Originally by: 5pinDizzy

---

Edited by: 5pinDizzy on 26/05/2008 13:39:13
I noticed the navy augoror is heading for an apparent nerf if anything, looking at the fitting, it certainly has one less highslot, and everything else looks the same.

So anyway, sold mine yesterday, and aint buying another one ever again as its no longer worth it with the extra highslot missing.

I dont know what the hell some of you are talking about, saying the navy augoror now has 7 low slots, it ALREADY HAD 7 LOW SLOTS.

Unless there is something like a 5 or 10% damage to laser turrets in its description, which the OP has completely overlooked, it's been nerfec, and I'm glad I've sold mine as the same ship as it was with a highslot missing is worth about 50 million tops now in my book.

Another thing, making tech 1 and tech 2 navy editions, way to make the game even more confusing CCP. GJ

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

*moderated - mother abuse - Mitnal*

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

*moderated - mother abuse - Mitnal*

---

Originally by: Benco97

---

When my ideas for updates to the mining frigates get shot down because "There is no point in having those ships" Could someone please tell me the bloody point behind these ships? None of them are spectacular yet here we are, non-combat ships converted to combat.

Where are the navy barges with 5 launchers? They'll come eventually no doubt. No no no, THEY'LL not be pointless, no combat ship ever is. We need more combat ships, thousands more ships that all do exactly the same thing, this is definately what EVE needs. Well done guys.

---

Originally by: TheG2

---

Why do the Gallente, the race that relies on drones, have the smallest amount of drone space and bandwidth?

---