| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
OverLord PL
   |
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:23:00 -
[991]
Against
|
Dominik Miethling
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:34:00 -
[992]
Against due to overuse of the Nerfbat.
|
Midfielder
Red Assault Brigades
United Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:38:00 -
[993]
Against webnerf!
|
Ar3s
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:39:00 -
[994]
Against webnerf!
|
Krantus
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:42:00 -
[995]
Against webnerf!
|
viollllllas
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:43:00 -
[996]
AGAINST
|
Slithery Stalker
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:44:00 -
[997]
Against webnerf!
|
Captain Crunch
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:47:00 -
[998]
Against webnerf!
|
MadMadMad
Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 10:58:00 -
[999]
nano must live |
Gyoji
T e r c i o s
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:13:00 -
[1000]
|
bella lugosi
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:18:00 -
[1001]
Edited by: bella lugosi on 29/07/2008 11:18:30
against. the constant nerfs are getting absurd. the number of unintended changes incurred by altering so many game mechanics at once will be staggering.
you say you want to reduce the "ludicrous speeds" on some ships, but have really implimented massive changes in speed and accelleration to every ship.
|
GodNoob 666
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:19:00 -
[1002]
AGAINST
|
easylad
Malicious Intentions
Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:20:00 -
[1003]
Plz plz plz plz dont nerf nanos, There are plenty of ways to stop nano fleets if people use there heads so there is no need to change it.
|
5h4dy
Caeco Dominus
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:24:00 -
[1004]
The nerf is to harsh and to much of a change to the way pvp works, a change as big as this can completely break pvp as we currently know it and that isnt a good thing.
|
Anja Lind
Genesis Rising
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:26:00 -
[1005]
<--
|
Inoi Troriak
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:28:00 -
[1006]
I for one am really dissapointed with ccp on this matter. I fly a multitude of ships nano being my ship of choice. It has taken me and im sure the rest of you a great deal of time to skill in this area. We pay good money to play eve and the way I see it this game is geared up for the bears in eve. CCP do yourselfs a favor and LEAVE NANO ALONE!!!! SO YES I AM 100% against the nerf.
One last thing I can See CCP loosing many pilots if this nerf is bought into affect why are you fixing something that is not broken Wake up !!! 
|
TheMean Machine
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:40:00 -
[1007]
against! |
Bobroglaz
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:41:00 -
[1008]
Edited by: Bobroglaz on 29/07/2008 11:41:41
AGAINST
Small gang warfare must prevail all this is going to is add to the blob warfare thats currently controling eve. |
Hastrabull
Beach Boys
BeachBoys
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:44:00 -
[1009]
signed |
Ior Mader
Exiled.
Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 11:56:00 -
[1010]
Edited by: Ior Mader on 29/07/2008 11:56:49
I'm disappointed with this knee-jerk reaction. I find it interesting that when people complain about nanos being overpowered and start telling their hard luck stories of encountering them, the last thing they want to hear is constructive suggestions on how to setup or what to do, to avoid a repeat. They seem to have accepted the party line that nanos are overpowered and need to be changed and won't consider that perhaps they also could adapt.
The big blobfests are not fun. I fly them when I have to out of a feeling of duty to the team. The small fast gangs are fun and don't take such solid massive blocks of time. Please leave some variety in the game CCP so that small gang pvp is still an option.
|
ArchVonBaron
Dire Trucking
Varangian Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:04:00 -
[1011]
In its current form I'm against the nerf, and until they sort it out I won't support it, and no I don't fly any nano ships because I can't afford them.
|
EvilFree
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:07:00 -
[1012]
nano nerf will kill all small scale pvp 
|
Hilder
G.E.A.R.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:14:00 -
[1013]
Nano setups unquestionably need rebalancing. Its also quite telling to see the section of the player base most vocal in their "moral outrage"  . Nano should no longer be the "I-Win button" it is atm, but these changes are too much CCP!
|
Divus
Black Omega Security
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:15:00 -
[1014]
-------------------------------------------------
|
Evesham
Decorum Inc
Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:23:00 -
[1015]
Well I guess this means that we should all start roaming around in slow ass Battleships taking 5 minutes to get through a system, meaning going 10 jumps there and 10 jumps back will take 2 hrs.
Oh BTW I support this thread if you must keep nerfing stuff then please don't do to speedy ships what you did to the Pilgrim give the ships that are meant to be fast a boost so they stay fast
|
PeaceDeath
The First Foundation
Circle-Of-Two
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:38:00 -
[1016]
аgainst
|
AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:39:00 -
[1017]
AGAINST !!!!!!!!!!
|
Ion Hound
Mortis Angelus
The Church.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:49:00 -
[1018]
I am against this nerf. |
BRS san
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 12:59:00 -
[1019]
against
|
dangster
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:05:00 -
[1020]
againts. i spent the 1st year and half of my eve life maxing my skills 4 nano and have used this skill 2 progress 2 new ships that can b nano. this will b a major set bk 4 ccp if this does happen and seems there going backwards not forwood
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |