| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SkyFlyer
   |
Posted - 2008.07.21 00:34:00 -
[1]
Well im plannin on gettin a rook soonish for our classic High Sec Wars so there i woz cudnt get any decent fittin rly together this is wat i thought to fit:
[New Setup 1]
[Low Slots]
Signal Distortion Amplifier II
Signal Distortion Amplifier II
Signal Distortion Amplifier II
[Medium Slots]
ECM - Spatial Destabilizer II
ECM - Phase Inverter II
ECM - Ion Field Projector II
ECM - White Noise Generator II
ECM - Multispectral Jammer II
ECM - Multispectral Jammer II
Sensor Booster II[Scan Resolution]
[High Slots]
'Malkuth' Heavy Missile Launcher I[Thunderbolt Heavy Missile]
'Malkuth' Heavy Missile Launcher I[Thunderbolt Heavy Missile]
'Malkuth' Heavy Missile Launcher I[Thunderbolt Heavy Missile]
'Malkuth' Heavy Missile Launcher I[Thunderbolt Heavy Missile]
Improved Cloaking Device II
[Rig Slots]
Particle Dispersion Projector I
Ionic Field Projector I
I use the Cloak to get into the Optimal Range before the fight and ppl wont see me like lol and the sensor booster to get the lost scan res back from the cloak like!?!?!
So any thoughts???
|
Boz Well
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 00:38:00 -
[2]
 Quote:
So any thoughts???
Two.
1. You have no face.
2. You should use more !'s
|
Admiral Pelleon
Caldari
White Shadow Imperium
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 00:46:00 -
[3]
I read the title, saw rokh instead of rook, saw the fitting paired with the OP's face and almost laughed myself to death.
Yes that'll work. 
________
Originally by: Tarminic
I believe your mother should have re-rolled her birth control.
|
Element 22
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 01:04:00 -
[4]
I'm a chargin mah laser!
Signatures are annoying...kinda like me. |
Derek Sigres
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 01:24:00 -
[5]
Still haven't gotten the face Fixed I see
Short answer is you may want to consider expanding your EHP if you can. Otherwise 7 jammes and 2 - 3 amps is pretty much what you expect to find on a Rook/Falcon. That being said, don't use T2 if you can avoid it - the best named jammers are better than or equal to the T2 varients with lower fitting requirements.
|
Shiodome
Caldari
Universal Securities
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 01:27:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Shiodome on 21/07/2008 01:32:51
1.use Assult launchers, because:
[a]you 'should' be out of range to use your heavies anyway
[b]you'll find the only things you do shoot at are the tacklers that scream out towards you, which your heavies won't hit.
2.don't use a cloak, because:
[a]it messes up your lock time, in what frequently becomes a 'who jams the opposing ECM boat first' contest.
[b]you don't get any speed bonus cloaked, so you're going 75% slower than any already low top speed. that ISN'T going get you into optimal range anywhere near quick enough to be useful (58m/s lol).
[c]if you're gonna fit a cloak... fly a falcon?
3.don't use the sensor booster because:
[a]the cloak locking delay is 12 seconds before you can even start locking... you'll never get near to making up that lost time, even with the scan res script. better off just without the cloak
[b]you need that mid slot for MWD/LSE, empire wars will be gates and stations, and being the last guy back to the gate due to no MWD will leave you dead (and sad).
[c]you're already going to lock faster than a falcon as you're not cloaking (right?), so you're winning the 'who jams the opponents ECM first competition'. it isn't important to jam super fast vs the damage dealers, as long as they're jammed in a reasonable amount of time then all is good. jamming a second faster on dps ships isn't worth the loss of a mid slot
4. Fit an MWD because:
[a]see '3.b'.
I like the rig choices though (2 x ECM range rigs is a waste, you're very unlikely to come across sniper fleets in an empire war, so absolute max ECM range isn't needed). Your choice of ECM mods is personal preference tbh, i prefer all racials, other prefer multi's... just try a few variations and decide what you prefer. Oh and thumbs up for choosing the rook over the falcon, i always enjoyed flying it more, as you get involved in the fight more, get to shoot stuff, and it's cheaper... plus it takes more balls. :D
if it's of any interest, i use the following setup for ages in 0.0 and low sec, and had great fun with it (only ever lost 1 of them, well i lost another due to doing something stupid, but that's a different story  )
Quote:
[Rook]
Signal Distortion Amplifier II
Signal Distortion Amplifier II
Signal Distortion Amplifier II
10MN MicroWarpdrive II
BZ-5 Neutralizing Spatial Destabilizer ECM
Enfeebling Phase Inversion ECM I
Enfeebling Phase Inversion ECM I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
'Umbra' I White Noise ECM
Large Shield Extender II
Assault Missile Launcher II, Bloodclaw Precision Light Missile
Assault Missile Launcher II, Bloodclaw Precision Light Missile
Assault Missile Launcher II, Bloodclaw Precision Light Missile
Assault Missile Launcher II, Bloodclaw Precision Light Missile
Assault Missile Launcher II, Bloodclaw Precision Light Missile
Ionic Field Projector I
Particle Dispersion Projector I
I'd frequently take the shield extender off for another jammer, and swap for different mixes of jammers depending on intel... i think it's important for all ECM boats to be flexible rather than keep the same mods every fight. e.g if you know they use a lot of caldari, fit more caldari jammers, duh' :D
good luck o/
_____________________________________
today i am this cool:
[uncool]================[*]====[cool]
|
SkyFlyer
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 01:28:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Derek Sigres
Still haven't gotten the face Fixed I see
Short answer is you may want to consider expanding your EHP if you can. Otherwise 7 jammes and 2 - 3 amps is pretty much what you expect to find on a Rook/Falcon. That being said, don't use T2 if you can avoid it - the best named jammers are better than or equal to the T2 varients with lower fitting requirements.
Ye true mayb ill use hypnos dunno yet but what about the cloak and recalibration thing????
|
Derek Sigres
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 01:30:00 -
[8]
Originally by: SkyFlyer
Originally by: Derek Sigres
Still haven't gotten the face Fixed I see
Short answer is you may want to consider expanding your EHP if you can. Otherwise 7 jammes and 2 - 3 amps is pretty much what you expect to find on a Rook/Falcon. That being said, don't use T2 if you can avoid it - the best named jammers are better than or equal to the T2 varients with lower fitting requirements.
Ye true mayb ill use hypnos dunno yet but what about the cloak and recalibration thing????
When you uncloak you have to expend a certain amount of time "recalibrating" your sensors during which you cannot attempt to lock a target. On top of this is the penalty you take to scan resolution when it comes time to try and lock a target.
|
Wen Jaibao
Soul Ripper Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 02:21:00 -
[9]
Your face..
Also, refer to this as a guide on punctuation.
|
BiggestT
Caldari
Fun Inc
|
Posted - 2008.07.21 04:37:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Derek Sigres
Still haven't gotten the face Fixed I see
Short answer is you may want to consider expanding your EHP if you can. Otherwise 7 jammes and 2 - 3 amps is pretty much what you expect to find on a Rook/Falcon. That being said, don't use T2 if you can avoid it - the best named jammers are better than or equal to the T2 varients with lower fitting requirements.
but their cheaper
and if a rook has a problem fitting some extra cpu form its ecm, so help me!
poudly annoying fc's since 2007 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |