|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 21:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Andski wrote:I'm predicting no end of posts about INCURSIONS by ignorant NULL SEC peeps.
FIXED
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 21:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:How about nerfing both incursions (more LP, much les isk - especially in high sec) and bounties (harder nerf for high sec than low and null - possibly increase salvage to compensate)?
FIxes the risk reward scale and inflation.
NOPE can't see any bias you have against hi sec making ISK. Here let me throw it back at you: How about nerfing Tech moons ( making moons run dry eventually and having Drones randomly poop moon goo even in HI SEC ) and having a harder nerf to bounties in NULL SEC because obviously the biggest bots are operating in impunity protected in the depths of SOV space
/sarcasmMode |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 22:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Which I assume what you mean by adjustments are changes to VGs to remove blitzing while boosting assault and HQ income right?
Side question when will we see a dev blog about those changes? After fanfest right? And will we have plenty of time to test them on Sisi to make sure there arent any surprises right?
Yet thanks for yet again pointing how wrong many are about Incursion Inflation. They just don't get it. In my opinion all they see is rage from Incursions providing an alternative to broken nullsec.
Why the hell would we boost assault and HQ isk rewards when we need to reduce the flow of isk into the game?
Because you'd have more people doing assaults & HQ's if their ISK/hour were mre on par with Vanguards... if it were not for the time to set these fleets up they are ALOT more fun then Vanguards and more ships are lost more often because of the higher Alphas. The less ISK/ hour because they are not such a grind makes them worth it but talking people into doing them with the extreme dispaity in profit per hour always makes it a difficult proposition especially for NCN's |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 07:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:(Notice the signifcant plex spike co-incidental with Crucible and also the significant number of plex volumes.) Unsurprisingly, PLEX prices spike when a new expansion comes out. Equally unsurprisingly is the when hisec incursions are shut down (c/f Darius III, Ammzi and friends), PLEX prices start to drop. Incursion runners are not the only people buying PLEX, you have that much right. The number of extremely cash-rich Incursion runners who are able to buy PLEX at any price are the ones placing extreme upward pressure on the price. ThIs was made quite clear during the period that Incursions were interdicted: people I know we're simply not logging in except to verify that no new incursions were running. During that period, PLEX prices fell slightly. Due to the diffuse nature of NPC bounty income in nullsec, that stream of income will not impact PLEX prices so significantly. When you are making 60M ISK/hr and are replacing ships lost in PvP, you do not exert as much pressure on the PLEX market as the person making 100M ISK/ hr who never has to replace their ship. The Incursion runner simply has more disposable income. So dismiss my opinion if you will, but be aware that I have made none of the claims that you have demanded me to support.
You are talking through your bum I didn't see a relaxation in PLEX prices until afterwards... the 'interdiction' was so short lived you could not say PLEX's prices went up or down either way without horrible p values statistically |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 07:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:(Notice the signifcant plex spike co-incidental with Crucible and also the significant number of plex volumes.) Unsurprisingly, PLEX prices spike when a new expansion comes out. Equally unsurprisingly is the when hisec incursions are shut down (c/f Darius III, Ammzi and friends), PLEX prices start to drop. Incursion runners are not the only people buying PLEX, you have that much right. The number of extremely cash-rich Incursion runners who are able to buy PLEX at any price are the ones placing extreme upward pressure on the price. ThIs was made quite clear during the period that Incursions were interdicted: people I know we're simply not logging in except to verify that no new incursions were running. During that period, PLEX prices fell slightly. Due to the diffuse nature of NPC bounty income in nullsec, that stream of income will not impact PLEX prices so significantly. When you are making 60M ISK/hr and are replacing ships lost in PvP, you do not exert as much pressure on the PLEX market as the person making 100M ISK/ hr who never has to replace their ship. The Incursion runner simply has more disposable income. So dismiss my opinion if you will, but be aware that I have made none of the claims that you have demanded me to support. You are talking through your bum I didn't see a relaxation in PLEX prices until afterwards on my graphs which indicates another factor was at play... the 'interdiction' was so short lived you could not say PLEX's prices went up or down either way without horrible p values statistically.
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Two step wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:May as well source the tweets just to keep the rabid people from raging. -Liang Done. What does "Wormhole blue books" refer to? I have no clue what that is.
Also it'd be nice to see NPC Bounties dwarfing all on this list..... as a complete compairson is if you could add the ISK equvalents of the mineral faucets of moon goo & nano ribbons produced to show the complete story ( the trit mined & comparisions before & after bott bans would give you then the WHOLE inflation story - production ineffieciencies) |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
I hate it when I hit edit then forums interprets it as quote! |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:Wormhole blue books Source $10,430,000,000,000 Incursions Rewards Source $8,566,015,400,900 Mission Rewards Source $2,470,815,985,076 Misson Bonuses Source $2,346,410,541,970 Insurance Payouts Source $3,366,455,121,035 Insurance Costs Sink -$1,618,888,782,680 NPC Bounties Source $32,083,329,999,805 NPC Sell Orders Sink -$13,000,000,000,000 Transaction Taxes* Sink -$2,375,100,000,000 Broker Fees* Sink -$2,607,100,000,000 LP Store* Sink -$6,331,570,000,000 PI Construction* Sink -$627,850,000,000 Clones* Sink -$910,600,000,000 Office Rental* Sink -$488,650,000,000 War Fees* Sink -$149,350,000,000 Repair Bills* Sink -$287,100,000,000 PI NPC Taxes* Sink -$741,820,000,000 Sov Bills* Sink -$809,100,000,000 Contract Brokers Fee* Sink -$301,600,000,000 Contract Sales Tax* Sink -$324,800,000,000
Before incursions about 19T of isk inflow + people that were doing ratting before and turned into incursion after.
After incursions about 29T of isk inflow that means +50% or slightly less of isk retained in an economy. That is a huge increase.
And how much% of population participate in incursions ? Definietly not 50%. Notice that wormhole blue boxes are huge inflationary as well but i dont mind that much since risk/reward mechanism apply. Look up at the numbers again incursions are 25% of NPC bounties ( where are you getting this 50% inflo?!?! besides out of your BUTTOCKS??? ) TALKING ABOUT CHERRY PICKING STATISTICS THERE ARE LIES THEN THERE ARE LIES THEN ARE YOUR SUPER WHOOOPERS WHICH YOU PRESENT AS STATISTICS!!! THE INFLOW OF BOUnTIES IS NOW 32 TRILLION your 19 trillion just does not translate into todays numbers. Go back to school & take a real math class.
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
test |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:I hate it when I beleive i hit edit but actually hit quote ! |
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
mackluver wrote:[quote=Zircon Dasher] Where as high-sec incursions suffer ship loss only from unwary pilots and unfortunate ganks. .
That is blantantly false statement if you ran Incursions as much as I do you'd see the losses from various issues. I saw a bhallgorn go poof last night due to a different reason. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:14:00 -
[12] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:DarthNefarius wrote: Look up at the numbers again incursions are 25% of NPC bounties ( where are you getting this 50% inflo?!?! besides out of your BUTTOCKS??? ) TALKING ABOUT CHERRY PICKING STATISTICS THERE ARE LIES THEN THERE ARE LIES THEN ARE YOUR SUPER WHOOOPERS WHICH YOU PRESENT AS STATISTICS!!! THE INFLOW OF BOUnTIES IS NOW 32 TRILLION your 19 trillion just does not translate into todays numbers. Go back to school & take a real math class.
YOu still dont get it. Introducing incursions has icnreased about 40-50% isk retained in the economy.
And most of this isks comes in form of concord protection gameplaye. Its broken !!!![/quote]
No it HAS NOT the lp sink of Condord halves that |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 20:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote: It's those running sites/mission/incursions 24h/d with their bots,
You cannot bot Incursions really... you have to be there non AFK & if you are 6-7 boxing ( let alone 10 boxing) you wil lose competitions repeatedly.
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 20:18:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote: (snip) It's those running sites/mission/incursions 24h/d with their bots, mining entire belts al alone with their bots, running belts/sites in null with their very numerous bot alts, running incursions with their numerous alts and bots. (Darth Nefarius: YOU CAN'T bot incursions except maybe in deep NULL SEC SOV? )
(snip) Add moon goo, the biggest passive income in the game. Throw some drone crap once again profiting to a very small part of eve players and killing a major part of the game for years now: mining
The list can go on, but whatever you'll pick each and every one of these will always bring exponential rewards for those playing more than 2 accounts, exploiting game mechanics, using bots. At the end of the day the single player, the guy discovering the game and playing it normally with some fellows found here and there when he reads this kind of threads he might as well think there are different servers of eve online.
I agree the passive MOON goo focuses the ISK into the hands of a few & it needs some rethinking becuase T2 prices are strangle holded by a few cartels... I like idea of drones pooping moon goo myself or MOONs eventually being depleted & new moons popping up somehow. I think an increase in availability of moon goo to all would be a godsend to T2 inflation Wormhole products don't seem to be concentrated in the hands of a few, yet...
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:[ What if WH moons also provide moongoo, but only at a lower level of efficiency depending on the WH-level? Say 25% for a L3 and 50% for a L6. Adding the additional logistical headaches, WH corps will never be able to really compete with null-sec moons, but they can crack up the monopolies a bit. Especially since there is an abundance of free moons to be found.
Interesting idea to break up the T2 monopoly & its decrease T2 costs... I guess I'd also ask why not also start replacing the Sansha incursion with a sleeper incursion to spread the nano ribbons out amongst all 3 spaces (Empire, NULL, & WH ) |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 07:21:00 -
[16] - Quote
Have to re-iterate: THE MINERAL SITUATION IS MUCH,MUCH MORE WORRYING THEN INCURSIONS,level 4-5 bounties, bott bans & tech moon faucets BY A LONG SHOT replace drones pooping alloys with bounties IN 1 SWITFT BLOW(PATCH?) AND YOU'LL SEE HYPER INFLATION WHICH WILL make your HEADS SPIN IMHO |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 07:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:You are talking through your bum I didn't see a relaxation in PLEX prices until afterwards on my graphs which indicates another factor was at play... the 'interdiction' was so short lived you could not say PLEX's prices went up or down either way without horrible p values statistically.
Your graphs are talking out their bum. I was following the PLEX prices due to being in the market. Interdiction started, prices went down. Interdiction ended, prices went back up. There's a little bathtub in the graph right about that time. Then there are the PLEX offers which despite their unattractiveness compared to GTC from resellers do have an impact on PLEX prices ingame.
There are downward fluctuations over the year that very closely correspond with PLEX offers, the interdiction, and school holidays. There are peaks which correlate with pre-expansion speculation and others which correlate with "OMG PLEX PRICES" posts by market manipulators.
Perhaps try running with shorter rolling durations, since a 7-day rolling average is going to show you nothing of value apart from week long trends. Try an 8 hour rolling average to spot trends shorter than a week.
As for your statistics, note that p-scores are used for determining the confidence that a particular result set fits your hypothesis. Statistics and probability are about analyzing sets of numbers in a static sample, not trends, and certainly have nothing to do with facts.
The interdiction you talk about has a low confidence level due to its haphazard time ( sample set was small ) I don't think a trend could be established and I question vehmetly your conclusions as being unfounded. FYI there was a earlier incursion interdiction by the way that was just as long ( there was also a very much shorter 'almost' interdiction of MOM sites which really makes the number of Incursion interdiction = 3) did you see the same PLEX price reduction then? |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 15:49:00 -
[18] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:I wonder what the correlation is between people who started playing the game (or started paying attention to price metrics) in the less inflationary periods (say mid 2007) vs those who started in a more inflationary period (late 2008-early 2009)? Looks like quite the swing from mid 2007 to now! -Liang
I wonder what the correlation of NULL SEC trolls in the forums whining about Hi Sec ISK earning ( level 5 missions , Incursions, etc ) is versus the actual implementation of Nerfs to them. |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 16:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:I wonder what the correlation is between people who started playing the game (or started paying attention to price metrics) in the less inflationary periods (say mid 2007) vs those who started in a more inflationary period (late 2008-early 2009)? Looks like quite the swing from mid 2007 to now! -Liang
Interesting graph if it was not for that first few HUGE blips before 2005 you'd see more deflation then inflation (area under the line is larger ). It looks like there were longer periods of deflation then inflation but I may have to break out a ruler to confirm. |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Also, if you're going to call me a "raging nullsec troll" for stating what appears to be a pretty unequivocal fact... please also inform me why you believe that group based high sec content should be more lucrative than group based content in low sec, null sec, and WH space.
-Liang
Actually I was trolling for any trolls not just you &you bit hook line & sinker... U mad bro? |
|

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kaivar Lancer wrote:Thanks for that graph. Doesn't look like anything to be too concerned about.
To by honest the graph does show a downward trend I hope never to see any deflation again but in a free market economy you do expext to see periods of overheating & cooling. The worst swings looked to be at the beginning of the game & a deflationary period in 2007 IMHO. Looking at the graph I expect to see deflation during the summer of 2012 of the northern hemispere |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 20:10:00 -
[22] - Quote
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
Thanks for that graph. Doesn't look like anything to be too concerned about.
To be honest the graph does show a downward trend currently & I hope never to see any deflation again but in a free market economy you do expect to see periods of overheating & cooling. The worst swings looked to be at the beginning of the game & a deflationary period in 2007 which was greater then 5% . Looking at the graph I expect to see deflation during the summer of 2012 of the northern hemisphere. |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 21:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:. Also, I was pretty clear that I'm not mad.
-Liang
U sound mad bro... mad hatter mad  |
|
|
|