| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Guvante
GALAXIAN
   |
Posted - 2008.05.15 17:57:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Kale Kold
Holy Hell, the corp interface is dire! And when i say dire i mean the so called designers should be shot. It is horrible! period! there is nothing even remotely nice to say about it! 
Have you used the corporate interface? Do you realize the flexibility and power it gives you? Sure it is a pain to use and buggy at times, but it definatly does a decent job of providing options.
Not to say it doesn't need improvement, given there are only 7 hangars availible, you either have to give each produce the ability to steal billions in mats, or only build when a director is on. I don't know about anyone else but neither of those sounds like a good solution 
Additionally as others have said, what is up with no logging ability at all in hangars? There is the ability with Audit Log containers, but then again, even that is restrive (You can't actually log withdrawls, just unlocks, and having to lock and unlock every item in frequently used stations sucks) A nice check box and log window without logging that just logs every transaction for a month or so would pwn. 
|
Rells
Caldari
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 06:08:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Pwett
Not only has the corp interface been garbage for my entire eve career; they broke the ability to use audit containers in a such a way that giving someone access to the contents in the can automatically gives them access to take the can.
And that was broken at least a year ago now.
Absolute rubbish.
Not to mention the old concept of giving people take access to a hangar but not view access which allowed them to build for corp safely. Was a nice workaround.
Broken since revelations. Broken "on purpose".
|
Caligulus
Legion of Lost Souls
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 07:51:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Rells
Originally by: Pwett
Not only has the corp interface been garbage for my entire eve career; they broke the ability to use audit containers in a such a way that giving someone access to the contents in the can automatically gives them access to take the can.
And that was broken at least a year ago now.
Absolute rubbish.
Not to mention the old concept of giving people take access to a hangar but not view access which allowed them to build for corp safely. Was a nice workaround.
Broken since revelations. Broken "on purpose".
On that same topic, paying for corp jobs was simple. If it was in the corp hanger and you had manufacturing roles the cash would come out of the corp wallet to cover the installation fees without giving the member explicit take access to a wallet division.
Who's ******* dumb idea was that?
-------------------------------------------------
**** You're out of your mind!
**** Well that's between me and my mind. |
Jurgen Cartis
Caldari
Interstellar Corporation of Exploration
Nex Eternus
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 08:37:00 -
[34]
Look on the bright side: it means you never have to worry about mutiny, no one in their right mind would intentionally take the CEO job if they have any experience at the director level. 
But seriously, the all-or-nothing permissions (why do I have to give accountant jobs to people to let them pick up deliveries?!?) and general tendency to make things difficult is not fun. Not to mention the documentation.
While they're at it they can work on the S&I interface too. . .
--------------------
ICE Blueprint Sales
FIRST!! -Yipsilanti
Pfft. Never such a thing as a "last chance". ;) -Rauth |
Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles
Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 09:25:00 -
[35]
Seconded. The BPO lockdown mechanism is poorly documented and buggy.
My research services
Spreadsheets: Top speed calculation - Halo Implant stats |
Ruah Piskonit
Amarr
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 11:06:00 -
[36]
I miss old escrow?
but ya, the corp interface is bad. . .but I have mastered it through blinf faith that its working. . .somewhere on the interweb.
----
|
Zeba
Minmatar
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 15:01:00 -
[37]
I briefly though about banding all my alts into a corp over a year ago but after experimenting with the interface on a disposible alt I decided that pen 'n paper were superior. 
inappropriate signature. ~WeatherMan |
Joe Starbreaker
|
Posted - 2008.05.19 15:19:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Zeba
pen 'n paper were superior
/me cries because it's true.
The corp interface needs to be fixed.
Action items:
1) allow us to create as many corp hangars as we need
2) allow us to fix station containers in a hangar so they can't be stolen, but can be accessed
3) allow us to make corp blueprints available for use by members to run personal jobs. that is they would use their own money and materials, and wouldn't have to be given the 'factory manager' role, access to corp materials, and wallet access.
4) make locking/unlocking blueprints easier. at the moment it takes at least a dozen clicks per blueprint (closer to 20 clicks i think) and half the time it fails due to a voting bug anyway.
5) fix shares, and enable share trading
6) document, document, document!
----------------
[insert signature here] |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |