|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sabe
Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 01:16:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Sabe on 16/06/2008 01:17:48 Edited by: Sabe on 16/06/2008 01:17:08 I think the title is pretty simple and clear.
I'm not looking for "your" personal objection to why it shouldnt happen, frankly I dont give a rats arse about what you think... I paid my dues for years just like you and many wannabe's like you, this is my cash and my game so butt your arse out... this is my request to the Developers at CCP not to the player base of arrogant egotistical snobs who have nothing better to do in life then ruin other peoples game for the sheer sadistic glee of it.
all that asside... Directors and CEO's have a serious headache in large alliances with their dedicated and hard working members who for security reasons do not have the role to setup their own personal POS's. Understandable and I won't argue "that" issue.
We need the option to place POS's up as launched personally with options to allow Sov claiming ability for each tower to that persons alliance.
Work it out Dev's... but the time has come for Control Towers to have the "Launch for Self" option.
Thank you,
Sabe ----- TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constructive criticism".
I'm not smacking... I'm telling you how it was, is and will be. |
Sabe
Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 15:24:00 -
[2]
It can be done by changing the structure of how access to pos's are done.
Allow people within a corp to be able to put up their pos without being given access to other pos's by default.
Right now a person needs to be given the Anchor Role in a corp thus giving them access to ALL corp pos's...
Lets have a way to individualize the pos's so I can run one of my own within my corp and not worry about corp thieves... yes a real problem for those who have large corps which some of you may not understand the complexities of yet.
as for those who oppose the idea just because I preemptively insulted you...
Here's a tissue... :)
----- TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constructive criticism".
I'm not smacking... I'm telling you how it was, is and will be. |
Sabe
Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 18:20:00 -
[3]
1: I kinda like my attitude and so do many of the people I fly with, but not all... tough chit, I have to get along with people I dont like much either.
2: Running POS's with one person has always been possible, I've run a dozen POS's with moon mining and reactions and still have time to pvp. Obviously you know nothing about POS's. They have always been able to setup and upkept by one person, the labor involved is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the game mechanics.
POS's have for a long time been waiting for tweaking. They just did some but there's more that needs to be done. POS's have been under almost the same rules with the same features since the beginning of the game 5 years ago. Yes they have tweaked it some but I think its time for "launch for self" option or a tweak of the system to allow idividuals more freedom within their corp to have personal POS's.
3: CCP loves isk sinks... POS's are a big one. Promote people to buy more POS's.
4: Moon material market will have more materials available for more people to buy to build more T2 ships and mods with thus, lowering the costs for T2 mods and ships before they begin bringing in T3 Mods and ships.
5: I already have a small alt corp for my empire POS, this isn't what I'm talking about doing.
6: one last good solid preemptive "up yours" flame for any and all future flamers. (Disclaimer: Read my sig boneheads)
7: Come to 0.0 if you dont like me and put your money where your mouth is. We're low on targets anyways... seems wherever we go the reds dwindle down to nothing.
8: And yes, I've been know to be a little biatch when I wanna be.
----- TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constructive criticism".
I'm not smacking... I'm telling you how it was, is and will be. |
|
|
|