| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
pwnedgato
   |
Posted - 2008.05.27 21:15:00 -
[1]
I say no matter what rounds we issue they should all be infused with pig blood somehow. Then begin announcing that we will be using rounds treated in such a manner.
 Originally by: Crumplecorn
These is a forum for this.
|
pwnedgato
|
Posted - 2008.05.27 22:51:00 -
[2]
Just don't mention that horrible 4.7mm round. They market that thing as a "armor defeater" or in other words "It'll pass through without them noticing".
Originally by: Crumplecorn
These is a forum for this.
|
pwnedgato
|
Posted - 2008.05.28 00:21:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Benco97
This thread is scary, you all sound so... Violent.. talking about the most effective way to kill people. 
The violence inside is like a dangerous animal that I keep in a cage. An animal that knows how and when to pick the lock.
Would be the best way to put it really.
Originally by: Crumplecorn
These is a forum for this.
|
pwnedgato
|
Posted - 2008.05.28 05:27:00 -
[4]
Originally by: goodby4u
Course in the longrun getting hopped up on drugs to fight is stupid, but for that 5 minutes, you need to empty your clip to kill them.
Dunno about that have you seen that haze trailer? BOOSH!
Originally by: Crumplecorn
These is a forum for this.
|
pwnedgato
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 02:07:00 -
[5]
What about something exotic like airburst rifle rounds? It detects an obstacle and fractures itself resulting in a very nasty wound/kill profile.
Originally by: Crumplecorn
These is a forum for this.
|
pwnedgato
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 03:23:00 -
[6]
Edited by: pwnedgato on 04/06/2008 03:23:26
Note I said fracture. As in it would have an effect similar to a frangible, but more pronounced because it would splinter into larger chunks. Also as an exotic round cost would be a secondary consideration. Then again cost should always be the dog wags the tail not the other way around.
Also since this topic seems to have led my mind in this direction I would just like to say. War should always be waged with the full intent of victory. Doing otherwise causes situations like the current one and Vietnam. I believe in modern anti-guerrilla warfare the answer is to change the role of infantry from eliminating hostiles to one of finding the hostiles then sitting on them until something larger and preferably far more explosive eliminates them. (regardless of situation, as a few team guys I knew said, "sucks to be a hostage")
Originally by: Crumplecorn
These is a forum for this.
|
| |
|