [6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [7] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [3] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [0] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [7] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [7] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [7] More PVE content for small groups [8] More PVP content for small groups [8] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [8] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [7] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [0] Remove all T2 BPOs [4] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs Recruitment Director :: EVE University DV for CSM
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.07 22:56:00 - [41] Originally by: Eima Nalt In game, I hear a lot about nano-f----try from vairous pilots in various alliances but I notice that almost all of the responding candidates disagree with either of the statements about nerfing speed tanking. Is this a serious disconnect between candidate views and subscriber concerns? Is democracy broken? Discuss. The issue is a very complex one. It may be that they do not think that fast ships specifically should be nerfed but that counters should be added or that a more neutral speed change should be implemented that keeps the value of the tank high, but reduces the ability to disengage. Vote Goumindong for CSM
Saloris Nighthawke Ryche's Aggressors Asylum	Posted - 2008.05.07 23:10:00 - [42] I just want to thank Akita T for doing this. I know the candidates don't HAVE to fill this out but I will say that I will certainly spend more time thinking about a candidate that does take the time to do this. That said it is a shame that CCP themselves did not provide a better platform for the candidates to let themselves and thier views known. Alas, as always, the players themselves step up and fill in the blanks left by CCP. so.... o7 Akita T - sig was here
Andargor theWise Collateral Damage Unlimited	Posted - 2008.05.08 00:12:00 - [43] Nice initiative, didn't know who to vote for. Here's my contribution, a scorecard to pick candidates. Self-explanatory, done really quickly, so no guarantee on accuracy, etc etc. Feel free to adjust and repost. - Stop the Feature Glut: Take the API to the Next Level
b0ksah Minmatar Nomads Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2008.05.08 09:22:00 - [44] Edited by: b0ksah on 08/05/2008 09:25:22 CANDIDATE NAME : Peter Juul Jensen COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : Denmark [7] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [2] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? [6] Rate your own forum reading presence [5] Rate your own forum posting presence [8] Rate your own ingame presence [7] Rate your own PvP activity level [4] Rate your own PvE activity level [4] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [12] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [6] Lowsec mining needs a boost [0] Highsec mining needs a boost [7] We need larger mining ships [4] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [0] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [4] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever) [9] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [0] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf [5] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [5] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [5] No insurance for CONCORD kills [0] No insurance for 0.0 kills [0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [0] No insurance for Battleships and above [3] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die [4] Moon mining needs a total revamp [7] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [0] Allow moon mining in highsec [9] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [6] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [4] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [2] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [0] Local should be replaced with constellation chat [0] Local should be replaced with region chat [0] Local must go away completely [8] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc) [4] Stealth bombers need a boost [5] Black ops need a boost [3] Marauders need a boost [2] HICtors need a nerf [9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [0] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [9] Web drones need a boost [6] Painter drones need a boost [2] ECM drones need a nerf [0] ECMs need a nerf [0] RSDs need a nerf [0] Carriers need a nerf [2] Motherships need a nerf [7] Titans need a nerf [0] Focus fire needs a nerf [9] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [3] T1 rigs are too expensive [7] T2 rigs are too expensive [6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [4] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [8] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [6] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [6] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [7] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [7] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [9] More PVE content for small groups [9] More PVP content for small groups [9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [9] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [8] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [0] Remove all T2 BPOs [7] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs [9] Add more ways to roleplay you charather !! The Chaplain sighs and smiles. "That would have to do." Vote For Me Because ... You Can !! -= Dumdidum =-
ork chief	Posted - 2008.05.08 11:20:00 - [45] CANDIDATE NAME : Kirill Koban COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : Ukraine [5] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [1] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? [5] Rate your own forum reading presence [2] Rate your own forum posting presence [7] Rate your own ingame presence [6] Rate your own PvP activity level [7] Rate your own PvE activity level [7] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [6] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [9] Lowsec mining needs a boost [0] Highsec mining needs a boost [7] We need larger mining ships [7] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [7] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [7] Jump freighters need a big boost boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots) [9] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [0] Highsec mission-running needs a boost [5] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [5] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [1] No insurance for CONCORD kills [0] No insurance for 0.0 kills [0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [0] No insurance for Battleships and above [7] Dysprosium situation is fine [2] Moon mining needs a total revamp [9] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [9] Allow moon mining in highsec [5] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [5] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [5] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [1] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [2] Local should be replaced with constellation [2] Local should be replaced with region [0] Local must go away completely [9] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalitiessee * for specifics [6] Stealth bombers need a boost [8] Black ops need a boost [2] Marauders need a boost [0] HICtors need a nerf [9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships * [9] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships * [6] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [6] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [5] Web drones need a boost [5] Painter drones need a boost [5] ECM drones need a nerf [5] ECMs need a nerf [0] RDSs need a nerf they need to be fixed [5] Carriers need a nerf [7] Motherships need a nerf [9] Titans need a nerf [0] Focus fire needs a nerf [9] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships kinda [4] T1 rigs are too expensive kinda [4] T2 rigs are too expensive [6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [5] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [4] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [0] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [0] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [7] More PVE content for small groups [9] More PVP content for small groups [9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [7] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [5] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [2] Remove all T2 BPOs [7] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs
Shatana Fulfairas Gallente Celestial Horizon Corp. Valainaloce	Posted - 2008.05.08 11:35:00 - [46] CANDIDATE NAME : <Leanna Jane Evelyn Fulford> COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <United Kingdom> [6] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [8] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? IMHO travel to iceland to meet with those who are trying to help the game is essential for all candidates on this [7] Rate your own forum reading presence [5] Rate your own forum posting presence [8] Rate your own ingame presence [5] Rate your own PvP activity level [7] Rate your own PvE activity level [9] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level As ive stated on my blog of this i have 1 pure pvp char and one pure industry char in game [3] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [8] Lowsec mining needs a boost [4] Highsec mining needs a boost [5] We need larger mining ships I belive we need a ship between the rorqual and the hulk atm as w jump staright from a hulk into a capital ship.. [8] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [4] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [6] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever) [5] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [5] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf [4] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [4] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [4] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [8] No insurance for CONCORD kills I agree with this becaus [0] No insurance for 0.0 kills [3] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [5] No insurance for Battleships and above [3] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die [8] Moon mining needs a total revamp [7] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [3] Allow moon mining in highsec [8] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [3] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [3] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [6] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [4] Local should be replaced with constellation chat [4] Local should be replaced with region chat [4] Local must go away completely [3] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc) [5] Stealth bombers need a boost [5] Black ops need a boost [5] Marauders need a boost [4] HICtors need a nerf [3] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [3] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [5] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [6] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [4] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [4] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [4] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [3] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [7] Web drones need a boost [6] Painter drones need a boost [3] ECM drones need a nerf [3] ECMs need a nerf [] RSDs need a nerf [1] Carriers need a nerf [1] Motherships need a nerf [5] Titans need a nerf [4] Focus fire needs a nerf [6] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [6] T1 rigs are too expensive [8] T2 rigs are too expensive [5] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [2] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [2] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [1] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [6] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [7] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [5] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [5] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [7] More PVE content for small groups [7] More PVP content for small groups [4] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [6] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [9] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [1] Remove all T2 BPOs [7] Add ways to get new T2 BP Shatana Fulfairas Strength through Unity - Honour and Serve Candidate for CSM Shatana's Campaign Website
Andargor theWise Collateral Damage Unlimited	Posted - 2008.05.08 22:17:00 - [47] Originally by: Andargor theWise Nice initiative, didn't know who to vote for. Here's my contribution, a scorecard to pick candidates. Self-explanatory, done really quickly, so no guarantee on accuracy, etc etc. Feel free to adjust and repost. A little update. Put in weights and stuff, added the last candidates, corrected a smal calc error, and credited Akita . - CSM Candidate Picker
Max Torps Gallente eXceed Inc. eXceed.	Posted - 2008.05.08 22:22:00 - [48] Originally by: Andargor theWise A little update. Put in weights and stuff, added the last candidates, corrected a smal calc error, and credited Akita . Hi Not all candidates in the thread are on there I'm afraid. Vote for me!
Andargor theWise Collateral Damage Unlimited	Posted - 2008.05.08 22:37:00 - [49] Originally by: Max Torps Originally by: Andargor theWise A little update. Put in weights and stuff, added the last candidates, corrected a smal calc error, and credited Akita . Hi Not all candidates in the thread are on there I'm afraid. Sorry, I somehow missed you and Noghri. Fixed (edited your quote too with the new URL) - CSM Candidate Picker
Kayscha	Posted - 2008.05.08 23:36:00 - [50] I'm shocked at how many candidates strongly feel that older (solo player) characters such as myself ought to be kicked out of NPC corps into one man corps. Hey, what have I ever done to you? :O Besides the small problem that I wouldn't have any skills to manage my own corp, I'd very much hate what this does to my role-playing attempts as a long-time NPC corp member. If this is about griefers hiding in NPC corps whenever the turf gets hot, I suggest you'd better address NPC corps as a whole instead and add the following option for candidates: [9] restrict membership to NPC corps to players with a certain minimum standing towards corp and empire as well as a minimum sec rating and [9] let players/corps/alliances declare war on NPC corps - at the cost of becoming hostile to that corp's NPCs and stations as well, and likely to their closest friends too (say, that empire's other corps). oh, and why not [9] make all NPC corps joinable, coupled with certain requirements as well as specific advantages and drawbacks, and a meaningful way to interact with them. Don't forget, NPC corps are in the game, so it should follow that they have an actual role in the game as well.
Inanna Zuni Minmatar The Causality Electus Matari	Posted - 2008.05.09 09:14:00 - [51] CANDIDATE NAME : Alison Wheeler COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : London, England, UK ]First up, a comment that this, like all box-tick and assign-a-value surveys without open answers can give misleading results because of the different standpoints of the person asking the questions, the one answering, and the readers. Make your own conclusions or, even better, read my positions on many of these elsewhere. As regards nerfs and boosts for individual ships, that is something that pilots will always be arguing about and, like many of the other issues raised by these questions, isn't something for the Council to decide themselves but for each of the members of the CSM to canvas opinion from the wider number of EVE pilots, miners, industrialists, pirates and traders. I concur that a number of the newer ship types need tweaking though. I have published opinions on many of these already and those discussions are more useful to pilots making their voting decision than a list of numbers. Q&A threads are the way to go imho. As regards forum presences, etc. I read as many different threads as I can, but I'm not into AOL posting; if I have something useful to add that hasn't already been said by many others I will comment, not otherwise. IZ
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.09 10:05:00 - [52] Originally by: Kayscha I'm shocked at how many candidates strongly feel that older (solo player) characters such as myself ought to be kicked out of NPC corps into one man corps. Hey, what have I ever done to you? :O Besides the small problem that I wouldn't have any skills to manage my own corp, I'd very much hate what this does to my role-playing attempts as a long-time NPC corp member. If this is about griefers hiding in NPC corps whenever the turf gets hot, I suggest you'd better address NPC corps as a whole instead and add the following option for candidates: [9] restrict membership to NPC corps to players with a certain minimum standing towards corp and empire as well as a minimum sec rating and [9] let players/corps/alliances declare war on NPC corps - at the cost of becoming hostile to that corp's NPCs and stations as well, and likely to their closest friends too (say, that empire's other corps). oh, and why not [9] make all NPC corps joinable, coupled with certain requirements as well as specific advantages and drawbacks, and a meaningful way to interact with them. Don't forget, NPC corps are in the game, so it should follow that they have an actual role in the game as well. Why i do not really support kicking these players out it would take all of 10 minutes and 20,000 isk to train up Corporation Management 1 for an older player. I started out with 5 charisma and it would take me 10 minutes, 17 seconds with no implant in. Managing a corp is essentially free. Vote Goumindong for CSM
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.05.09 19:29:00 - [53] Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52 CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page> COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page> <snip> Version : 1.2[/yellow] No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion. You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you! - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.09 19:35:00 - [54] Originally by: Xaen Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52 CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page> COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page> <snip> Version : 1.2[/yellow] No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion. You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you! its in my manifesto :( Vote Goumindong for CSM
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.05.09 19:46:00 - [55] Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Xaen Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52 CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page> COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page> <snip> Version : 1.2[/yellow] No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion. You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you! its in my manifesto :( But you didn't feel it was important enough to add. Also we disagree strongly here: [9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships * [9] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships * [9] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalitiessee * for specifics And I won't elaborate here because this isn't the thread to discuss it in. - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.09 20:05:00 - [56] Edited by: Goumindong on 09/05/2008 20:05:23 Go ahead and ask in my thread, I'd be happy to explain. ED: Also, i think i am out of space on my post to add more Vote Goumindong for CSM
Grey Shadow	Posted - 2008.05.09 20:15:00 - [57] Edited by: Grey Shadow on 09/05/2008 20:15:25 CANDIDATE NAME : Andy Ody COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : UK (Scotland) Version : 1.2 [4] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [0] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? [7] Rate your own forum reading presence [4] Rate your own forum posting presence [7] Rate your own ingame presence [5] Rate your own PvP activity level [4] Rate your own PvE activity level [3] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [2] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [8] Lowsec mining needs a boost [3] Highsec mining needs a boost [7] We need larger mining ships [3] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [2] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [6] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever) [7] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [3] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf [5] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders [4] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [4] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [9] No insurance for CONCORD kills [0] No insurance for 0.0 kills [2] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [1] No insurance for Battleships and above [4] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die [6] Moon mining needs a total revamp [6] Allow moon mining in 0.4 [4] Allow moon mining in highsec [7] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [2] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [6] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [4] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [8] Local should be replaced with constellation chat [8] Local should be replaced with region chat [9] Local must go away completely [1] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc) [7] Stealth bombers need a boost [7] Black ops need a boost [8] Marauders need a boost [4] HICtors need a nerf [4] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [2] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed) [4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower) [3] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [3] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [2] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [2] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [6] Web drones need a boost [7] Painter drones need a boost [4] ECM drones need a nerf [3] ECMs need a nerf [4] RSDs need a nerf [5] Carriers need a nerf [5] Motherships need a nerf [5] Titans need a nerf [3] Focus fire needs a nerf [7] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [4] T1 rigs are too expensive [3] T2 rigs are too expensive [6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [4] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [3] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [7] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [5] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [7] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [4] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [5] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends [6] More PVE content for small groups [5] More PVP content for small groups [7] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps [8] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws [7] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface [4] Remove all T2 BPOs [6] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs Andy
SencneS Amarr Rebellion Against big Irreversible Dinks	Posted - 2008.05.09 21:56:00 - [58] Did all the Candidates actually read the scale correctly? 0 = completely disagree 9 = completely agree Now re-read these two statements carefully... [ ] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [ ] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression If you said a high number for both, you are saying - I think salvaging a wreak is aggression but looting it is OK. I'm actually kind of concerned that something like this can be so easily overlooked by some candidates, Although I am also assuming they actually meant to say 9/0 instead. Here is a tip for the rest of the candidates. [9] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression Means you want to be able to kill anyone even looking at the wreak. [0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression Means you want to salvage and loot, free of risk. [0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression Mean you want it the way it currently. [9] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression Mean you want it the exact opposite from what it is now, Salvage is aggression, but looting is not. Amarr for Life
Siigari Kitawa Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.05.10 03:09:00 - [59] Originally by: SencneS [0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression [9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression Means you want to salvage and loot, free of risk. WRECKS, not cans. If you loot somebody's can yeah, you're open game. But when you think about it, looting somebody's wreck is what causes half of highsec mission runner grief anyway. Additionally, if they don't loot and leave it's public. Wrecks are not cargo containers.
Ki An Gallente Filiolus Of Bellum	Posted - 2008.05.10 09:14:00 - [60] Read this thread after I voted. Seems I chose the right candidate even without this info. Nevertheless, good initiative. Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.