| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
tubelight
Caldari Provisions
   |
Posted - 2008.06.26 12:50:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: SuiJuris
Originally by: Foocurr
MWD's are not too popular.
PVP for another year or so and come back.
not saying I agree with the OP but MWD's ARE TOO popular, They are the first thing Anyone fits to ANY PvP ship without a second thought.
There's this little module called a 'Stasis Webifier'...
The objective of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his |
Krij
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 14:05:00 -
[32]
/Sarcasm on
I firmly believe all carebears should be invunerable to all weapon and modules. In fact anytime a missile hits a Hulk I think it should increase it's mining yield. This is because carebears are the most important players in Eve.
/sarcasm off
|
Baleygr
Royal Hiigaran Navy
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 14:39:00 -
[33]
This is a fantastic idea! Kudos to the OP, I hope they do as he says.
(+) AB Fixed and has a purpose outside of PVE!
(+) WCS Have purpose - Gallente Deimos and Recons get a boost this way.
(+) Nano effectiveness reduced
|
Lyria Skydancer
Eve Defence Force
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 14:54:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Foocurr
MWD's are not too popular.
Fail.
-----------------------------------------
[Video] I'm a soldier, so remember the name |
Pteranodon
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 15:13:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Gartel Reiman
Originally by: Ragnor Dayton
Maybe better to make it a MWD speed boost effect though rather than complete disruption needing a WCS to correct.
It's a fundamentally bad idea - tweaking it makes it less bad, but will never make it good. Best to just let it die.
I have a solution. Just take the word "warp" out of the module name & call it a "get my arse out of here quick burner"-easy really. I asked the very same question WHY?- my old corp laughed at me & took the **** but I could not see the logic in being warp scrambled then being able to micro warp.
|
Pteranodon
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 15:18:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Anubis Hatak
90% of people's ****ty nano solutions would kill ceptors, you give any sort of web range bonus (or this peice of crap for an idea) and ceptors will be screwed over simple as...
P.S. Your idea sucks.
I like the idea of ceptors being screwed over. They really screw up my battleships & always when I forget to fit a nuet-they are like flys around a cowpat.
|
Anubis Hatak
OUTLAWZ IMMORTAL
White Core
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 15:43:00 -
[37]
Anyone who thinks this is a good idea needs to be shot, really..
I wonder what's next, "make sensor dampeners stop armor repairers working"? 
|
Yozarian Kee
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 15:53:00 -
[38]
I think its a great idea.. just have to get myself a carrier first becaus everyone will be flying bs and above.
|
George Carsonygen
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 10:21:00 -
[39]
Edited by: George Carsonygen on 27/06/2008 10:21:54
I like your idea, it just makes sense! Nanos just need to learn to play and accept the fact that they should not be able to escape at will.
|
AnKahn
Caldari
Hunters Agency
Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 16:21:00 -
[40]
Script them!(disrupters)
One script prevents warping away, one script prevents MWDing.
Boost afterburners! Webs effect AB, but not MWD.
Give MWD a big agility nerf.
Script bubbles! Big huge warp disruption field OR big huge flypaper (that you can warp out of). Each different effect field cannot occupy the same space.
The above has a lot more dynamics than the current binary system.
OR leave it all alone an l2p?
|
Ezekiel Sulastin
Central Research Nexus
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 17:44:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Baleygr
This is a fantastic idea! Kudos to the OP, I hope they do as he says.
(+) AB Fixed and has a purpose outside of PVE!
(+) WCS Have purpose - Gallente Deimos and Recons get a boost this way.
(+) Nano effectiveness reduced
Uhhh, what? Anything that would screw up any blasterboat's ability to get into face range is a HUGE MASSIVE NERF TO THEM. The Deimos would be nuked, as would every other blasterboat IN THE GAME as it dies struggling to make range.
----
WTB Armor Nerf Hardener II, 10^100 isk OBO |
Baleygr
Royal Hiigaran Navy
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 21:39:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Ezekiel Sulastin
Uhhh, what? Anything that would screw up any blasterboat's ability to get into face range is a HUGE MASSIVE NERF TO THEM. The Deimos would be nuked, as would every other blasterboat IN THE GAME as it dies struggling to make range.
Deimos: WCS+MWD
WCS prevents the ship from being MWD jammed, and with Blasters the 40% targeting range nerf from the WCS is irrelevant.
Alternatively fit AB and more tank/gank.
All interceptors would require AB instead of MWD for survival.
|
TheMailman
GreenSwarm
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.01 09:30:00 -
[43]
<sarcasm> requesting micro warp disruptor </sarcasm> |
Amastat
Caldari
Omegatech
|
Posted - 2008.07.01 09:52:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Amastat on 01/07/2008 09:52:49
Ugh... *shakes head disappointingly*
CCP - just rename MWD to Really Big Afterburner or something and kill this thread.
I've seen lots of trolls before, some ingenious ones - but this one is just ridiculous.
____________________
"All warfare is based on deception... we must seem unable...seem inactive...and crush him " - Sun Tzu |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |