| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
   |
Posted - 2008.05.22 12:21:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Dingo
Nexa I don't understand your obsession with pursuing corps that don't want to fight? At the end of the day all you end up doing is sitting outside a station for hours on end getting bored. It's free choice that really makes this game for me, and I like the choice not to fight if it suits me, you really need to get over it and move onto a corp that will put up a fight.
I have two accounts if one gets dec'd I leave that charicter logged in at a station to give them something to do and carry on playing on the other account, much simpler than having multiple corps to jump to.
Um. For the money?
Why is it so difficult to understand this basic principle?
For "fun fights" (1) Find PvP corp -> dec that corp -> war made mutual _ fun for all
But fun fights are expensive and stuff has to be paid for
For ISK (1) Find fat rich mission-runner/miner corp -> dec that corp -> rich tubby bears pay up (or learn to fight or hire mercs or whatever).
Both activities are equally legitimate.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 15:51:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Nachtigal Night
Now Now you know fine well im not saying that, All im saying is your way and ethics and rules, just does not seem to be fair
Wait, so you think it's fair that people that smack incessantly, provoke you needlessly, scam you, kill your friends and basically acts like tossers should have a "get-out-of-jail-free-card"? That's what we are talking about here, after all.
The fun starts when these people who "just want to be left alone" start howling for blood when some noob in a destroyer starts salvaging a few mission wrecks. CNR vs salvaging Catalyst is a fair fight c/d?
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 06:45:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Dexion Slayer
TBH i support the idea to locking members into a corp that has been wardecced like so :
"You cannot quit your current corporation as it has been wardecced, please wait untill the wardec is over."
But seriuosly nexa, not to rain on your parade or nething, this is the how manieth thread you made about this? Do you think ccp will actually change the game mechanics for us pvpers?
Imo ccp is more favorish towards carebears then to piwats.
Anyways still good luck mate :)
Hmmm, that might be going a little too far. I would propose the following alternatives:
(1) That members of that corp can leave, but that they can't join another corp while the wardec is active.
(2) That they can join another corp, but that the wardec is automatically extended to that corp as well (I favour this one). Of course, there should most certainly be a pop-up warning along the lines of "this player is currently under war sanctions by the terms of the Yulai Convention. If you accept him in to your corp then your corp will immediately be in a state of war with WhateverCorp" to prevent the obvious abuse.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Malcanis
R.E.C.O.N.
Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 07:34:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tsiros
Honestly now, why i see more crying about the subject of the thread from the wannabe pvpiers or those that actually think they are pvpiers, in comparison to the carebears that have to deal with them??
Well your post just helped even the balance a little.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
| |
|