| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kay Han
Stardust Heavy Industries
Majesta Empire
   |
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:11:00 -
[1021]
/me is against this nerf. It¦s absolutly not needed and there are more imprtant things to fix arround
 Originally by: CCP Atropos
Personally I think Amarr ships should consume slaves in a similar way that other ships consume ammunition.
|
Sir Substance
Minmatar
Sunspot Requisitions
Worlds End Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:20:00 -
[1022]
the current ratio of about 900-300 amuses me.
-
PvPers always say "GB2WoW". the message is that EVE is hard, and people just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for *them*, that all went out the window? |
Matrixcvd
Caldari
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:25:00 -
[1023]
against the nerf, keep it up boys
|
Labienus
Gallente
Mortis Angelus
The Church.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:38:00 -
[1024]
Against, nerf just takes it too far and elimates nano ships as a viable option.
|
Hanid Queen
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:40:00 -
[1025]
Edited by: Hanid Queen on 29/07/2008 13:42:33
AGAINST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
|
Gimpslayer
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:47:00 -
[1026]
against
|
Lord dMt
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:53:00 -
[1027]
Up Nano ships
Down chinese farmers!!!! Anyway u will die in both case cos u're only noob!!!
buahahaha
|
Sir dMt
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:54:00 -
[1028]
Edited by: Sir dMt on 29/07/2008 13:54:05
Nano ships for ever \o/
|
Dr dMt
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:55:00 -
[1029]
Nano nano, la tua mano...ops sry :)
Anyway up for nano ships
|
Lemonxi
Sour Lemons
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:55:00 -
[1030]
Voted
|
Darkxen
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 13:56:00 -
[1031]
.
|
Sohta
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:04:00 -
[1032]
Against, the nerf to the nanoships
|
Streptokok
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:05:00 -
[1033]
Edited by: Streptokok on 29/07/2008 14:05:11
Against.
|
KarakC
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:05:00 -
[1034]
Small ew ships(electronic attack ships) cretad for satisfying goon requests.
Speed nerfed for satisfying chinese isk famer requests.
What's the next? Nerfing weapons, indestructible minning ships?
Vote no to CCP mindless plans.
|
Siobhan Delphi
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:18:00 -
[1035]
againstttt
|
BostonGeorge
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:29:00 -
[1036]
Edited by: BostonGeorge on 29/07/2008 14:29:46
Originally by: Siobhan Delphi
againstttt
|
Cpt Cry
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:30:00 -
[1037]
against
|
Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:30:00 -
[1038]
against
Vote against the nano nerf!
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|
Dranadar
Privateer Industrial Operations
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:31:00 -
[1039]
no no no
Dranadar - Space Monkey
|
Columbus Expo
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:31:00 -
[1040]
omg no...
|
HighwayMan DhD
Highwaymen
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:32:00 -
[1041]
no. stop this idiocy
|
K'lairne
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:33:00 -
[1042]
against
|
Jebe Noyon
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:33:00 -
[1043]
Nerf nano and you will see an entirely new level of emo.
|
Whistler Vinci
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:33:00 -
[1044]
stupid move imo. against
|
GeorgeYung
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:34:00 -
[1045]
agasint.
|
Space Cracker
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:35:00 -
[1046]
against it.
|
32Kilo
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:35:00 -
[1047]
nooooo
|
Dandy Highwayman
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:36:00 -
[1048]
against it...
|
Sir Quentin
Nuts and Bolts
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 14:55:00 -
[1049]
Against
---
www.nubo-corp.de - Nuts and Bolts Killboard |
HedFunk Iillumanatie
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:07:00 -
[1050]
noo
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |