|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sylthi
Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 11:52:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Sylthi on 26/07/2008 11:54:11 Yeah, I have to come down firmly on the side of AGAINST on this one.
As many people have said, this is not a "nano-nerf" this is just a "nerf everything in sight that has to do with speed".
If CCP thinks the speed in some ship types (and/or specific module/implant combinations) are a problem, they need to address THOSE specific areas; not EVERY SINGLE thing in the game that has to do with speed.
This is just an utter fail way of going about it.
*
* |
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 08:42:00 -
[2]
Remember to check the "give your support" box when making a post, or your vote really doesn't get noticed, or counted! Thanks people.
(I already voted, so I don't need to do it again!)
Cheers. *
* |
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 05:50:00 -
[3]
People, be SURE to check the "Check here if you want to give your support to the idea/discussion going on" box when you are making your post, or your vote won't get properly tallied.
Thank you for your "No" vote on this critical issue.
Cheers.
P.S. My vote was tallied a LONG time ago, so this post is just a reminder to all of you. Peace. *
* |
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 06:00:00 -
[4]
People, be SURE to check the "Check here if you want to give your support to the idea/discussion going on" box when you are making your post, or your vote won't get properly tallied.
Thank you for your "No" vote on this critical issue.
Cheers.
P.S. My vote was tallied a LONG time ago, so this post is just a reminder to all of you. Peace. *
* |
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 17:31:00 -
[5]
People, be SURE to check the "Check here if you want to give your support to the idea/discussion going on" box when you are making your post, or your vote won't get properly tallied.
Thank you for your "No" vote on this critical issue.
Cheers.
P.S. My vote was tallied a LONG time ago, so this post is just a reminder to all of you. Peace. *
* |
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 05:35:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
This issue counts as the most popular public issue for the coming August 3rd meeting so we will be discussing it. I've certainly done some testing myself on SISI and I'd advise as many people as possible to do that too. Go there, form up nano gangs and anti nano gangs and see if its possible now for speed to escape 0.0 bubble gamps. Make sure the BH's and devs get to see for themselves what happens. Basically - having a huge ass thread like this is good for highlighting the issue and now thats certainly been done - but its now time to get testing on SISI and coming up with some specific proposals for how to improve the changes suggested in the devblog.
This. Get to it people. Give the devs in game examples of why all of these changes are a bad thing or they are going to blatently ignore popular demand like always. I, for one, am doing my part, have you done yours gentle reader?
*
* |
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 06:11:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Sylthi on 04/08/2008 06:13:29
Originally by: Tia' Moroth Ok so our subscription money is being wasted flying you to Iceland to talk about Issues that really mater such as MUSICAL ****ING INSTRUMENTS? Not the game breaking changes the dev's who asume the standard nano pilot has a full set of High Grade snakes and T2 Rigs.
Christ almight. I might as well biomass my charicters right now.
THIS. I am EXTREMELY disappointed in the CSM reps who voted to put this off and are potentially going to do nothing about this issue.
The entire point of the CSM was/is to bring the concerns of the player base to the CCP devs. There are now several THOUSAND votes (both for and against) telling you to do just that. You then turn around and vote DIRECTLY to NOT do your job. All I can say is: WTF.
The general consensus of the council was that "it is too early" to say/do anything about this. Absolute Bullocks.
Fact: The "Against" vote poll is winning by more than 2 to 1 at the time of this typing, and has been ever since it was posted.
Does this give the CSM any sort of a clue as to the MAJORITY feelings of the player base concerned by this issue?
Fact: Read any 20 pages, hell, read any 10 pages of the "Against" poll and the general consensus becomes so OBVIOUS that a pre-schooler could sort it out. MOST people is BOTH the "For" and "Against" poll agree that a change is needed to speed. But, specifically in the "Against" poll, MANY point but that the devs are going WAY to far and considering too many changes to very BASIC game play elements.
Am I TOTALLY insane, or is this, or is this not, MORE than enough information to DO YOUR JOBS and go to CCP with the idea that they need to (at the very least) severely reduce the scope of the changes they are planning?
Bottom line: To those reps who voted FOR moving forward with this issue: Thank you for keeping the faith with your constituents. To those reps who voted directly NOT to do your jobs: Shame on you. And, good luck getting my vote for re-election.
*
* |
|
|
|