EVE Search - [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Maggot Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.06.01 14:50:00 - [1]
Maggot Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.06.06 17:57:00 - [2] CVA, Seriously dont make arguments that CVA "fights for the little guy" because you encourage them to setup in Providence. Everyone knows you do this because it increases your power and influence, as does Hardin's alliance creation scheme, and thus increases the numbers of potential allies when a fight comes.
Maggot Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.06.06 18:29:00 - [3] Originally by: Vantras Originally by: Maggot CVA, Seriously dont make arguments that CVA "fights for the little guy" because you encourage them to setup in Providence. Everyone knows you do this because it increases your power and influence, as does Hardin's alliance creation scheme, and thus increases the numbers of potential allies when a fight comes. This post wins the thread war! It is one of our longest running jokes in the CVA that if Hardin makes an Alliance prepare for the war dec, pirate infestation, move to red on the settings board. Someone can probably take the time to make a list but its quite shocking how many Hardin created Alliances are our enemy. Sure, half of the alliances made are for pirate types which would be enemies anyway, and the others are potentially new buddies.
Maggot Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.06.06 18:55:00 - [4] Originally by: Pezzle Edited by: Pezzle on 06/06/2008 18:34:58 for you Maggot, buddy =) Stay on Target! Okay :) Well if allowing them to be destroyed causes an huge devaluation of an existing asset then the solution is simple - give them additional bonuses with value.
Maggot Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.06.06 23:04:00 - [5] 2000+ people voted Jade in on the basis that this was a key issue. I am sure one of us can post the "issue" if he likes and then he can support it thus meeting the criteria. in my view: -make them destructable -make it hard to destroy them -give outposts extra bonuses to compensate for the additional vunerability.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.