EVE Search - BEST DEV BLOG EVER

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

BEST DEV BLOG EVER

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 11:55:00 - [1] Edited by: NeoTheo on 25/07/2008 11:56:42 Hammer i am now availible to have your babies, despite fears of unrequented manlove. /Salute best change in years. now just sort assault frigs and blackops mmmkay? ;) Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
Pindleskin Amarr Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:00:00 - [2] Agreed.. apart from the manlove thing Neo... ;0 /cheer for speed changes Pindle ----this----
Eran Laude Gallente Strix Armaments and Defence	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:04:00 - [3] /agreed . . . to an extent . . . I'm just concerned this is going to branch beyond nano*s and hit blasterboats as well, for which speed is essentially a requirement. Apart from more branching concerns like this which I think we may see addressed as the deployment undergoes testing on Sisi, I'm glad to see nano*s get ass**d by CCP. About bloody time!
Prof Patpending Warp badgers with guns	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:05:00 - [4] I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in anger and were suddenly banned. I fear something has been nerfed.
Carmaline	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:05:00 - [5] Yay to those changes, lets see what it gets watered down to :(
Altterra	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:05:00 - [6] good ideas, even if it should affect blasterboats I don't see much of a problem, it's only fair that they have to tank a bit before reaching their perfect range tbh.
BLACK D0G Empyrean Age	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:08:00 - [7] ludicrous speed! GO!
Voculus E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:08:00 - [8] Well it's about frakkin' time! But here is what makes no sense to me: Quote: Afterburners should be a viable module selection for PVP. Quote: Afterburners are being slightly adjusted to decrease the variation in speed boost from 105-171% to 112.5-162% Seriously, CPP? You're going to nerf ABs in the hopes that they become a viable option in PvP? _________________________________________________________
Prof Patpending Warp badgers with guns	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:10:00 - [9] Originally by: BLACK D0G ludicrous speed! GO! They've just gone to pleat!
serento	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:11:00 - [10] I have always worried about two things... 1. Nanos will be "changed" 2. Neotheo's orientation Serento
Felix Dzerzhinsky Caldari Wreckless Abandon Un-Natural Selection	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:14:00 - [11] The Arazu is going to become a good choise now. .. ---- GO BLUE!!
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:16:00 - [12] click Post in appropriate thread - DesuSigs
Mankirks Wife	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:16:00 - [13] Originally by: BLACK D0G ludicrous speed! GO! lol, I read that line in the dev blog and had exactly the same thought.
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:16:00 - [14] Originally by: Eran Laude /agreed . . . to an extent . . . I'm just concerned this is going to branch beyond nano*s and hit blasterboats as well, for which speed is essentially a requirement. Apart from more branching concerns like this which I think we may see addressed as the deployment undergoes testing on Sisi, I'm glad to see nano*s get assd by CCP. About bloody time! to be honest i dont think its going to be a major issues, most people that nano* ships will slow down, boats like the RAX, and Demios should remain at there usual MWD speed give or tank a VERY paltry number if you think about it, its not like you nano a stright out blaster boat anyhow (as generally you need your hull and armor to keep your shit together). we will see tho, if anything i think this will make blasterboats slightly better off... Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:17:00 - [15] Originally by: Altterra good ideas, even if it should affect blasterboats I don't see much of a problem, it's only fair that they have to tank a bit before reaching their perfect range tbh. Because flying directly at your enemy with your sig radius blown up to the size of a small moon doesn't require tanking, amirite? - DesuSigs
MenanceWhite Amarr Red Light Navy	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:19:00 - [16] Edited by: MenanceWhite on 25/07/2008 12:23:40 Quote: Afterburners should be a viable module selection for PVP. Guerrilla warfare must remain a viable combat tactic. Afterburners are being slightly adjusted to decrease the variation in speed boost from 105-171% to 112.5-162% Afterburner is'nt a "viable" module selection in PvP and now it's going to become "viable" after a 9% max velocity nerf? Guerrilla warfare is a viable combat tactic? Wow it's so viable, that I have to bring a blob just to guerrilla that decently tanked Absolutions ass. Because otherwise it's just going to tank all damage untill a even bigger blob arrives to kill my blob. It's so much Guerrilla tactics I'm stunned really. STUNNED. B R I L L I A N T C C P --- Originally by: Torfi There's alot. That can be done. With.. corpses Originally by: Oveur
luminous russula	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:19:00 - [17] yeah right, all those who have no idea how to play the bloody game and whine all day on the forums get what they whined for, well in all honesty, idiots like those obviously represent the majority therefore they should get what they wished for... but be careful at what you nerf, cause soon all you will have will be ******s picking fits from the forums and flying the same ships around all the time, so much for complexity you were aiming for... HACs maybe shuldn't be as fast, but t2 frigates should be able to speed tank, they should be able to brake 6k without faction fits, or implants...
GallenteCitizen20080615 Gallente Federation War News	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:20:00 - [18] being a long ranbge tracking sniper battleship , and a curse pilot i have never had any problem with nanos since i either have some webbies at the gate and me just pound on them from afarr or have that single large nos in my top slots which get a juicy long range and kill cap in seconds thing die fast so this doesnt effect me and ludercrus speed is exactly what i thought of when he said that in the dev blog
alpha charlie Minmatar North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:20:00 - [19] goodbye mimatar
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:24:00 - [20] Originally by: MenanceWhite Quote: Afterburners should be a viable module selection for PVP. Guerrilla warfare must remain a viable combat tactic. Afterburners are being slightly adjusted to decrease the variation in speed boost from 105-171% to 112.5-162% Afterburner is'nt a "viable" module selection in PvP and now it's going to become it after a 9% max velo nerf? B R I L L I A N T Guerrilla warfare is a viable combat tactic? Wow it's so viable, that I have to bring a blob just to guerrilla that nicely tanked Absolutions ass. READ before you post, how abuot that. because now, MWD's will shut down when you get warp scrammed, specifically the current 2 point range of short range scrams will shut off a MWD. with webs being reduced in power, in order to fully web a shiip as you do now, you need to first A), scram it to shut off the MWD, and then web it, to well err web it. (as webs will only do 50% now, but as the MWD wont be running, its the same effect but you need 2 modules not 1). afterburners will not suffer from this and cause the web is now nerfed at a base level, this means AB's are a decent choice. its simple really. Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
Voculus E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:24:00 - [21] Edited by: Voculus on 25/07/2008 12:24:05 Originally by: luminous russula yeah right, all those who have no idea how to play the bloody game and whine all day on the forums get what they whined for, well in all honesty, idiots like those obviously represent the majority therefore they should get what they wished for... but be careful at what you nerf, cause soon all you will have will be ******s picking fits from the forums and flying the same ships around all the time, so much for complexity you were aiming for... HACs maybe shuldn't be as fast, but t2 frigates should be able to speed tank, they should be able to brake 6k without faction fits, or implants... CCP could just bring WCS back to their former glory. That way you can do the same thing, and run around in your ship, and do nothing but run around in it. _________________________________________________________
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:26:00 - [22] Edited by: NeoTheo on 25/07/2008 12:26:20 Originally by: luminous russula yeah right, all those who have no idea how to play the bloody game and whine all day on the forums get what they whined for, well in all honesty, idiots like those obviously represent the majority therefore they should get what they wished for... but be careful at what you nerf, cause soon all you will have will be ****s picking fits from the forums and flying the same ships around all the time, so much for complexity you were aiming for... HACs maybe shuldn't be as fast, but t2 frigates should be able to speed tank, they should be able to brake 6k without faction fits, or implants... maybe its you who dont have a clue how to play? nano ships took the , its not like i dont fly them like everyone else. the only way i die is if i am a ****, simple as. I sense pure crying over spilt milk, most of us are going to suffer cash wise, my Ishtar is now prolly going to need a full refit, but before i could just prema run my mwd release drones and 1win.com. maybe it you who found your iwin button and cant be arsed to adapt? Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
MenanceWhite Amarr Red Light Navy	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:27:00 - [23] Edited by: MenanceWhite on 25/07/2008 12:28:05 Originally by: NeoTheo post hurf durf because people using MWD are so stupid, that they get within scrambler range. Nanos were fine, the only problem with them is that they work like WCS did before. --- Originally by: Torfi There's alot. That can be done. With.. corpses Originally by: Oveur
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:28:00 - [24] Originally by: MenanceWhite Originally by: NeoTheo post hurf durf because people using MWD are so stupid, that they get within scrambler range. arazu? Tackling line of Ceptors? Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
MenanceWhite Amarr Red Light Navy	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:32:00 - [25] Originally by: NeoTheo Originally by: MenanceWhite Originally by: NeoTheo post hurf durf because people using MWD are so stupid, that they get within scrambler range. arazu? Tackling line of Ceptors? Oh pleaase, going close to attack because of one being damped after the patch would be like the same as attacking that huggin/rapier/curse 70km away from you before the patch. Tackling ceptors were almost as perfectly possible after as before the patch effects. --- Originally by: Torfi There's alot. That can be done. With.. corpses Originally by: Oveur
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:35:00 - [26] Originally by: MenanceWhite Originally by: NeoTheo Originally by: MenanceWhite Originally by: NeoTheo post hurf durf because people using MWD are so stupid, that they get within scrambler range. arazu? Tackling line of Ceptors? Oh pleaase, going close to attack because of one being damped after the patch would be like the same as attacking that huggin/rapier/curse 70km away from you before the patch. Tackling ceptors were almost as perfectly possible after as before the patch effects. did i mention damps? why not take a look at ALL the bonuses on the arazu? second if bringing a huggin along really helped previously i wouldnt moan so much but as MWD's stayed on, inertia carried you out of web. Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
luminous russula	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:35:00 - [27] Originally by: NeoTheo Edited by: NeoTheo on 25/07/2008 12:26:20 Originally by: luminous russula yeah right, all those who have no idea how to play the bloody game and whine all day on the forums get what they whined for, well in all honesty, idiots like those obviously represent the majority therefore they should get what they wished for... but be careful at what you nerf, cause soon all you will have will be ****s picking fits from the forums and flying the same ships around all the time, so much for complexity you were aiming for... HACs maybe shuldn't be as fast, but t2 frigates should be able to speed tank, they should be able to brake 6k without faction fits, or implants... maybe its you who dont have a clue how to play? nano ships took the , its not like i dont fly them like everyone else. the only way i die is if i am a ****, simple as. I sense pure crying over spilt milk, most of us are going to suffer cash wise, my Ishtar is now prolly going to need a full refit, but before i could just prema run my mwd release drones and 1win.com. maybe it you who found your iwin button and cant be arsed to adapt? read before you insult... HACs should be nerfed, a ship that size shouldn't go as fast, but interceptors, which are small should be able speed tank, but we will see if they will be able to in the future...
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:40:00 - [28] Originally by: luminous russula but interceptors, which are small should be able speed tank, but we will see if they will be able to in the future... They will be able to , build a ceptor right now, set your speed at 4.5k and then orbit a battleship or a battle cruiser. you will find you will not be hit. the only difference is that you will not have a ishtar catching you up and wtf drone pwning you if you decide to flee, this change does nothing but put ceptors in a better position. Neotheo Dark Materials Linkage
Orogaldeo Amarr Star Horizons	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:40:00 - [29] YAY, SELL VAGA BUY CERBERUS SELL INTY BUY AF GHAAAAA EVERYBODY TO THE NERFBOAAAAATTTT /madness _________________________________
Karunel Princeps Corp T e r c i o s	Posted - 2008.07.25 12:53:00 - [30] Originally by: MenanceWhite Oh pleaase, going close to attack because of one being damped Thanks for clearing up that you don't have any idea about what you're talking about. ____ Originally by: elbenito The problem with large fleet engagements is that the hamsters stop to watch.

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.