EVE Search - North and IRON

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

North and IRON

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
steamy The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 22:31:00 - [91] Originally by: Yaay Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Look at dis lil nub trying to smack yaay. Yaay might have been a foe but he was a competent one at that, along with dacovale and agmar. You? I'm putting this up on my wall. "The day a Goon complemented me." If you are putting it up on your wall, does it mean you want to be reminded of this? talk about hitting rock bottom Steamy
Yaay Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.19 22:50:00 - [92] Originally by: steamy Originally by: Yaay Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Look at dis lil nub trying to smack yaay. Yaay might have been a foe but he was a competent one at that, along with dacovale and agmar. You? I'm putting this up on my wall. "The day a Goon complemented me." If you are putting it up on your wall, does it mean you want to be reminded of this? talk about hitting rock bottom Hobos fail more at caod than they do at well, everything. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=619019IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID
Butter Dog The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.19 23:08:00 - [93] Originally by: Yaay Hobos fail more at caod than they do at well, everything. WEDIE: 5729 Ships killed (304822.69M ISK) 458 Ships lost (12795.6M ISK) GAME: 1449 Ships killed (201431.47M ISK) 385 Ships lost (11251.09M ISK) ----------
Martin VanBuren GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.19 23:26:00 - [94] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Yaay Hobos fail more at caod than they do at well, everything. WEDIE: 5729 Ships killed (304822.69M ISK) 458 Ships lost (12795.6M ISK) GAME: 1449 Ships killed (201431.47M ISK) 385 Ships lost (11251.09M ISK) don't forget the alliance you guys lost too, although I am not sure at what rate that converts into isk
Szprinkoth Sponsz GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.20 00:13:00 - [95] k/d ratios
Jita Mistress Forge Enterprises	Posted - 2008.06.20 00:36:00 - [96] Is this a guy or a girl?
Bumkin Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 00:41:00 - [97] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Yaay Hobos fail more at caod than they do at well, everything. WEDIE: 5729 Ships killed (304822.69M ISK) 458 Ships lost (12795.6M ISK) GAME: 1449 Ships killed (201431.47M ISK) 385 Ships lost (11251.09M ISK) since you keep throwing that up there....you were in the alliance longer yes. therefore you have more kills. we were also in the alliance for the last 2 or 3 weeks of the 304 campainge....bandwagon much? keep trying man
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 00:44:00 - [98] Originally by: Bumkin Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Yaay Hobos fail more at caod than they do at well, everything. WEDIE: 5729 Ships killed (304822.69M ISK) 458 Ships lost (12795.6M ISK) GAME: 1449 Ships killed (201431.47M ISK) 385 Ships lost (11251.09M ISK) since you keep throwing that up there....you were in the alliance longer yes. therefore you have more kills. we were also in the alliance for the last 2 or 3 weeks of the 304 campainge....bandwagon much? keep trying man no you whernt. "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Bumkin Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 00:50:00 - [99] yes we were, we joined the alliance like the second week of january, and i was in 304 repping and fighting. so was the rest of the corp.
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 00:54:00 - [100] Originally by: Bumkin yes we were, we joined the alliance like the second week of january, and i was in 304 repping and fighting. so was the rest of the corp. keep thinking that was the campaing of takeing 304 all you whant, dosnt make it true. "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Bumkin Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 01:01:00 - [101] sorry i should clarify since you are being ********. we were there defending 304
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 01:12:00 - [102] Originally by: Bumkin sorry i should clarify since you are being ********. we were there defending 304 thats cool now you are starting to get the hang of the time line of events also regarding k/d we where only in the alliance for 3 months more than you even if we follow the % of time we spent more in insurgency we simpely where better than you. so if fail corp beats you'r corp what dose that make you ? ps. why do you bother to argue with us on the forum? "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Bumkin Game-Over Consortium Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 01:22:00 - [103] mostly because you feel the need to bash game-over in any thread that has anything to do with the north, whether its about insurgency or not. gods gift to insurgency you were not. im done here
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 01:32:00 - [104] Originally by: Bumkin mostly because you feel the need to bash game-over in any thread that has anything to do with the north, whether its about insurgency or not. gods gift to insurgency you were not. im done here hang on its you guys that keep showing up to bash us. i coudnt care less what you do, who you shot or what you had for breakfast. "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
SigmaPi Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 02:06:00 - [105] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam They wanted trouble and they got it. And your alliance paid more dearly for it than we ever did Replace 'trouble' with 'fun' and you're half way toward understanding INSRG's mentality at that time. But you'll never truly get it - you're in RAZOR. http://www.eve-razor.com/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_id=441 (Insurg had 47.08% efficiency against RZR. This is including the lost Titan on our side.) SigmaPi Cutting Edge Incorporated Executive Commander RAZOR Alliance
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 02:25:00 - [106] Originally by: SigmaPi Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam They wanted trouble and they got it. And your alliance paid more dearly for it than we ever did Replace 'trouble' with 'fun' and you're half way toward understanding INSRG's mentality at that time. But you'll never truly get it - you're in RAZOR. http://www.eve-razor.com/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_id=441 (Insurg had 47.08% efficiency against RZR. This is including the lost Titan on our side.) and razor was the only allaince insurgency was fighting true story! "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
Love Shine Black Plague. RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 07:38:00 - [107] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Kyguard GAME proved themselves in that 1 month and that's why I happened to join them. Bandwagoners or not they proved themselves in the end, if your corp wasn't busy complaining about the invasion and actually doing something maybe you'd know. Keep digging. No-one from my corp apart from me went away, and then I went only for 2 weeks Seriously. Facts > your drivel. WEDIE hold the record in INSRG for most caps deployed in the Branch campaigns by a mile, we installed more deathstars than you during the Branch defence, we killed more ships. As far as I'm concerned any other measure of success (like 'what you think') is simply drivel and not worth consideration. AHAHAHA Took me two minutes of looking at the RZR board since the insurg KB doesn't seem to show pos kills to find that Hobos lost: 5 Large pos 0 Medium pos 2 Small pos 28 Pos Mods to the NNC GAME on the other hand lost: 9 Large Pos (+4) 1 Medium Pos (+1) 0 Small Pos (-2) 41 Pos Mods (+13) Insurgency as a Whole lost: 97 Large Pos 33 Medium Pos 44 Small pos 401 pos mods Clearly Facts > your drivel... ----------------- I am a Very Pretty Man!!! Win a Freighter for only 33 million isk in the 4th Oregon Lotto!
Algey The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 08:34:00 - [108] Losing towers and installing towers isn't quite the same thing now is it. We were redeploying towers all the damned time, and to be honest so were a lot of corps (even Game). Celes had more pos gunners (lots of corps put their gunner alts into Celes), and they took over a number of strategic pos (jump bridges etc) from other corps (including ourselves). It wasn't just celes doing that either, control of the strategic pos often moved to whoever had a pos pair that was working at that particular point.
Angelonico Series of Tubes	Posted - 2008.06.20 08:46:00 - [109] No idea who's trolling who in this thread at this point, but Iron are chill brosefs. o/ Machette
Tearavygh Quillam Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 08:46:00 - [110] Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: SigmaPi Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam They wanted trouble and they got it. And your alliance paid more dearly for it than we ever did Replace 'trouble' with 'fun' and you're half way toward understanding INSRG's mentality at that time. But you'll never truly get it - you're in RAZOR. http://www.eve-razor.com/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_id=441 (Insurg had 47.08% efficiency against RZR. This is including the lost Titan on our side.) and razor was the only allaince insurgency was fighting true story! Hey, now, we gave you 'fun', don't be so bitter.
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 08:56:00 - [111] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: SigmaPi Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam They wanted trouble and they got it. And your alliance paid more dearly for it than we ever did Replace 'trouble' with 'fun' and you're half way toward understanding INSRG's mentality at that time. But you'll never truly get it - you're in RAZOR. http://www.eve-razor.com/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_id=441 (Insurg had 47.08% efficiency against RZR. This is including the lost Titan on our side.) and razor was the only allaince insurgency was fighting true story! Hey, now, we gave you 'fun', don't be so bitter. i love how you keep margalizing all your "friends" if i had friends like you i woudnt need enermys "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
MrRx7 Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 09:02:00 - [112] Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: SigmaPi Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam They wanted trouble and they got it. And your alliance paid more dearly for it than we ever did Replace 'trouble' with 'fun' and you're half way toward understanding INSRG's mentality at that time. But you'll never truly get it - you're in RAZOR. http://www.eve-razor.com/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_id=441 (Insurg had 47.08% efficiency against RZR. This is including the lost Titan on our side.) and razor was the only allaince insurgency was fighting true story! Hey, now, we gave you 'fun', don't be so bitter. i love how you keep margalizing all your "friends" if i had friends like you i woudnt need enermys your bad at this.
Lilan Kahn The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.20 09:08:00 - [113] Originally by: MrRx7 Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: SigmaPi Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam They wanted trouble and they got it. And your alliance paid more dearly for it than we ever did Replace 'trouble' with 'fun' and you're half way toward understanding INSRG's mentality at that time. But you'll never truly get it - you're in RAZOR. http://www.eve-razor.com/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_id=441 (Insurg had 47.08% efficiency against RZR. This is including the lost Titan on our side.) and razor was the only allaince insurgency was fighting true story! Hey, now, we gave you 'fun', don't be so bitter. i love how you keep margalizing all your "friends" if i had friends like you i woudnt need enermys your bad at this. Thats what your dad told me too after i had "fun" with your mom "Bringing Content to you 1 round of ammo at a time"
darth solo Celestial Apocalypse	Posted - 2008.06.20 09:23:00 - [114] INSRG ran its course and was fun. it was never meant to be around forever. it gave its members a good laugh and therefor was a success no matter what ppl think. Im glad its over. i can chill now and try diff things. as for IRON, we helped them out a few times when they asked for it. blade runners have history with celes apoc, i like raven deblade so made sure it stayed good. they then attacked us on blue without warning, maybe they thought that the 500 man NC gangs needed help?.. who knows, who cares, it wont be forgotten. d solo.
Tearavygh Quillam Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.20 09:35:00 - [115] Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Hey, now, we gave you 'fun', don't be so bitter. i love how you keep margalizing all your "friends" if i had friends like you i woudnt need enermys Bitter friends for bitter ends?
Misschievous	Posted - 2008.06.20 11:15:00 - [116] 3 pages of off-topic cry baby bull**!!! Insurgency sucked arse, not matter which of the corps where better than the other, you are still ** corps!!!! IBTL

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.