EVE Search - eBank Resignation

All Channels

Market Discussions

eBank Resignation

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 08:53:00 - [1] Amen. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 09:07:00 - [2] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 09:17:20 Originally by: Ray McCormack Originally by: Mr Horizontal EBANK's Board Discussions make MD look like a kindergarten playground in terms of drama and depth and breadth of discussion. I fail to see how someone with your obvious intelligence doesn't understand how their comments are alienating their organisation. You mean there are more instances where Shar bows to puke in front of a cheering crowd? I admit I've only seen 2 of them so far but I'm always aching for more. If I remember well, we did get a report about foul language seeing extensive use by the board members. At that time we didn't know if it was accurate or not. I definitely need to get myself a subscription to Ebank's Board Discussions. I just hope I didn't miss the best parts already. Sad to see you go Shar, really; look at the bright side though, no strings attached from now on Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 09:26:00 - [3] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 09:27:14 Originally by: EBANK Ricdic I can say however that there is no reason for customers to be concerned, their funds are not in any form of jeopardy. If this were the case I believe it would have been mentioned by Shar. The biggest concern customers should have is that we are losing an integral member of the team I'll tell you exactly what the remainder members are thinking: "Don't let me be the last to scam!" It is inevitable. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 12:43:00 - [4] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 12:45:54 What surprised me the most was that neither Hexxx nor Ricdic seem to care or attempt to sway Shar's decision. It's as if whatever the reason behind the resignation is irreconcilable. FFS people you've been working together for such a long time, you're practically good friends. Can't you put your differences aside or work out a compromise? Upholding social values should be an end in itself not a means to an end. You're losing a friend in exchange of 30 silver coins. I wonder how long will it take before you take a shortcut towards profit and scam everyone. You people sicken me! Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 12:53:00 - [5] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 12:55:45 Originally by: SentryRaven Originally by: YouGotRipped Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 12:44:54 What surprised me the most was that neither Hexxx nor Ricdic seem to care or attempt to sway Shar's decision. You seriously believe that would happen on EVE-O? Originally by: EBANK Ricdic Sad to see you go Shar, but good luck in the future. Just read this. It's an outrage. Shar was a good friend not a tool to be disposed of when it no longer served Ricdic's purpose. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 17:55:00 - [6] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 18:03:43 Originally by: Kwint Sommer I was getting a little worried but Hexxx's response went a ways toward allaying my concerns. I await that public statement. "Absolutely!" In fact from now on Ebank can lose as many key members as Ricdic desires, as long as it releases a public statement and has enough liquidities to cope with the subsequent wave of withdrawals prompted by utter disgust if not pertinent concern for one's own isk. With such level of competence I am surprised this "enterprise" is still afloat. Originally by: Astorothe Ah rgr. Shame to see you go Shar. I reckon you would have been keeping the bastards honest! This says it all. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 18:09:00 - [7] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 18:16:26 Originally by: Kwint Sommer With such quality of posts I'm surprised you haven't ruined your reputation and been banned for trolling. Oh wait. Everyone knows where your loyalty stands when it comes to discussing Ebank issues. I really wasn't expecting an unbiased opinion... next time try surprising me! Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 18:20:00 - [8] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 15/07/2008 18:20:33 Originally by: HawkBlade Originally by: Kwint Sommer With such quality of posts I'm surprised you haven't ruined your reputation and been banned for trolling. Oh wait. What is sad is that his original post was very very good. If he could've left it unedited it would've been a damned powerful statement. I was immensely surprised at the insightful-ness and brevity of the original. That's the sad thing though that he doesn't yet understand. Leave your posts unedited mate and you might get some credibility and >gasps< respect. The constant editing .... At the moment you posted I was still in process of writing my own post. I was completely unaware of what you wrote. But I'll edit it back. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 18:45:00 - [9] Originally by: Hexxx The Board is not ignoring Shar's resignation or his opinion. Does that mean you'll have Shar back and see to it that such things never happen again? I mean obviously you guys have some teamwork issues to solve but it's nothing the Board can't overcome. Right? Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 19:41:00 - [10] Originally by: HawkBlade And could you please ask Ricdic to stop attacking Athre, in game, over my actions? BTW where is Ricdic when we want to crucify him? Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.15 19:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Xelios Xarxes I've seen this coming for a while, and Ricdic is the sole reason I wouldn't trust my ISK with Ebank. When people who're that arrogant have had control over large amounts of money in the past, we all know what happened in the end. I support your decision of resigning, especially after seeing the other members of EBank basically saying "cya" instead of daring to go against King Ricdic. I wish you the best and congratulate you on being the only one who isn't a sheep. Everyone here has a lot of respect for you. EBank is on its way to becoming a totalitarian monarchy & Ricdic will have the last laugh. << Saved for an "I told you so." to come at a later date. While it is true that Ricdic is a very dedicated player I don't think so much decisional power should be concentrated in his hands. And the archives of these forums know I'm right. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.16 08:50:00 - [12] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 16/07/2008 08:54:40 1. I think anyone that bothered reading the thread to this point is well aware of the fact that Ricdic is a founding member (a very dedicated one) but also a liability and needs to answer before the Board of Directors just like anyone else. The Board is supposed to act in the best interest of investors and clients and not bow to the will of one guy that clearly doesn't have what it takes to run eBank alone. Adopt voting as a means of decision in matters that concern funds allocation exceeding a certain amount, personnel addition, anything that has a potential influence on the degree of success of the enterprise. 2. Confine Ebank to banking operations only / running a stock exchange. Allow greater transparency towards a third party. For a 1% return on savings we cannot afford the 700B Ebank manipulating and screwing the market or putting a great deal people out of business. 3. Have Shar back in the same position as before. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.16 09:38:00 - [13] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 16/07/2008 09:38:54 Originally by: Letias Originally by: YouGotRipped Originally by: Letias So now that everyone knows that Ebank actually takes risks with their money they decide to withdraw it? When I signed up in the very first batch of accounts I knew that by depositing my money there was a risk of loss either whole or partial. There is a difference between taking risks and letting Ricdic handle the funds. I invested in that too if you keep reading. By having him handle all deposits has not been an issue of him handeling funds in the past, interesting how that is not the thrust of your argument. Just because something did not happen doesn't mean everything is perfect. (and in Ricdic's case it did happen). How many RHCRPs does it take to realize that Ricdic's judgment is lacking to the point he is unsuited for taking decisions unaided? Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.16 09:56:00 - [14] Originally by: Letias Originally by: YouGotRipped Just because something did not happen doesn't mean everything is perfect. (and in Ricdic's case it did happen). How many RHCRPs does it take to realize that Ricdic's judgment is lacking to the point he is unsuited for taking decisions unaided? How many RHCPs have there been? Obviously, one too many. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.16 11:49:00 - [15] Edited by: YouGotRipped on 16/07/2008 11:53:42 Originally by: Hexxx 1) EBANK is not fine. 2) EBANK cannot afford to lose Shar. Ricdic we'll be held accountable before the Board like everyone else. He's in no position to take decisions that concern the welfare of the enterprise all by himself. We'll submit him to an IQ test as well. 3) EBANK is losing plenty of cash by the hour due to our poor teamwork and handling of this crysis. No we don't want to do something about it besides telling everyone that things are fine the way they are. No we don't want to think about transparency issues now. 4) Alt-Trolls that love EBANK threads should stop pointing out the obvious. No one can control Ricdic. After all Ricdic is eBank. There Hexxx. I've corrected it now. Motherships
YouGotRipped Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.07.16 19:27:00 - [16] Guys we need to focus our efforts in the right direction - finding a solution to this crisis. As I already stated in another thread, eBank needs to put Ricdic on leash and take Shar back. It's that simple. Motherships

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.