| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 13:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
...when they released the Tier 3 battlecruisers.
Back when you had something shiny tackled, "I HAVE A CHIMERA TACKLED, NEED DPS" everyone hopping in there Machariels, Vindicators and gank bs alike.
When CCP released these Tier 3's did they even think about the impact it would have any battleship usage. Yes battleships are still used in big gangs like baddons and arty maels.
Now there is even less reason to fly battleships in smaller gangs for a few reasons, why would you fly slow and armor tanked bs with guardians...when you can roam in Tier 3's with scimis.
Tier 3's are faster They hit harder FOR SOME REASON The talos tracks like a zealot WTF?
Those are the reasons to not fly a bs gang when if you can fly a bs with t2 guns, you can fly a Tier 3 with t2 guns.
So CCP seems to have never thought of Tier 3's just replacing battleships in the high DPS role.
They might not have the tank of a bs but why do you need 150k ehp when you are as mobile as any nano hac.
I really think the Tier 3's need another quick look at
Anyone who says otherwise is probably using them to a high degree or are just bitter.
I usually Adapt or Die but this just bugs me a little Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |

wallenbergaren
University of Caille Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 13:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
The roles of Battleships and t3 BCs don't overlap at all in my opinion. t3 BCs have no HP, you fly them very differently and in very different situations. If anything they've taken over the role of sniper HACs, not BSes. |

Daneel Trevize
The Scope Gallente Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 14:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
The point is, especially Gal BSs got shat on again as while they got a small buff to their speed & dps, they now have to live in a world with matching dps ships that they have no hope of catching, and that are perfect for adding to camps & sniper gangs, or just any blob. As gibbo said, why bring/roam in an armour/active tanked/non-nano BS when the tank just became relatively far weaker, while nothing else changed much. Speed & range tanking is already superior and scales with the opponents you face, so these tier3s get the best of both worlds. They obviously need to lose their speed. For those that say the Mega has the same tracking and more tackle than a Talos, the latter can navigate to mitigate transversal and evade tackle, the Mega just gets to start the locking cycle and pray things will get caught just at the right range.
The general creep up in everyone's buffer from cheap rigs still hasn't been addressed. And the stupid deadly speed reduction from expensive armour rigs compared to the minor sig bloom from cheap shield ones (on ships that are probably mwding anyway so sig's already terrible and what's a little more).
Tier3s are build admitting the speed & ranged dps world is best for reducing your risk and increasing you chance of killing. Instead of being designed to balance against this they just compound the issue. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
831
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 15:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Why do you even bring Gallente BS on the table for this discussion?
Some one will soon come and tell you that Dominix is THA master BS best all around etc and that you are a noob or a stupid guy that never understands whatsoever, that 2k+ Vindicaters all day long, Megathrons 1300dps all day long and etc and etc again.
Then you look at their KB's, then you look at Eve-kill stats and watch km's stream for 15min, and then you realize T3's were good as idea and also a game breaking machine on top of Canes and Drakes. So what? -there's nothing you can do or say that will bring some reason or change anything around anyway.
Look at hybrids fake rebalance and how every time they got 1pt up others got 2pts up. You're wasting your time. |

Fredfredbug4
Kings of Kill EVE Animal Control
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 15:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Battleships can get hit hard and Battleships can hit hard.
Tier 3 battlecruisers can only hit hard.
If you put a Talos against a Megathron the Mega is going to win. Why? Because the Megethron isn't going to be on fire a minute into the fight. |

Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 15:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
Fredfredbug4 wrote:Battleships can get hit hard and Battleships can hit hard.
Tier 3 battlecruisers can only hit hard.
If you put a Talos against a Megathron the Mega is going to win. Why? Because the Megethron isn't going to be on fire a minute into the fight.
I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot.
Also no offense but Ship A vs Ship B is an argument that will never be won in eve because the situation will never be as it was anticipated. By that logic a 400dps DD with 5k ehp will kill a 180dps jag with 6.5k ehp. Which can and cant happen.
Obviously a bs can be hit hard and a tier 3 cant but the problem exists with the fact...unless you are fighting a gang with tier 3's or scorch baddons/barrage tempest/mael then a tier 3 gang will slaughter a bs gang every single time as long as they can supply long point, which isent hard when every nano gang is running around with loki links and a 100km point arazu and 95km web huggin.
I really do feel as if Tier 3's have took over the role of DPS "in a hurry" and are starting to take over the mass amount of drakes about...have you seen how ******* fast a bunch of tier 3's melt a 80k ehp drake. The drake used to be the only bc in the game that was capable of doing the same dps from 70km as it did @ 5km and with its massive tank it became the mainstream of any gang, hell we used to roam in 6-7 drake gangs with a scimi and long point arazu and slaughtered 50man gangs...now its happening with the tier 3's, except with more dps and speed...
Hell we have engaged active tanked mega's/maelstroms that popped so fast its as if they had no mods fitted at all. Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
184
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 16:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
"I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot."
you're stupid... no bs sized weapon has as good tracking as a crusier sized weapon due to the fact of sig resolution...
try again...
|

Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 16:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:"I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot."
you're stupid... no bs sized weapon has as good tracking as a crusier sized weapon due to the fact of sig resolution...
try again...
lol eh yeah your stupid...for a start "SIGNATURE RESOLUTION" is not even a thing in the game. Its Signature Radius and a guns signature radius has NOTHING to do with it stracking.
Try again, dipshit
Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
601
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 17:04:00 -
[9] - Quote
What bothers me the most is the fact how damn slow most battleships are. Even faction and pirate ones are utterly clumsy. Mach and Vindi are set apart, but the rest are extremely immobile. Bhaalgorn and Nightmare almost make me want to eject and push them ahead manually. Haven't tried the Snake and don't remember the numbers, but I'm pretty sure it's more or less the same in this regard.
Why should a pirate or a faction ship capitalize on extra tank rather than extra mobility - that's something I'll never get. Give 'em a bit of both! Fon Revedhort for CSM 7 |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
97
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 17:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:Fredfredbug4 wrote:Battleships can get hit hard and Battleships can hit hard.
Tier 3 battlecruisers can only hit hard.
If you put a Talos against a Megathron the Mega is going to win. Why? Because the Megethron isn't going to be on fire a minute into the fight. I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot. Also no offense but Ship A vs Ship B is an argument that will never be won in eve because the situation will never be as it was anticipated. By that logic a 400dps DD with 5k ehp will kill a 180dps jag with 6.5k ehp. Which can and cant happen. Obviously a bs can be hit hard and a tier 3 cant but the problem exists with the fact...unless you are fighting a gang with tier 3's or scorch baddons/barrage tempest/mael then a tier 3 gang will slaughter a bs gang every single time as long as they can supply long point, which isent hard when every nano gang is running around with loki links and a 100km point arazu and 95km web huggin. .
Well, to be fair when was the last time you saw a mega fleet? I mean over 5 ships?
tier 3s vs battleships have issues for the most part unless the battleship FC is completely incompetent, or its a kitchen sink fleet. I haven't gunned BS vice tier 3s, but I've flown logi with the BS's outnumbered in geddons and we uttlerly wrecked the oracles that came against us.
They could speed tank the guns somewhat, they had no answer to 600 bouncers.
|

Templar Dane
Amarrian Retribution
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 18:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:MeBiatch wrote:"I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot."
you're stupid... no bs sized weapon has as good tracking as a crusier sized weapon due to the fact of sig resolution...
try again...
lol eh yeah your stupid...for a start "SIGNATURE RESOLUTION" is not even a thing in the game. Its Signature Radius and a guns signature radius has NOTHING to do with it stracking. Try again, dipshit
Actually, there is signature resolution. Check any gun.
A gun with 400m sig res has to track 10x faster to hit the same target as a 40m sig res gun.
Try taking off the monocle, it reduces user IQ by 80.
|

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Nulli Secunda
333
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 18:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:lol eh yeah your stupid...for a start "SIGNATURE RESOLUTION" is not even a thing in the game. Its Signature Radius and a guns signature radius has NOTHING to do with it stracking.
Try again, dipshit
there is a signature resolution for turrets, 400m for large, 125m for medium, i can't recall off the top of my head what small was.
although I do agree that in practice the blaster talos tracks just fine, since it's the best tracking close range turrets on a ship with a tracking bonus and for whatever reason you chose to compare it to the worst tracking close range turret with no tracking bonus (the zealot).
also: i agree that there are very limited reasons to use a BS in small gangs currently, but im not sure that is necessarily undesirable. at least hte metagame shakeup is pretty interesting and everyone is still at a point where they don't know what will happen in a lot of these situations. |

Cambarus
Baros Reloaded
126
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 18:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
Templar Dane wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:MeBiatch wrote:"I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot."
you're stupid... no bs sized weapon has as good tracking as a crusier sized weapon due to the fact of sig resolution...
try again...
lol eh yeah your stupid...for a start "SIGNATURE RESOLUTION" is not even a thing in the game. Its Signature Radius and a guns signature radius has NOTHING to do with it stracking. Try again, dipshit Actually, there is signature resolution. Check any gun. A gun with 400m sig res has to track 10x faster to hit the same target as a 40m sig res gun. Try taking off the monocle, it reduces user IQ by 80. I take offense to that monocle comment, many of us wearing monocles are well aware of the fact that signature resolution is a thing, as well as how it affects tracking.
That said, I am somewhat curious as to how the talos is so game breaking, when a mega gets nearly the same gun dps (with more drone dps) with the same guns while having the same bonuses. How exactly does the talos outrange the mega? Did they go and sneak a range bonus into it while I wasn't looking? |

Kessiaan
Greater Order Of Destruction Happy Endings
95
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 18:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tier 3s and BS don't overlap much, IMO.
Tier 3s are really good at pewing battlecruiser gangs, in 1v1s where gank >> tank, and on gate camps where someone else is handling tackle. They're also really good at any fight you would have won anyway in something else. Battleships are much better in any engagement where you have to stand and fight - don't forget battleships generally have higher resists as well (since they can devote more slots and grid to tank) which makes logis more effective in addition to the raw EHP increase.
I actually went back to 720 artycane as a roaming sniper. The loss of EFT DPS is more than made up for by its vastly superior tracking, especially when shooting at tackle and/or at fairly close range, not to mention its much stronger tank (esp. w/ scimi support), as well as more utility via a drone bay with ECMs and two neuts. My killboard - http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Kessiaan |

Kovorix
Matari Exodus
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 19:27:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:
That said, I am somewhat curious as to how the talos is so game breaking, when a mega gets nearly the same gun dps (with more drone dps) with the same guns while having the same bonuses. How exactly does the talos outrange the mega? Did they go and sneak a range bonus into it while I wasn't looking?
The standard shield Talos fit has 2x TE and 2x mag stab in the lows, giving it very good dps at very good range (better than the mega). You could technically shield tank a mega, but it's WAY easier to catch and hit, so the low EHP is crippling. And giving up 4x lows for damage mods on an armor tank results in basically the same problem.
Also, you guys are forgetting cost - tier 3 BCs are a much better value than tier 1 battleships and are at the same price point. The more expensive battleships make the problem worse. I'm not making a judgment here that T3 BCs are always better than battleships, but the fact that they are cheaper, do the same damage, and are actually more survivable makes them the clear choice for most pvp gangs out there.
We have gotten to a point in the game where survivability has VERY little to do with EHP and much more to do with speed and pilot skill. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
832
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 22:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot.
Wooosh !! STOOOOOOOOOP IT !!
Talos doesn't have range bonus or is there any hidden bonus we're not aware of?
Thing is that you're trying desperately to compare things that can't. Shield fit your mega and nano it, it will be faster +/- than your Talos, still have more dps and lot more tank/drone bay. And I guarantee you I can make mega have more dps at far distances you can do with your Talos. +1 gun will never be better than +1 or 2 dmg mods, never did and will never do.
It's just that you haven't realised yet battleships don't have to be brick tanked to be good and keep all their advantages compared with Tier3 BC's |

OfBalance
Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 23:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:Shield fit your mega and nano it, it will be faster +/- than your Talo
Even a plated/trimark Talos is faster than a shield mega, so you're way off there. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
832
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 23:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
OfBalance wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:Shield fit your mega and nano it, it will be faster +/- than your Talo Even a plated/trimark Talos is faster than a shield mega by more than 100ms and still has much better comparative agility, so you're way off there.
You're doing it wrong  |

OfBalance
Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 23:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:OfBalance wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:Shield fit your mega and nano it, it will be faster +/- than your Talo Even a plated/trimark Talos is faster than a shield mega by more than 100ms and still has much better comparative agility, so you're way off there. You're doing it wrong 
******* trolled again. 
I need my coffee. |

Shayla Sh'inlux
Aliastra Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 23:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:MeBiatch wrote:"I beg to differ, talos gets much more range than a mega and go do 800dps out to 45km with just about same tracking as a scorch zealot."
you're stupid... no bs sized weapon has as good tracking as a crusier sized weapon due to the fact of sig resolution...
try again...
lol eh yeah your stupid...for a start "SIGNATURE RESOLUTION" is not even a thing in the game. Its Signature Radius and a guns signature radius has NOTHING to do with it stracking. Try again, dipshit
Just popping to say that ending your post with "try again, dipship" when it's as clueless as this one made me all warm and fuzzy inside. |

DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
970
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 23:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:...when they released the Tier 3 battlecruisers.
Back when you had something shiny tackled, "I HAVE A CHIMERA TACKLED, NEED DPS" everyone hopping in there Machariels, Vindicators and gank bs alike.
When CCP released these Tier 3's did they even think about the impact it would have any battleship usage. Yes battleships are still used in big gangs like baddons and arty maels.
Now there is even less reason to fly battleships in smaller gangs for a few reasons, why would you fly slow and armor tanked bs with guardians...when you can roam in Tier 3's with scimis.
Tier 3's are faster They hit harder FOR SOME REASON The talos tracks like a zealot WTF?
Those are the reasons to not fly a bs gang when if you can fly a bs with t2 guns, you can fly a Tier 3 with t2 guns.
So CCP seems to have never thought of Tier 3's just replacing battleships in the high DPS role.
They might not have the tank of a bs but why do you need 150k ehp when you are as mobile as any nano hac.
I really think the Tier 3's need another quick look at
Anyone who says otherwise is probably using them to a high degree or are just bitter.
I usually Adapt or Die but this just bugs me a little I only quoted this because I like your avatar. |

Pulgy
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 03:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ti3s are paper thin. That is all. No range? No problem!Join the Church of the Holy BlasterGäó . A Hybrid religion. |

Adacia Calla
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 03:27:00 -
[23] - Quote
I bought a Tornado the other day to see what it flew like. It easily out runs frigs/dessies/cruisers with a couple expensive exceptions like Vagabonds, and Cynabals, which doesn't matter because you can pop them at 60km when they have a 1000m sig.
I kinda agree, despite that they're glass cannons, they really should be looked at :/ |

Yoma Karima
Kuloldas
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 03:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ironically ter3's are the only BCs in the game made the traditional way. Don't believe me look up WW1 Battle Cruisers British Royal Navy. they do their job and they do it well:p Those who wish to end War wish to end what it means to be human. Those who advocate War do not know its power. Yet Those who learn from War will be remembered for all time.
|

OfBalance
Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 03:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
Yoma Karima wrote:Ironically ter3's are the only BCs in the game made the traditional way. Don't believe me look up WW1 Battle Cruisers British Royal Navy. they do their job and they do it well:p
And that's highly important in this game of spaceships with submarine physics. |

Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 03:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Great. Now I've seen EVE ships and gameplay described in terms of tanks and WW1 naval ships. You guys do realize that this isn't supposed to model anything real, right?
The important part is that the game is balance, not that such and such ship works like a "Typhoon class submarine" while another serves as a "main battle tank." This is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT! Sig tanking is the new black |

OfBalance
Caldari State
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 04:02:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ahrieman wrote:Great. Now I've seen EVE ships and gameplay described in terms of tanks and WW1 naval ships. You guys do realize that this isn't supposed to model anything real, right?
The important part is that the game is balance, not that such and such ship works like a "Typhoon class submarine" while another serves as a "main battle tank." This is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!
The typhoon looks more like a submarine than most of our spaceships, I think you're on to something there. |

Ireland VonVicious
Gurista Saints Assassin Confederacy
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 04:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
I see the over powered aspect to Tier 3 bc's when comparing to battleships.
Why? because you are comparing them to eachother instead of targets.
If you are v.s. a gang of cruisers you want that BS! I'll take that domi at the same price as a tornado anyday in that situation.
If targets are other bc's and battleships then out run them and put the hurt on them the tier 3 bc is going to shine.
What these do is help weaker pilots in groups hold off higher sp pilots who are in small groups much better then they could before. That's pretty much what they do. A bit of extra dps as snipers. Noob corps just got sharper teeth! |

Dirk Magnum
Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
220
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 04:10:00 -
[29] - Quote
They do tier 3 BS damage at tier 1 BS price, with standard BC defenses or less. They're ships that can't decide if they're a BS or a HAC, but which overshadow both in certain areas (damage vs. cost, mainly.)
Personally, I'm loath to spend 100 mil on a glass cannon (which is what they end up costing with t2 fittings more or less.) IMO there are no flaws with the tier 3 BCs: 1. there is very little reason to choose a glass cannon HAC over one in gang combat, making HACs less relevant 2. they have a tracking bonus, meaning their effective DPS can easily exceed that of the gankiest standard battleships
They're a stark departure from CCP's trend of making new ships more and more specialized, and I'm not sure I like it. But on the other hand I don't have extremely strong feelings about it either. I'm more annoyed by the surging popularity of the alpha welpfleet, to which the Tornado is a major contributor. Even if we had a more dynamic combat system that rewarded individual tactics in the gang environment, engagements where every primary dies on the first volley get silly after awhile. "For example, if you are thinking about selling a Republic Fleet Firetail as a regular Firetail, be sure that the market volume is high on regular Firetails and that there are plenty of buy/sell contracts for Republic Fleet Firetails. [...] The players most interested in Republic Fleet Firetails are going to be players flying regular ones."-á -- PB |

Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 04:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
OfBalance wrote:Ahrieman wrote:Great. Now I've seen EVE ships and gameplay described in terms of tanks and WW1 naval ships. You guys do realize that this isn't supposed to model anything real, right?
The important part is that the game is balance, not that such and such ship works like a "Typhoon class submarine" while another serves as a "main battle tank." This is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT! The typhoon looks more like a submarine than most of our spaceships, I think you're on to something there.
This thread is now about submarines. SUBMARINES OR GTFO!
MOAR SUBMARINES!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTohYRUt_2c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7G0Ae4gQNQ&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrU0bYq7KPQ&feature=related Sig tanking is the new black |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |