| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cinnamon Stick
   |
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:08:00 -
[91]
|
Fandanguero
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:08:00 -
[92]
let it be
Iyanden craftworld |
Crazy Stalker
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:08:00 -
[93]
|
Glowy
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:08:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Glowy on 26/07/2008 19:08:18
|
phillie blunt
Live And Let Die
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:09:00 -
[95]
|
Andre Lariny
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:16:00 -
[96]
Support :)
|
Tekeran
The Hull Miners Union
The Red Skull
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:18:00 -
[97]
I support the nano nerf although I'm a bit worried about my blasters... shouldn't hurt them too much though.
We are now recruiting! |
Tzujeih
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:22:00 -
[98]
Somebody lock this shit. Its going onto sisi. If the devs like the changes it brings, they should implement.
Since it isn't even monday, every single post in this thread is worthless, and I hope the eve devs realize it.
|
Sebastien Starstrider
Minmatar Ship Construction Services
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:23:00 -
[99]
For :P
|
Roberta Taori
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:23:00 -
[100]
Nerf!!!
|
|
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:24:00 -
[101]
 Originally by: Tzujeih
Somebody lock this shit. Its going onto sisi. If the devs like the changes it brings, they should implement.
Since it isn't even monday, every single post in this thread is worthless, and I hope the eve devs realize it.
good point this should instead be in support of it being tested :P
|
Thrawntl
AWE Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:29:00 -
[102]
support
|
Johana Don
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:35:00 -
[103]
|
FURY EG
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:36:00 -
[104]
support
|
moren0
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:43:00 -
[105]
Support
|
Windjammer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:49:00 -
[106]
Unacceptable. Too many ships adversely effected in too many ways. Not just speed.
Even if you want to nerf the speed of nano ships, these changes are an extremely bad fix. It's a nerf to agility, not just speed.
They would affect the ability of Transport ships, Cov-Ops, etc. to get by blockades.
Windjammer
|
Lieutenant Isis
Gristle Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 19:50:00 -
[107]
Originally by: Amoun Ra
I support the nano nerf. Even though i sympathize with those players who spend billion in their ships it shouldn't make them invulnerable no matter what and nano is just that. For those who say that they have the right to be invulnerable because they spent billions on their ships well eve is not about who has the fatter wallet right ?
I believe this nano nerf is going to bring diversity to gameplay in eve while still allowing speed as a viable tactic but not the ultimate tactic. I also read lots of the posts on the comments of the devblog and tbh the majority of those who are against this nerf seem to be players who have adapted nano warfare as their only method of pvp and forgot that eve is all about diversity of tactics so for those people i say i am sorry but i am not convinced by your point of view.
Also for the argument that nano appeared to counter blob warfare guess what right now the way things are we are heading toward nano blob warfare which i believe would kill eve. And i do believe that nano is one of the main reasons solo pvp has died out too.
It may be painful this nano nerf but the way i see its better now while the majority of eve doesn't nano because that was definitly where we were heading to, and if that happened it would have been too late.
By the way i just bought a nano ship a few days ago and i have trained a lot of skill just to be able to fly it. 
Oh well i will just have to find another use for it now and i am sure those skills will help in some way or another  i will just have to adapt
I totally agree with this statement. And there may still be tweaks to be made, but until we try them out on sisi, we don't know how good the changes will be.
|
darkyblood
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:12:00 -
[108]
yeah nerf that invu ships 
|
Soleil Fournier
AWE Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:13:00 -
[109]
I fully support the nano changes.
|
doomcarrier
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:13:00 -
[110]
nerf it !!
|
|
|
DJ MULER
Caldari
SPANI
T e r c i o s
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:14:00 -
[111]
suport
HUNTER |
Sugui
Nuclear Stalkers inc.
DeaDSpace Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:15:00 -
[112]
We are Caldari! We are FOR this changes! =)
It wil make a little hardly live of nano pilots and little easyly live of the others. I think... +)
|
Steel Tigeress
Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:15:00 -
[113]
nano's turn to adapt or die.
|
Kovaos
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:16:00 -
[114]
Originally by: Steel Tigeress
nano's turn to adapt or die.
it's a shame you couldn't with nanos..... we had to do it in the last nerf to nanos they did... grow up.
|
Grim Fangs
Solar Dragons
SOLAR FLEET
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:18:00 -
[115]
support
|
Apollo Quinn
ADAMA Corps
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:26:00 -
[116]
Yes. Diversity in the cosmos.
|
Ulric Denrai
Amarr
Glass House
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:38:00 -
[117]
Nerf it.
|
Agasper
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:39:00 -
[118]
Support
|
Prismaa
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:40:00 -
[119]
|
Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:42:00 -
[120]
Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2008 20:42:17
Support. My reasons have all been outlined many times elsewhere.
-Wrayeth
n00b Extraordinaire
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!" |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |