| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
WAuter
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:46:00 -
[31]
HAC = heavy assault cruiser, not heavy assault interceptor.
|
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:13:00 -
[32]
you can now take a bc instead of hac, more tank/dps and cheaper! hey how about removing a bonus of all hacs and replace it with one that is build in already 
|
TheEndofTheWorld
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:20:00 -
[33]
What purpose do the HACs/RECONs have now once the current nano-nerf is utilized.
|
Marshall Knight
Ardent Industrial
Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:47:00 -
[34]
What is the problem with nerfing nano i see no big issue.
Hacs were never designed to go uber fast they were designed as a heavy tanked cruiser with good resists to engage battleships and extra bonus that you dont get from battlecruisers. eg.
Myrmidom is a drone boat with a decent tank and bonus to reps.
Ishtar has bonus to resists, 5km per lvl extra drone control range and and extra drone space per lvl and also the same drone damage bonus as a teir 2 bc and in my oppinion are much better thana teir 2 bc. hacs still have there uses just not as an i win button and yes they were i win buttons.
To all the people who say you can kill nanos maybe with a rapier and dps ship on 1 hac but when its 5 or more hacs together it becomes very hard task. Good on ccp with the nerf and hell i will still use mine for ratting there awsome for pve so get over it and deal with it and maybe now we can actually have proper tanked ship fights again.
|
Novemb3r
Vale Heavy Industries
Molotov Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:56:00 -
[35]
 Originally by: Napro
Yeah... we could do all these specializations to accomodate to your gameplay. Or you can accept that your I Win button is gone and accomodate everyone else's gameplay.
Looks like the devs made that choice for you
The problem is that it doesn't just mess with the I-win button (not that it was anyway) of nanos, it affects a whole range of other ships and combat style. Any blaster boat smaller than a BS is now pretty much dead in the water.
Even BS sized blaster boats are in trouble as with the web nerf they can't track anything smaller than another battleship.
And it looks like CCP based the changes on every nano ship running around with HG snakes, t2 polys and a claymore in system when really the vast majority of nano ships are fitted with basic t2 gear and t1 polys and LG or no snakes.
And we have tested this. It's not just idle speculation.
-
|
Spoon Thumb
Paladin Imperium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:59:00 -
[36]
The problem isn't the speed. It is that there is no way to force nano's to fight. There are pleanty of ways to fight nano's if they choose to engage.
Nano's are low risk because they are too easy to escape or avoid combat in
|
Neddy Fox
Gallente
Paxton Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:03:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Neddy Fox on 29/07/2008 12:03:48
We already found ways to counter nano's, even to a degree where the enemy was changing tactics. I hate the nano-nerf, since it influences my blaster-boats.
Nano isn't a problem at all, but all the whiners who don't want to adapt are. THEY are ruining MY game, and no, I don't nano.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |