| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Dhip C
Minmatubbies
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 15:12:00 -
[91]
Edited by: Dhip C on 14/07/2008 15:12:46
Originally by: General StarScream
Originally by: Dracorimus If this happens and bob do advance with pre-knowledge of cynojammer nerf, then I think I'm gonna stop playing as there will be no point.....
My stuff, no you cant, its being melted if I go along with this char
BTW, im an ex-bob char for over 2-3 years, and feel very unhappy that one group can get what they want in a game by contacting devs...or cheating (T20).
a long time ago, when i was a littel less of a noob, i was in Xelas
and really funny how bob attacked 1 week befor the news of the new sov system, with cyno jammers.
It's a conspiracy.
|

TWD
Evolution Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 15:28:00 -
[92]
Originally by: TheAdj
Originally by: TWD
Only 400? That's quite disappointing. Better luck next time!
Where have you been hiding sweetheart, I've missed you! Stop fake-scouting AZN and get up here so we can have talks like the old days.
Tempted, but not ready yet to surrender MY LIFE to EVE once again!
|

Admiral Crom
Minmatar DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 15:56:00 -
[93]
I don't wanna Hear anyone talk about CYNOJAMMERS being Overpowered. If so, and if Nerfed... Let go back to NOL and see who really would have won. BOB might have drooped to it's knee's. But what do I know!?! Ummm Duh! |

Nick Curso
Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:25:00 -
[94]
This cant be the same Draco can it....
|

Two Knives
GoonFleet
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:34:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Admiral Crom I don't wanna Hear anyone talk about CYNOJAMMERS being Overpowered. If so, and if Nerfed... Let go back to NOL and see who really would have won. BOB might have drooped to it's knee's. But what do I know!?!
DONT YOU MEAN CRYNOJAMMERS!?!?!?
great post
|

JenDen
Caldari The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:41:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Admiral Crom I don't wanna Hear anyone talk about CYNOJAMMERS being Overpowered. If so, and if Nerfed... Let go back to NOL and see who really would have won. BOB might have drooped to it's knee's. But what do I know!?!
this post makes sense - Sig: StackNerfing * GangLinks |

Alexios Komnenos
Minmatar Byzantine Holding Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:46:00 -
[97]
Edited by: Alexios Komnenos on 14/07/2008 16:50:20 Edited by: Alexios Komnenos on 14/07/2008 16:46:52
Originally by: Dracorimus If this happens and bob do advance with pre-knowledge of cynojammer nerf, then I think I'm gonna stop playing as there will be no point.....
My stuff, no you cant, its being melted if I go along with this char
BTW, im an ex-bob char for over 2-3 years, and feel very unhappy that one group can get what they want in a game by contacting devs...or cheating (T20).
CCP never has done an adequate job of coming clean after that incident. I also don't believe that Devs don't still intervene based on playing favorites, or their own ingame affiliations, and fact of the matter is that other than banning employees from playing on non company accounts so their behavior can be tracked nothing can prevent this.
The fact that T20 wasn't fired and the only punishment handed out was to the guy who exposed him alone gives CCP a serious lack of credibility and the impression that they really don't take this seriously.
The answer of course is transparency. The number of CCP employees in each corp/alliance should be public knowledge. Not their names, identity, etc, but the COUNT of how many there are in each corp/alliance. That way the employees have a reason to be cautious and play it fair, because if it's known that 15 devs are in "Alliance A" and zero in "Alliance B" if something funny happens with Dev intervention in a conflict between them then those questions will be asked, and such things won't be able to be gotten away with.
Fact of the matter is, I don't think that ANYONE seriously believes that the T20 scandal was the ONLY time Devs have stepped in to abuse their positions to help their own side. It was just the one where they got caught.
And yes, I do believe that BOB has foreknowledge of game changes. It's been leaking around for awhile that some mega nerf to cynojammers is coming.
Claiming that they can't be destroyed against a determined defense is bullshit. I've seen it done to my side, and I've been part of a fleet that destroyed one. People who whine about cynojammers are really no less crying carebears than those who whine about nanos, etc. Suck it up, and bring a fleet to do the job. Taking a system that someone has Sov 3 in is hard if it's defended properly with jammers/deathstar pos's/jump bridges BECAUSE ITS SUPPOSED TO BE HARD!
|

Ponderous Thunderstroke
Republic War Machine Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:50:00 -
[98]
Originally by: Alexios Komnenos Edited by: Alexios Komnenos on 14/07/2008 16:46:52
Originally by: Dracorimus If this happens and bob do advance with pre-knowledge of cynojammer nerf, then I think I'm gonna stop playing as there will be no point.....
My stuff, no you cant, its being melted if I go along with this char
BTW, im an ex-bob char for over 2-3 years, and feel very unhappy that one group can get what they want in a game by contacting devs...or cheating (T20).
CCP never has done an adequate job of coming clean after that incident. I also don't believe that Devs don't still intervene based on playing favorites, or their own ingame affiliations, and fact of the matter is that other than banning employees from playing on non company accounts so their behavior can be tracked nothing can prevent this.
The fact that T20 wasn't fired and the only punishment handed out was to the guy who exposed him alone gives CCP a serious lack of credibility and the impression that they really don't take this seriously.
The answer of course is transparency. The number of CCP employees in each corp/alliance should be public knowledge. Not their names, identity, etc, but the COUNT of how many there are in each corp/alliance. That way the employees have a reason to be cautious and play it fair, because if it's known that 15 devs are in "Alliance A" and zero in "Alliance B" if something funny happens with Dev intervention in a conflict between them then those questions will be asked, and such things won't be able to be gotten away with.
Fact of the matter is, I don't think that ANYONE seriously believes that the T20 scandal was the ONLY time Devs have stepped in to abuse their positions to help their own side. It was just the one where they got caught.
And yes, I do believe that BOB has foreknowledge of game changes. It's been leaking around for awhile that some mega nerf to cynojammers is coming.
Yeah, because without a nerf, BLoB couldn't get "good fights".
---
"PT, you are a complete and total jerk."
Yes. Yes I am.
|

bloomich
Caldari In Siders
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:50:00 -
[99]
Originally by: Dracorimus If this happens and bob do advance with pre-knowledge of cynojammer nerf, then I think I'm gonna stop playing as there will be no point.....
My stuff, no you cant, its being melted if I go along with this char
BTW, im an ex-bob char for over 2-3 years, and feel very unhappy that one group can get what they want in a game by contacting devs...or cheating (T20).
Game Mechanic abuse's are bad. On a different note, did you move your nighthawk & raven up for the high sec lvl5 agent?   
|

Moran Trayga
Infinity Continuum
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 16:52:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Alexios Komnenos Edited by: Alexios Komnenos on 14/07/2008 16:46:52
Originally by: Dracorimus If this happens and bob do advance with pre-knowledge of cynojammer nerf, then I think I'm gonna stop playing as there will be no point.....
My stuff, no you cant, its being melted if I go along with this char
BTW, im an ex-bob char for over 2-3 years, and feel very unhappy that one group can get what they want in a game by contacting devs...or cheating (T20).
CCP never has done an adequate job of coming clean after that incident. I also don't believe that Devs don't still intervene based on playing favorites, or their own ingame affiliations, and fact of the matter is that other than banning employees from playing on non company accounts so their behavior can be tracked nothing can prevent this.
The fact that T20 wasn't fired and the only punishment handed out was to the guy who exposed him alone gives CCP a serious lack of credibility and the impression that they really don't take this seriously.
The answer of course is transparency. The number of CCP employees in each corp/alliance should be public knowledge. Not their names, identity, etc, but the COUNT of how many there are in each corp/alliance. That way the employees have a reason to be cautious and play it fair, because if it's known that 15 devs are in "Alliance A" and zero in "Alliance B" if something funny happens with Dev intervention in a conflict between them then those questions will be asked, and such things won't be able to be gotten away with.
Fact of the matter is, I don't think that ANYONE seriously believes that the T20 scandal was the ONLY time Devs have stepped in to abuse their positions to help their own side. It was just the one where they got caught.
And yes, I do believe that BOB has foreknowledge of game changes. It's been leaking around for awhile that some mega nerf to cynojammers is coming.
You know that a dev said when they ran a check to see which devs were where, they found that goons had the most devs.
Also, if you know that it has been "leaking around for a while" that there is a cyno jammer nerf coming, why couldnt BoB have heard these rumours too and acted on them? Or are you saying a dev told you? I mean there are so many holes in your argument I could go on for hours here... - MORAN TRAYGA - |

Kaitou Shiroi
U-208 Blade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:07:00 -
[101]
See, everyone points at the losses BoB is taking in the MAX campaign, and I think that is part of the picture. But again, the goal (as far as I can ascertain) is to cause "Maximum damage and disruption." By this token, looking at sov changes from 10 July (the first day after the rollout) RA alone has lost/given up sov in at least 16 systems in the MAX area. They've also switched out pos mods so that there are less faction mods on certain poses, and even unanchored at least a few large faction poses (one of which a BoB fleet scooped up after I found it ).
So even if there is a large amount of losses in ships, the sheer disruption value of the campaign can't be denied. Not to mention, we're less than a week into this. I'd like to see where this goes from here. 
|

Two Knives
GoonFleet
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:11:00 -
[102]
Originally by: Kaitou Shiroi See, everyone points at the losses BoB is taking in the MAX campaign, and I think that is part of the picture. But again, the goal (as far as I can ascertain) is to cause "Maximum damage and disruption." By this token, looking at sov changes from 10 July (the first day after the rollout) RA alone has lost/given up sov in at least 16 systems in the MAX area. They've also switched out pos mods so that there are less faction mods on certain poses, and even unanchored at least a few large faction poses (one of which a BoB fleet scooped up after I found it ).
So even if there is a large amount of losses in ships, the sheer disruption value of the campaign can't be denied. Not to mention, we're less than a week into this. I'd like to see where this goes from here. 
My prediction? Downhill
|

Moran Trayga
Infinity Continuum
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:14:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Kaitou Shiroi RA alone has lost/given up sov in at least 16 systems in the MAX area.
Are we looking at the same map? Or does this map not cover the whole MAX time period? 'Cos I only count 7. - MORAN TRAYGA - |

Lunas Feelgood
S.A.S
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:16:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Yuri Vladomirovic
Lunas you are my first 8/10 troll, but u get +1 for trying to be a smartarse, and +1 for stupidity, thats 10/10, congratulation!!!
thx alot allways wanted a 10/10 post
Bob Highcommand:
We planned it all
BOB: Hey its unfair Goons killed all our pets and we are now outnumbered |

Lunas Feelgood
S.A.S
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:20:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Tholarim Edited by: Tholarim on 14/07/2008 12:52:27
Originally by: hmmmmmmmm fact yes,we lost over 600 ships in 4 days (300+BSS) yes,we lost all inicil sop fleet yes,we kill som fac 3-4 poss and take dys moons but guys who cares i like good fight and my brothers like good fight(escept my buddy HEY YOU ,he bether love to be on Adriatic see,drink beer in commpany of 2-3 Croatian girls) soo...in fight somtimes we win som times we not.. but we have high moral and spirit only i hope thet LAG godess will have more mercy next time see u all in space eng. is not my nativ lang.:P
dude, what? 
I toally agree with thol here dude what..
btw hello thol dear good to see you still playing, still love DICE remember that no matter how much I laugh at the other nub corps in BOB
Bob Highcommand:
We planned it all
BOB: Hey its unfair Goons killed all our pets and we are now outnumbered |

Limitanes
Unlimited Blade Works
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:27:00 -
[106]
Originally by: Kaitou Shiroi See, everyone points at the losses BoB is taking in the MAX campaign, and I think that is part of the picture. But again, the goal (as far as I can ascertain) is to cause "Maximum damage and disruption." By this token, looking at sov changes from 10 July (the first day after the rollout) RA alone has lost/given up sov in at least 16 systems in the MAX area. They've also switched out pos mods so that there are less faction mods on certain poses, and even unanchored at least a few large faction poses (one of which a BoB fleet scooped up after I found it ).
So even if there is a large amount of losses in ships, the sheer disruption value of the campaign can't be denied. Not to mention, we're less than a week into this. I'd like to see where this goes from here. 
So RA is choosing not to engage in Pure Blind and is subsequently taking steps to minimize damage taken. Meanwhile the BoB support fleet - the poor bloody infantry who have to carry the day before the the heavy capital cavalry can do anything - is proving more suicidal than a mob of emo kids whose favourite band just dissolved and is doing its damnedest to lose billions of isk worth of materiel daily.
Truly, this must be the greatest success in the history of successes. |

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 17:32:00 -
[107]
Originally by: TWD Cynojammers are obviously overpowered obviously.
Don't worry though, they'll get fixed soon (tm).
Wouldn't that also make any imperial aspirations in NOL null and void?
These forums are FUBAR, upgrade this decade! |

Jennai
The Greater Goon
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 00:03:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Moran Trayga You know that a dev said when they ran a check to see which devs were where, they found that goons had the most devs.
Also, if you know that it has been "leaking around for a while" that there is a cyno jammer nerf coming, why couldnt BoB have heard these rumours too and acted on them? Or are you saying a dev told you? I mean there are so many holes in your argument I could go on for hours here...
I think the thing about devs was for the entire anti-BoB bloc, and they included CSD or whatever those guys are called now.
I doubt if there's any pre-knowledge being abused here. if they knew something was coming up, why would they attack now and repeatedly fail instead of just getting logistics in place for a huge offensive on patch day? also, there probably won't be another patch for quite a while since we just had a big one last month and it's CCP vacation season.
Originally by: Alexios Komnenos Claiming that they can't be destroyed against a determined defense is bullshit. I've seen it done to my side, and I've been part of a fleet that destroyed one. People who whine about cynojammers are really no less crying carebears than those who whine about nanos, etc. Suck it up, and bring a fleet to do the job. Taking a system that someone has Sov 3 in is hard if it's defended properly with jammers/deathstar pos's/jump bridges BECAUSE ITS SUPPOSED TO BE HARD!
is it supposed to be hard? yes
is it supposed to require dozens of failed attempts to take ONE system and then hundreds more to remove an entrenched alliance that's actively defending? probably not, as it's not fun and takes unreasonable amounts of time and will only get worse as everyone builds more titans
I don't think CCP intended 0.0 warfare to turn into this WW1-in-space stalemate where it takes weeks and vast numbers of casualties to make a tiny advance that will probably be lost to the next day's counterattack.
|

Jita Mistress
Forge Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 02:59:00 -
[109]
Originally by: Jennai I don't think CCP intended 0.0 warfare to turn into this WW1-in-space stalemate where it takes weeks and vast numbers of casualties to make a tiny advance that will probably be lost to the next day's counterattack.
That's CCP's fault for letting Eve turn into Capital Ships online. It's completely broken, ridiculous, and unbalanced.
|

Mud Pandemonium
Minmatar Trainwreck INC.
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 03:12:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Jita Mistress
Originally by: Jennai I don't think CCP intended 0.0 warfare to turn into this WW1-in-space stalemate where it takes weeks and vast numbers of casualties to make a tiny advance that will probably be lost to the next day's counterattack.
That's CCP's fault for letting Eve turn into Capital Ships online. It's completely broken, ridiculous, and unbalanced.
And the current success of Factional Warfare only cements the fact that Capital Ships Online is truly the one and only cancer killing 0.0 warfare.
I bet everything looked good on paper, a carrier or two surrounded by a fleet of battleships and other assorted support just like CCP shows in their trailers, not entire fleets consisting of capitals.
I think before my days are done, I want to be a fisherman. |

Taffun
Minmatar E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:08:00 -
[111]
Edited by: Taffun on 15/07/2008 04:28:14 Edited by: Taffun on 15/07/2008 04:17:42 Edited by: Taffun on 15/07/2008 04:16:45 Here is the problem, Bob feel like they should be able to jump in "Max" capitals and own any system within in a nights worth of work, Creating "Max" damage. yes Eve has crossed a line where the biggest cap fleet wins. Caps are cheap, especially since the game has been deployed for many years. But i do think the Devs of Eve realized this and decided the easiest way to remedy this was... CynoJammers.
So Bob, continue to build your cap fleet until we can't count the number of caps on the field without pulling out that dusty old calculator. The fact remains that in-order to protect alliances from the cap blob, there are cyno jammers. This is not an issue with proper Trained Fc's that are willing to suicide entire fleets of hundreds to take down one cyno jammer.. If this game was easy to dominate then everyone would play it.
So my two cents for both sides of this Max damage war, Sit down, shut up and get ready to lose some ships.. that is the only way systems are won. regardless who you are. Battles are not won on the forums, no matter how hard either side tries. also, alliances and corps need to stop looking to CCP to Change the game every time they lose an engagement, change your tactics and adapt or become extinct, the simple rules of life and evolution.
ohh ya, The north is still waiting for their opportunity to post a little morale booster for all to see when you log on.. just saying, kinda one sided to allow one side to post about how perfect they are. Shows the Eve community that CCP does really favor one side.
|

Digicomm
The Digital Communists
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:25:00 -
[112]
Wall of Text, you suck.
Try paragraphing maybe?
sup?
|

Taffun
Minmatar E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:29:00 -
[113]
happy now
|

Tyra Ba'aleron
Minmatar FACTOR 8
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:29:00 -
[114]
Edited by: Tyra Ba''aleron on 15/07/2008 04:33:50 I think you forgot your Corp/Alliance rules fake taffun, prepare for an asshumping.
|

Cletus Graeme
Caldari Bladerunners Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:29:00 -
[115]
Edited by: Cletus Graeme on 15/07/2008 04:29:40
I will say this once but I will say it in caps so it is very clear.
ALL IRON PILOTS PLEASE REPSECT THE CAOD BAN AND STOP POSTING IN THIS FORUM. IRON DOES NOT POST ON CAOD.
THANKYOU.
|

Phantasmo
GoonWaffe
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:29:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Jita Mistress
Originally by: Jennai I don't think CCP intended 0.0 warfare to turn into this WW1-in-space stalemate where it takes weeks and vast numbers of casualties to make a tiny advance that will probably be lost to the next day's counterattack.
That's CCP's fault for letting Eve turn into Capital Ships online. It's completely broken, ridiculous, and unbalanced.
I agree. DELETE ALL CAPITAL SHIPS. Every single one of them.
|

Digicomm
The Digital Communists
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 04:37:00 -
[117]
Edited by: Digicomm on 15/07/2008 04:40:37
Quote: Here is the problem, Bob feel like they should be able to jump in "Max" capitals and own any system within in a nights worth of work, Creating "Max" damage. yes Eve has crossed a line where the biggest cap fleet wins. Caps are cheap, especially since the game has been deployed for many years. But i do think the Devs of Eve realized this and decided the easiest way to remedy this was... CynoJammers.
So Bob, continue to build your cap fleet until we can't count the number of caps on the field without pulling out that dusty old calculator. The fact remains that in-order to protect alliances from the cap blob, there are cyno jammers. This is not an issue with proper Trained Fc's that are willing to suicide entire fleets of hundreds to take down one cyno jammer.. If this game was easy to dominate then everyone would play it.
So my two cents for both sides of this Max damage war, Sit down, shut up and get ready to lose some ships.. that is the only way systems are won. regardless who you are. Battles are not won on the forums, no matter how hard either side tries. also, alliances and corps need to stop looking to CCP to Change the game every time they lose an engagement, change your tactics and adapt or become extinct, the simple rules of life and evolution.
ohh ya, The north is still waiting for their opportunity to post a little morale booster for all to see when you log on.. just saying, kinda one sided to allow one side to post about how perfect they are. Shows the Eve community that CCP does really favor one side.
Much better thanks.
sup?
|

Jita Mistress
Forge Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 05:11:00 -
[118]
Originally by: Phantasmo I agree. DELETE ALL CAPITAL SHIPS. Every single one of them.
That'd suit me just fine.
|

SlowMovingFisherman
Minmatar I Eatz Ur Baconz
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 05:21:00 -
[119]
Originally by: Tyra Ba'aleron Edited by: Tyra Ba''aleron on 15/07/2008 04:33:50 I think you forgot your Corp/Alliance rules fake taffun, prepare for an asshumping.
/me thinks asshumping is in progress...
|

The Cursed
Destructive Influence Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 05:52:00 -
[120]
Hums if anyone would like to post anything of importance please do so. Everything IĈve read up to this point shows me nothing of a failure on this op. Bob is fighting a cap defended system with BS only and yes taking losses. IĈd like to see any alliance in eve make the same move and not take losses also. The loss of a BS is no diff then losing a t1 cruiser or frigate at this point. The payout is high and the loss is minimal. If we lost 600 command ships then IĈd say it was a big hit but were not. Beer em Good!!!!!!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |