| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
J'Mkarr Soban
Proxenetae Invicti
   |
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:45:00 -
[121]
--
These are my personal views and in no way represent the views of Proxenetae Invicti, which maintains a neutral stance stemming from the strong ethics demanded of its work. |
Nallika
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:45:00 -
[122]
support
|
Maurok Ortega
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:49:00 -
[123]
I think what ccp are attempting to accomplish with this nerf is a good thing and the dev blog makes alot of sense. I certainly support this.
|
Furb Killer
The first genesis
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:50:00 -
[124]
|
Neechi HollanderDanny
PROGENITOR CORPORATION
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:54:00 -
[125]
Nerf it
|
dragonlord24
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:56:00 -
[126]
nerf it
|
Steel Tigeress
Gallente
Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:56:00 -
[127]
 Originally by: Kovaos
Originally by: Steel Tigeress
nano's turn to adapt or die.
it's a shame you couldn't with nanos..... we had to do it in the last nerf to nanos they did... grow up.
Having to fit 1 specific module, nano yourself, or fly one races ships to counter nano's is not adapting. Its pidgeonholing.
Adapt or die....
|
Sgt Napalm
Synergy Evolved
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:15:00 -
[128]
|
Dartuho
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:20:00 -
[129]
It was needed for a long time
|
Aionstar
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:26:00 -
[130]
|
|
|
Dak Rungar
Up2-NoGood
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:35:00 -
[131]
|
czStiguria
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:42:00 -
[132]
Edited by: czStiguria on 26/07/2008 21:43:15
ok for me
|
Druadan
Aristotle Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:51:00 -
[133]
I support the nano nerf, but not in its entirety. I support all its motions except one...
I do no support the 7.5km scrams deactivating MWDs, as this is just too unnecessarily catastrophic to blasterboats, and does nothing to solve the actual speed problem, as the prime offenders will not come closer than 15km anyway.
Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
JuGGeR
Phantom Squad
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:53:00 -
[134]
nerf is comming ,,, i dont care tbh .. but a change is always nice ..
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371 <--- nerf vid showing the difference...
Phantomsquad |
Krasavitca
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:54:00 -
[135]
support
|
Neurosis
Minmatar
RillaCorp
Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 21:56:00 -
[136]
I support this effort, NERF interdictors as well, bring them in-line with thier bigger brother the hic and make it all focused, leave the bubbles to the anchorable structures imo, removes the need for speeding away from the blob as the only viable option
_________________________________________________'
"I have the ability and the experience to do destroy BoB and believe me, BoB is getting desperate"
'Madeye'McCreedy'
[red]Sig is not eve r |
Ben Derindar
Dirty Deeds Corp.
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:13:00 -
[137]
It's for the best.
/Ben
|
Kita Radeon
Gallente
Hakata Group
Blade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:20:00 -
[138]
Changes are being put on sisi on monday iirc. Its still to early to judge the nerfs before they are tested. Anyways I doubt that they would be implemented as they are now. I think CCP has just come up with some radical ideas and will let the forum whiners shape the actual nerfs.
----
All my opinions are poorly thought out and do NOT represent my Corp, Alliance, or self when I am Sober. |
Inertial
The Python Cartel
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:27:00 -
[139]
Even if you are for a nano nerf, unless its this specific nerf you want, you should post in the other thread. This affects more than just nanoes.
Personally I am against this nerf, CCP would do better by adjusting snakes and polycarbs, than nerfing speed as a whole.
we are recruiting!
|
MasterEYE
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:30:00 -
[140]
this will be DIFRENT :p
|
|
|
Foulque
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:40:00 -
[141]
|
MECHcore
Celestial Apocalypse
The Requiem
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:50:00 -
[142]
Kill teh nanoships !! 
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Hango ([email protected]) |
Atr0nach
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:07:00 -
[143]
Nerf them they ruin the game.
|
Kaltano Darkwind
AWE Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:09:00 -
[144]
I support fixing anything broken, even if flying at insane speeds is crazy fun.
The Prepared Soul,
Kaltano Darkwind
"Can you prepare for the unexpected? No, you can prepare only to be suprised." |
Dominious
New Light
Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:09:00 -
[145]
|
Zetjur Jilnou
Rapid Deployment Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:20:00 -
[146]
|
NanDe YaNen
The Funkalistic
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:21:00 -
[147]
Support in general
The web/ab/mwd/scram thing is...
If you're in scram range, you're in web range.
Oh! I'm going to fit an afterburner and get scram immunity! But I'm in web range...
Bad idea. Bad idea. Fix by making web effectiveness have a sig radius/propulsion relationship. Thus if you have small thrust of a small ship and the big radius of a MWD ship, you get extra penalty from web. If you have the appropriate ratio given by an AB, you are still at a healthy transverse when webbed.
Poor Thorax.
|
Cypher Run
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:21:00 -
[148]
Edited by: Cypher Run on 26/07/2008 23:20:59
All for it
|
Sid Zero
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:31:00 -
[149]
I'm not really supporting it as a nano-nerf, because it isn't really that much of a nano nerf. I do support it because this is a semi-direct Assault frigate boost and also possibly a gate camp nerf.
Testing throughout the following month will tell.
For now, I motion that the proposed changes be implemented.
|
Rawr Cristina
Caldari
Omerta Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:41:00 -
[150]
support.
...
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |