EVE Search - Xaen's Forecast for EVE

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Xaen's Forecast for EVE

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2008.07.25 21:22:00 - [61] Edited by: Crumplecorn on 25/07/2008 21:22:44 Originally by: TheG2 Sorry, I was referencing Battleships with large blasters, not medium ships which have more maneuverability. Regardless of what you've posted, the ship will have enough speed to easy coast within the required range for it's blasters to be within or near optimal range. Once within the range yourself, you can web and cut the enemies MWD yourself. the enemies MWD Nobody is suggesting there is an issue attacking other MWD boats, because there isn't one. Against AB boats, replace that last step with 'you can web and sit there as they AB away while you are stuck with base speed'. - DesuSigs
Euriti Gallente SniggWaffe	Posted - 2008.07.25 21:31:00 - [62] Originally by: Aria Seniste Originally by: Zephyr Rengate Originally by: Jinx Barker All HACs? What about Drone HACs or the Amarrian Missile boats? I would guess those will go up/or stay the same. A non nano ishtar is rather crap. Not really. The fact that you believe this shows the problem with nanos in the first place. Also: Web nerf. Consider it. You can bring these "nerfed" HACs (which will still probably get 2~2.5km/s) into web range now without it being suicide. Inties can fight in web range, still getting 50%~ of their speed... web range is no longer suicide. Maybe assault frigates get a role now. HACs can fight close range and still run. You still need a 24k point to tackle effectively, and the room to fit a point AND a scram AND a web.. is nonexistant. If they have a web, you can probably still MWD. If they have a scram, you get your full speed, minus the MWD, without a web. Either way, close range is no longer suicide for small ships. This is good. You know what's wrong with cruiser active tanking? Doesn't have the buffer for it and you need buffer for it, active tanking usually revolves around taking damage while repairing some of it to slow down the loss of hp, in very few cases you tank all damage. With 2000 armor you don't have this buffer. You dont have the structure buffer either You have this on a BC.
Haradgrim Tyrell Corp INTERDICTION	Posted - 2008.07.25 21:37:00 - [63] Originally by: Xaen [list] HACs become useless. The price of them will plummet. I'll buy your cerbs and I think other HACs will do just fine.... other than that I mostly agree -- Originally by: CCP Oveur ...every forum whine feels like a baby pony is getting killed
OVERCOPES 1 Amarr Amarr Secret Service	Posted - 2008.07.25 21:38:00 - [64] Edited by: OVERCOPES 1 on 25/07/2008 21:41:55 Originally by: APEXrevived agreed xaen. i do not believe there is a rampant inbalance regarding nano setups. there are plenty of counters to my vagabond. it's very dangerous change for not a good enough reason. please see SWG Combat Upgrade Plz see gankageddon nerf,plz see EWAR nerf,plz see nos nerf,plz see fitting torps to cruisers and cruise missles to frigate nerf,i could go on. Guess what the game still grows,so GTFO out of EvE if you cant adapt. And if you dont think there is an imbalance to nanos you are one seriously deluded person. Technolisa>those yellow things work better than platinum insurance :P
GallenteCitizen20080615 Gallente Federation War News	Posted - 2008.07.25 21:42:00 - [65] Edited by: GallenteCitizen20080615 on 25/07/2008 21:44:35 wow that 0.0 firght you are describing isnt right our allaince hasnt had the need to use a cap for almost a week and we been doing fleet or small gang warfare 50 man non cap fleet head to us and that was fun P.S the "nano nerf" doesnt effect player that didnt pick it as there flavour of the month hell we had a small nano HAC gang that has a crap FC as we killed them all with a bunch of sniper megas, couple of rapiers and curses and all 22 of then died =) dont even tell me it cant be done, because it can and i never picked NANO as i prefer to actually have something on my armour other than bubble paper
Nito Musashi	Posted - 2008.07.25 22:54:00 - [66] one thing i will say is ccp should have come out a year ago and said they were taking a good hard look at speed tank/nanos before we got to this point then boom hey too bad we are changing it. many will cheer many will cry some will adapt and eve will go on in the end.
Tippia Caldari School of Applied Knowledge	Posted - 2008.07.25 23:23:00 - [67] Originally by: Xaen Rolling your head across the F1-F8 keys becomes the new way to play. No way! (But mainly because if I do that, I start repping my enemies, and that's generally a bad idea as I understand it… )
Danny Altenburg	Posted - 2008.07.25 23:37:00 - [68] Originally by: Tippia Edited by: Tippia on 25/07/2008 23:27:19 Also: WTS: a bunch of Drakes, Myrms, Harbingers and Feroxes (Feroxi?) I believe the correct plural would be 'Feroces' Though 'Faeces' would be considered an acceptable alternative in some circles.
CHAOS100 Black Plague. RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.07.25 23:44:00 - [69] You mean blasters weren't already obsolete??? --------------
Lieutenant Isis Gristle Industries	Posted - 2008.07.25 23:46:00 - [70] Originally by: Xaen Originally by: TheG2 Edited by: TheG2 on 25/07/2008 18:13:22 I predict you'll be about as accurate as my local weather man (not very). And that, is a prediction you can count on. Thanks for watching, stay classy San Diego. Optimal range for a medium blaster w/void is about 3.2km. And without a web and a scram the transversal on the target ship is going to be too high to hit. And with Null you can have an optimal of 5.6 plus a falloff of 7.5, certainly a hittable range. You do realise that there is more then one type of ammo right?
P'uck	Posted - 2008.07.25 23:46:00 - [71] Originally by: Neth'Rae You know any ship without a mwd that can go faster than an arazu with? :P I don't know, maybe an afterburner vigil/slasher
gtcsellalt	Posted - 2008.07.26 04:32:00 - [72] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Xaen HACs become useless. The price of them will plummet. Modest loss of subscriptions. Let's be honest, there are more Raven flying Mission runners than anything. Significant increase in drake and drone boat prices, sales, and usage. Arazus are going to double in price if they haven't already. The price of Snakes drops by 40% or more. The prices of Slaves increase by 30% or so. The prices of Centurions increase by 30% or more. Combat recons get cheap, and useless, fast. Stick around and see how accurate I am! Those points seems fairly unlikely. lol what a noob arazu already doubled in price. thx for input though.
Lucius Nahme	Posted - 2008.07.26 04:56:00 - [73] Xaen hasn't been right once yet so my I know where my money is going Tortun Nahme's alt, he couldn't be arsed to switch
Daelin Blackleaf The Reclaimed	Posted - 2008.07.26 04:59:00 - [74] Originally by: Xaen Combat recons get cheap, and useless, fast. While some of your "predictions" have been around for months if not years I find it hard to believe a scrambler buff would lessen use of the Lachesis. Further I doubt the Huginn will become less popular now that you need more webs to achieve the same effect and an increase in spider tanking can only be a good thing for the Curse. The Rook of course is a somewhat special case thanks to basically being a non-covert-cloaking Falcon.
burek Mercenary Forces	Posted - 2008.07.26 05:12:00 - [75] You forgot one. The megapulses will be back with a vengeance. Don't mind that so much as forseeing this stupidity (dev listening to whiners) I have respecced from minmatar to ammar half a year ago.
Nova Fox Gallente Novafox Shipyards	Posted - 2008.07.26 05:24:00 - [76] Maybe if xaen didnt post the forcast in such a neutral or negative toned manner it would have not drawn the crowd of haters as it did. New Ship Idea: Tender Supply Ship, The Logistics Sister
Merin Ryskin Peregrine Industries	Posted - 2008.07.26 06:57:00 - [77] Originally by: Xaen HACs become useless. The price of them will plummet. Awesome. This is the best part. I really hope you're right, I can't wait until my HAC prices drop because people think they suck. Quote: Combat recons get cheap, and useless, fast. Combat recons are ALREADY cheap and useless, thanks to force recons being so much better. How much cheaper than "you'd have to pay me to fly one" can you get?
Nova Fox Gallente Novafox Shipyards	Posted - 2008.07.26 07:05:00 - [78] Your no Rells though, I rather hear that guy complain or make predictions than you tbh. New Ship Idea: Tender Supply Ship, The Logistics Sister
Flamewave Crimson Moon Society	Posted - 2008.07.26 07:26:00 - [79] Originally by: Xaen HACs become useless. The price of them will plummet. Good, can't wait. I could use a few more. __________

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.