|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saracha
BIG
Gentlemen's Agreement
5
   |
Posted - 2011.09.09 03:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yeah i would have to agree with Zirise. Dividing up the CSM would only hurt the institution. It would create the sense that each member of CSM is only relevant to his or her on "sphere", reducing the CSM's political power from the limited pull it has in CCP now to just a handful of individuals who don't know much about the game as a whole. Not what we need from CSM.
If you feel like Role-playing is being under represented in CSM then the best thing to do by far would be to organize people. I t seems to me that any role-playing groups should have an advantage because such a group would be more dedicated for role-playing reasons to get someone elected. |
Saracha
BIG
Gentlemen's Agreement
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 03:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah i would have to agree with Zirise. Dividing up the CSM would only hurt the institution. It would create the sense that each member of CSM is only relevant to his or her on "sphere", reducing the CSM's political power from the limited pull it has in CCP now to just a handful of individuals who don't know much about the game as a whole. Not what we need from CSM.
If you feel like Role-playing is being under represented in CSM then the best thing to do by far would be to organize people. I t seems to me that any role-playing groups should have an advantage because such a group would be more dedicated for role-playing reasons to get someone elected. |
Saracha
BIG
Gentlemen's Agreement
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 03:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well the idea in a democracy (which the CSM is) is that you go with majority rule, while at the same time protecting the rights of minorities. Having a person get elected into the CSM because they live in lowsec for example, even though they recieved much less votes defeats the purpose. If (like in the last election) one region gets favored heavily, then those candidates need to be on CSM. The people we actually voted for are the one the majority wants, unless something else gets in the way, like violating the EULA, then the people actually elected should be on CSM. |
|
|
| |
|