|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:39:00 -
[1]
AGAINST !!!!!!!!!!
|

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:52:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Yaay my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.
|

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 15:23:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Yaay Edited by: Yaay on 29/07/2008 18:49:05
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.
and how many people in eve have more than one account.
I don't know how many players have more than one account, but what does it change ? you only have one vote per payed account.
|

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 15:31:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Yaay Edited by: Yaay on 29/07/2008 18:51:20
As for you Tri guys, Remember that time you were asked to run 1 battleship op and you revolted completely and asked that I leave the alliance.... or when Super flipped out because I asked him (not told him) to cut back on Nano, not altogether remove it from use.
Gee wonder why I asked him that, maybe this patch has something to do with it.
I don't think this is the appropriate way to wash the dirty laundry of requiem. You perfectly know, why tri members didn't join in that op. God, what am I happy to be back in TRI.
|

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 12:55:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Was raised in today's CSM meeting - discussion ensued - chatlog is Vote on nano-nerf statement at 16:45
Feel free to have a read about what was said.
Very dissapointed in the CSM !!!! You are considering you own opinions on the subject and not the input generated by the Pro-Con the vote. I tought your mission was to voice the feeling of the community not your own???
You seem to think that we all just vote pro-con without trying it out on sisi. Well you are wrong, I think there are plenty of posts with concrete evidence that this nerf is bad, and will eliminate a certain type of warfare as it is no longer a viable option with the proposed changes.
CCP seems to think that all Nano pilots use HG snakes and use T2 poly's on. I think they can find out, if they wanted to, on how many pilots acutally use this type's of mods and implants in actual combat. But I'm convinced it will be a minorty. The typical nano pilot is using T1 poly's, T2 nano's and overdrives, and maybe a speed mod. This is what should be looked into that the typical setup by most nano pilots remains a viable option. Not nerf everything that the ridicilous stuff that most can't offord remains a half baked solution.
Go do your job CSM !!!!
|

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 13:25:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman Edited by: AdmiralFreeman on 04/08/2008 13:28:34 Edited by: AdmiralFreeman on 04/08/2008 12:59:10
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Was raised in today's CSM meeting - discussion ensued - chatlog is Vote on nano-nerf statement at 16:45
Feel free to have a read about what was said.
Very dissapointed in the CSM !!!! You are considering your own opinions on the subject over the input generated by the Pro-Con the vote/poll. I tought your mission was to voice the feeling of the community not your own??? AGAINST / PRO NERF = 2/1 I think its clear !!!
You seem to think that we all just vote pro-con without trying it out on sisi. Well you are wrong, I think there are plenty of posts with concrete evidence that this nerf is bad, and will eliminate a certain type of warfare as it is no longer a viable option with the proposed changes.
CCP seems to think that all Nano pilots use HG snakes and use T2 poly's on. I think they can find out, if they wanted to, on how many pilots acutally use this type's of mods and implants in actual combat. But I'm convinced it will be a minorty. The typical nano pilot is using T1 poly's, T2 nano's and overdrives, and maybe a low cost speed mod implant. This is what should be looked into that the typical setup by most nano pilots remains a viable option. Not nerf everything that the ridicilous stuff that most can't offord remains a half baked solution.
Go do your job CSM !!!! The vote tells you exactly what you should do !!!!
Well I've added the speed nerf Issue to the agenda again for the August 17th meeting and urged all the CSM delegates to make the effort to get onto SISI for the two intervening weeks so we can hopefully have a more useful discussion at the next meeting. Fingers crossed we get something more useful from the next one.
For the record: Jade, Omber Zombie, Ben Derider, Ank voted for a statement on the nano nerf last meeting. Bane Glorious, Darius Johnson, Inanna and Tusko Hopkins voted against. If you feel that any of the CSM delegates who would ordinarily be representing your interests on this issue have made a mistake then I'd advise you to evemail, convo, or otherwise engage them in discussion and let them know what you think.
Thanks for your efforts Jade, its appreciated. Keep on pushing !!!
To the other CSM members : I think the message given by the vote is pretty clear, so I don't understand why you are reluctant on voicing the results of the vox-populi ? Invoking the fact that the proposed changes are still subject to change is b***s**t. You know as well as I, that if we don't act now, the nerf is going to happen. So get in the frontline and act based on the votes!!
Also unsure what some of your CSM members(-1), that voted against the CSM putting something forward are going to test on sisi. As they seem to have close to no KB stats / proven combat experience, or display any relevant pre nerf pvp experience..... or does being in csm mean that you are defacto experts on small gang warfare and tactics ?
If they would have been pre-occupied by the upcomming changes they would already have tested is on sisi the day it was released. don't you think so ?
|
|
|
|