I've never seen an incursion channel break 200 people, even with drive throughs that are forced to be in the channel untill they log out.

confirming that incursion runners didn't do any PvE during the 7.5 years before incursions were released.

.

Three vanguards per incursion. 6 sites per system. 11 per fleet. when there are more than 198 (- local residents) in Incursion local everybody is not getting paid. Unless there are a couple assault fleets and the occasional HG. Still <600 pilots making that bank at any given time. And with 6 fleets you WILL contest as the 6 sites don' t just pop up instantly.

You can ALWAYS make 50 mil an hour in raw ISK once you have an Incursion capable shiny, and use it to run missions instead.

You can SOMETIMES make 100 mil an hour running Incursions. Not all of the dreaded 66% can make all of that money all of the time, no matter how hard you try to hype it.

GǪand the truth of the matter is that incursions make for a massive ISK faucet that is completely out of proportion to how many are doing it and where they're done.

Your EVE Poker winnings aren't coming out of the magical ISK faucet.

Poker is zero sum. You win 500M ISK, someone (or some people) lost 500M ISK.

You mean those things that don't inject any ISK? Those things that require significant (and continuous) investments in manpower to acquire and keep running? Those things that exist exclusively in nullsec where they create wars and the losses of cubic kilometres worth of assets? Yeah, no. They're not really an issue for the economy.

Nice straw man though GÇö fits right in with the ridiculous straw man of the OP.

Considering how risk-averse incursion fleets seem to be, it doesn't seem like a very hard thing to do (i've seen a 11-strong fleet with 3 logistics stand down because someone had a war dec from a 2 man corp with no online members, this caused an aggro timer to one of the logistics and the entire operation stood down for 15 minutes).

I can only wonder what declarations of war or sudden appearances by thrashers and tornados can do.

quite stupid that 25% isk generated drop into 1% of eve population

Bounties arent a problem and never were and its not at all surprising they generate the most ISK. I think noone ever said otherwise. Incursions whereas are a problem, because they are totally out of proportion. A minimal number of players generating 1/3 of all bounty income on the server?
Thats a small bunch of suddenly VERY rich people. That is hurting the economy and not primarily bounty income and what is attached to it.

Moon goo doesn't create ISK, it merely moves it.

[
First of all, no, it doesn't. It injects about Gàö the amount. Wspace is also 0.0, and thus deserve a higher payout, so even if it did, that would be kind of expected. More the to point, though, since you seem to be missing it, just like Darth here: how many people are running those wspace sweeps?

[
Compared to keeping a profitable moon? Nope.

What economical issues are there with moon goo (aside from being a deflationary materials faucet)?

And how often has your 6 bill shiny been blown up?

Fix your keyboard and read it again. Not necessarily in that order, but do both. Oh, andGǪ
GǪeven with all that angrish, you're still missing the point. So, read my citation and my post again, and fix your keyboard.
So a lot less than the cost of acquiring and keeping a moon safe.

[
You could. Do you have any shred of evidence? Or, to restate the question since you didn't actually answer it: what economical issues are there with moon goo?

Like I said earlier: most likely because it's kind of a GÇ£seasonalGÇ¥ thing GÇö it's not a constant flow out of wspace, but something the big collectors (the ones creating enough volume to make a difference) gather up for a month or three in the POS until it's time to pack the Orca / Freighter / whatever to the gills and jump it out for a selling spree.

And how often does that happen? I think there's a lot more lost defending moons in a week than you lost in one ship a month ago. I doubt you lose that much that often.

Whether I've lost a pimped out shiny is irrelevant, I'm not the one using strawman arguments by pointing at moon goo as an isk faucet when it's actually not, it's a mineral faucet.