| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
   |
Posted - 2008.06.25 09:06:00 -
[1]
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 09:09:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Xparky on 25/06/2008 09:11:02
And there's always scythes and scimitars that have nice bonuses to tracking links, giving even better tracking, also you can lower the transversal by not sitting on the gate and moving in the same direction your target moves.
It seems it's possible to damage them after all ...
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 09:10:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Shakuul
LIES ALL LIES NANOS ARE OP IM GOING TO IGNORE THE MASSIVE BODY OF EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY. I don't believe in evolution either.
Tut, tut, you broke the forums. Edit your post and remove the quoted image.
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 11:42:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tenuo
You are stupid aren't you? Way to misunderstand a graph. Look on the left side, percentages. at 24km a shocking 78% hit chance on a nano ship! at 60, nearly 100!
Way to shoot yourself in the foot.
Because 78% and 100% chance to hit is not good enough to hit nanos ?
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 13:19:00 -
[5]
CCP will nerf nanos.
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 14:55:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Tenuo
Counter argument this:
Rails
ACs
Waaait a minute, are those 2 setups nano killers ? They're not supposed to exist !! Lies, all lies *covers eyes and ears* lies lies lies lies lies lies lies etc
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 15:17:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Shadowsword
You are dishonest. Instead of taking average parameter, you deliberately slanted your "tests" with unrealist parameters to support your claims.
Why dishonest ? Is it not necessary to set up ships with the sole purpose of killing nanos? Where is the dishonest part, I don't get it.
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 15:35:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Xparky on 25/06/2008 15:35:46
It is theoretically possible to web from 98.2km - Overheated Domination webber, on a max skilled Huginn, boosted by a max skilled claymore pilot with Skirmish Warfare Link - Interdiction Maneuvers activated. I'd say 98.2 km is pretty ****in far.
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 17:13:00 -
[9]
Originally by: *****zilla
But these numbers mean more and more that Rapiers/Huginns are *required* ships in gangs/fleets.
Well then, better stock up while they're cheap 
. |
Xparky
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.06.25 17:25:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Shadowsword
That's besides the point. We're not speaking about how to fit to drive off nanos, as we already know that's possible. We're speaking about how the average pvp setup, the one you fight everyday, can or can't return fire if engaged by a nano ship.
I get it now, you're talking about 1v1 multi role setup.
Well then ... where should I start ...
. |
| |
|