|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
posteroid
im right your wrong
   |
Posted - 2008.05.09 17:38:00 -
[1]
Edited by: posteroid on 09/05/2008 17:39:14
Actually BE will not decloak if its obvious we will lose a ship/ships but the difference between that and only decloaking for a solo gank is considerably larger than with every other corp and alliance in eve due to the skill and team work of the pilots in BE.
The reason why this statement is true is because quite simply we are better than you and so we can engage much greater numbers than you could ever manage and we do so most of the time successfully.
Now the only thing that is stopping you from training up and learning in gang, in game skills to build skilled units in your corps and alliances is you. So suck it up stop making silly excuses and learn some pvp skills cos i can guarantee that the first time you wipe out a larger better equipped gang without taking a single loss you will consider it worth the time you spent training.
PS: I am posting with a alt cos my main is banned for posting pictures.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.09 17:46:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: USN CVN72
Ding Ding USN Arriving.
Let me say this one more time. Burn Eden is SO YESTERDAY NEWS!!!
Get over yourselves dudes. You are only posting about how SmashKill sucks because you are not getting the attention you so desire in Eve.
Why don't you post when you make a serious attempt to take over our space. Come back in 1 month when you actually take over BWF replace our tower's with your own and claim the station with the Burn Eden Flag.
Burn Eden is so YESTERDAY NEWS bring it or move on...
Oh by the way TRI is by far more superior then Burn Eden will ever be... RK/Smash enjoyed the pressure that TRI brought when they looked for targets in BWF. They had class and showed us many lessons on combat tactics and excitement. Burn Eden only managed to sit at gates and look for ganks. Nothing impressive at all just typical scavengers.
Ding Ding USN Departing.
Do you honestly think that we would ever consider getting involved in skilless laggy blob warfare when most of us joined BE cos we were sick of it in the first place???. We leave the blob wars to skilless muppets like you .
Fyi using the phrase "YESTERDAYS NEWS" a lot makes you look like a total tard. Just thought you should know .
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 12:21:00 -
[3]
Edited by: posteroid on 10/05/2008 12:22:33
It is quite interesting how a carebear with his feelings hurt cos of this thread and the recent BE campaign responds, i personally like the "irrelevant" and "modern game" comments as they have just the hint of anger and a obvious need to inflict retribution while dismissing the obvious injury the BE campaign and this thread has had on your ego's.
No small squad pvp corp or alliance has the ability to truly financially hurt a huge nap fest of alliances like RK/atlas and co (unless you catch a muppet moving said alliances BPO's or such), only another huge nap fest has the ability to do that by taking away their space, BE/TI and all of eve understand this. Now this has been true since the first multi thousand player alliance/nap was formed and has not changed in years so the comments like "modern game" and "remaining relevant" not only have no basis in fact but are also an amusing and unoriginal attempt to salvage a modicum of pride.
BE/TI is partly about causing ppl grief, making isk from loot but mostly about being successful at what we do, it is a gathering of like minded perfectionists who consider a loss of a ship in 0.0 unacceptable no matter the reason or odds. On a individual level we are highly successful at these goals and comments made by our victims claiming not to care about losses have been bandied about eve since the beginning of the game and will probably continue until the final hour of eves existence and give ppl plenty of lulz until then.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 13:39:00 -
[4]
WOW defensive much?? .
Originally by: Darineah Charach
Don't rat, mine or even NPC much so not much of a carebear personally. As for feelings hurt, nope not that either. Retribution? For what? You didn't kill me. Before you make the claim that you killed my alt...My sec status won't let me into Jita etc so i have an alt that does that for me. His names Romeril Tanassian, didn't kill him either. In fact, if you're so fond of KB proof, look me up on yours. See for yourself.
And yet you felt the need to post "WE dont care about those losses anyway" and "you do not matter to us or eve anymore" comments.
Originally by: Darineah Charach
Like i said there are organisations out there who operate on a relatively small scale and are still able to make larger forces stand up and take notice. BE just isn't one of them, hell if you can't even make SMASH care (aside from the rest) that's gotta be proof in itself doesn't it? My point was simply that bragging about how awesome you are when you don't even register with the majority of the alliances.. is kinda sad.
Id sure love to know who these other organization's are that run 5-10 man gangs and cause you huge nap fest boys such grief can you please reveal to us there names and tell us how they manage to hurt you so much with only 5 or so ppl.
And yes i can see 12 pages of smash and others telling us that they do not care about the losses over and over and over and over 12 full pages of "protesting too much me thinks".
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 14:02:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Darineah Charach
Can we leave out the 'over 12 full pages of "protesting too much me thinks".' argument? Cos it goes both ways, there's also 12 odd pages of BE and friends protesting about how awesome they are.
Thats because we are awesome and you guys are protesting way to much for ppl who do not care.
Originally by: Darineah Charach
Also, don't get pedantic in your arguments. Yes i said 'we' don't care. My response of 'you didn't kill me' was in reply to you talking about me specifically. I'm certain the guys who lost their ships were plenty annoyed. But the alliances as a whole...not so much.
A alliance is made up of individuals and not only that must have a level of pride not only on the whole but on a individual level as well and it is obviously smarting over the spanking we gave "you" (as in your alliance as a hole) or ppl not directly involved like yourself would not be posting such convoluted denials and veiled insults.
Originally by: Darineah Charach
My point is a simple one. I repeat, BE are extremely good at what they do but the days where their activities warrented a CAOD post and actually made a difference to the organisations they took on, are gone.
Aside from the occasional high value bpo gank BE have the same effect now as they always have and tbh the whiners and complainers like you who say we do not matter have always said the same thing every time a thread is posted with the standard "we still own our space", "those losses are nothing measured against our size" blah blah blah blah rinse and repeat.
PS: So your not gonna tell us the names of these uber organizations that rock your world with only 5 or so ships then?.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 14:55:00 -
[6]
Edited by: posteroid on 10/05/2008 15:00:19
Originally by: Darineah Charach
There aren't any, like i said they evolved. My point isn't that other people do what you do better, it's that other people HAVE in the past done what you do, but to stay relevant they adapted and grew.
They just lowered their standards and recruited enough ppl to be able to blob that as far as im concerned in devolving as any fights they get into or effect they have on others involves sheer numbers not skill.
Originally by: Darineah Charach
PL is a possible great example. To the best of my knowledge they don't involve themselves in 'blob' warfare but if they come into your space you better sit up and take notice. Prior to that, they operated on a much smaller scale.
While PL have some good pvpers id hardly call napping and jumping on the goon bandwaggon something to be proud of, but again the only reason you mention PL is due to sheer numbers and nothing else. All your comments are from seeing through the eyes of a blobber with no thought to actually having pride in individual and teamwork piloting skills.
Here is the truth bud, i like a lot of others in BE have been in huge napped up alliances and fought in massive fleet ops and even led and planned them on more occasions than i can easily count, and we finally got sick of it.
Now in our time in all those huge alliances if a group of 5-10 pilots had hung around our space at will popping well over 500 ships and over 700 if you include pods and losing hardly any we would have been royally miffed.
Now im sure ppl in our old alliances would have protested vehemently on these very forums that it was not a lot of isk in the grand scheme of things and that we still hold our space and made the exact same claims that you and every other alliance does when it gets owned in its own space. But the truth is that everybody including those who lost not a single ship to the invaders would be enormously annoyed at such a huge and embarrassing k/d ratio in our own space.
Now you can keep bleating on and claiming otherwise and even point out that isk wise we are not very important to the big picture, but the truth is we came into your home bent you over and then left with barely a scratch and that is a hit to anybody with a modicum of self respects ego deny it all you like.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 14:58:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Sevdah
Originally by: Shin Ra
...Guys, you are terrible - sort it out.
I think BE pilots should read The Daily Fix first before posting.
Why most ppl remember the goons propaganda: "We do not care about (insert things they sucked at)", although i had no idea RK had sunk so far tbh.....
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 16:26:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Darineah Charach
Actually the reason i mention PL is because they started out small and grew. NAPwagon or not they are a force to be reckoned with.
I could just have easily said OUTBREAK, or several others. All of whom are able to have an impact on 0.0 entities without resorting to the blob. But the argument is moot, you don't want that playstyle so ok.
If you'd like to continue the discussion i'm all for it, just point out to me how your efforts affect us in real terms and we'll go from there. I'm willing to concede that from your point of view the damage inflicted is severe, all i'm saying is you're using the wrong yardstick and if you really want to hurt a 0.0 alliance, you'll have to get out of the pipes.
Then again, maybe i should keep my mouth shut. BE with larger gangs roaming through valuable systems....probably shouldn't give you guys any ideas
PL are now a seen force to be reckoned with as far as 0.0 alliances are concerned because they recruited numbers and napped the biggest blobbers in eve (goons, razor....)
Outbreak flew a slightly similar way to BE (using ranged ships), apart from not using cloaks or ravens and the fact that they also napped up with a larger entity (the MC Tortuga thing) eventually as well although Ive heard they now have split away from that nap a bit but i am not 100% about that intel. So again it comes down to sheer numbers...
The yard stick we use is a our own and we measure ourselves and others by it but then who does not do the same thing?.
You measure a threat by how large a blob a alliance or nap can bring to take your space while we have utterly no interest in holding or taking space what so ever and personally if i was given some space id just sell it as maintaining it or defending it in blobby fights is my idea of a nightmare and not something i am even slightly interested in.
But like i said earlier as a former member and FC of a 0.0 space holding nap fest if 5 or so pilots came into my home and killed over 500 ships and 200+ pods financially id not give a toss, but as a point of personal pride and respect for my alliance and self respect for myself and my corp/alliance mates id be more than a little miffed and anybody who says they would not feel that way must either be lying or have no respect for themselves or their corp/alliance.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 17:29:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Darineah Charach
OK, you want to judge us by your standards and as you said everyone will. Then why flame and smack if we judge your effectiveness by ours? That goes both ways, and i don't condone (not that i have any control over it being just a pleb pilot) the smack from my side in here as well. The point still stands that if you want to maintain a presence in EvE you have to adapt with the game.
I see what you mean but the point we are trying to make is that we consider a great k/d ratio from gang pvp plus the loot that comes from it our goals but you seem to think we are in it to destroy your alliance or summat.
Imagine a target shooter he fires his gun and the guy he is competing with say "lol noob u missed my target " and the guy who shot says "nup nub i was shooting at the other target and i hit a bullseye tyvm stfu tard".
Anybody with half a braincell knows that 5-10 pilots (unless you decide to move your entire naps BPO collection through a gate we are camping) cannot take space or do any real significant damage to napped up alliances like RK/atlas and co but then we were not trying to we were aiming elsewhere and we nailed the bullseye (as usual).
So when we see claims of "you cannot really hurt us as a alliance" and "come and take our space if you think you hard enough" (my personal favorite) comments it *****s us up as we could not give a toss about your space just your loot and we got buckets full of it over our little 2 week stint.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 19:25:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Sevdah
Originally by: posteroid
...we were aiming elsewhere and we nailed the bullseye (as usual)
ROFL, yeah you were aiming for few easy ganks in BWF. And by now we all know that ganking noobs is BEs actual pvp skill level.
OUCH somebody is bitter did you forget to lube up before we reamed you or are you just jealous?.
|
|
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.11 02:05:00 -
[11]
Edited by: posteroid on 11/05/2008 02:13:36
Originally by: Tortenstecher
Dude, you couldn't do shiat to a bigger alliance, let alone hurt someones wallet from such an alliance or even "crush" anything bigger than a small noobish gang.
Who cares about your wallets its ours that get filled from ratting you morons in your own systems .
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.11 13:16:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Atsuko Ratu
So burn eden can cloak camp a few alliances who are busy fighting wars in other places.
Am impressed. I'd join you if I had the patience to sit cloaked off a gate for 2 weeks.
What makes you think we would take some noob who since 2006 has killed less ships than we normally do on a 2 week campaign let alone a month.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.12 10:52:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Kraven Dragonis
You had a good run and a lot of nice easy kill, really wished we could of PvP with you guys but every time we tried you ran or clocked up pity you donĘt like fair fights maybe next time you mite grow some nads but I doubt it.
Oooo bitter much???.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 11:49:00 -
[14]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 11:49:45
Originally by: Kera Delacour
As impressive as those stats look I have to say it's not exactly rocket science to rack up good stats gate camping in cloaking battleships fitted with damps in the mids. Anything that can remotely threaten you ya just warp off and cloak.
That said... that is a lot of kills. Smash should probably learn to communicate better so that so many easy ganks aren't attainable.
-----------
Ooo look a paper tiger, LOL you've gotta love the ppl who post things like that really.
Yes yes everybody knows Kera Delacour would win eve cos the eve fitting tool and her calculator say so..............................
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 13:27:00 -
[15]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 13:28:30
Originally by: Kera Delacour
But to come to forums and crow over high kill counts and low losses when all you do is gate camp and station camp and you use ship configurations specifically designed to allow you to safely run from any real fight is kind of silly.
Running from a "real fight"????.
Fights occur in eve really in only 3 places (apart from the occasional ganks in belts or probed out ships) 1. At a pos. 2. At a Station 3. At a gate. Now ganking a ship at a pos is possible but risky so most small gang fights happen at gates or stations, mostly gates. (yes there are exceptions but these are the most common).
The ship configurations not only allow BE to reposition (run away as you call it) but also to remove either high dps or other potential threats from causing them a problem thus allowing a limited number of pilots the ability to fight outnumbered without incurring losses (hopefully). The very fact that you consider sitting still and slugging away instead of repositioning your assets to reduce or stop losses altogether shows how poor your and others combat experience and teamwork within the gang really is.
A 8-10 vs 20- 40 fight may take BE 30 mins to an hour or even longer to win but we will do so without taking a loss a lot of the time. Now some ppl may call it running away or even cowardly for not sitting still (lol comments like this from those who brought 20-40 or more to fight 8 always makes me chuckle) but moving around the field and positioning assets is a basic part of combat most blobber 0.0 entities have forgotten or never learned as they rely totally on numbers.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 14:14:00 -
[16]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 14:14:44
Originally by: Kera Delacour
stuff
TBH you have no idea about BE although making claims of only gankers compared to ppl who hold space (only blobbers) is naive. Having a 8 - 10 man gang sitting in your space when your a 3000+ member alliance/nap and losing 500-100+ ships while only killing a few may not hurt the alliances wallet, it may not hurt the alliances space but self respect and pride are also a big factor and nobody can tell me that its not a issue.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 14:50:00 -
[17]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 14:54:58
Originally by: *****zilla
If it weren't for these cries for attention on the forums few would remember you. That is your legacy.
While your legacy is one of getting owned by 8 man gangs and telling everybody that you did not care (are you goon alts cos you sound just like them as they tend not to care about stuff they suck at or at least thats what they say).
Oh yea and you are members of a alliance that held some space...wow like thats hard i mean you had to click the accept alliance recruitment button and everything.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 17:54:00 -
[18]
Originally by: *****zilla
Actually I've fought in most of the conquests in Geminate. I've been involved in nearly every station that was taken for one side or the other. For the stations that we've put up I've donated time and isk when asked.
If you wish to smack talk, it helps to have some sort of basis.
Ive got a news flash for ya buddy, you remember telling us that the ships we killed and the isk lost by those individual players was utterly insignificant to your alliance because of its size.
Well i have no doubt that because of its size your self acclaimed contributions to your alliance are even less earth shattering in the big picture. I mean you were that one extra pilot in the 300 man blob that did blah blah well... whoopiee give the sheep a campaign medal and tell him to stfu.
Nothing is unusual about either of our situations bud the sheep always flock together in large groups and the wolves always trim the herd, then after the wolves have feasted they howl about it a bit, and the surviving sheep bleat about how they were not eaten and how lucky...erm uber that makes them.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 18:26:00 -
[19]
Originally by: *****zilla
Originally by: posteroid
your self acclaimed contributions to your alliance are even less earth shattering in the big picture.
I'm fine with this. I've participated for the benefit of the group and have had fun. If someone is acting solo and gets ganked I could care less about them.
Both of our organizations work the same in this manner. The difference is that it is easier to trim the fat with a small corp where everyone can be monitored.
Originally by: posteroid
...and the surviving sheep bleat about how they were not eaten and how lucky...erm uber that makes them.
Yet when we pop you all I've heard is whining that you shouldn't have died.
This is nothing but two hunters pulling down the weak from each others packs. A larger organization will obviously have more soft targets. This isn't unique. Nor is this special.
You do not have weak targets you are a weak target and while we may lose the occasional ship the fact is virtually all our losses come from being outnumbered, while our kills can be from solo kills or gangs that outnumber us.
Im looking forwards to the debut of our recordings on your TS cos your fc's did not sound like they did not care about the losses or the gangs they put together (and lots to us) were a lot more than just solo muppets. Il send you a copy.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:02:00 -
[20]
I do enjoy your self delusional spin and propaganda tbh,... if you do not lose as a gang or if a solo dude gets popped he is a muppet and a weak member of your alliance but if you actually have a plan and put together a fleet to implement it and fail you claim it was a leeroooy gang and you "didn't want those ships anyway".
|
|
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:17:00 -
[21]
Originally by: yunger
Eve is not about avoiding getting killed it¦s about killing stuff.
Bow your head and worship us then.
763 kills / 23 losses
Btw you cannot kill anything in a pod so avoiding getting popped is a good idea.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:21:00 -
[22]
Originally by: *****zilla
Originally by: posteroid
... if you actually have a plan and put together a fleet to implement it and fail you claim it was a leeroooy gang and you "didn't want those ships anyway"
Generally a leroy gang is one in which even the members realize that the current plan is bad.
A leeroy gangs only plan is to warp in and start shooting until they are all dead or the targets are, calling a gang a leeroy gang just because you are losing and wish to dismiss the loss as unimportant is called denial.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:29:00 -
[23]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 19:35:47
Originally by: yunger
Try a few leeroy sometime, your k/d ratio will be worst but you will get more kills.
yunger
Corporation: Big Guns Inc.
Alliance: Atlas Alliance
Kills: 74 Real kills: 74
Losses: 5 Real losses: 3
Ok pal........
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:33:00 -
[24]
Originally by: *****zilla
You spend entirely too much time avoiding death for our tastes. For as much time as you play more kills could be achieved.
Like you cos your stats are a joke.
Corporation: The Shadow Order
Alliance: SMASH Alliance
Kills: 107
Real kills: 97
Losses: 19
Since: 2007-01-25
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:42:00 -
[25]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 19:44:44
Originally by: TroNaaR
Strange... I dont see your toon on battleclinic...
But I'll take ur word for it that your are elite...
Who do I call to cancel my account?
The BE kb is available for anybody to read as arte the top killers stats and tbh his 15 month stats would not be something our alts would be proud of for a month let alone 15 months.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 19:52:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Sekhmet Orion
words
Bitter much?.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 20:04:00 -
[27]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 20:04:30
Originally by: Sekhmet Orion
more drivel
The first 12 pages were entertaining but i personally got sick of being told that all we killed were nubs and leerooy fleets and that we would get more kills doing the same.
When after a bit of KB research clearly showed these uber killer leerooy boys have less kills in a year or more than most of our alts get in a month let alone our mains.
Now if you do not like my posting or find my point inconvenient join the club.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 20:14:00 -
[28]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 20:14:37
Originally by: Sekhmet Orion
truth hurts
I guess thats why theres so many bitter SK/atlas posters telling us how getting owned in their own space does not matter. Goon clones/alts do ya think???.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 20:25:00 -
[29]
Originally by: King Hopy
Also maybe you should pay attention to the fact that where we are fighting we take as many losses and make as many kills in a few days. Puts your "achievement" into proper scale.
REALY??? I had no idea you invade with only 8 ppl and get all those kills (and be honest a lot more losses), id love to see the links and praise the 8 pilots for such a great achievement...
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 20:33:00 -
[30]
Originally by: King Hopy
Where did I say we only used 8 people and only took that few losses?
Oh i thought you were comparing us to each other?.
|
|
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 20:46:00 -
[31]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 20:47:55
Originally by: Thoran Karlien
Elite groups who only recruit the elite will die, if they don't change... hope be will change, or perhaps this was already the beginning of the end.
Yea cos the changes over the next few days are gonna really cripple us i mean its not like BE has been going since 2003. So tell me again how to keep a corp going in eve mr 2006 as your obviously highly knowledgeable on the subject.............
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 20:55:00 -
[32]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 20:55:19
Originally by: King Hopy
Originally by: posteroid
Originally by: Thoran Karlien
Elite groups who only recruit the elite will die, if they don't change... hope be will change, or perhaps this was already the beginning of the end.
Yea cos the changes over the next few days are gonna really cripple us i mean its not like BE has been going since 2003. So tell me again how to keep a corp going in eve mr 2006 as your obviously highly knowledgeable on the subject.............
Just a question. What will you do when the cloaking on non specialized ships gets nerfed?
You mean how will we adapt like we did with stabs and all the other things we adapted around after they were nerfed over the last 4+ years???.
I guess you will have to wait and see .
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 21:42:00 -
[33]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 21:43:14
Originally by: *****zilla
I'm sure any titan pilot out there would use the same reasoning.
At the end of the day cloaks allow you to pick your targets with zero risk. Enagage when you wish against easy targets. Avoid combat against what could kill you.
What we get are entire gangs/fleets that are cloaked off of a gate. Tacklers, dictors, webbers, dps. Combined with a scout in the next system anyone jumping through the gate must take a risk while you do not.
NO i do not think that titan pilots can warp between safes to avoid getting probed like conventional ships (they are hardly the most nimble of chappies) tbh so its not the same.
We avoid combat against uber blobs but we will engage outnumbered just not stupidly outnumbered where losing all our ships is a virtual certainty.
Warping from safe to safe until a valid target/targets arrive would stop probers from catching us just the same but would be a bit of a pain tbh but is also risk free.
PS: We sometimes have spies we sometimes do not it depends on the alliance but then name me a alliance that does not....
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 22:20:00 -
[34]
Originally by: *****zilla
Originally by: posteroid
NO i do not think that titan pilots can warp between safes to avoid getting probed like conventional ships (they are hardly the most nimble of chappies) tbh so its not the same.
Actually titans can warp from safe to safe; just like any other ship. No rational super cap pilot would do this as a cloak offers a vastly superior alternative.
That because they would proly be probed long before they got to warp as a titan is as slow as hell to warp.
We do it cos its convenient as well so we do not need to jump safes, and do not forget for doing so we cannot lock for 10 seconds after dropping cloak and also have a much slower lock time and for a BS thats a loooong time.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 22:41:00 -
[35]
Edited by: posteroid on 14/05/2008 22:43:35
Originally by: Thoran Karlien
We leave the bad locking time to you, you leave us the super cap probing, okay? Because you don't want to do the "boring" stuff, right?
YES your finally your catching on.
Actually if you consider the average age of a BE member is about 3 or 4 years in eve or longer for some we have done the whole frozen screen blob fight, and the "we are uber we own space" bit, we have killed capitals we have killed titans some of us have planned and led fleet ops with and against capitals and titans with hundreds of conventional ships.
To summarize we have done most if not all of the things that you think makes you important at the moment, and got bored with it a long time ago as it involves holding the hands of morons who will never learn. So we fly together with others who know their jobs without having to be told, we do not have or need a FC's because of our individual combat xp, although our TS is always active during combat with ppl giving intel on themselves or others.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 22:47:00 -
[36]
Originally by: *****zilla
Countered with a <finger quotes>"Sensor Booster"</finger quotes>. Anything that doesn't pop from the tacklers should be easy to lock for the battleships.
Remember we fly sniping ships so in the past it was easier before scripts to hit at long range and have a good lock time with a cloak but now its a bit more difficult although we do and have worked out a fit that allows us a reasonably good locking time while still allowing us to snipe.
|
posteroid
im right your wrong
|
Posted - 2008.05.14 22:55:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Thoran Karlien
Originally by: posteroid
Actually if you consider the average age of a BE member is about 3 or 4 years in eve or longer for some we have done the whole frozen screen blob fight, and the "we are uber we own space" bit, we have killed capitals we have killed titans some of us have planned and led fleet ops with and against capitals and titans with hundreds of conventional ships.
To summarize we have done most if not all of the things that you think makes you important at the moment, and got bored with it a long time ago as it involves holding the hands of morons who will never learn. So we fly together with others who know their jobs without having to be told, we do not have or need a FC's because of this although our TS is always active during combat with ppl giving intel on themselves or others.
The bitter bleating of a sheep.
I agree you most certainly on one of your points you most certainly are a small c**k in a big hole.
|
|
|
| |
|