|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
   |
Posted - 2008.07.25 11:26:00 -
[1]
This is ******ed.
Straight up. It's becoming a trend, i hate to say it, that the some of the most recent changes to the game only promote large 0.0 allainces and more blobbing. Speed -is- Guerilla warfare.
Just no.
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 11:35:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Sirial Soulfly
As always with every nerf, its adapt or quit time.
Oh yeah that's fine, we'll adapt. Except adapting in this case means having bigger numbers, or not engaging.
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 11:38:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Sid Zero
I have a suggestion for keeping Guerilla warfare tactics viable, even making it more viable, with the proposed nano nerf.
If speed is nerfed, gatecamping should be nerfed too.
1) double lock time at gates
2) remote sensor boosters are disabled at gates
3) warp core stabilisers get a revamp: instead of making a ship completely immune to scrambling, they introduce a delay before scrambling kicks in. And throw away the ridiculous drawbacks currently associated with them - gimping your setup by dedicating 1 or 2 slots to these modules is already enough.
Yeah let's throw low-sec piracy out the window too, great idea.
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 11:40:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Medore
Originally by: Sid Zero
I have a suggestion for keeping Guerilla warfare tactics viable, even making it more viable, with the proposed nano nerf.
If speed is nerfed, gatecamping should be nerfed too.
1) double lock time at gates
2) remote sensor boosters are disabled at gates
3) warp core stabilisers get a revamp: instead of making a ship completely immune to scrambling, they introduce a delay before scrambling kicks in. And throw away the ridiculous drawbacks currently associated with them - gimping your setup by dedicating 1 or 2 slots to these modules is already enough.
you are aware that none of this will help whilst in a bubble in 0.0 right? a ceptor will still lock a BS down quite quickly.
that said i like these changes. its about time nano's wernt the only viable things to fly in small gang pvp
I enjoy tanking and old-school playstyles as much as the next guy, but looks to me like we'll have less small gang pvp and more blobs out of this.
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 11:45:00 -
[5]
Edited by: MirrorGod on 25/07/2008 11:45:39
Dear CCP,
Your idea is crap
<3 MirrorGod
*starts training gallente cruiser 5
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 12:26:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Bellum Eternus
The way things are going now, every ship in the game is going to be affected in a negative fashion and nano ships will still be at the top of the pile.
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Militia
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 14:51:00 -
[7]
LEAVE NANO'S ALONE! :crocker:
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
|
|
| |
|