EVE Search - Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 22 post(s)
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 805	Posted - 2012.03.06 18:52:00 - [1] - Quote The amount of rage in this thread is equally proportional to those that havent read all the posts before theirs The simlpest way of handling this would be to refuns FOUR times the SP removed from a pilot to instantly pay for the 4 new racial variants of destroyers and Battlecruisers. I know this would be my prefered choice as i fly all 4 racial variants VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 805	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:06:00 - [2] - Quote FYI - in the future when you make a 'ship tree', nobody cares about the ships manufacturer. Unless this has some real meaning for the future, remove it, they are T2 ships. Having three differently colored borders for T2 ships is unnecessary. VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 805	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:13:00 - [3] - Quote are people going to be happy training through a racial destroyer to 4 when there is only a single tech 1 ship per race? how long before you add more destroyers? VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 806	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:20:00 - [4] - Quote FOFOFOFOOOO wrote: On a side note its quite funny to see that it now takes less time to get into a dread then a black ops bs. *Good thing they fixed black ops bs.* + 1 like VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 806	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:23:00 - [5] - Quote Bloodpetal wrote: CONTRADICTORY IMAGES, PLEASE CLARIFY These images don't line up : http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Skilltreeafter_1920.jpg http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Amarrshiptree2_1920.jpg In the first image you're saying you want to break away from having prerequisites based on T2 Frigate hulls to get to T2 Cruiser hulls. And the second image you're going back to saying you need the prerequisites for T2 Frigates to get to T2 Cruisers? Which is it? Take a deep breath, wipe the foam from your mouth and read the devblog again the 'second' image you linked shows the current state of the game, and was in a paragraph that started like this; "To understand what ships lines are all about, letGÇÖs recap the four theoretical factors that sort ships out" the 'first' image you posted is the proposed change. tl:dr stop foaming at the mouth with rage long enough and you might understand whats going on VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 806	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:26:00 - [6] - Quote Elanor Vega wrote: Arline Kley wrote: I'm surprised they had to wiki-link an Oil Platform. But Oil Platform dont go boom when you hit it with a rock - like mining barges/exumers in EVE. http://cdn.marineinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/oil_rigs-accident.jpg i wouldnt be so sure about that statement VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 806	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:33:00 - [7] - Quote Hitokiri Battoesai wrote: Wow You did not understand his statement at all. I have a cap pilot also, and there is no way I would have trained BS 5 on 2 races if I did not have to. Ok, that makes sense. But at the time you DID NEED to train it to lvl5, so why do you think you deserve a refund of any kind? Nothing has been taken from you, CCP didnt tell you to train exclusively for capital ships did they? tl:dr HTFU VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 807	Posted - 2012.03.06 19:36:00 - [8] - Quote Bloodpetal wrote: Erim Solfara wrote: You're reading more into that than you need to, the latter image says nothing about skill requirements. It's alluding to a thematic structure for ships, nothing more, nothing less. Someone who flies destroyers and interceptors might logically want to fly an interdictor, that is all. These images match the CURRENT design. They aren't the "NEW DESIGN". Use your eyeballs and you'll see that. http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Skilltreebefore_1920.jpg http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Amarrshiptree2_1920.jpg These two images match exactly. The "BEFORE" and "Amarr Ship Tree" are exactly the same layouts, not matching the new format proposed @ http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Skilltreeafter_1920.jpg Hence, asking for them to correct or clarify what they're trying to demonstrate. stop being so simple. Here, let me add notes for you the current skill tree http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Skilltreebefore_1920.jpg the current ship tree http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Amarrshiptree2_1920.jpg the proposed change to the skill tree http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/8742/1/Skilltreeafter_1920.jpg VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.