| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ragnar Dannaskjold
   |
Posted - 2008.07.12 05:13:00 -
[1]
It will double as a "prostitute"house.
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
|
Mike Ludkips
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 05:19:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Mike Ludkips on 12/07/2008 05:19:37
Edited by: Mike Ludkips on 12/07/2008 05:19:03
There was an EVE P O R N site for awhile that charged ISK. I dunno how successful it was you might consider trying that first to establish a reputation and get a large client list.
|
soldieroffortune 258
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 05:27:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Mike Ludkips
Edited by: Mike Ludkips on 12/07/2008 05:19:37
Edited by: Mike Ludkips on 12/07/2008 05:19:03
There was an EVE P O R N site for awhile that charged ISK. I dunno how successful it was you might consider trying that first to establish a reputation and get a large client list.
wow, if you are serious, then, just, WOW, this is in relation to people finding "relationships" on the internet, now people look at avatars? at least go get a playboy or something thats real
|
Mike Ludkips
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 05:29:00 -
[4]
Nono not like naked pics of eve people, just regular old playboy p o r n hosted so it would be compatible in EVE, for those lonely mining ops or whatever.
Although I'm sure if you were a talented artist you could make some.
|
Neth'Rae
Gallente
Decorum Inc
Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 05:53:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mike Ludkips
Nono not like naked pics of eve people, just regular old playboy p o r n hosted so it would be compatible in EVE, for those lonely mining ops or whatever.
Although I'm sure if you were a talented artist you could make some.
He means that it was compatible with the in-game browser, I remember it from way back when I first played EVE.
I just heard about it though, never actually saw it :P
And I did always wonder how he could charge isk for it?
Request signatures at EVE-GFX |
Kawaii Sakura
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:02:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
It will double as a "prostitute"house.
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
might actually have a use for the exotic dansers
|
|
GM Zhainius
Amarr
Game Masters
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:06:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
For the record, that would be a violation of the ToS, so I would recommend against it.
---
GM Zhainius
EVE Online Customer Support
CCP Games |
|
Mike Ludkips
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:08:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Neth'Rae
And I did always wonder how he could charge isk for it?
he gave out personal passwords and charged for those
|
Tanith YarnDemon
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:17:00 -
[9]
Originally by: GM Zhainius
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
For the record, that would be a violation of the ToS, so I would recommend against it.
About that...
Seeing how this is one of those situation when both involved parties would have agreed to deal(it's even specified the payment would be upfront) and are to expect an isolated enviroment where all parties are expected to parttake in language that are sexually explicit and vulgar - I would have expected it to be excempt from the ToS.
This also leads to a much more pressing issue. For example reading point 19, it would be impossible to update my account settings - such as credit card details without first cancelling my subscription? And yet you've even created an interface explicitly there to violate your own ToS?
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:41:00 -
[10]
Originally by: GM Zhainius
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
For the record, that would be a violation of the ToS, so I would recommend against it.
I believe he means ISK when he talks about "money", not real-world cash.
As such, it should be ok as long as the "cybering" is not sexually explicit (but then again, who the heck would bother, heh).
But then again, you have rule #9...
"You may not advertise, employ, market, or promote any form of solicitation – including pyramid schemes and chain letters – in the EVE Online game world or on the website."
So... was the EIB scam a TOS offense ? 
Seriously guys, you need to update those TOS a bit...
_
The mineral/moonstuff balance || *THE* nanofix
|
|
|
Tanith YarnDemon
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:53:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Akita T
I believe he means ISK when he talks about "money", not real-world cash.
As such, it should be ok as long as the "cybering" is not sexually explicit (but then again, who the heck would bother, heh).
But then again, you have rule #9...
"You may not advertise, employ, market, or promote any form of solicitation û including pyramid schemes and chain letters û in the EVE Online game world or on the website."
So... was the EIB scam a TOS offense ?
Seriously guys, you need to update those TOS a bit...
Nevermind the EIB scam, but there are other actors around right now such as the BIG lottery, the pixelpage nevermind eve.orb.at and such.
|
Ioci
Gallente
Ioci Exploration
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:58:00 -
[12]
Nude didnt work for Age of Conan but they don't really have a game as of yet, to play after the 1 week giggle factor is gone. |
masternerdguy
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 06:59:00 -
[13]
worst troll ever.
|
SwampFox1940
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:08:00 -
[14]
gotta wonder if concord will be in the stations
|
masternerdguy
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:08:00 -
[15]
we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it!
Heres my idea.....
Each faction gets a new battlecruiser
They are Survivor class.
They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price.
Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill):
+50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount
50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake)
50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers)
50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks)
But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons.
-75% to turret tracking
-75% to missile launcher rate of fire
+75% to reload time of modules
+75% to turret rate of fire.
Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
|
Neth'Rae
Gallente
Decorum Inc
Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:13:00 -
[16]
Originally by: masternerdguy
we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it!
Heres my idea.....
Each faction gets a new battlecruiser
They are Survivor class.
They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price.
Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill):
+50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount
50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake)
50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers)
50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks)
But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons.
-75% to turret tracking
-75% to missile launcher rate of fire
+75% to reload time of modules
+75% to turret rate of fire.
Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
Dude Shut up!
We're talking about cybering, hookers and important stuff! 
Request signatures at EVE-GFX |
Mike Ludkips
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:21:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Neth'Rae
Originally by: masternerdguy
we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it!
Heres my idea.....
Each faction gets a new battlecruiser
They are Survivor class.
They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price.
Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill):
+50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount
50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake)
50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers)
50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks)
But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons.
-75% to turret tracking
-75% to missile launcher rate of fire
+75% to reload time of modules
+75% to turret rate of fire.
Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
Dude Shut up!
We're talking about cybering, hookers and important stuff!
Wow maybe he's trying to make this into another forced meme like 'this is my raven setup'
|
masternerdguy
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:22:00 -
[18]
if (mode == -3) {
//Configure Player for test
player.currentSolarSystem = "Ziaac";
//Create the test universe
space[0] = new cosmos(0, 500, 100, "Sigos");
space[0].setSolarSystem("Ziaac");
space[0].setPlanetTexture(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getImage(getUrl("test_planet_0000.png")));
//Create a 2nd test planet
space[1] = new cosmos(0, 12100, 19324, "Sigos Minor");
space[1].setSolarSystem("Ziaac");
space[1].setPlanetTexture(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getImage(getUrl("test_planet_0001.png")));
//Draw a Star
space[2] = new cosmos(1, 81082, 2024, "Ziaac");
space[2].setSolarSystem("Ziaac");
space[2].setPlanetTexture(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getImage(getUrl("test_star_0002.png")));
//Draw an asteroid field
space[3] = new cosmos(2, 1001, 9632, "Asteroid Field I");
space[3].setSolarSystem("Ziaac");
space[3].setPlanetTexture(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getImage(getUrl("test_asteroid_0003.png")));
//Draw a gas cloud
space[4] = new cosmos(3, 5600, 10034, "Riol Nebula");
space[4].setSolarSystem("Ziaac");
space[4].setPlanetTexture(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getImage(getUrl("test_gas_0004.png")));
}
|
Fraszoid
Caldari
ULTRA VEGA
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:31:00 -
[19]
While interesting, I have other friends to cyber with, however none will let me do lines of crash of their stomachs, will you be offering that service? I can bring my own crash to do.
--------------------------------------------------
Everyone is born right handed, only the great over come it.
Check out my players guide at:
http://www.eve-miners.info/guide/minersguide.html |
Epegi Givo
Amarr
Demon Theory
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 07:57:00 -
[20]
Originally by: masternerdguy
we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it!
Heres my idea.....
Each faction gets a new battlecruiser
They are Survivor class.
They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price.
Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill):
+50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount
50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake)
50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers)
50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks)
But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons.
-75% to turret tracking
-75% to missile launcher rate of fire
+75% to reload time of modules
+75% to turret rate of fire.
Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
Someone please pod him out of existence already.
Originally by: DroneCommander
Originally by: Isiskhan
My mother's name is Rolricka. Yes, I'm being 100% serious.
Dude! Your mum got RolRick'd!
|
|
|
Xonkra
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 08:07:00 -
[21]
Originally by: masternerdguy
worst troll ever.
/hug
Originally by: masternerdguy
we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it!
Heres my idea.....
Each faction gets a new battlecruiser
They are Survivor class.
They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price.
Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill):
+50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount
50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake)
50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers)
50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks)
But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons.
-75% to turret tracking
-75% to missile launcher rate of fire
+75% to reload time of modules
+75% to turret rate of fire.
Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
/hug
poor messed up thing 
---------
Founder of the Hug-a-troll initiative
Hug a forum troll because they can probably use it ! |
Ragnar Darkstar
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 08:22:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
I put on my robe and wizard hat. . . .
|
Zinras
Caldari
Order of draugr
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 08:54:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Zinras on 12/07/2008 08:54:49
Originally by: Tanith YarnDemon
Originally by: GM Zhainius
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
For the record, that would be a violation of the ToS, so I would recommend against it.
About that...
Seeing how this is one of those situation when both involved parties would have agreed to deal(it's even specified the payment would be upfront) and are to expect an isolated enviroment where all parties are expected to parttake in language that are sexually explicit and vulgar - I would have expected it to be excempt from the ToS.
I think the issue is rather three things:
1) You can't guarantee that the people signing up for a sex session between two males are of the age of consent. Mommy and daddy have credit cards too, you know, and they can sign up to EVE for the kid. While you can argue stuff like the parents could sit with the kid when playing and such, I think CCP would rather be on the safe side.
2) EVE isn't a ****site.
3) It would put "Mom's Basement" out of business 
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
*moderated - mother abuse - Mitnal*
CCP's best friend |
Market AltLOLOLOLO
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 08:59:00 -
[24]
Hey,
The CSM Chairman ran a RP Brothel before, even used to have a couple of lesbians kissing in his old sig.
So the only way to beat the TOS is to do what people do in real life - get some power!
|
Glassback
Body Count Inc.
The Requiem
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 09:10:00 -
[25]
Originally by: GM Zhainius
Originally by: Ragnar Dannaskjold
Cybering will cost money based on an hourly isk rate, paid upfront.
For the record, that would be a violation of the ToS, so I would recommend against it.
QF sense of humor failure
LinkedIn
|
Tanith YarnDemon
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 09:28:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Zinras
I think the issue is rather three things:
1) You can't guarantee that the people signing up for a sex session between two males are of the age of consent. Mommy and daddy have credit cards too, you know, and they can sign up to EVE for the kid. While you can argue stuff like the parents could sit with the kid when playing and such, I think CCP would rather be on the safe side.
2) EVE isn't a ****site.
3) It would put "Mom's Basement" out of business
1. It wouldn't be a sex session as it's still about chat in a virtual internet spaceship game. I have no idea how your local laws are formulated but I honestly doubt they would prohibit this. I don't object to the rule being there, I can see a multitude of reasons for it. I object to the interpretation of it. See the following paragraph.
2. EVE is an MMO and a community around it. Part of this community is a a serie of chronicles, stories and novels written by third parties, several of these contain erotic content of various levels - and are openly supported and distributed by CCP. I can't see how this would make EVE any more of a ****site than they do?
3. Uhm... hope there's a hidden point I just fail to interpret here.
Joy! Days of serious discussions makes the Yarn all soft and ticklish!
|
Zinras
Caldari
Order of draugr
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 09:39:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Tanith YarnDemon
Originally by: Zinras
I think the issue is rather three things:
1) You can't guarantee that the people signing up for a sex session between two males are of the age of consent. Mommy and daddy have credit cards too, you know, and they can sign up to EVE for the kid. While you can argue stuff like the parents could sit with the kid when playing and such, I think CCP would rather be on the safe side.
2) EVE isn't a ****site.
3) It would put "Mom's Basement" out of business
1. It wouldn't be a sex session as it's still about chat in a virtual internet spaceship game. I have no idea how your local laws are formulated but I honestly doubt they would prohibit this. I don't object to the rule being there, I can see a multitude of reasons for it. I object to the interpretation of it. See the following paragraph.
2. EVE is an MMO and a community around it. Part of this community is a a serie of chronicles, stories and novels written by third parties, several of these contain erotic content of various levels - and are openly supported and distributed by CCP. I can't see how this would make EVE any more of a ****site than they do?
3. Uhm... hope there's a hidden point I just fail to interpret here.
Joy! Days of serious discussions makes the Yarn all soft and ticklish!
1 and 2: See Chris Hansen.
3: See this.
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
*moderated - mother abuse - Mitnal*
CCP's best friend |
Tanith YarnDemon
|
Posted - 2008.07.12 09:51:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Zinras
1 and 2: See Chris Hansen.
3: See this.
A quick google and I realize I actually have seen his "show" atleast once. Though, when I did it was about pedophiles picking up what they thought were kids online and then caught them when they arrived at their house irl.
Quite far from 2 virtual characters roleplaying it out in this artificial enviroment. =)
But as I said, I'm not having issues seeing the rule being there, on the contrary.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |