| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:10:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Leandro Salazar
Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 22/05/2008 16:02:44
In the case of clear ridicule and disrespect expressed towards the CSM and EVE as a whole by members of their alliance, as well as the stated intent to disrupt EVE as game by said alliance, I would like to see the two GoonSwarm members on the CSM removed and replaced by the top backups, because the only thing I am confident they will do is make the work of the council harder and do their best to hurt EVE as a game.
Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here. Thank you.
Yes, clearly goon votes shouldn't count because you dont like them.
Originally by: nlewis
jammers are the meatshield [Bob] wish their pets were
|
Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:05:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tolis Irithel
Edited by: Tolis Irithel on 22/05/2008 18:32:05
I was never suggesting that the 22% was wrong, just for clarity; 22%>19% was not an argument that 22% was wrong. (I wouldn't make that argument because I don't agree that 22% is accurate, in any case.)
Fair enough though, you make perfectly good and valid points as to why members of large alliances may be considered to have more knowledge of the problems being discussed. I for one am quite happy with the range of different foci/opinions, on all sides of the debate.
(Editing, because the above post seems to have changed. I'm not really sure where the whole 11%<19% thing was coming from; I've never advocated or encouraged any change in CSM membership at all.)
That "19%" doesn't account for trading alts, or people who logged in for their free week and never played again though.
I agree with this thread, because by the logic of the OP jade or anyone else who I think is a complete annoyance to this game shouldn't be on the CSM either.
Originally by: nlewis
jammers are the meatshield [Bob] wish their pets were
|
Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:48:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Yorda on 22/05/2008 19:48:05
Originally by: Trader Man
I totally agree with the bold part, and hence it is especially strange that 2 gs ppl representing the whole 0.0
This will create biased single view. If you are arguing that 0.0 issues require more attention and hence more weight then fine, maybe we need more candidates from 0.0 elected then % population that actually lives in 0.0, however that implies goons are definently overrepresented
Actually if you only take the votes cast for the winning 9 CSM members goons got 22.15% of the votes.
We're under represented by 0.15% I demand a recount.
Originally by: nlewis
jammers are the meatshield [Bob] wish their pets were
|
Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 20:56:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Silence Duegood
Originally by: Gordon Antilis
No Support!
Goonswarm has done a lot for the community, and have single handedly destroyed far worse enemies in the Eve Universe. Goons wouldn't have been voted in if the people didn't want it.
The above is the stupidest post I've read in a long while.
I'll be sitting on the edge of my seat waiting for you to cite some examples of what wonderous things GS has done for the community (DoS attacks and racial/sexist discriminatory remarks don't really count, btw).
This game (let alone the CSM board) would be a far better place without them and their petulance.
Forced people to realize that maybe they could have fun in this game? Titan manifesto? Helped stop a single entity from owning all of 0.0? Repeatedly crash markets once people realize they are profitable (see data core market)?
Originally by: nlewis
jammers are the meatshield [Bob] wish their pets were
|
| |
|