| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
LoneRider
Minmatar
Com-Star
   |
Posted - 2008.12.11 20:22:00 -
[1]
Edited by: LoneRider on 11/12/2008 20:22:21
It should be like this by now (correct me if i'm wrong):
Suicide Ganker kills Industrial. Wreck is owned by victim. Corpmate from suicide gankers loot the wreck and get flagged for the victim's corp. Victim's corp mates kill looter.
Changing the System to dual ownership would mean:
Suicide Ganker kills industrial. Wreck is owned by suicide ganker as well as victim. suicide ganker's Corpmate may loot the wreck, will not get flagged, and will not get attackable for victim's corp. Defending their property would immediatelly flag the victim's corpmates and concord would kill them.
No, not really a good idea... needs changes concerning the victim / ganker thing.
|
LoneRider
Minmatar
Com-Star
|
Posted - 2008.12.11 20:44:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: JVol
This IS NOT about suicide ganking, its about WAR. Suicide Ganking has its 'regulations'and balance built into it, Huge sec hits and very fast concord responce. Keep on topic, again, this is about PVP, war, not high sec ganking. Whole different topic
This is about a change in the game mechanics, and it WOULD have an impact on suicide gankers - no matter whether you want to hear it or not. You cannot fix it for war without having it affect the suicide gankers as well. So you keep thinking about the consequences outside your focus.
|
LoneRider
Minmatar
Com-Star
|
Posted - 2008.12.11 20:52:00 -
[3]
Edited by: LoneRider on 11/12/2008 20:54:45
Originally by: JVol
I never suggested that the killers corp gets rights, just the killer.. So your suicide gank worries are not valid... killer would be in a pod, the 'deads'corpm8s could take vengance out on whoever takes loot in that case.. problem solved.. CCP, make it so.. GO!
OK, if it could be implemented like this, it would work. But "dual ownership" as mentioned in the starter post would mean that also corp mates would get "rights" - corp mates can have a look inside my cans without being flagged for anyone - And THAT would be a problem :)
|
LoneRider
Minmatar
Com-Star
|
Posted - 2008.12.11 21:04:00 -
[4]
Originally by: JVol
In any case it needs to be looked at, maybe if the 'killer' took a sec hit to make the kill, duel ownership wont apply.. If the killer killed you without taking a sec hit, war dec, or 0.0 youd get duel ownership. We have all killed targets in 0.0 to have vultures snag loot then jump the gate back into hi sec and laugh, how kool would it be to follow then in and have 15 min to kill their punk ass's?
Now that sounds like a deal :) With the sec. hit check it would be possible to make it effect only war and 0.0 - this way I would support it ;)
|
| |
|