EVE Search - North and IRON

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

North and IRON

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:38:00 - [61] Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Look at dis lil nub trying to smack yaay. Yaay might have been a foe but he was a competent one at that, along with dacovale and agmar. You? its okay we prefer to get called noobs and stuf its perfectly fine with us. so um abut that hole dineing in nol when is that happening i realy whant to know "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Jonan Saviere Black Plague. RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:43:00 - [62] Originally by: Butter Dog Blah Blah Blah.... yawns
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:44:00 - [63] Originally by: Jonan Saviere Originally by: Butter Dog Blah Blah Blah.... yawns dont you have another alliance to go disband in? "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:46:00 - [64] Edited by: Butter Dog on 19/06/2008 17:46:31 Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Look at dis lil nub trying to smack yaay. Yaay might have been a foe but he was a competent one at that, along with dacovale and agmar. You? lol, look at the goon, pretending he knows anything about INSRG Our greatest victory, imo and that of many others in the original INSRG, was the capture of 304 constellation as a much smaller alliance. The branch stations were easy by comparison - roll in with blob, take. GAME weren't even in the alliance during 304. I personally redefined the INSRG fleet doctrine and FC'd loads in the 304 campaign as anyone in the alliance at the time can testify. Dacovale did too ofc (and he really should have been appointed leader when Darth quit, but probably declined the position). Only when INSRG got fat with bandwaggoners did it start to slide. And yes, GAME were one such bandwaggoner. A good corp, just one with a shocking lack of strategic judgement... but lets all move to Curse and disband over it. edit cos i cant spell ----------
Kyguard Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:53:00 - [65] Originally by: Butter Dog I got plenty of evemails from ex INSRG leaders whining about you and C4. Posting them would be a breach of trust, if the individuals don't want to say it openly. Basically, you failed, and have trouble accepting that - I understand, its okay. Timeline: * WEDIE quit, saying INSRG under C4 cannot work. * INSRG announce move to Curse under C4/GAME leadership. * 5 days later, the alliance disbands. I hate to say 'I told you so' and all... I also got plenty of evemails from INSRG telling me how happy they were you were out of the alliance. Posting them would be a breach of trust, if the individuals (more like masses) don't want to say it openly. Basically, you failed at being a useful member of an alliance and have trouble accepting that - I understand, it's okay. Timeline: * Naptrain declares war on INSRG and invades Z-K, all of insrg present, lots of pew pew. * Naptrain gets into 4dtq and starts sieging towers, things don't look so good. * All WEDIE members have rl all of a sudden and disappear. * Time to evac, WEDIE returns and get their assets out. * WEDIE begin thinking they're important again and start ****. Talks of kicking them out begin and WEDIE leaves. Alas I'll give props to Ryan Coolness/Jimmysav he was cool and always there. o7 -
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:55:00 - [66] Originally by: Kyguard Originally by: Butter Dog I got plenty of evemails from ex INSRG leaders whining about you and C4. Posting them would be a breach of trust, if the individuals don't want to say it openly. Basically, you failed, and have trouble accepting that - I understand, its okay. Timeline: * WEDIE quit, saying INSRG under C4 cannot work. * INSRG announce move to Curse under C4/GAME leadership. * 5 days later, the alliance disbands. I hate to say 'I told you so' and all... I also got plenty of evemails from INSRG telling me how happy they were you were out of the alliance. Posting them would be a breach of trust, if the individuals (more like masses) don't want to say it openly. Basically, you failed at being a useful member of an alliance and have trouble accepting that - I understand, it's okay. Timeline: * Naptrain declares war on INSRG and invades Z-K, all of insrg present, lots of pew pew. * Naptrain gets into 4dtq and starts sieging towers, things don't look so good. * All WEDIE members have rl all of a sudden and disappear. * Time to evac, WEDIE returns and get their assets out. * WEDIE begin thinking they're important again and start ****. Talks of kicking them out begin and WEDIE leaves. Alas I'll give props to Ryan Coolness/Jimmysav he was cool and always there. o7 Yeah, you're correct. Oh... wait Anyone who googles 'Insurgency Killboard' and types my corp name in can see what rubbish you're talking about. Up until the dying days of the Branch stations, my corp was frantically buying and installing deathstars in a last-ditch attempt to save Sov whilst everyone else shoved their heads in the sand. Basically, its you/agmar/c4 with the same old dreary lines about me. Its predictable, transparent, and easily proved as false. Looking forward to seeing your latest alliance fail soonÖ ----------
Kyguard Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:57:00 - [67] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 19/06/2008 17:46:31 Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Look at dis lil nub trying to smack yaay. Yaay might have been a foe but he was a competent one at that, along with dacovale and agmar. You? lol, look at the goon, pretending he knows anything about INSRG Our greatest victory, imo and that of many others in the original INSRG, was the capture of 304 constellation as a much smaller alliance. The branch stations were easy by comparison - roll in with blob, take. GAME weren't even in the alliance during 304. I personally redefined the INSRG fleet doctrine and FC'd loads in the 304 campaign as anyone in the alliance at the time can testify. Dacovale did too ofc (and he really should have been appointed leader when Darth quit, but probably declined the position). Only when INSRG got fat with bandwaggoners did it start to slide. And yes, GAME were one such bandwaggoner. A good corp, just one with a shocking lack of strategic judgement... but lets all move to Curse and disband over it. edit cos i cant spell If you were around when Branch got invaded then you'd know that the only reason we stood out for so long was because of Agmar and GAME's leadership hands down. Ask anyone but your "ex-INSRG game/c4 haters" if they really exist. GAME proved themselves in that 1 month and that's why I happened to join them. Bandwagoners or not they proved themselves in the end, if your corp wasn't busy complaining about the invasion and actually doing something maybe you'd know. Keep digging. -
Mynas Atoch Eternity INC. Project Alice.	Posted - 2008.06.19 17:58:00 - [68] Originally by: Butter Dog * WEDIE quit, saying INSRG under C4 cannot work. Did anyone ever tell you guys about C4's imaginary Ragnarok? He used to pretend he had one, plan operations with allies with it, and then when it was needed claim he had login problems. He was eventually caught out but it cost MC a bunch of capitals - we had engaged expecting him to jump in and clear the tacklers (back when solo Titan's had to be logged out to die). His alliance booted his corp over it at the time - which was the only thing that prevented Seleene turning the Northern Campaign 180 degrees and wiping out YouWhat instead of D2. Sorry - reminiscing - please resume your smackfest. Myn
NATMav F.R.E.E. Explorer Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:00:00 - [69] That horse has been kicked enough!
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:03:00 - [70] Originally by: NATMav That horse has been kicked enough! no no it needs more flogging since the broken record waa waa brigade keeps brining it up "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:04:00 - [71] Originally by: Kyguard GAME proved themselves in that 1 month and that's why I happened to join them. Bandwagoners or not they proved themselves in the end, if your corp wasn't busy complaining about the invasion and actually doing something maybe you'd know. Keep digging. No-one from my corp apart from me went away, and then I went only for 2 weeks Seriously. Facts > your drivel. WEDIE hold the record in INSRG for most caps deployed in the Branch campaigns by a mile, we installed more deathstars than you during the Branch defence, we killed more ships. As far as I'm concerned any other measure of success (like 'what you think') is simply drivel and not worth consideration. ----------
Idaeus GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:16:00 - [72] Originally by: Butter Dog No-one from my corp apart from me went away, and then I went only for 2 weeks Seriously. Facts > your drivel. WEDIE hold the record in INSRG for most caps deployed in the Branch campaigns by a mile, we installed more deathstars than you during the Branch defence, we killed more ships. As far as I'm concerned any other measure of success (like 'what you think') is simply drivel and not worth consideration. Congrats on being the best failure.
Kyguard Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:28:00 - [73] Originally by: Butter Dog No-one from my corp apart from me went away, and then I went only for 2 weeks Seriously. Facts > your drivel. WEDIE hold the record in INSRG for most caps deployed in the Branch campaigns by a mile, we installed more deathstars than you during the Branch defence, we killed more ships. As far as I'm concerned any other measure of success (like 'what you think') is simply drivel and not worth consideration. Ah yeah the imaginary WEDIE deathstars or are you talking about the single Z-K one that me and you deployed on the last day? That must be it. You got one thing right, that pos was frantically installed, but pos with no mods aren't called deathstars. Congratulations on holding the record for deploying the most caps when INSRG was steamrolling naptrain pets. A real feat for your corp I'd imagine, hang it on your wall. If you could only brag about this during the Branch defence then we might still be there. As for your kill/death ratio that you so proudly posted, I'm not even going to touch on that, anyone with a half a clue will know that it's not all about kills, good job shooting yourself in the foot on that one. Tell me though how many times did your corp FC during the Branch defence? awaits we did this and this and this that nobody remembers about but we did do it!! Thinking your corp was the central puzzle piece for INSRG when nobody else thinks so is pretty funny. In the end it comes down to what your enemies saw and since the north don't know who your corp is apart from the forums and t1 cruisers in empire towards the end, we know who's talking bull**** and who's not. -
Shinma Apollo Perkone	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:29:00 - [74] Ok, let's take score. Cippa: Manages to get Goodfellas kicked out of GBC singlehandedly. Butter Dog: ISSN Failsurge Cippa 1 Butter 0 Hey, quick, Butter, say NOL!
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:32:00 - [75] Originally by: Kyguard Originally by: Butter Dog No-one from my corp apart from me went away, and then I went only for 2 weeks Seriously. Facts > your drivel. WEDIE hold the record in INSRG for most caps deployed in the Branch campaigns by a mile, we installed more deathstars than you during the Branch defence, we killed more ships. As far as I'm concerned any other measure of success (like 'what you think') is simply drivel and not worth consideration. Ah yeah the imaginary WEDIE deathstars or are you talking about the single Z-K one that me and you deployed on the last day? That must be it. You got one thing right, that pos was frantically installed, but pos with no mods aren't called deathstars. Congratulations on holding the record for deploying the most caps when INSRG was steamrolling naptrain pets. A real feat for your corp I'd imagine, hang it on your wall. If you could only brag about this during the Branch defence then we might still be there. As for your kill/death ratio that you so proudly posted, I'm not even going to touch on that, anyone with a half a clue will know that it's not all about kills, good job shooting yourself in the foot on that one. Tell me though how many times did your corp FC during the Branch defence? awaits we did this and this and this that nobody remembers about but we did do it!! Thinking your corp was the central puzzle piece for INSRG when nobody else thinks so is pretty funny. In the end it comes down to what your enemies saw and since the north don't know who your corp is apart from the forums and t1 cruisers in empire towards the end, we know who's talking bull**** and who's not. Dont be bitter that your corp failed at well, every thing its okay that you didnt have time to creat a corp that actualy can figure out to stick to stick together "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 18:46:00 - [76] Edited by: Butter Dog on 19/06/2008 18:47:27 Originally by: Kyguard Originally by: Butter Dog No-one from my corp apart from me went away, and then I went only for 2 weeks Seriously. Facts > your drivel. WEDIE hold the record in INSRG for most caps deployed in the Branch campaigns by a mile, we installed more deathstars than you during the Branch defence, we killed more ships. As far as I'm concerned any other measure of success (like 'what you think') is simply drivel and not worth consideration. Ah yeah the imaginary WEDIE deathstars or are you talking about the single Z-K one that me and you deployed on the last day? That must be it. You got one thing right, that pos was frantically installed, but pos with no mods aren't called deathstars. Congratulations on holding the record for deploying the most caps when INSRG was steamrolling naptrain pets. A real feat for your corp I'd imagine, hang it on your wall. If you could only brag about this during the Branch defence then we might still be there. As for your kill/death ratio that you so proudly posted, I'm not even going to touch on that, anyone with a half a clue will know that it's not all about kills, good job shooting yourself in the foot on that one. Tell me though how many times did your corp FC during the Branch defence? awaits we did this and this and this that nobody remembers about but we did do it!! Thinking your corp was the central puzzle piece for INSRG when nobody else thinks so is pretty funny. In the end it comes down to what your enemies saw and since the north don't know who your corp is apart from the forums and t1 cruisers in empire towards the end, we know who's talking bull**** and who's not. lol @ you You always were clueless about the deathstar situation, thanks for proving it once again. You didn't even know Sov was about to be lost in Z-K until I told you 3 hours before DT PS - 400% more kills, 20% more losses... that says all I need to know ohhhh yeah ----------
Kyguard Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:09:00 - [77] Originally by: Butter Dog lol @ you You always were clueless about the deathstar situation, thanks for proving it once again. You didn't even know Sov was about to be lost in Z-K until I told you 3 hours before DT PS - 400% more kills, 20% more losses... that says all I need to know ohhhh yeah Well yeah I couldn't get into z-k at all, bubble camps et all. Again, hang this achievement on your wall, your corp will be proud. At your next alliance you can have drunken songs about how you logged in for a day and showed Kyguard how its done! PS - 0 times FC'ing during Branch defence that says all anyone involved needs to know. Thanks for not touching base on the rest of my post, just as good as you saying its true. -
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:21:00 - [78] Originally by: Kyguard Originally by: Butter Dog lol @ you You always were clueless about the deathstar situation, thanks for proving it once again. You didn't even know Sov was about to be lost in Z-K until I told you 3 hours before DT PS - 400% more kills, 20% more losses... that says all I need to know ohhhh yeah Well yeah I couldn't get into z-k at all, bubble camps et all. Again, hang this achievement on your wall, your corp will be proud. At your next alliance you can have drunken songs about how you logged in for a day and showed Kyguard how its done! PS - 0 times FC'ing during Branch defence that says all anyone involved needs to know. Thanks for not touching base on the rest of my post, just as good as you saying its true. butter was on a 2 week break before we even got invadet and that was stated so on the insurgency forum. i am sure you wil find kara or jimmy to have fc'ed dure the the deffens along with some shanda. hang on 3 out of a 25 man corp fc'ing for insurgency. also % wise we ran 5% more sov pos's then we shoud if you took and devied total number of pos's our over the meber base. did we play a good part of the planing and logistics for geting the lazzy bums prepared for takeing 304? yes we did. did we field the majority of caps needet for takeing 304? yes we did. did we keep numbers up for takeing the carebear space with the mega of lag we put together? yes we did. do wedie have a hugh ego? yes. is there any substance to most of the hole we are a tad better than you all ego? if you compared us to most of the corps in insurgency yes there is, again we had number 1 2 3 4 5 all time killers in insurgency in our corp. so now run along and do some more fail "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Yaay Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:21:00 - [79] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Yaay Don't worry cipp, none of us like butter anyways. No, its just you and Agmar. I got plenty of evemails from ex INSRG leaders whining about you and C4. Posting them would be a breach of trust, if the individuals don't want to say it openly. Basically, you failed, and have trouble accepting that - I understand, its okay. Timeline: * WEDIE quit, saying INSRG under C4 cannot work. * INSRG announce move to Curse under C4/GAME leadership. * 5 days later, the alliance disbands. I hate to say 'I told you so' and all... We failed, cya round... at least we kicked you to the curb first http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=619019IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:24:00 - [80] Originally by: Yaay Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Yaay Don't worry cipp, none of us like butter anyways. No, its just you and Agmar. I got plenty of evemails from ex INSRG leaders whining about you and C4. Posting them would be a breach of trust, if the individuals don't want to say it openly. Basically, you failed, and have trouble accepting that - I understand, its okay. Timeline: * WEDIE quit, saying INSRG under C4 cannot work. * INSRG announce move to Curse under C4/GAME leadership. * 5 days later, the alliance disbands. I hate to say 'I told you so' and all... We failed, cya round... at least we kicked you to the curb first kicked us? lol please send me what ever you are smokeing "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:26:00 - [81] Originally by: Kyguard Originally by: Butter Dog lol @ you You always were clueless about the deathstar situation, thanks for proving it once again. You didn't even know Sov was about to be lost in Z-K until I told you 3 hours before DT PS - 400% more kills, 20% more losses... that says all I need to know ohhhh yeah Well yeah I couldn't get into z-k at all, bubble camps et all. Again, hang this achievement on your wall, your corp will be proud. At your next alliance you can have drunken songs about how you logged in for a day and showed Kyguard how its done! PS - 0 times FC'ing during Branch defence that says all anyone involved needs to know. Thanks for not touching base on the rest of my post, just as good as you saying its true. Are you talking about me personally FC'ing? Because my corpmates certainly did (Lilan, you missed out Algey). However we are 100% euro timezone pretty much and GAME are US, maybe you're not in the best position to judge. If you're asking 'did we FC in US TS' which you GAME mostly play in, the answer is definately 'no'. As for me personally, I actively FC'd in the campaigns we won. I didnt FC in the campaign we lost (but was an active particpant nonetheless). Correllation? I doubt it, but amusing nonetheless I honestly, don't know what you're trying to achieve here. We deployed more caps, killed more ships, erected more POS (including twinned jump bridges) during the Branch Defence... so now you're bringing it down to 'aha! but who FC'd more!'... dude, we lost the fight, I hardly think 'who FC'd more' is accolade of the century... keep trying though, its quite sweet ----------
Yaay Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:27:00 - [82] Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Look at dis lil nub trying to smack yaay. Yaay might have been a foe but he was a competent one at that, along with dacovale and agmar. You? I'm putting this up on my wall. "The day a Goon complemented me." http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=619019IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:28:00 - [83] Originally by: Yaay We failed, cya round... at least we kicked you to the curb first Agmar already tried that one. He was shown up to be a lying fool... you want to try too? Be my guest ----------
Tiger Delivery THE INTERNET.	Posted - 2008.06.19 19:31:00 - [84] Originally by: Yaay "The day a Goon complemented me." :cripes:
Olli Hokkanen Full Life Alternative	Posted - 2008.06.19 20:37:00 - [85] still waiting for some numbers on IRON fleets!
dastommy79 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 20:45:00 - [86] Originally by: Farham I thought we were IRON's cap force. Oh no wait, we just build them free caps and super caps. You know, like we do for everyone. Maybe you wouldnt have to make everyone caps if you didnt wierd quote all the time. Stop banning me please
Oofig VanDoogan Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.06.19 20:50:00 - [87] Holy ******* nerdrage thread ---------------------------------------------- Full circle. Sig nerfed due to is highly offensive content :( :(
Farham AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2008.06.19 20:51:00 - [88] Edited by: Farham on 19/06/2008 20:52:09 "Maybe you wouldnt have to make everyone caps if you didnt wierd quote all the time.Cool" I don't know why you guys have to make fun of my disability all the time. Maybe I will start a charity or something to help kids growing up with quoting retarrdation. (who knew retarrd was filtered) Everyone send me ISK for the children. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
Idaeus GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.19 21:49:00 - [89] Originally by: Pimpmaster General How the hell did an IRON thread become an ex-insurg drama thread is beyond me... CAOD.
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 21:57:00 - [90] Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: Pimpmaster General How the hell did an IRON thread become an ex-insurg drama thread is beyond me... Happends ever time butter posts his observations, his fans just comes along Aint it just so I wouldn't have it any other way. ----------

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.