EVE Search - WTB - amarr death cannon

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

WTB - amarr death cannon

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Wil Smithx	Posted - 2008.07.24 07:15:00 - [1] Don't know how many epopel have seen this but was on the escapist getting my weekly fix and saw an advert for eve, and I could help notice that was it an apoc, killed a titan and the whole capital fleet (it was minmatar so it might have just been a passing space breeze :P that caused them to blow up and nothing to do with the amarr weapon) with it with a single shot... I thinks to meself, I would like to buy this gun and go to jita...
Viqtoria Caldari Groping Hand Social Club	Posted - 2008.07.24 07:15:00 - [2] abaddon
ArmaggedonPSA Minmatar Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2008.07.24 07:54:00 - [3] I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start.
Hyperforce99 Gallente Infinite Covenant Lords of the Damned	Posted - 2008.07.24 08:02:00 - [4] Originally by: ArmaggedonPSA I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start. Its not in the game for the players but actually read the empyrean age book and watch the story as it unfolds in the game --------------------------------------------- Somewhere beyond happyness and sadness, I need to calculate what creates my own madness o/
Lui Kai Perkone	Posted - 2008.07.24 08:09:00 - [5] I'm kinda with Arma on this one. One of the things that drew me into the game origionally was seeing a trailer that looked AMAZING, and being told that it was entirely made from game footage. Amazing trailers with madeup, inapplicable stuff are a dime a dozen. ---------------- Ambulation Answers
justsometrader	Posted - 2008.07.24 08:12:00 - [6] how many trailers do you know that actually show of REAL ingame footage and not some prerendered sequences that are only made for showing off the bling bling ?
flashfreaking LFC Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.07.24 08:18:00 - [7] Originally by: justsometrader how many trailers do you know that actually show of REAL ingame footage and not some prerendered sequences that are only made for showing off the bling bling ? 9 Disallowed sig graphic. Send an e-mail to [email protected] when it meets the forum signature guidelines. ~Saint
justsometrader	Posted - 2008.07.24 08:21:00 - [8] Originally by: flashfreaking Originally by: justsometrader how many trailers do you know that actually show of REAL ingame footage and not some prerendered sequences that are only made for showing off the bling bling ? 9 I was not talking about EVE trailer, but game trailers in general, which have a tendency NOT to show ingame action, but prerendered movies. If I want to watch those, I throw in a Pixar movie....
Wil Smithx	Posted - 2008.07.24 08:42:00 - [9] Originally by: ArmaggedonPSA I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start. Originally by: Lui Kai I'm kinda with Arma on this one. One of the things that drew me into the game origionally was seeing a trailer that looked AMAZING, and being told that it was entirely made from game footage. Amazing trailers with madeup, inapplicable stuff are a dime a dozen. Originally by: justsometrader Originally by: flashfreaking Originally by: justsometrader how many trailers do you know that actually show of REAL ingame footage and not some prerendered sequences that are only made for showing off the bling bling ? 9 I was not talking about EVE trailer, but game trailers in general, which have a tendency NOT to show ingame action, but prerendered movies. If I want to watch those, I throw in a Pixar movie.... Exactly damn it, what happened to all those awesome videos made from in game footage, that was what made eve special, its graphics and enviroment were epic enough to sell themselves! Its just upsetting... a 100,000,000 isk ship destroying a 40,000,000,000 isk ship and its fleet alongside it in one shot. Hell that whole amarr fleet prob didnt cost as much as one of those dreads...
Eshud Uktar Uktar Raiders	Posted - 2008.07.24 09:43:00 - [10] It is actually a weapon that will be implemented in the game soon(tm). It is CCP's final solution to blobs. The module itself cannot be activated unless fired upon a fleet with 30+ pilots. The energy bolt will first destroy any capital sized vessels in alphabetic order, then move down to battleships and so on. The Bolt's energy is depleted once the blob fleet is down to 29 pilots. ------------------------------------------- Easy Riders might think they're free but they still have to follow the f**king highway.
GallenteCitizen20080615 Gallente Federation War News	Posted - 2008.07.24 09:47:00 - [11] Edited by: GallenteCitizen20080615 on 24/07/2008 09:47:02 you will find that the trailer for the first time is not ingame footage and that trailer and all the trailers are related to the going on of the empyrian age book that how you find out how they got it , who flying it, and why there is a titan orbiting above amatar planetary systems how concord was repeatably warn before being WTF****ganked
Nova Fox Gallente Novafox Shipyards	Posted - 2008.07.24 09:51:00 - [12] read the book you'll find out its part of the storyline that happened and i expected that sort of thing done in game was nearly impossible with the current engine or neither that we got a nice preview of the dx 10 version o-0. but eveyrthing before the last 30 seconds was ingame at max settings, good luck running eve on that high of a setting though. New Ship Idea: Tender Supply Ship, The Logistics Sister
Ryoji Tanakama Caldari Firestar Drive Yards	Posted - 2008.07.24 11:49:00 - [13] Originally by: Nova Fox read the book you'll find out its part of the storyline that happened and i expected that sort of thing done in game was nearly impossible with the current engine or neither that we got a nice preview of the dx 10 version o-0. but eveyrthing before the last 30 seconds was ingame at max settings, good luck running eve on that high of a setting though. I run EVE on maxed native settings with most other shiny options forced at driver level. No problem at all. Loads of other people do too.
Mr Crepsley Gallente SkillzKillz Diabolic Paradox	Posted - 2008.07.24 11:54:00 - [14] Edited by: Mr Crepsley on 24/07/2008 11:55:55 Read the novel and it answers what it does. pretty much its a terran weapon salvaged by the amarr. It makes the shields attack the armour or somehting like that so it will insta kill anything ----
Kagura Nikon Minmatar Infinity Enterprises	Posted - 2008.07.24 12:17:00 - [15] Originally by: ArmaggedonPSA I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start. Have you READ the book before posting that? If you had WARNING MINOR SPOILER: SPOILER BEGIN: Its a Terran weapon, from earth, that was salvaged in eve gate. Its unique and part of the background story SPOILER END. Same way Jovian ships are not available for you to play but they are part of the background story. Thsoe things only enrich the game ------------------------------------------------- If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough
Rawr Cristina Caldari Omerta Syndicate	Posted - 2008.07.24 12:23:00 - [16] Originally by: Wil Smithx Its just upsetting... a 100,000,000 isk ship destroying a 40,000,000,000 isk ship and its fleet alongside it in one shot. Hell that whole amarr fleet prob didnt cost as much as one of those dreads... That single weapon would cost more than a fleet 10x the size of the one it killed if it actually existed ...
Murk Loar Caldari The Ex-Patriots	Posted - 2008.07.24 12:25:00 - [17] You dont see many Mummaships ramming into stations either but that was still pretty awesome. I think it pays to play with a little imagination now and then,just pretend there's over 9000 crewmembers manning the turrets and systems on your ship and if you get popped they all die.The local chat after Malkalen proved to me that a lot of players,mostly RP'rs of course,have a pretty wild imagination.Each to their own obviously. If not just get Dire to start making trailers.Tortuga was all ingame bar sound effects and that was brilliant.
Wil Smithx	Posted - 2008.07.24 13:18:00 - [18] Originally by: Eshud Uktar It is actually a weapon that will be implemented in the game soon(tm). It is CCP's final solution to blobs. The module itself cannot be activated unless fired upon a fleet with 30+ pilots. The energy bolt will first destroy any capital sized vessels in alphabetic order, then move down to battleships and so on. The Bolt's energy is depleted once the blob fleet is down to 29 pilots. your voice is worthless.... Thats possibly the worst, not even a troll, just shit I have heard in a long time... People would just move in 29 man fleets, not to mention what happens if theres a 100 man gang with only 29 members in a grid - still getting gang bonuses.
Wil Smithx	Posted - 2008.07.24 13:21:00 - [19] Originally by: Murk Loar You dont see many Mummaships ramming into stations either but that was still pretty awesome. I think it pays to play with a little imagination now and then,just pretend there's over 9000 crewmembers manning the turrets and systems on your ship and if you get popped they all die.The local chat after Malkalen proved to me that a lot of players,mostly RP'rs of course,have a pretty wild imagination.Each to their own obviously. If not just get Dire to start making trailers.Tortuga was all ingame bar sound effects and that was brilliant. To get new members all they need do is show a cloverfields style video of the min titan coming into grid from a distance and setting off a doomsday...
Gnulpie Minmatar Miner Tech	Posted - 2008.07.24 13:30:00 - [20] Originally by: Hyperforce99 Originally by: ArmaggedonPSA I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start. Its not in the game for the players but actually read the empyrean age book and watch the story as it unfolds in the game Did they want to promote a book about Eve or Eve-Online? I agree with ArmaggedonPSA, that 'feature' had no affect to Eve, will have no affect and that is good so. And don't tell me that some imaginary fleet action during downtime affects Eve in any way. There was not a single player involved with all these downtime action. I always said that the latest vid is really bad. You can't completely make up things and then show it to people and say 'this is eve'. That is a blunt lie The visual effect in that vid are nice, but is has nothing to do with actual gameplay.
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:07:00 - [21] Originally by: Lui Kai I'm kinda with Arma on this one. One of the things that drew me into the game origionally was seeing a trailer that looked AMAZING, and being told that it was entirely made from game footage. Amazing trailers with madeup, inapplicable stuff are a dime a dozen. but they allready have that vtrailer, it was for trinity. There is no reason with no new graphics yet to showcase them. instead they pulled a starwars and had a super weapon the playerbase can't use it's just part of the story. I enjoyed it.
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:09:00 - [22] Originally by: Nova Fox read the book you'll find out its part of the storyline that happened and i expected that sort of thing done in game was nearly impossible with the current engine or neither that we got a nice preview of the dx 10 version o-0. but eveyrthing before the last 30 seconds was ingame at max settings, good luck running eve on that high of a setting though. no quite it was renders in over 4000x4000 rez and on top of that has the uncompressed normal maps. sexy.
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:10:00 - [23] Originally by: Gnulpie Originally by: Hyperforce99 Originally by: ArmaggedonPSA I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start. Its not in the game for the players but actually read the empyrean age book and watch the story as it unfolds in the game Did they want to promote a book about Eve or Eve-Online? I agree with ArmaggedonPSA, that 'feature' had no affect to Eve, will have no affect and that is good so. And don't tell me that some imaginary fleet action during downtime affects Eve in any way. There was not a single player involved with all these downtime action. I always said that the latest vid is really bad. You can't completely make up things and then show it to people and say 'this is eve'. That is a blunt lie The visual effect in that vid are nice, but is has nothing to do with actual gameplay. so because the last 20 seconds aren't good the whole video is bad?
Aloriana Jacques Amarr Royal Amarr Institute	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:16:00 - [24] Originally by: Lui Kai I'm kinda with Arma on this one. One of the things that drew me into the game origionally was seeing a trailer that looked AMAZING, and being told that it was entirely made from game footage. Amazing trailers with madeup, inapplicable stuff are a dime a dozen. Actually, when you WATCH the Empyrean Age trailer, you'll notice that is does NOT have the usual "all scenes in this trailer were captured from actual gameplay" notice at the begining. - - - Aloriana Jacques - Skill Sheet
vostok Minmatar Suns Of Korhal	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:18:00 - [25] Originally by: MotherMoon so because the last 20 seconds aren't good the whole video is bad? Isnt the whole vid like 1 minute long anyways that makes it 1/3 shit... Nice chicken with 1/3 shit added = mcdonalds = shit. It thus stands to reason that the whole video was shit!
Tzar'rim	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:22:00 - [26] non-game footage trailers are for people who are easily fooled by advertising. If there's a new game/MMO made and all you can watch is a rendered trailer you KNOW the game is either crap or won't be done for another 2 years. CCP, please keep to ingame graphics movies, it's what makes you stand out.
Kagura Nikon Minmatar Infinity Enterprises	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:22:00 - [27] Originally by: Gnulpie Originally by: Hyperforce99 Originally by: ArmaggedonPSA I hate to drag up a (probably, I dont really browse forums) old topic, but I mean....really, what was CCP thinking? Don't get me wrong, visually it was very cool to watch, and hopefully that scene will attract all forms of new players that by the time they see how rediculous the scenerio actually is, the overlords in iceland will aleady own their souls, and it will be too late. But heaven forbid that actual EVE players watch the video, where we showcase a feature that not only is not in the game, will never be in the game, and has about as much to do with the game as the dark side of the moon has to do with my ass. I found it (sort of) insulting that CCP did something like that, I mean hell it was cool...but if youre going to advertise your product, it seems showing off something that is actually in the game would be a good place to start. Its not in the game for the players but actually read the empyrean age book and watch the story as it unfolds in the game Did they want to promote a book about Eve or Eve-Online? I agree with ArmaggedonPSA, that 'feature' had no affect to Eve, will have no affect and that is good so. And don't tell me that some imaginary fleet action during downtime affects Eve in any way. There was not a single player involved with all these downtime action. I always said that the latest vid is really bad. You can't completely make up things and then show it to people and say 'this is eve'. That is a blunt lie The visual effect in that vid are nice, but is has nothing to do with actual gameplay. That book has a lot of effect on eve. Its how Sarum became emperor again. And its one of the reasons why we have FACTION WARFARE going on! Its called IMERSSIVE game background and its among the most important things for a long lived game.
Kagura Nikon Minmatar Infinity Enterprises	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:24:00 - [28] Originally by: Tzar'rim non-game footage trailers are for people who are easily fooled by advertising. If there's a new game/MMO made and all you can watch is a rendered trailer you KNOW the game is either crap or won't be done for another 2 years. CCP, please keep to ingame graphics movies, it's what makes you stand out. Disagree this is a very limited narrow vision based on assumption that everyone thinks as you think. The movies are a col extra! I would even PAY 100$ for a 1 hour movie of that battle! In fact the ONLY thing that was worth in the WHOLE expansion was that movie and the book.
Siberys	Posted - 2008.07.24 15:36:00 - [29] Originally by: Rawr Cristina Originally by: Wil Smithx Its just upsetting... a 100,000,000 isk ship destroying a 40,000,000,000 isk ship and its fleet alongside it in one shot. Hell that whole amarr fleet prob didnt cost as much as one of those dreads... That single weapon would cost more than a fleet 10x the size of the one it killed if it actually existed But the whole fleet would be killed along with the fleet that fired it.
Grarr Dexx Amarr Naval Protection Corp Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2008.07.24 16:06:00 - [30] Quote: Its just upsetting... a 100,000,000 isk ship destroying a 40,000,000,000 isk ship and its fleet alongside it in one shot. Hell that whole amarr fleet prob didnt cost as much as one of those dreads... You know, just one of those Impocs could officer-fit that entire fleet that got blown up.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.