EVE Search - Council of Stellar Management Summit Recap, Dev Blog by Xhagen

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Council of Stellar Management Summit Recap, Dev Blog by Xhagen

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
BRUCELLA 2 Horizon Fontaine Blanche House of Mercury	Posted - 2008.06.27 00:19:00 - [31] You can read this Dev Blog in french here -> EVE News Center ------------------------------------------- Vous cherchez une traduction frantaise des nouvelles de EVE ? C'est ici : EVE News Center
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2008.06.27 03:57:00 - [32] Quote: Delegated to: Serenity Steele Jumpbridges and Cynojammer fix Transferable Killrights Funky POS Alterations expecting an answer why you dind't bring up your topic...
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2008.06.27 04:32:00 - [33] Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: LaVista Vista These are the issues that were discussed: 0001 Skill Queue Functionality 0002 Bombs need a Boost 0003 Problems with Aggression Timer 0004 Black Ops Improvements 0005 CSM should vote for it's own Chairman 0006 Destructable Outposts 0007 Double Click of Pilot name/avatar 0008 Cargo hold size of ships in hangar 0009 Alliances and Faction Warfare 0010 5% Voting issues 0011 Electronic Warfare Icons in the Overview 0012 Minium Size of HUD Elements 0013 Skill page tweaks 0014 Personal Asset HUD Element tweak 0015 Pilot avatar listing in chat channel 0016 Switch ammo for all weapons at once 0017 Discussion on Empire War Dec mechanics 0018 0.0 Sovereignty Issues 0019 Contract Improvements 0020 Public POS Arrays 0021 Assembly Array Issues 0022 Shares, dividends and stock market discussion 0023 Sell Order availability standing, Seller Name Listing 0024 Experimental Industry Issues, Long-Term industry discussion 0025 Game Time Code Concerns 0026 Suicide Ganking 0027 Drone Implants 0028 Forum Issues and fixes The minutes are being worked on. I don't have any ETA on it though. Sorry. I thought you voted yes on the funky POS changes? you know being able top build towers and bridges connecting the POS modules... no wait, I'm SURE you did. A mistake was made when we submitted, which meant that the issue about mid-sized freighters and the POS changes wasn't sent off.
Mar Drakar LDK Ministry Of Amarrian Secret Service	Posted - 2008.06.27 09:25:00 - [34] does long term industry stuff include, something like multiple job start on one go? for example I want to make 10 production runs, on 10BPC's, and I make on series of clicks... not 10 times same clicks... again again aagain..... and again... again again again again again.. and yes, again (that was 10 times again and thats annoying, now imagine you wait 10 times to load installations list, and 10 times load of slot list...) -- Make your life worth dying. CEO LDK
Franga NQX Innovations	Posted - 2008.06.27 11:04:00 - [35] Some juicy topics. Originally by: Rachel Vend ... with 100% reliability in most cases ...
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2008.06.27 13:50:00 - [36] thanks for the answer mate, that's really too bad to hear :/
Adam C 0utbreak	Posted - 2008.06.27 14:19:00 - [37] I've read the discussion from jade on shc on 0.0 fw styled warfare and r** and pillage of station* idea's. I must say, those gave me a warm giddy feeling I haven't felt in years. - Best of luck on those idea's
Zaphroid Eulthran Minmatar Imperial Visions	Posted - 2008.06.27 18:52:00 - [38] So you "lost" the mid sized freighter topic again I take it? . Hi-Sec Industry NEEDS Mini Freighters <- not T2 bazillion ISK alliance toys
Acobar Minmatar Agony Unleashed Agony Empire	Posted - 2008.06.27 19:55:00 - [39] I would love to see some focus on the corp interface since it is one of the least mentioned or updated modules. :)
Bane Glorious	Posted - 2008.06.27 21:54:00 - [40] We also unofficially discussed topics including: Cyno Jammers and Jump Bridges, Player Bannings, Buffing mid- and upper-tier large Autocannons, some kind of aggro-related issue I think, and a couple other things that I can't remember. I intend to get the issue of "Capital Ships Online" into the August meeting, which is online, not in Iceland. Either way, while in Iceland, some CCP devs did make some encouraging comments related to it nonetheless.
Solomunio Kzenig Amarr SPORADIC MOVEMENT The Gurlstas Associates	Posted - 2008.06.28 07:18:00 - [41] Originally by: Serenity Steele One key thing that we learnt during the sessions is that CCP are open to much wider discussion on the future of EVE than many of the detailed balancing issues. Also that technical detail raised in some of the threads is not necessary - if we state the goal of where we as players would like EVE to go (eg. self-policing through transferable kill rights) then CCP are keen to work out the technicalities. This.
Gigi Barbagrigia 58th Syndicate	Posted - 2008.06.28 09:09:00 - [42] I miss the days when devblogs actually had a substance. But I have to admit your PR person is doing good job.
Franga NQX Innovations	Posted - 2008.06.28 11:02:00 - [43] Originally by: Gigi Barbagrigia I miss the days when devblogs actually had a substance. But I have to admit your PR person is doing good job. They still happen. But are infrequent. The type you speak of used to be Oveur or Tux's realm. But one of them is on a different product now and one is apparently on paternity leave. Greyscale does them. Not many others do. Always these one's about what the GMs are doing, or what the volunteer's section are doing. You can tell from the lack of responses to those types of blogs that not too many care. It's the game-mechanic/feature/ideas blogs that everyone wants. Originally by: Rachel Vend ... with 100% reliability in most cases ...
Cailais Amarr VITOC	Posted - 2008.06.28 11:16:00 - [44] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: LaVista Vista These are the issues that were discussed: 0001 Skill Queue Functionality 0002 Bombs need a Boost 0003 Problems with Aggression Timer 0004 Black Ops Improvements 0005 CSM should vote for it's own Chairman 0006 Destructable Outposts 0007 Double Click of Pilot name/avatar 0008 Cargo hold size of ships in hangar 0009 Alliances and Faction Warfare 0010 5% Voting issues 0011 Electronic Warfare Icons in the Overview 0012 Minium Size of HUD Elements 0013 Skill page tweaks 0014 Personal Asset HUD Element tweak 0015 Pilot avatar listing in chat channel 0016 Switch ammo for all weapons at once 0017 Discussion on Empire War Dec mechanics 0018 0.0 Sovereignty Issues 0019 Contract Improvements 0020 Public POS Arrays 0021 Assembly Array Issues 0022 Shares, dividends and stock market discussion 0023 Sell Order availability standing, Seller Name Listing 0024 Experimental Industry Issues, Long-Term industry discussion 0025 Game Time Code Concerns 0026 Suicide Ganking 0027 Drone Implants 0028 Forum Issues and fixes The minutes are being worked on. I don't have any ETA on it though. Sorry. I thought you voted yes on the funky POS changes? you know being able top build towers and bridges connecting the POS modules... no wait, I'm SURE you did. A mistake was made when we submitted, which meant that the issue about mid-sized freighters and the POS changes wasn't sent off. You missed off the POS issue?! /me bops LaVista over the head with a rolled up E-ON. Oh and get em to fix the pilgrim while youre there - sneak off during a coffee break or something and hold someone hostage - should do the trick. C. VITOC - Amarr Corp for Faction Warfare!
Typhado3 Minmatar Ashen Lion Mining and Production Consortium Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.06.28 11:52:00 - [45] I notice that nano nerf was not in that list does this man that ccp is not listening to all the nerf nanno threads? or that it's still coming up? waiting on transcript but good to know stuff is being done even if I can't see everything yet. Typhado
Daelorn Perkone	Posted - 2008.06.28 13:50:00 - [46] Originally by: Mashie Saldana Originally by: LaVista Vista These are the issues that were discussed: 0016 Switch ammo for all weapons at once It was a recent dev post on the forum about that which in short stated that it won't happen as it simply will cause too much load on the database. Shame as it would be a very nice feature. WTF? Whats the diffidence between us doing it by hand or having a short "macro"-like code switch it all for us?
Solidius Minmatar	Posted - 2008.06.29 01:45:00 - [47] Edited by: Solidius on 29/06/2008 01:46:41 Originally by: Mashie Saldana Originally by: LaVista Vista These are the issues that were discussed: 0016 Switch ammo for all weapons at once It was a recent dev post on the forum about that which in short stated that it won't happen as it simply will cause too much load on the database. Shame as it would be a very nice feature. That reeks of crappy coding and/or db design, or a flat out BS excuse. The difference in perf for a stored procedure that changed one value at a time vs 8 or 10 or whatever is almost nonexistant. Hell, they could just have a function in the client code that let you one-click-change-all-ammo in the UI, then in the code stagger the actual individual change requests to the db over a couple of seconds. This seems like an incredibly easy problem to solve. Edit: Heh. high five Daelorn
Melissa Ravenflame Caldari Zulu Squadron	Posted - 2008.06.29 09:40:00 - [48] Would be good to sort the minutes out and post them guys. I'm sure there are a lot but I would have thought these would have had a rather high priority. Seems to be a 'We'll get them done at some point....' attitude.
Zex Maxwell Caldari	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:01:00 - [49] wait a sec here, here was an old CSM? what happened to that?
Reptzo Channel 4 News Team	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:12:00 - [50] Originally by: Melissa Ravenflame Would be good to sort the minutes out and post them guys. I'm sure there are a lot but I would have thought these would have had a rather high priority. Seems to be a 'We'll get them done at some point....' attitude. It's just like all the written transcripts of the live dev blogs, promised every time, not 1 has ever been delivered.
Athre Minmatar The Higher Standard	Posted - 2008.06.29 17:23:00 - [51] Originally by: Melissa Ravenflame Would be good to sort the minutes out and post them guys. I'm sure there are a lot but I would have thought these would have had a rather high priority. Seems to be a 'We'll get them done at some point....' attitude. It appears anything official is tied up in ccp red tape. <points to nav bar CSM -> Meeting Minutes -> sees 2 from May, nothing from June >
King Hopy Interstellar eXodus R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.06.30 09:14:00 - [52] Originally by: Typhado3 I notice that nano nerf was not in that list does this man that ccp is not listening to all the nerf nanno threads? or that it's still coming up? waiting on transcript but good to know stuff is being done even if I can't see everything yet. Typhado There's no need for such a nerf.
EliteSlave Minmatar M. Corp Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2008.06.30 17:03:00 - [53] As much love for the CCP Devs i have, and Xhagen <3. I truly believe that this CSM Project is going to go down in flames, I do not believe there will be anything to come out of this. I do not trust the playerbase to make fair changes to Eve as they will always be made on their own behalf, as i have many supporters of this, I wish CCP would back away from this and have the game design team do their own jobs.
SentryRaven KIA Corp KIA Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.30 18:14:00 - [54] Originally by: LaVista Vista A mistake was made when we submitted, which meant that the issue about mid-sized freighters and the POS changes wasn't sent off. Oh LVV.... come on now..... sad little bunny
WARTECH ASSASSIN	Posted - 2008.07.01 06:50:00 - [55] I'm surprised why the CRAPPY AND POINTLESS BOUNTY SYSTEM wasn't discussed. I'm sure old players know the problem: Ohhh... bounty on me. Let's collect it. Hey buddy, kill my Jump Clone that has no implants and let's split it 50/50. Oh, wait, lemme get on my alt instead and I'll collect 100% of my own bounty instead.
Mr Horizontal Gallente KIA Corp KIA Alliance	Posted - 2008.07.01 16:25:00 - [56] I've been getting increasingly annoyed about the distinct ineptitude of publishing minutes in a timely and consistent manner. The CSM have to realise that they are an elected entity and they're primary point of addressing any issues discussed is the electorate. Currently the official place to post minutes being here is WAY out of date. Then you have SS's supposed official CSM site here that is also WAY out of date. And the only place seemingly having fairly up to date meetings is the various threads here in Jita Park Speaker's corner (though even so, Meeting 4 is missing them). Sort it out. Now. Director \| www.eve-bank.net
Hamfast Gallente	Posted - 2008.07.01 20:51:00 - [57] Edited by: Hamfast on 01/07/2008 20:51:26 Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: LaVista Vista These are the issues that were discussed: 0001 Skill Queue Functionality 0002 Bombs need a Boost 0003 Problems with Aggression Timer 0004 Black Ops Improvements 0005 CSM should vote for it's own Chairman 0006 Destructable Outposts 0007 Double Click of Pilot name/avatar 0008 Cargo hold size of ships in hangar 0009 Alliances and Faction Warfare 0010 5% Voting issues 0011 Electronic Warfare Icons in the Overview 0012 Minium Size of HUD Elements 0013 Skill page tweaks 0014 Personal Asset HUD Element tweak 0015 Pilot avatar listing in chat channel 0016 Switch ammo for all weapons at once 0017 Discussion on Empire War Dec mechanics 0018 0.0 Sovereignty Issues 0019 Contract Improvements 0020 Public POS Arrays 0021 Assembly Array Issues 0022 Shares, dividends and stock market discussion 0023 Sell Order availability standing, Seller Name Listing 0024 Experimental Industry Issues, Long-Term industry discussion 0025 Game Time Code Concerns 0026 Suicide Ganking 0027 Drone Implants 0028 Forum Issues and fixes The minutes are being worked on. I don't have any ETA on it though. Sorry. I thought you voted yes on the funky POS changes? you know being able top build towers and bridges connecting the POS modules... no wait, I'm SURE you did. A mistake was made when we submitted, which meant that the issue about mid-sized freighters and the POS changes wasn't sent off. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=781074&page=4#114 One of these is not quite right... mind telling me which? --------*****-------- Learn and be informed, because a Politicians worst nightmare is an informed voter... So choose your CSM Candidates wisely
Sgt Napalm Synergy Evolved	Posted - 2008.07.03 17:30:00 - [58] Where is the minutes?
Manfred Rickenbocker The Elliance Delta.Green	Posted - 2008.07.08 21:28:00 - [59] Bumping for Minutes ETA? ------------------------ Peace through superior firepower: a guiding principle for uncertain times.
bluebeyond DEATHFUNK R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.07.09 03:54:00 - [60] Edited by: bluebeyond on 09/07/2008 03:54:38 Something should be done about the price and length of GTCs. The new changes put in place are shocking. This game is just costing too bloody much now. Should be much higher up than 25!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.