EVE Search - NAVY CRUISERS (Test stats warning)

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

NAVY CRUISERS (Test stats warning)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Jaratsri Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2008.05.22 13:43:00 - [31] Quiet Lev, the Navy Omen is fine =) Beeing a total sucker for the Zealot and now I get to play with this, sweet
Siigari Kitawa The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.05.22 13:50:00 - [32] What 20m3 dronebay on the Exeq? CCP go crawl back under a rock and learn how to make "Navy" work. www.siigarikitawa.com
Pliskkenn Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2008.05.22 13:59:00 - [33] That Scythe is looking mighty fine. Hurray for CCP \o/ ---
Winterblink Body Count Inc.	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:03:00 - [34] Originally by: Siigari Kitawa What 20m3 dronebay on the Exeq? CCP go crawl back under a rock and learn how to make "Navy" work. Obviously not intended to be a drone ship. But you can at least slap some T2 lights and murder some frigates. Still, it's an Exeq. Never ever ever came to mind when I thought of combat. :) warp drive active \| nature vraie
Taedrin Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:04:00 - [35] What next? The navy version of mining frigs mine an enemy's hull away with mining lasers?
Blutreiter Digital Fury Corporation Digital Renegades	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:06:00 - [36] Originally by: Taedrin What next? The navy version of mining frigs mine an enemy's hull away with mining lasers? They're for forced collateral kidney stone removal. Cogito ergo boom - I think i'll blow sht up* Originally by: CCP Explorer I know we have said this before, but this time we really mean itÖ
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong FOUNDATI0N	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:12:00 - [37] Originally by: Taedrin Edited by: Taedrin on 22/05/2008 14:07:25 What next? The navy version of mining frigs mine an enemy's hull away with mining lasers? Originally by: Pliskkenn That Scythe is looking mighty fine. Hurray for CCP \o/ cough split bonuses cough. Will be like a mini-phoon minus the awesome drone bay. yeah, and?
Alyth Corp 1 Allstars Insurgency	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:15:00 - [38] Originally by: Taedrin cough split bonuses cough. Will be like a mini-phoon minus the awesome drone bay. Looks like that thing is going to absolutely murder Intys and careless HACs. I think this is one ship where a split weapon bonus is going to work very well.
Mioelnir KULT Production Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:22:00 - [39] Originally by: MotherMoon yeah, and? Split weapons with split bonuses means basically you are cheated out of one bonus, because you need both ship bonuses to get one damage bonus to all your guns. Ships that have 1 weapon system get that bonus and usually something else on top of it. Also, where a Heat Sink on a AN Omen gives a damage bonus to all weapons, a Scythe FI needs a gyro and a BCU for that. For that to not suck, it has to be made up by something. That 'something' is still searched for in the Scythe FI case.
Megan Maynard Out of Order	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:33:00 - [40] /me just found my new favorite ship.......... Miz Stelth Bomerz iz the ****nit.

Tippia School of Applied Knowledge	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:34:00 - [41] Originally by: Blutreiter Coincidentally it is also the slowest by far, has the worst scan resolution and an abysmal shield recharge rate, even if it has a little bit more buffer. Sure, if by "abysmal shield recharge rate" you mean "the best shield recharge rate of the lot." Quote: Also, imagine the cap consumption of the lasers with that ROF... shudder Luckily, it also has the best cap recharge by a wide margin…
Megan Maynard Out of Order	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:36:00 - [42] Originally by: Mioelnir Originally by: MotherMoon yeah, and? Split weapons with split bonuses means basically you are cheated out of one bonus, because you need both ship bonuses to get one damage bonus to all your guns. Ships that have 1 weapon system get that bonus and usually something else on top of it. Also, where a Heat Sink on a AN Omen gives a damage bonus to all weapons, a Scythe FI needs a gyro and a BCU for that. For that to not suck, it has to be made up by something. That 'something' is still searched for in the Scythe FI case. Why would you ever put damage mods on that ship??? NAAAAANNNNOOOOO!!!! HOOOORAY! Miz Stelth Bomerz iz the ****nit.
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:38:00 - [43] Navy omen looks like the true t1 version of the zealot with the extra grid and terrific slot layout ^^ How does one acquire these? Some mix of tags and isk through LP store or are they accessible without grinding? ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
OneSock Crown Industries	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:54:00 - [44] Damn Auguror gets one more high and two more lows than the Exequror. Hardly balanced given the **** poor drone bay on the exeq. It's even smaller than the regular exeq's. LoL
Mioelnir KULT Production Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2008.05.22 14:56:00 - [45] Originally by: Megan Maynard Why would you ever put damage mods on that ship??? NAAAAANNNNOOOOO!!!! HOOOORAY! I agree, with its current layout, it is a ship specialising in running away. I simply don't think the minmatar ship lineup need yet another ship that is fast and good at running away with no other defining trait. Then again, it may be to compensate for the new Fleet Stabber (5/4/6, 5 turrets/3launcher, 5% RoF, 10% tracking, +200something powergrid).
Grimpak Trinity Nova Trinity Nova Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:04:00 - [46] Edited by: Grimpak on 22/05/2008 15:04:54 Originally by: Winterblink Still, it's an Exeq. Never ever ever came to mind when I thought of combat. :) indeed, specially when you add the fact that it has a dmg + RoF bonus. wich is something that I never seen in a blaster ship. wich means that the ship, with gallente cruiser 5 has the damage of a cruiser with 6.3 turrets using only 4. wich means gankage at T1 levels. ouch. --- Trinity Nova Mercenary Services Web Site - Nominated for the 2008 E-ON Magazine Awards
Bish Ounen Omni-Core Freedom Fighters Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:08:00 - [47] Hmmm.. Actually, the Navay Exec looks like it will make an excellent Heavy Tackler. Reasonably good base speed, 3 mids, (MWD, Web, WD) and 5 lows (let's see, nano2, nano2, OD2, OD2, DC2) and 3 upgrade slots (polycarbs, or low friction nozzles and maybe a cap reg?) Ok, it's not an Inty (duh) but I'll bet you could make a good tackler out of that for not too much ISK. And you'd last longer than in a Frig. Not a bad use for what is essentially a civilian ship.
Megan Maynard Out of Order	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:19:00 - [48] Originally by: Mioelnir Originally by: Megan Maynard Why would you ever put damage mods on that ship??? NAAAAANNNNOOOOO!!!! HOOOORAY! I agree, with its current layout, it is a ship specialising in running away. I simply don't think the minmatar ship lineup need yet another ship that is fast and good at running away with no other defining trait. Then again, it may be to compensate for the new Fleet Stabber (5/4/6, 5 turrets/3launcher, 5% RoF, 10% tracking, +200something powergrid). I was unaware the fleet stabber was changing.... Miz Stelth Bomerz iz the ****nit.
Neth'Rae Neth's Workshop	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:21:00 - [49] Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 22/05/2008 15:04:54 Originally by: Winterblink Still, it's an Exeq. Never ever ever came to mind when I thought of combat. :) indeed, specially when you add the fact that it has a dmg + RoF bonus. wich is something that I never seen in a blaster ship. wich means that the ship, with gallente cruiser 5 has the damage of a cruiser with 6.3 turrets using only 4. wich means gankage at T1 levels. ouch. Flying it atm and it has some serious cap issues, which means you can't have a webber and a scram at the same time :< Request signatures at EVE-GFX
Segge Bolled Dirty Sexy Pilots	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:31:00 - [50] Navy Omen. Navy Osprey. Hell yes I am happy with these. I don't fly Gallente or Matari as much, but I glanced at the Navy Exequror and it did seem an interesting development that could be exploited usefully in the service of converting mass into energy.

Benco97	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:38:00 - [51] Originally by: Taedrin What next? The navy version of mining frigs mine an enemy's hull away with mining lasers? I swear by the power of Grayskull that I will slaughter ever single CCP hamster and pee in their fishtank if the mining frigates become combat ships. I'll do it. Originally by: Kirjava This man speaks the truth, when he farts we count the length in seconds and make squillions buying winning lottery tickets.
Taua Roqa Eve University Ivy League	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:43:00 - [52] Navy Osprey looks like a caracal only worse...eh? Navy Scythe however looks incredibly nice, look forward to flying that!...and that omen...WTF O_O -------------------------------------------- [IMAGE REMOVED] Threads are stacking-nerfed; the more posts you add the less effective those posts are. My I/Q Ration!!!11
Pliskkenn Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2008.05.22 15:55:00 - [53] Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: Taedrin Edited by: Taedrin on 22/05/2008 14:07:25 What next? The navy version of mining frigs mine an enemy's hull away with mining lasers? Originally by: Pliskkenn That Scythe is looking mighty fine. Hurray for CCP \o/ cough split bonuses cough. Will be like a mini-phoon minus the awesome drone bay. yeah, and? Having read the other comments, I still love the idea of it. ---
Forge Lag	Posted - 2008.05.22 16:00:00 - [54] Edited by: Forge Lag on 22/05/2008 16:23:20 Originally by: Grimpak indeed, specially when you add the fact that it has a dmg + RoF bonus. wich is something that I never seen in a blaster ship. wich means that the ship, with gallente cruiser 5 has the damage of a cruiser with 6.3 turrets using only 4. wich means gankage at T1 levels. ouch. Except Navy Vexor has 6,25 turrets and 6 lows and 4 heavy drones. Otoh note that they have very powerfull bonuses and build-in nano. Something fishy here. Edit: And build in overdrive. And small sig. Seems like instead of nerfing nano they have chosen to give nano to the masses. If the ships have reasonable price.
Grimpak Trinity Nova Trinity Nova Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 16:37:00 - [55] Edited by: Grimpak on 22/05/2008 16:38:15 Originally by: Neth'Rae Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 22/05/2008 15:04:54 Originally by: Winterblink Still, it's an Exeq. Never ever ever came to mind when I thought of combat. :) indeed, specially when you add the fact that it has a dmg + RoF bonus. wich is something that I never seen in a blaster ship. wich means that the ship, with gallente cruiser 5 has the damage of a cruiser with 6.3 turrets using only 4. wich means gankage at T1 levels. ouch. Flying it atm and it has some serious cap issues, which means you can't have a webber and a scram at the same time :< as expected. now you see why I wanted dmg + RoF bonuses in the hyperion you get this massive damage at very short ranges for a very few short time. Originally by: Forge Lag Edited by: Forge Lag on 22/05/2008 16:23:20 Originally by: Grimpak indeed, specially when you add the fact that it has a dmg + RoF bonus. wich is something that I never seen in a blaster ship. wich means that the ship, with gallente cruiser 5 has the damage of a cruiser with 6.3 turrets using only 4. wich means gankage at T1 levels. ouch. Except Navy Vexor has 6,25 turrets and 6 lows and 4 heavy drones. Otoh note that they have very powerfull bonuses and build-in nano. Something fishy here. Edit: And build in overdrive. And small sig. Seems like instead of nerfing nano they have chosen to give nano to the masses. If the ships have reasonable price. but then again, the GN exeq is one tier below the GN vexor, if we take into consideration the regular versions. --- Trinity Nova Mercenary Services Web Site - Nominated for the 2008 E-ON Magazine Awards
Dragons Talon	Posted - 2008.05.22 16:44:00 - [56] Originally by: Pliskkenn That Scythe is looking mighty fine. Hurray for CCP \o/ Agreed...although agreeing with a member of Veto feels wrong
ragewind VersaTech Interstellar Ltd. SMASH Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 16:52:00 - [57] the scythe is an over power beast. 6 highs and able to fit 6 weapons with 2 damage bonuses so all weapons have have a damager bonus were as the ospray has 4 weapons and only 1 damage bonus the other is just a range bonus which dosnt help the ship at all
Siigari Kitawa The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.05.22 17:38:00 - [58] I feel Gallente got overlooked again. I mean, with cap issues blasters are useless. Really, Thoraxes are cap stable and can support an omg tank. So the idea of a ship that costs 10x as much (I estimate Navy Exeqs around 40-50 mil) means you want it to actually work for what you're getting. :\ If they increase the dronebay 20m3 so we can use 4 mediums, then you could swap out a gun for a nos even to keep your cap up. Plus, the slot fittings on the Exeq demand more tank. Give it 6 lowslots so it can increase the tank or give it more drones. Pick, either it does damage or it tanks. 5 lowslots doesn't make the greatest tank setups. The Omen is obviously totally borderlining on broken, with HAC fittings for a tech 1 ship. Finally, you give it a bonus to only medium hybrid turret. Good luck fitting a blasterboat with that grid and medium hybrids. Fitting options are what a ship comes down to. Just a thought. www.siigarikitawa.com
Summer's End Intel 7	Posted - 2008.05.22 17:56:00 - [59] AN Omen looks ******* awesome.. When you can't run, you crawl, and when you can't crawl - when you can't do that...You find someone to carry you.
Poba The Collective Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2008.05.22 18:07:00 - [60] wow, i was truely excited about this untill i saw the stats. navy omen = win navy exeq = fail lousy drone control, and only 4 turrents on a slow ship.... ? cele would have been a much better idea ccp, exeq = fail, athough its perfectly in-line with the recent gal hate nerfs ~Welcome to the internet, where the men are men, the women are men, and the children are FBI agents~



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.