EVE Search - Ultimate counter to nano gangs

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Ultimate counter to nano gangs

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Dust Walk The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:38:00 - [1] Re-introducing the nano battle ship of the old days. Perfect for killing the nano cruisers while maintaining every viable counter to nano ships (webs, heavy neuts, ecm, etc). Discuss. -- OMG NERF ME!
ZinderX500 RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:39:00 - [2] Are you optimus prime ? _____________________ Shelley Godfrey: Have you lost your mind!? Baltar: That's an interesting question, and one I pose to myself on a regular basis.
Tamia Clant New Dawn Corp New Eden Research	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:39:00 - [3] Yes, because reintroducing nanobattleships is the way to fix the nano issue. Looking for queue-free research slots? Click here!
Wendat Huron Stellar Solutions	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:40:00 - [4] Not less nano but more, genious! Make it so that speed modules makes the ship even more vulnerable and increase the range of some smartbombs so you can effectively smartbomb them with a group of battleships. These forums are FUBAR, upgrade this decade!
Dust Walk The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:41:00 - [5] Originally by: Tamia Clant Yes, because reintroducing nanobattleships is the way to fix the nano issue. It is a perfect alternative. There is no nano issue, just introduce more effective alternatives to counter them such as the speed battleship. -- OMG NERF ME!
Dust Walk The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:45:00 - [6] Originally by: Wendat Huron Not less nano but more, genious! I thought so. It was not broken before and it sure is not broken now. Nothing wrong can come of the re-introduction of nano battleships. -- OMG NERF ME!
Marconus Orion D00M.	Posted - 2008.06.23 00:58:00 - [7] Yes! Also introduce nano carriers to combat the nano battleships. Problem fixed!!! CCP put this in next patch asap! Obviously the OP has done massive research into the issue at hand and this can't be tolerated any longer!!!
Novemb3r Vale Heavy Industries Molotov Coalition	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:01:00 - [8] Originally by: Marconus Orion Yes! Also introduce nano carriers to combat the nano battleships. Problem fixed!!! CCP put this in next patch asap! Obviously the OP has done massive research into the issue at hand and this can't be tolerated any longer!!! I think what really needs to be introduced to balance it all out is nano POS. PLEASE CCP LET ME PUT POLYCARBS ON MY LARGE TOWERS -
Tamia Clant New Dawn Corp New Eden Research	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:03:00 - [9] Originally by: Novemb3r I think what really needs to be introduced to balance it all out is nano POS. PLEASE CCP LET ME PUT POLYCARBS ON MY LARGE TOWERS That's a scary thought. Looking for queue-free research slots? Click here!
Shinux The Really Awesome Players R.E.P.O.	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:04:00 - [10] How are we going to fix the nano battleships?

auverne	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:07:00 - [11] Originally by: Marconus Orion Yes! Also introduce nano carriers to combat the nano battleships. this i for one welcome out nano-hel and nano-nidhoggur overlords sometime in the future it's a great way to fix the minmatar caps at the same time!
Tankn00blicus Cosmic Vacum Cleaners	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:42:00 - [12] Where's my nanopod?
Grarr Dexx Naval Protection Corp Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:43:00 - [13] Originally by: Novemb3r Originally by: Marconus Orion Yes! Also introduce nano carriers to combat the nano battleships. Problem fixed!!! CCP put this in next patch asap! Obviously the OP has done massive research into the issue at hand and this can't be tolerated any longer!!! I think what really needs to be introduced to balance it all out is nano POS. PLEASE CCP LET ME PUT POLYCARBS ON MY LARGE TOWERS Oh god no my alliance members are having trouble putting torps on an undefended pos hugging shields
Gimpb	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:47:00 - [14] Edited by: Gimpb on 23/06/2008 01:47:57 Honestly, it might not actually be that bad an idea. The hardest part about killing nano ships these days is the things that can catch them can't survive catching them. A nano hac could survive a BS long enough for the cavalry to arrive... a heck of a lot better than an intie can survive a hac anyway. edit: you can nano a phoon
Tamia Clant New Dawn Corp New Eden Research	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:48:00 - [15] Originally by: Tankn00blicus Where's my nanopod? You mean this? Looking for queue-free research slots? Click here!
Artemis Rose Eleckrostatik	Posted - 2008.06.23 02:01:00 - [16] Nano POS!! __________________________________________________ Currently Playing: Trolls from Outer Space Current Equipment: VISAcard chain mail, +2 Amulet of Epic Whine. WTB Purple Nerf Bat.
Dust Walk The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.23 02:13:00 - [17] Excellent! I think I can see people agreeing! -- OMG NERF ME!
Tamia Clant New Dawn Corp New Eden Research	Posted - 2008.06.23 02:15:00 - [18] Originally by: Dust Walk Excellent! I think I can see people agreeing! But you look surprised! Did you not expect people to agree? Looking for queue-free research slots? Click here!
Nul Settys UnderDog Industries Free Trade Zone.	Posted - 2008.06.23 03:33:00 - [19] It might work, but we would need to introduce a specially created class of 'nano-gorilla' ships to kill the nano-battleships.
Slickdrac JET FORCE	Posted - 2008.06.23 03:36:00 - [20] Are we talking about the stackable MWDs? I fully support this reintroduction. I suck at forums

Reem Fairchild Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2008.06.23 03:40:00 - [21] Originally by: Slickdrac Are we talking about the stackable MWDs? I fully support this reintroduction. He is talking about the situation before the spring 2007 "nano-nerf", with the inertial stabilizers of doom that we had back then.
DubanFP Four Rings Souls of Vengeance	Posted - 2008.06.23 04:30:00 - [22] Originally by: auverne i for one welcome out nano-hel and nano-nidhoggur overlords sometime in the future Well it's possible to get a hel up to 1.5km/s already. Not bad considering the immunity to webifiers. Just drop a crapload of warrior IIs for the ceptors and Hammerhead IIs for the nanocruisers with good drone navigation skills and a couple Drone navigation computers. Finally throw in a couple Heavy nuets to crap out the nanoships for good measure and I think it would be funny to try out. Think about it. Complete immunity to webifiers with the defense/offence of a carrier. Hammerhead IIs and Warrior IIs will toast just about anything that can keep up. Faction heavy Nuets will only add to that. Officer webs to make sure. Win or lose it can only end with some humorous results. _______________ ReiAyanami> We bring you tidings of AARRRRRRRRR
Terianna Eri Scrutari	Posted - 2008.06.23 04:50:00 - [23] Originally by: Nul Settys It might work, but we would need to introduce a specially created class of 'nano-gorilla' ships to kill the nano-battleships. I think I see a Simpson's reference here. __________________________________
PsychoBones Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.23 05:17:00 - [24] Originally by: Nul Settys 'nano-gorilla' This thread is going places...
IHaveTenFingers ADVANCED Combat and Engineering	Posted - 2008.06.23 06:40:00 - [25] Originally by: Shinux How are we going to fix the nano battleships? RZR Nano carriers. -TF
Dust Walk The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.23 14:35:00 - [26] Good morning bump to the best idea on this forum -- OMG NERF ME!
Plumpy McPudding Pator Tech School	Posted - 2008.06.23 14:37:00 - [27] Edited by: Plumpy McPudding on 23/06/2008 14:37:42 Alt + Q is the only counter! __________________________ Fear me for I have an insatiable appetite! Proprietor and inventor of Chocolate Chip Chocolate Donut flavored Ice Cream.
Melor Rend	Posted - 2008.06.23 14:38:00 - [28] Fix lag that will automatically nerf nano because then it may actually be possible to lock nanoships before they're out of webrange again hehe.
Dihania Mucho Dolor	Posted - 2008.06.23 14:39:00 - [29] Originally by: Tamia Clant Yes, because reintroducing nanobattleships is the way to fix the nano issue we really do not have. fixed that . EVE: "The Hand-holding Age". I need isk!Accepting donations. Renting sig space.Taking various jobs.
Dust Walk The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.06.23 14:53:00 - [30] Originally by: Reem Fairchild Originally by: Slickdrac Are we talking about the stackable MWDs? I fully support this reintroduction. He is talking about the situation before the spring 2007 "nano-nerf", with the inertial stabilizers of doom that we had back then. This. -- OMG NERF ME!



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.